ライフサイエンスコーパス: penetrating keratoplasty

1 neal perforation or the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

2 s are available to treat ametropia following penetrating keratoplasty.

3 ompared with conventional blade trephination penetrating keratoplasty.

4 rogressive corneal melt required therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

5 K can be successfully used while waiting for penetrating keratoplasty.

6 of complications seen in procedures such as penetrating keratoplasty.

7 proved safety profile compared with standard penetrating keratoplasty.

8 ucoma refractory to medical management after penetrating keratoplasty.

9 rs after cataract surgery and 21 years after penetrating keratoplasty.

10 comes, or are potentially an alternative for penetrating keratoplasty.

11 ormal eyes and eyes that have undergone post-penetrating keratoplasty.

12 success rate for clear corneal grafts after penetrating keratoplasty.

13 elial syndrome, vitreoretinal disorders, and penetrating keratoplasty.

14 und healing following refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty.

15 fractive keratectomy, radial keratotomy, and penetrating keratoplasty.

16 have undergone corneal refractive surgery or penetrating keratoplasty.

17 concerns regarding the safety and success of penetrating keratoplasty.

18 anaged accordingly and only 1 patient needed penetrating keratoplasty.

19 h pneumatic descemetopexy and a few ended in penetrating keratoplasty.

20 D decay is reduced when compared to standard penetrating keratoplasty.

21 No eyes required subsequent penetrating keratoplasty.

22 ndothelial cell keratoplasty (DSAEK) or even penetrating keratoplasty.

23 t corneal neovascularization after high-risk penetrating keratoplasty.

24 was effective for performing laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty.

25 lamellar keratoplasty have begun to supplant penetrating keratoplasty.

26 rier only) implants at the time of high-risk penetrating keratoplasty.

27 luded corneal perforation and/or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

28 tial value in predicting graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty.

29 entially decreasing or delaying the need for penetrating keratoplasty.

30 th more invasive surgery such as lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty.

31 nt procedures to minimize adverse effects of penetrating keratoplasty.

32 is, resulting in increased graft survival in penetrating keratoplasty.

33 d with corneal perforation, both requiring a penetrating keratoplasty.

34 d at 3 months, but only 2 patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty.

35 of endothelial damage, patients may require penetrating keratoplasty.

36 onjunctival injection in mice that underwent penetrating keratoplasty.

37 Twelve patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty 1 month after CXL (group A) and

38 p A) and the remaining 12 patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty 3 months after CXL (group B).

39 Two patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty 3 months after inadequate visua

40 Twenty-four eyes of 22 patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty: 4 had granular dystrophy, 12 h

41 nal corneal transplantation register, 13 920 penetrating keratoplasties, 858 deep anterior lamellar k

42 All cases of infectious keratitis following penetrating keratoplasty admitted to the Royal Victorian

43 e sequencing of glaucoma surgery relative to penetrating keratoplasty affects the outcome.

44 cally reduce postoperative astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty and lead to improved, functiona

45 endothelial cell loss in the long term after penetrating keratoplasty and to predict when cell densit

46 he implantation of an intraocular lens after penetrating keratoplasty, and long-term results of penet

47 uch as corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL), penetrating keratoplasty, and photorefractive keratectom

48 size; corneal perforation and/or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty; and time to re-epithelializati

49 on of donor and recipient corneas for use in penetrating keratoplasty, anterior-lamellar keratoplasty

50 Endothelial transplantation has supplanted penetrating keratoplasty as the procedure of choice for

51 Penetrating keratoplasty as well as disease targeted lam

52 undergoing combined cataract extraction and penetrating keratoplasty as well as patients with a hist

53 nts diagnosed with microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty at the National Taiwan Universi

54 ears of age or younger who underwent primary penetrating keratoplasty at Wills Eye Hospital Cornea Se

55 l techniques differ from those used in adult penetrating keratoplasty because of the reduced ocular r

56 dergone an average of 2.2+/-1.2 (range, 1-8) penetrating keratoplasties before keratoprosthesis impla

57 and other anterior segment-related (eg, post-penetrating keratoplasty), bleb-associated, glaucoma dra

58 Penetrating keratoplasty can commonly restore vision in

59 etropia and astigmatism following successful penetrating keratoplasty can seriously impact a patient'

60 from 32 keratoconus cases, 27 postoperative penetrating keratoplasty cases, and 29 postoperative con

61 s probably due to surgical trauma and, after penetrating keratoplasty, cell-mediated rejection and ot

62 creased hazard of perforation or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty compared with placebo after con

63 The corneal stroma in persons undergoing penetrating keratoplasty contained amyloid.

64 Penetrating keratoplasty (date range, 1992-2013), ALK (d

65 onfocal microscopy that was performed before penetrating keratoplasty demonstrated an acellular zone

66 onor age is not a factor in survival of most penetrating keratoplasties for endothelial disease.

67 donor age is not an important factor in most penetrating keratoplasties for endothelial disease.

68 nts aged at least 17 years receiving a first penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus, Fuchs' endothe

69 d the resultant corneal scarring may require penetrating keratoplasty for visual rehabilitation.

70 lood leukocytes were obtained at the time of penetrating keratoplasty from three patients who had und

71 he visual and refractive advantages of large penetrating keratoplasty grafts with the high survival r

72 grafts with the high survival rate of small penetrating keratoplasty grafts.

73 corneal surgery, particularly full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty, has been performed since the i

74 d FECD, defined by a need for endothelial or penetrating keratoplasty, has not been investigated.

75 d to remain optically clear following murine penetrating keratoplasty; however, gamma irradiation red

76 CI, 1.05-11.22), and number of prior failed penetrating keratoplasties (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.18-2.28)

77 netrating keratoplasty (NR PK) and high-risk penetrating keratoplasty (HR PK).

78 Best corrected visual acuity 1 year prior to penetrating keratoplasty in 15 eyes (nine patients) rang

79 data from 953 CLEK subjects who did not have penetrating keratoplasty in either eye at baseline and w

80 Penetrating keratoplasty in infants and young children i

81 Sixteen rabbits underwent allogenic penetrating keratoplasty in one eye.

82 th frequent complaints of glare necessitates penetrating keratoplasty in the majority of patients ove

83 Although pediatric penetrating keratoplasty is challenging, successful tran

84 Endothelial cell density at 6 months after penetrating keratoplasty is predictive of graft failure,

85 omes for the correction of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty, laser-assisted in-situ keratom

86 Infectious keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty leads to a high graft failure r

87 Similarly to penetrating keratoplasty, microkeratome-assisted mushroo

88 KPro exchange (n = 8), penetrating keratoplasty (n = 1), or evisceration (n = 2

89 included post-cataract surgery (n = 6), post-penetrating keratoplasty (n = 2), and post-trabeculectom

90 taract surgery (n = 4), and occurrence after penetrating keratoplasty (n = 2).

91 injection in mice that underwent normal risk penetrating keratoplasty (NR PK) and high-risk penetrati

92 e likely to perforate or require therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (odds ratio: 6.27; 95% CI: 2.73

93 y to have perforation or require therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (odds ratio=0.42; 95% CI, 0.22

94 Documents related to penetrating keratoplasty only have been decreased, where

95 red thirty-nine eyes (96 corneal grafts post penetrating keratoplasty or Descemet stripping automated

96 y, is a promising therapeutic alternative to penetrating keratoplasty or lamellar keratoplasty that i

97 rticipants with a history of glaucoma before penetrating keratoplasty, particularly with prior glauco

98 ng endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) (51%), 84 penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (46%), and 4 keratoprosthe

99 djusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; P < 0.001), penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (adjusted HR, 1.12 vs. ALK

100 Patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (n = 142, 39.2%), anterior

101 istory of corneal blindness caused by failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and inability to accuratel

102 rapidly replacing traditional full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for endothelial disease.

103 utomated-endothelial-keratoplasty (DSAEK) or penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for endothelial dysfunctio

104 tomated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for Fuchs endothelial dyst

105 Surgical technique was penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in 1209 cases, anterior la

106 helial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in Asian eyes.

107 Other outcomes included comparisons to penetrating keratoplasty (PK) published results and comp

108 Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) ranks among the oldest and

109 cipients (n = 13,644) undergoing their first penetrating keratoplasty (PK) registered on the United K

110 Forty-four eyes (41.9%) underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK), 37 (35.2%) underwent ante

111 omated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and in a control group th

112 hy (PBK), or keratoconus who had undergone a penetrating keratoplasty (PK), endothelial keratoplasty

113 rmining factors of microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

114 e risk of rejection and failure after failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

115 option for eyes that are not candidates for penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

116 ected by severe keratoconus and submitted to penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

117 on of the cannula and required conversion to penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

118 th endothelial keratoplasty [DSEK], 30 eyes; penetrating keratoplasty [PK], 10 eyes) for Fuchs' dystr

119 h KPro are compared with those of eyes after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) as well as control eyes.

120 e the preferred surgical procedure replacing penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for corneal endothelial d

121 y patients who had undergone a first DALK or penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for keratoconus.

122 To report a patient with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) graft endothelial failure

123 and/or perforation necessitating therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) or evisceration.

124 nking (CXL) and conventional management with penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) when indicated in managin

125 on during cataract surgery in patients after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).

126 used to seal 4.1-mm central lacerations and penetrating keratoplasties (PKPs) in enucleated porcine

127 s is lower after DSEK compared with standard penetrating keratoplasty, possibly because wound healing

128 utcomes of patients that underwent pediatric penetrating keratoplasty (PPK) for herpes simplex virus

129 umber of comorbid conditions including prior penetrating keratoplasty, prior glaucoma surgery, iridoc

130 Patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty received ciprofloxacin 0.3% or

131 In contrast to penetrating keratoplasty, rejection following DSAEK is a

132 taract surgery, endothelial keratoplasty, or penetrating keratoplasty, respectively.

133 nt can be surgically inserted at the time of penetrating keratoplasties, since the implant achieves t

134 lanted after complicated cataract surgery or penetrating keratoplasty, they are indicated in several

135 ly over the past decade, from full-thickness penetrating keratoplasty towards lamellar keratoplasty t

136 neal perforation or the need for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK) within 3 months.

137 ation and/or the need to undergo therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK).

138 The only eye that required penetrating keratoplasty was an early intervention belie

139 a (122 eyes, group 2), and in cases in which penetrating keratoplasty was associated with vitrectomy

140 corneal neovascularization developing after penetrating keratoplasty was found between treatment gro

141 Conversion to penetrating keratoplasty was necessary in 1 case (1.1%).

142 No conversion to penetrating keratoplasty was necessary.

143 Penetrating keratoplasty was offered to 5 patients when

144 Orthotopic penetrating keratoplasty was performed using irradiated

145 Penetrating keratoplasty was reported in 20 of 37 (54%)

146 Full-thickness penetrating keratoplasties were performed in normal mice

147 f corneal neovascularization occurring after penetrating keratoplasty were evaluated in a substudy (L

148 ieving visual results comparable to those of penetrating keratoplasty, while sparing a healthy endoth

149 ating keratoplasty, and long-term results of penetrating keratoplasty with glaucoma drainage tube imp