ライフサイエンスコーパス: peer support

1 up psychoeducation or optimised unstructured peer support.

2 rsity in the implementation of mental health peer support and an increasing research interest in peer

3 est that therapeutic relationships, informal peer support and negative experiences related to staff m

4 Peer support and peer-led family psychoeducation represe

5 Peer support and peer-led family support for persons liv

6 finding productive roles for user/consumers, peer support and reducing stigma.

7 The objective of this study was to evaluate peer support and reminiscence therapy, separately and to

8 The presence of caring leaders, peer support, and an organizational commitment to safe,

9 eastfeeding, including professional support, peer support, and formal education, change behavior and

10 Peer support as a professional role has an emerging lite

11 ective than similarly intensive unstructured peer support, but was more acceptable and improved outco

12 rds and the enhanced information sharing and peer support elicited through the group FANC undoubtedly

13 Peer support for HCV is one way to overcome these barrie

14 Further investigation of peer support for HCV treatment and its impact on both in

15 sychoeducation versus optimised unstructured peer support for patients with remitted bipolar disorder

16 d to attend 3 nurse practitioner-facilitated peer support group sessions.

17 Hypothesis 2 was rejected: the peer-support group experience failed to prevent repeat p

18 : monetary incentive and peer-support group, peer-support group only, monetary incentive only, or no

19 n the psychoeducation group and three in the peer-support group) died during follow-up; these deaths

20 d to 4 interventions: monetary incentive and peer-support group, peer-support group only, monetary in

21 e compared with 98 (65%) participants in the peer-support group; time to next bipolar episode did not

22 -min sessions of group classes, three 30-min peer support groups, and regular telephone follow-ups an

23 at psychoeducation groups was higher than at peer-support groups (median 14 sessions [IQR three to 18

24 red a monetary incentive participated in the peer-support groups, compared with 9% of those who were

25 ices for people with mental health problems, peer support has been strengthened by the recovery parad

26 Reciprocal peer support holds promise as a method for diabetes care

27 ional change processes and the challenges in peer support implementation are discussed.

28 The value of peer support in formal and informal settings is discusse

29 fectiveness of supplemental interventions to peer support in formula feeding cultures.

30 ty of randomized controlled trials utilizing peer support in LMICs.

31 Peer support increases the duration of EBF in LMICs; how

32 timing of peer visits, how to best integrate peer support into packaged intervention strategies, and

33 Peer support is a proven strategy for many chronic illne

34 Current issues include benefits of peer support, its efficacy and effectiveness.

35 ntion are unclear compared with unstructured peer support matched for delivery and aim of treatment,

36 elter, food services, employment assistance, peer support, medical care, and mental health services.

37 Various types of peer support merit further evaluation.

38 Peer support models for chronic disease management have

39 HCV peer support models have been implemented in various set

40 Peer support models have been implemented successfully,

41 ipants to receive psychoeducation (n=153) or peer support (n=151); all (100%) participants had comple

42 re living as female from clinical (n=15) and peer-support (n=24) settings.

43 dolescents' developmental wellbeing, promote peer support network among adolescents with the conditio

44 (p=0.367) and no difference in the effect of peer support on EBF at 4 versus 6 months postpartum (p=0

45 Assessing the impact of peer support on service users, peer providers and organi

46 ons with a component of lay support (such as peer support or peer counseling) were more effective tha

47 re is no evidence from the trial that either peer support or reminiscence is effective in improving t

48 as patient education, medication management, peer support, or some form of postacute care, that are i

49 tions), abuse and violence, inadequate team (peer) support, problems with workload planning, needle s

50 , supervised LHWs plus an optional 6-session peer support program.

51 Community efforts and peer support programs are needed in addition to provider

52 Peer support programs have led to improved outcomes amon

53 faction, therapeutic relationships, informal peer support, recovery and negative events experienced d

54 this randomized controlled trial, reciprocal peer support (RPS) arm patients participated in a HF nur

55 Peer support significantly decreased the risk of discont

56 seases, particularly the positive effects of peer support, technology-based interventions, and skill-

57 cards; (b) enhanced information sharing and peer support through the facilitated group process and;

58 (TAU) plus one of the following: one-to-one peer support to family carers from experienced carers (C

59 The effect of peer support was significantly reduced in settings with

60 nces, service user satisfaction and informal peer support were greater in crisis houses than on acute

61 pport and an increasing research interest in peer support work (PSW), this review focuses on prioriti

62 Service users as peer support workers have helped patients recover, and m