戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 pinion recommends in favor of routine annual pelvic examination.
2 t women's health are often evaluated through pelvic examination.
3 eening consisted of mammography and bimanual pelvic examinations.
4 led to questions about the role of screening pelvic examinations among asymptomatic women.
5             Evaluation usually begins with a pelvic examination and an ultrasound to determine both t
6 toms suggestive of prolapse should undergo a pelvic examination and medical history check.
7 ion, which should include a careful history, pelvic examination, and Papanicolaou smear, should be re
8                          Clinical breast and pelvic examinations are commonly accepted practices prio
9 tified for overall benefits and harms of the pelvic examination as a 1-time or periodic screening tes
10 olescents for Chlamydia trachomatis during a pelvic examination at each clinic visit.
11 re interviewed and received counseling and a pelvic examination at enrollment, 1 month, and 6 months,
12 ne screening, it is indicated if an adequate pelvic examination cannot be performed or if additional
13 morbidity or mortality benefits of screening pelvic examination for any condition were identified.
14 on screening for gynecologic conditions with pelvic examination for conditions other than cervical ca
15             The positive predictive value of pelvic examination for detecting ovarian cancer was less
16 nefits, accuracy, and harms of the screening pelvic examination for gynecologic conditions for the US
17 y rates resulting from an abnormal screening pelvic examination for ovarian cancer ranged from 5% to
18  recommendations on the utility of screening pelvic examination for the detection of pathology in asy
19 SPSTF found inadequate evidence on screening pelvic examinations for the early detection and treatmen
20 r women need to be seen annually for routine pelvic examinations has arisen.
21                                              Pelvic examinations have historically been a part of reg
22 on screening for pathologic conditions using pelvic examination in adult, asymptomatic women at avera
23                No data supporting the use of pelvic examination in asymptomatic, average-risk women w
24  ACP recommends against performing screening pelvic examination in asymptomatic, nonpregnant, adult w
25  No trials examined the effectiveness of the pelvic examination in reducing all-cause mortality, redu
26 stic accuracy and harms of routine screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic primary care populat
27 , it is unclear whether performing screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women has a signific
28 f benefits and harms of performing screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult w
29  and potential harms of performing screening pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adult w
30                                 Although the pelvic examination is a common part of the physical exam
31                                              Pelvic examination is often included in well-woman visit
32                Low-quality data suggest that pelvic examinations may cause pain, discomfort, fear, an
33 though more than half (62%) had had a recent pelvic examination, only 42% had recently used a condom
34  studies reported accuracy for the screening pelvic examination: ovarian cancer (4 studies; n = 26432
35 dees at 2 Provincial STI clinics receiving a pelvic examination, regardless of a history of anal inte
36            The percentage of women reporting pelvic examination-related pain or discomfort ranged fro
37 uded testing for HIV presence and pregnancy, pelvic examinations, risk reduction counselling, and tre
38     GCT is usually associated with a mass on pelvic examination that is subsequently confirmed on ult
39  recruited; as a part of their routine entry pelvic examination visit, they completed a self-administ
40                                     Bimanual pelvic examination was reported with similar frequency b
41             Nine brain, two cardiac, and two pelvic examinations were performed by using a 1.5-T clin
42 mplication rate within 1 year of a screening pelvic examination with abnormal findings.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。