ライフサイエンスコーパス: peer review

1 tive artifacts are evaluated and selected by peer review.

2 rms of biases inherent within the process of peer review.

3 received fewer citations than those sent for peer review.

4 dies, on the whole, there was value added in peer review.

5 usions are generalizable to future rounds of peer review.

6 with establishing the highest standards for peer review.

7 h the current dominant approach to radiology peer review.

8 another before sending out a decision after peer review.

9 uding morbidity/mortality conferences (88%), peer review (77%), and outcomes registries (51%).

10 in a peer-reviewed journal or presented as a peer-reviewed abstract at a scientific conference; exami

11 Peer review acts as the gatekeeper to these mechanisms.

12 patient was pregnant (nine of 64 [14%] in PR peer review and 28 of 185 [15%] in QA quality assurance

13 rnational professional societies, requesting peer review and endorsement (by 31 societies listed in t

14 Internet, have been used in conjunction with peer review and publication in journals in the physical

15 as counter rhetoric concerning the future of peer review and scholarly communication.

16 agonists and antagonists and summarizes the peer reviewed and patented literature.

17 ocols for each subset of experiments will be peer reviewed and published prior to data collection.

18 systematic review was conducted to identify peer-reviewed and gray full-text documents in English wi

19 This systematic review of peer-reviewed and gray literature examines the human hea

20 f-the-art review and literature synthesis of peer-reviewed and gray literature published since 2004.

21 n listeriosis through a systematic review of peer-reviewed and grey literature (published in 1990-201

22 In this systematic review we searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature publications reporting

23 We searched 12 databases for peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed reports with primary

24 A total of 109 peer-reviewed and original research-oriented dental jour

25 e-scale programs to measure debris, but many peer-reviewed and published scientific studies of marine

26 etween the Art Exhibition Game and scholarly peer review are discussed and the implications for the d

27 Distortions in peer review are driven by economic forces and enabled by

28 A systematic review of 48 peer- reviewed articles with postlicensure data from 24

29 esize indications for DC surgery reported in peer-reviewed articles between 1983 and 2014 into a redu

30 and Embase were systematically searched for peer-reviewed articles from January 2007 through Februar

31 To date, 3 peer-reviewed articles have been published after a media

32 atabase's inception to 21 September 2013 for peer-reviewed articles of any design and language found

33 to identify US authors who have contributed peer-reviewed articles on a neurosurgery topic that rema

34 ls, and Scopus to identify English-language, peer-reviewed articles on clinical and prognostic factor

35 English-language peer-reviewed articles published between 1964 and 2016 w

36 English-language peer-reviewed articles published between 2000-2014 were

37 rations in hazard assessments, from over 600 peer-reviewed articles published between 2008 and 2013.

38 databases was performed to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles published between January 1980 an

39 Peer-reviewed articles published from 2000 to 2013 on in

40 sis, data were abstracted from 1303 original peer-reviewed articles published from January 1, 2011, t

41 Nearly half of all peer-reviewed articles published in cardiovascular journ

42 NFO were systematically searched to identify peer-reviewed articles published in English before Janua

43 PsychINFO-were searched to retrieve relevant peer-reviewed articles published in English.

44 Peer-reviewed articles were identified through searches

45 Twenty-four peer-reviewed articles were included as well as one peer

46 A total of 780 peer-reviewed articles were included.

47 On average, chairs authored 98 peer-reviewed articles, 2 books, and 11 book chapters.

48 Data were extracted from peer-reviewed articles, books, and reports identified us

49 Peer-reviewed articles, including case reports, case ser

50 Peer-reviewed articles, including case reports, case ser

51 Evidence-based peer-reviewed articles, including prospective and retros

52 Evidence-based peer-reviewed articles, including randomized trials, cas

53 This underscores the limitations of peer review as a means of assessing grant applications i

54 tional Institutes of Health (NIH) should use peer review assessments to make complex funding decision

55 reprint, and validation via a combination of peer review at a journal and additional evaluation by th

56 manuscript underwent extensive AHA internal peer review before consideration and approval by the AHA

57 OMIM is based on the published peer-reviewed biomedical literature and is used by overl

58 ortant challenges in the areas of scientific peer review, breadth of diseases and countries, and fore

59 , including expert committee development and peer review by designated committees of each of the part

60 -rejected manuscripts, deemed as unworthy of peer review by editors, received fewer citations than th

61 the parameter, the task force reviewers, and peer review by members of each sponsoring society.

62 the parameter, the Task Force Reviewers, and peer review by members of each sponsoring society.

63 Recommendations related to funding, peer review, career paths, and the university-government

64 There was limited published peer-reviewed clinical literature available regarding US

65 conferences or released to the press before peer-review, creating confusion in the viral hepatitis f

66 A detailed review of scientific, peer-reviewed data was performed.

67 EXTRACTION: A detailed review of scientific, peer-reviewed data was performed.

68 The PR peer review database had fewer major events (one of 64 [

69 re clinically important errors, while the PR peer review database serves to establish benchmarks for

70 untary QA quality assurance and mandatory PR peer review databases were searched for obstetrics and g

71 In QA quality assurance and PR peer review databases, respectively, perceptional (47 of

72 radiologists in QA quality assurance and PR peer review databases, respectively; 23 and nine radiolo

73 age restrictions, we systematically searched peer-reviewed databases, searched the grey literature, a

74 Preprints, non-peer-reviewed drafts of manuscripts available on the Int

75 er, an external validation of the quality of peer reviews during the laboratory experiment, based on

76 taken, synthesizing findings from published, peer-reviewed empirical studies that addressed priority

77 sed on well-known cut-offs identified in the peer-reviewed English literature.

78 Search of the peer-reviewed English-language literature on disaster me

79 nception through January 2015, including any peer-reviewed English-language publication that describe

80 Included were 27 peer-reviewed, English-language studies published throug

81 s that strive to offer medical care based on peer-reviewed evidence-based, and expert consensus guide

82 We gathered peer-reviewed experimental data on the effects of acidif

83 Included studies were peer-reviewed experimental or observational studies that

84 ls and most often investigator-initiated and peer-review funded.

85 , we confirmed a lack of association between peer-review grant percentile ranking and grant citation

86 tion and for maximizing the effectiveness of peer review have not been determined.

87 er, and efforts to formalize postpublication peer review have not yet resonated with scientific commu

88 Peer-reviewed historical and contemporary literatures ar

89 Thirteen peer reviewed HIV VL publications and five HIV EID paper

90 iorepository; dedicated resources to support peer-reviewed, hypothesis-driven research; access to ded

91 Journals are exploring new approaches to peer review in order to reduce bias, increase transparen

92 Peer review is central to the process through which epid

93 But these findings may not mean that peer review is failing.

94 is finding raises concerns regarding whether peer review is ill--suited to recognize and gestate the

95 search, it is critical to understand whether peer review is intrinsically susceptible to failure, or

96 Peer review is the cornerstone of scholarly publishing a

97 Peer review is the main institution responsible for the

98 Although peer review is widely seen as vital to scientific evalua

99 Peer review is widely used to assess grant applications

100 these publications have been cited by 13,612 peer review journal articles with 31 (11%) of the manusc

101 eceased" and "controls" to identify relevant peer-reviewed journal articles.

102 We included original research published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language.

103 They were also significantly involved in peer-reviewed journal literature, serving as editors (20

104 wing eligibility criteria: be published in a peer-reviewed journal or presented as a peer-reviewed ab

105 within the African continent, published in a peer-reviewed journal with an abstract, and included pat

106 esults were published in an English-language peer-reviewed journal.

107 ntitative research study; (6) published in a peer-reviewed journal.

108 ial and publication of the main results in a peer-reviewed journal.

109 if they were original studies published in a peer-reviewed journal; recruited children (aged 0-18 yea

110 -date review of the information published in peer-review journals on direct N2O emissions from agricu

111 These recommendations cover publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations (oral or poster

112 ched PubMed for English-language articles in peer-reviewed journals and the Cochrane Library database

113 y reports of FIH trials of mAbs published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2000 and April 20

114 out the nurses' use of CPGs and published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2000 and August 2

115 can and Caribbean countries and published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2008, and April 2

116 earch of four databases and a hand search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were conduc

117 earch of four databases and a hand search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were conduc

118 990 to December 2012) and a manual search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were perfor

119 , and Cochrane Central, and a hand search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were perfor

120 m 1965 to October 2012) and a hand search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were perfor

121 1965 and March 1, 2016, and a hand search of peer-reviewed journals for relevant articles were perfor

122 lts aged 65 years and older and published in peer-reviewed journals from 1946 to November 20, 2013.

123 rch of reviews in English language-published peer-reviewed journals in 2006-2013 was performed.

124 90 000 articles on CT have been published in peer-reviewed journals over the past 40 years, fewer tha

125 rched PubMed for English-language studies in peer-reviewed journals published from January 1, 1990, t

126 Studies published in peer-reviewed journals reported greater effects than did

127 opathic pain, including studies published in peer-reviewed journals since January, 1966, and unpublis

128 We include studies published in high-impact, peer-reviewed journals that have informed or altered the

129 mate effects and of studies not published in peer-reviewed journals to underestimate them.

130 Studies published in English in peer-reviewed journals using both quantitative and quali

131 is often published in Spanish and/or in non-peer-reviewed journals, making it difficult for the inte

132 viral Society-USA reviewed data published in peer-reviewed journals, presented by regulatory agencies

133 able versions of reviewed FS can be cited in peer-reviewed journals.

134 ts who leave residency programs) outcomes in peer-reviewed journals.

135 We included articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals.

136 to stress urinary incontinence published in peer-reviewed journals.

137 ished in the last decade in well-established peer-reviewed journals.

138 decisions are based on published results in peer-reviewed journals.

139 Results were limited to publications in peer-reviewed journals.

140 shed in English from across the world and in peer-reviewed journals.

141 a free, open-source, open-data, curated and peer-reviewed knowledge base of biomolecular pathways.

142 el approach to case selection and structured peer review leading to actionable quality interventions.

143 examination questions using evidence-based, peer-reviewed literature and adheres to accepted psychom

144 ary encode the process science gathered from peer-reviewed literature and regulatory reports.

145 We undertook a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature and sought out unpublished pres

146 for inclusion if they were published in the peer-reviewed literature and used a validated method to

147 Studies that were published in the peer-reviewed literature and used validated assessment m

148 We systematically searched databases of peer-reviewed literature and widely distributed a call f

149 The peer-reviewed literature currently contains the outcomes

150 We searched the peer-reviewed literature for studies that reported quant

151 LAGB and provide a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature for weight loss at 10 years or

152 of 242 microarray studies extracted from the peer-reviewed literature found that current practices fo

153 We performed a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature from January 2000 to February 2

154 umber of systematic reviews published in the peer-reviewed literature has increased dramatically in t

155 We systematically searched the peer-reviewed literature in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Scie

156 Inclusion of QI in the peer-reviewed literature is needed to foster its advance

157 Keyword searches of peer-reviewed literature published between January 2005

158 Peer-reviewed literature published from January 1, 1978,

159 Available information in the peer-reviewed literature regarding diagnostic efficacy a

160 address this, we systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed literature that assesses climate change im

161 studies of the EVD epidemic published in the peer-reviewed literature to assess the key uncertainties

162 Searches of peer-reviewed literature were conducted in PubMed and th

163 Analysis of selected articles in the peer-reviewed literature with interpretation and perspec

164 The peer-reviewed literature, however, offers few estimates

165 h an increase in retracted articles from the peer-reviewed literature, is beginning to erode the trus

166 the basis of the evidence available from the peer-reviewed literature, our tentative conclusion is th

167 t base constructed by a team of experts from peer-reviewed literature, users can integrate new data i

168 that clinical decisions are informed by the peer-reviewed literature.

169 rst for these regions to be published in the peer-reviewed literature.

170 has been obtained by manual curation of the peer-reviewed literature.

171 ed on these "replacement chemistries" in the peer-reviewed literature.

172 inea pig enzyme has not been reported in the peer-reviewed literature.

173 species assemblages, through metaanalysis of peer-reviewed literature.

174 recent medical conferences and published in peer-reviewed literature.

175 (68)Ga-DOTATATE has not been reported in the peer-reviewed literature.

176 enealogy" may influence the landscape of the peer-reviewed literature.

177 research papers and reviews published in the peer-reviewed literature.

178 The increasing amount of peer-reviewed manuscripts requires the development of sp

179 ublications with data for 188 countries: 101 peer-reviewed manuscripts with 13 reporting data for hig

180 While intended to guide the preparation of peer-reviewed manuscripts, the principles of transparent

181 view of global PK indications as reported in peer-reviewed manuscripts.

182 We reviewed the peer-reviewed medical and health policy literature from

183 nterventions that may improve the quality of peer-reviewed medical research publications.

184 We completed searches of peer-reviewed (MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO), internet,

185 appropriate prescribing, monthly prescribing peer-review meetings, and brief caregiver education.

186 may be to establish basic rules that render peer review more transparent, such as publishing the rev

187 enterprise depends on the fair and objective peer review of research grants, leading to the distribut

188 s from the USA and Europe recently completed peer review of the carbon ion therapy at NIRS.

189 Recent reports suggest that peer reviews of National Institutes of Health grant appl

190 Peer reviews of the European compiler organizations were

191 ted by the rapid growth of "post-publication peer review," open access publishing, and data sharing t

192 AR and the BPS, the portal provides concise, peer-reviewed overviews of the key properties of a wide

193 found that the percentile scores awarded by peer review panels correlated with productivity as measu

194 er of studies have questioned the ability of peer review panels to predict the productivity of applic

195 This paper examines the success of peer-review panels in predicting the future quality of p

196 ted works was ensured by their acceptance by peer review, participation in clinical trials, and autho

197 uthors also offer an alternative approach to peer review: peer feedback, learning, and improvement (o

198 Hence, the seemingly conflicting findings on peer review percentile ranking of grants and subsequent

199 re are conflicting data about the ability of peer review percentile rankings to predict grant product

200 onfounders, there was no association between peer-review percentile ranking and bibliometric end poin

201 Post-publication peer review (PPPR) is transforming how the life sciences

202 and weaknesses of American Heart Association peer review practices, and recommends best practices for

203 statement reviews the current literature on peer review practices, describes the current American He

204 viewed articles were included as well as one peer-reviewed presentation, one commission report, and o

205 whose findings were subject to the rigorous peer-review procedures of the NRC.

206 st of the papers included in the review were peer-reviewed proceedings of technological conferences o

207 ribes the current American Heart Association peer review process and those of other agencies, analyze

208 Improving the peer review process, overcoming the limitations of print

209 This analysis of the peer-review process at Stroke identified several factors

210 it is difficult to check for any bias in the peer-review process because the identity of peer reviewe

211 A better understanding of the manuscript peer-review process could improve the likelihood that re

212 pective on the ongoing discussion of how the peer-review process may be improved.

213 dicates that those involved in the editorial peer-review process must have sound statistical knowledg

214 utilizing quantitative bias analysis in the peer-review process, editors can potentially avoid unnec

215 show that women are underrepresented in the peer-review process, that editors of both genders operat

216 bility of a user is assessed through digital peer-review processes that aggregate ratings into reputa

217 vers or other second-generation devices in a peer-reviewed publication (by July 1, 2016).

218 on results as described in the corresponding peer-reviewed publication.

219 only web-based database available compiling peer reviewed publications and case studies on PFS.

220 Studies included (1) peer-review publications with 3 or more patients, and (2

221 espondents with more than 10 climate-related peer-reviewed publications (about half of all respondent

222 To evaluate the available evidence in peer-reviewed publications about the diagnosis and treat

223 account perspectives not usually included in peer-reviewed publications and after-action reports, inc

224 the A-index to compute the weighted sums of peer-reviewed publications and journal impact factors, d

225 ental groups were manually annotated from 74 peer-reviewed publications containing mouse protection d

226 In the past 25 years, over 1800 peer-reviewed publications have focused on SECM, includi

227 Medline, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library for peer-reviewed publications of cohort studies describing

228 his cyclical interest in that the numbers of peer-reviewed publications on this topic increase during

229 Respondents have published an average of 2.7 peer-reviewed publications per year, totaling more than

230 English-language, peer-reviewed publications published from January 1, 194

231 Peer-reviewed publications reporting patient outcomes af

232 Thirty-four original, peer-reviewed publications were identified for inclusion

233 Eleven randomized trials (8 peer-reviewed publications, 3 abstract-only presentation

234 ications per year, totaling more than 15,678 peer-reviewed publications, of which 1,875 appeared in h

235 positions posed by several policy documents, peer-reviewed publications, organization proposals, and

236 d all been in studies reported previously in peer-reviewed publications, were diagnosis and treatment

237 luded unpublished programmatic documents and peer-reviewed publications.

238 c evidence ( approximately 14,000 pieces) in peer-reviewed publications.

239 rmined independently on the basis of earlier peer-reviewed publications.

240 journals as a repository for data supporting peer-reviewed publications.

241 operties of 17 metal ions were obtained from peer-reviewed publications.

242 NCBI and the DDBJ Omics Archive, supporting peer-reviewed publications.

243 he quantity and the quality of the resultant peer-reviewed publications.

244 lRiks data both at meetings and published in peer-reviewed publications.

245 commitments, ClinicalTrials.gov, and matched peer-reviewed publications.

246 , 2013, were conducted for English-language, peer-reviewed, publications of randomized clinical trial

247 ion, we performed a systematic review of the peer-reviewed published literature collecting all report

248 National guidelines and peer-reviewed published literature were used to recommen

249 ars ago, in 2005, we did a scoping review of peer-reviewed, published articles on palliative care dev

250 Peer-reviewed, published literature was searched to asce

251 English peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed method

252 , landmines, UXO, and AXO to locate original peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method

253 rched 12 databases for peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed reports with primary data on botulism in c

254 me of pathogen-host interactions reported in peer reviewed research articles.

255 Original, peer-reviewed research studies (no methodological restri

256 adership, practice, and advocacy, as well as peer-reviewed research, organisation reports, and grey l

257 Based on extensive peer-reviewed research, this statement concludes that tr

258 ies, or presented as conference abstracts at peer-reviewed scientific conferences since the 2014 repo

259 MA guidelines, we did a systematic review of peer-reviewed scientific evidence describing the associa

260 d definition of the disorder based on proper peer-reviewed scientific information.

261 tors acquire data through manual curation of peer-reviewed scientific literature and from direct subm

262 cardiovascular disease based on the existing peer-reviewed scientific literature.

263 In this study, we evaluated 379 peer-reviewed scientific papers to explore how Nmin and

264 uded the following: financial relationships, peer review score (PRS), and meeting placement prominenc

265 A one-standard deviation worse peer-review score among awarded grants is associated wit

266 ional Science Foundation have suggested that peer review scores of funded grants bear no association

267 We find that better peer-review scores are consistently associated with bett

268 er investigator, and the predictive value of peer-review scores on subsequent scientific productivity

269 A peer-reviewed search strategy obtained English-language

270 ing agencies use many different criteria and peer review strategies to assess grant proposals.

271 provides a comprehensive metaanalysis of 838 peer-reviewed studies (>2,500 sites in 73 countries) tha

272 ure, and PsycINFO were searched for original peer-reviewed studies (to June 2012) measuring zinc conc

273 We identified no peer-reviewed studies of AXO effects, so we extended the

274 Systematic review of peer-reviewed studies testing the effectiveness of EMP s

275 English language, peer-reviewed studies that evaluated an intervention to

276 pating ICU teams adapt data from hundreds of peer-reviewed studies to operationalize a systematic and

277 mes through meta-analysis, English-language, peer-reviewed studies were identified via PubMed, Embase

278 Peer-reviewed studies with direct comparison of patient

279 variability in slope factor observed across peer-reviewed studies.

280 nfo electronic databases yielded 40 original peer-reviewed studies.

281 For the American Heart Association, a Peer Review Subcommittee is charged with establishing th

282 quality assurance and nine of 64 [14%] in PR peer review ), such as recommending unnecessary follow-u

283 that emerging flaws in the integrity of the peer review system are largely responsible.

284 tering mechanism provided by the traditional peer review system.

285 ecades-old traditional publication model and peer review system.

286 , although many have noted problems with the peer-review system for both manuscripts and grant submis

287 for systematic reviews in health care, with peer-reviewed systematic reviews that are published by C

288 ory difficulty to identify English-language, peer-reviewed systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and Coc

289 refractory pain to identify English-language peer-reviewed systematic reviews, meta-analyses, Cochran

290 Peer-review systems must demand these qualities in propo

291 and trust, we have found that scoring-based peer review tends to drive radiologists inward, against

292 , we reflect on our consultative approach to peer review, the challenges of reproducibility, and the

293 cientific paper: subjective post-publication peer review, the number of citations gained by a paper,

294 Because TESS proposals undergo rigorous peer review, the studies in the sample all exceed a subs

295 generic recommendations but not tested in a peer-reviewed trial for their manufacturer's ICDs.

296 ing the combination "radiology AND (error OR peer review)." Two reviewers independently selected stud

297 Funding source--industry versus peer review versus mixed--did not impact citation rates.

298 e the effect of competitive incentives under peer review, we designed a novel experimental setup call

299 A quality assurance and 49 of 64 [76%] in PR peer review ) were considered minor events: wording in t

300 ist performance improvement is scoring-based peer review, which reflects a traditional quality assura

301 has created new pathways for postpublication peer review, which regularly leads to corrections.