ライフサイエンスコーパス: perforation

1 reening-related harms (including bleeding or perforation).

2 ke-free survival for all types of esophageal perforation.

3 hy to bilateral corneal melt with subsequent perforation.

4 ed with an increased rate of histopathologic perforation.

5 nto the pelvic region that caused intestinal perforation.

6 selected patients at risk of intraoperative perforation.

7 or diagnosis of appendicitis and appendiceal perforation.

8 plenic flexure with pneumatosis and signs of perforation.

9 nd, which was essential to repair the midgut perforation.

10 is, stercoral ulcer formation and subsequent perforation.

11 iated with increased risk of histopathologic perforation.

12 secondary to corneal melting, scarring, and perforation.

13 ive and associated with an increased risk of perforation.

14 of CC complicated by several deep ulcers and perforation.

15 tible with small bowel ischemia-necrosis and perforation.

16 e patients, and one patient experienced vein perforation.

17 utic keratoplasty, predominantly for corneal perforation.

18 on can lead to corneal ulceration, melt, and perforation.

19 abdominal surgery without cecal ligation and perforation.

20 nfiltrate or scar size and increased odds of perforation.

21 rated role for Wnt signal inhibition in oral perforation.

22 treatment, and 4% evolved to full-thickness perforation.

23 plant were associated with a greater odds of perforation.

24 of nasal and dental complications and septal perforation.

25 lialized corneal surface without the risk of perforation.

26 association between specific US findings and perforation.

27 ding, protein loss, stricture formation, and perforation.

28 rane compared with patients without membrane perforation.

29 iated with increased risk of histopathologic perforation.

30 ed with an increased rate of histopathologic perforation.

31 hickness, residual bone height, and membrane perforation.

32 nting was performed for anastomotic leaks or perforations.

33 gical alternative for the closure of corneal perforations.

34 nal resection in cases of intestinal typhoid perforations.

35 uces a thinning of trabeculae and trabecular perforations.

36 hments and 37.1% (13/35) experienced retinal perforations.

37 essel dissection (1.3% versus 1.1%; P=0.05), perforation (0.7% versus 0.4%; P=0.001), and periprocedu

38 Four esophageal perforations (1%) developed after FBD.

39 trend, P = .002), whereas the proportion of perforations (32.3% in 2010 to 31.9% in 2013) and ED rev

40 colonoscopy in asymptomatic persons included perforations (4/10,000 procedures, 95% CI, 2-5 in 10,000

41 Gastrointestinal perforation, a hole in the human gastrointestinal system

42 nt Program (SCOAP), we evaluated patterns of perforation among patients (>/=18 years) who underwent a

43 transplanted infective colitis with colonic perforation and Bell Palsy (both possibly related).

44 One patient developed right ventricular perforation and cardiac tamponade during the implant pro

45 gocytosis protects neutrophil membranes from perforation and contributes to maintaining L. monocytoge

46 Clinicians should consider the risk of perforation and counsel patients/families accordingly wh

47 ures, including the frequency of appendiceal perforation and ED revisits, remained stable, and the pr

48 tents in the management of benign esophageal perforation and in the management of esophageal anastomo

49 There was no association between perforation and in-hospital time prior to surgery among

50 ery for imperforate anus or focal intestinal perforation and isolated ENS cells.

51 d fecal disimpaction is indicated to prevent perforation and peritonitis.

52 Benign esophageal perforation and postoperative esophageal anastomotic lea

53 re lung infection in one patient, intestinal perforation and small intestinal obstruction in one pati

54 gated common complications including cardiac perforation and tamponade, pneumothorax, stroke, transie

55 aracteristics, we examined the predictors of perforation and the association of perforation with othe

56 Predictors of perforation and the severity of associated adverse event

57 lure at 6 weeks after enrollment, defined as perforation and/or increase in ulcer size by >/=2 mm.

58 s the odds of the patient developing corneal perforation and/or needing TPK (95% CI, 1.18-4.40; P = .

59 third had a 71.4% risk of developing corneal perforation and/or needing TPK.

60 those at highest risk for developing corneal perforation and/or needing TPK.

61 1.67; P = .002) increased odds of developing perforation and/or needing TPK.

62 at predict a high risk of developing corneal perforation and/or the need to undergo therapeutic penet

63 months; secondary outcomes included corneal perforation and/or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty.

64 ded 3-month infiltrate or scar size; corneal perforation and/or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty;

65 ity seems to be compromised by postage-stamp perforations and additional aberrant pulses, possibly be

66 on makes it possible to rapidly identify new perforations and anastomotic or primary repair dehiscenc

67 bone remodelling, and are thought to prevent perforations and maintain microstructure.

68 There were two cardiac perforations and three cases of major bleeding in the ab

69 ection, one other neoplasms, and two colonic perforations) and one died due to sepsis.

70 mplications (abscess, fistula, stricture, or perforation), and severity of the inflammation.

71 tion with negative appendectomy, appendiceal perforation, and 3-day ED revisits.

72 less than 30 mg/L, no radiological signs of perforation, and appendix diameter of 10 mm or smaller.

73 verse events-febrile neutropenia, intestinal perforation, and cholangitis-were reported by one patien

74 ix, presence of appendicitis and appendiceal perforation, and establishment of an alternative diagnos

75 tizing enterocolitis, spontaneous intestinal perforation, and neurodevelopmental outcomes-defined as

76 ertension, thromboembolic events, intestinal perforation, and neutropenia in the bevacizumab group.

77 postablation esophageal ulcers progressed to perforation, and no patient without esophageal thermal u

78 SCVA), 3-month infiltrate/scar size, corneal perforation, and re-epithelialization rates stratified b

79 r specimen outcome (suboptimal TME specimen, perforation, and/or R1 resection) on multivariate analys

80 of procedural adverse events such as leaks, perforations, and fistulas, but newer indications such a

81 ve anastomotic leaks, spontaneous esophageal perforations, and iatrogenic esophageal perforations wer

82 Perforations are rare but can result in significant visi

83 d pathogen-induced host cell plasma membrane perforation as a novel mechanism used by diverse pathoge

84 Knowledge of spontaneous perforation as a potential complication of previously un

85 The main outcome of interest was perforation as diagnosed on final pathology reports.

86 olonoscopy complications, specifically bowel perforation, aspiration pneumonia, and splenic injury.

87 However, the risk of perforation associated with anesthesia services was incr

88 CI 1.23-5.1), diagnosis of single intestinal perforation at laparotomy (aOR 3.1 95% CI 1.05-9.3), and

89 e following US findings were correlated with perforation at multivariate analysis: maximum appendicea

90 to a clinician and radiologist with gastric perforation being a great mimicker of other urgent abdom

91 rescriptions was used to compare the rate of perforation between quinolone and neomycin plus hydrocor

92 ecause of a marked difference in the rate of perforation between the 2 groups.

93 emergency neonatal surgeries involving bowel perforation, bowel resection, congenital diaphragmatic h

94 phosphonate therapy is effective at reducing perforations but may also cause microcrack accumulation,

95 te-treated fracture patients exhibited fewer perforations but more numerous and larger microcracks th

96 larified how these helices contribute to MOM perforation by determining that, in the oligomers, Bak a

97 Contrary to this, perforation by fishbones has most often been described i

98 thesis that Ca2+ and K+ fluxes subsequent to perforation by LLO control L. monocytogenes internalizat

99 None of the perforation cases were aborted midprocedure, and all per

100 ult Wistar rats underwent cecal ligation and perforation (CLP), and serum and brain (hippocampus and

101 ely inhibit the sequential steps in membrane perforation, combined with video microscopy, electron to

102 Perforation complications occurred in 15 sinuses with 25

103 Coronary perforation (CP) during chronic total occlusion percutan

104 As coronary perforation (CP) is a rare but serious complication of p

105 The evidence base for coronary perforation (CP) occurring during percutaneous coronary

106 The primary outcome was bowel perforation, defined using a validated algorithm.

107 t prevent membrane resealing, revealing that perforation-dependent L. monocytogenes endocytosis is di

108 ly related to the implant procedure: cardiac perforation, device dislocation, and femoral vascular ac

109 is underwent emergency laparotomy: number of perforations, distance of perforations from the ileocaec

110 ign body density, compatible with intestinal perforation due to migration of the biliary stent.

111 Intestinal perforation due to the migration of these stents is an e

112 8 years old without predisposing factors for perforation during a 6-month look-back period entered th

113 This retrospective case series shows nine perforations during 104 lateral window maxillary sinus a

114 increasing time to OR was not a predictor of perforation, either as a continuous variable (odds ratio

115 30-day and 90-day mortality from esophageal perforation (EP), paraesophageal hernia causing obstruct

116 S findings are significantly associated with perforation, especially the presence of complex periappe

117 nagement of patients presenting with colonic perforation, especially those with risk factors for CC.

118 cations, thrombotic events, gastrointestinal perforations), except bleeding, which was more common in

119 Delayed small bowel perforation following BAT is thought to occur secondary

120 the first case report of delayed small bowel perforation following BAT with extensive portomesenteric

121 any other case report of delayed small bowel perforation following BAT without signs of intraabdomina

122 Isolated small bowel perforation following blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) is an

123 reflect selection of those at higher risk of perforation for earlier intervention or the effect of an

124 receptor levels determines cell fate during perforation formation and leaf senescence.

125 antly lower in window stage leaves (in which perforation formation and PCD are occurring) as compared

126 on and receptor expression during lace plant perforation formation and senescence is proposed.

127 Perforation formation occurs through developmentally reg

128 amined the role of ethylene receptors during perforation formation.

129 arotomy: number of perforations, distance of perforations from the ileocaecal valve, and type of surg

130 dpoint was the rate of complex appendicitis (perforation, gangrene, and/or abscess).

131 tioned bands, pouch dilation, band slippage, perforation, gastric volvulus, intraluminal band erosion

132 mbrane thickness was 0.84 +/- 0.67 mm in the perforation group and 2.65 +/- 4.02 mm in the non-perfor

133 ridge thickness was 2.78 +/- 1.37 mm in the perforation group and 4.21 +/- 2.09 mm in the non-perfor

134 ients had Schneiderian membrane perforation (perforation group).

135 ration group and 4.21 +/- 2.09 mm in the non-perforation group.

136 ration group and 2.65 +/- 4.02 mm in the non-perforation group.

137 Patients who experienced membrane perforation had a thinner membrane compared with patient

138 After adjustment, ICD recipients with perforation had greater odds of other associated major c

139 ns controversial, since significant rates of perforation have been reported.

140 Valve perforation (hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval

141 sured within 30 days, including colonic (ie, perforation, hemorrhage, abdominal pain), anesthesia-ass

142 strointestinal complications are ulceration, perforation, hemorrhage, and obstruction.

143 In response to perforation, host cells undergo Ca2+ -dependent but K+ -

144 high tidal volume but not cecal ligation and perforation impaired lung function.

145 Patients with perforation/impending corneal perforation were excluded

146 f patients (35/73), or progressed to scleral perforation in 4% of patients (3/73) over a mean follow-

147 n, which favors the right colon, spontaneous perforation in CC has in all cases involved the left col

148 "Spontaneous" perforation in CC, in which no instigating factor is ide

149 Independent associates of perforation in native vessels included age, chronic occl

150 ort herein an additional case of spontaneous perforation in previously undiagnosed CC and review the

151 als, dehiscence in five (8.62%), and mucosal perforation in seven (12.07%).

152 scariensis, is an aquatic monocot that forms perforations in its leaves as part of normal leaf develo

153 Last, we observed small perforations in the peripheral ring that are likely init

154 th percutaneous retrieval (in 1.7%), cardiac perforation (in 1.3%), and pacing-threshold elevation re

155 Tympanic membrane (TM) perforation, in particular chronic otitis media, is one

156 utcomes were frequent in those patients with perforation including bleeding, transfusion, myocardial

157 High tidal volume and cecal ligation and perforation increased individual bronchoalveolar lavage

158 mortality and intracardiac abscess and valve perforation independently predicted 1-year mortality.

159 avioral abnormalities following endovascular perforation induction of SAH in mice, a heavily-utilized

160 ts in the control group demonstrated corneal perforation; infection recurred in 1 of them.

161 acute complications such as diverticulitis, perforation, intestinal hemorrhage and obstruction.

162 Esophageal perforation is a dreaded complication of atrial fibrilla

163 Gastric perforation is a life-threatening condition, requiring e

164 Spontaneous perforation is a rare and serious complication of CC.

165 Oral perforation is characterized by dissolution of the BPM,

166 and mortality rates, and delayed small bowel perforation is even rarer.

167 Schneiderian membrane thickness and membrane perforation is examined in lateral window sinus augmenta

168 tional options fail to maintain vision or if perforation is imminent.

169 are also consistent with the hypothesis that perforation is most often a prehospital occurrence and/o

170 ) subsequent to LLO-mediated plasma membrane perforation is required for the activation of a conventi

171 Schneiderian membrane perforation is the most common complication of maxillary

172 In recurrent gastrointestinal tract perforation it was 75 and 77% versus 90 and 38% (Candida

173 causes, demographic differences in age, sex, perforation location, and underlying causes exist betwee

174 ere we report the repair of gastrointestinal perforation made by a needle-puncture wound in the silkw

175 been reported to be maxillary sinus membrane perforation (MSMP).

176 cations included loss of suction (n = 1) and perforation (n = 4).

177 uction during trephination (n = 2, 2.3%) and perforation (n = 4, 4.6%).

178 In 5 of 832 patients (0.6%), an esophageal perforation (n=3) or an esophagopericardial or atrioesop

179 y was associated with a high rate of retinal perforations (n = 13) and retinal detachments (n = 6).

180 ing infiltrate size, corneal melting, and/or perforation necessitating therapeutic penetrating kerato

181 Rates of laparoscopy, perforation, negative appendectomy, morbidity, length of

182 GI perforation occurred in 2.2% of bevacizumab-treated pati

183 Cardiac perforation occurred in 625 patients (0.14%).

184 Esophageal perforation occurred only in patients with category 2 le

185 Three Schneiderian membrane perforations occurred in the 323 sinus lifts.

186 of AA did not significantly increase risk of perforation (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence inter

187 iated specifically with an increased risk of perforation (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00-1.15),

188 0.10-0.31; P < 0.001) and increased odds of perforation (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.69; P = 0.

189 95% CI, 0.15-0.43; P < 0.001) and increased perforations (odds ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.46-3.97; P < 0

190 orbid conditions, weight, hospital type, and perforation, odds ratio of concordance for IV + enteral

191 geries were complicated by an intraoperative perforation of Descemet membrane; no other intraoperativ

192 king following SAH, induced via endovascular perforation of the anterior cerebral artery.

193 Perforation of the appendix was the only independent ris

194 Perforation of the colon occurring during or shortly fol

195 Foreign body ingestion complicated by perforation of the digestive tract is a well-known occur

196 omputed tomography confirmed the presence of perforation of the gall bladder and cholecysto-cutaneous

197 ically during stone excision or secondary to perforation of the urethra by a stone.

198 bnormality may be iatrogenic or secondary to perforation of the urethra by a stone.

199 A legacy effect of perforation on 12-month mortality was observed.

200 A legacy effect of perforation on mortality was evident, with an odds ratio

201 ecause of colitis (two with gastrointestinal perforation), one patient because of myocarditis, and on

202 Following insect gut perforation, only a weak immune response was observed be

203 patients who present early after esophageal perforation or anastomotic leak with limited mediastinal

204 ve morbidity when performed for either ulcer perforation or bleeding.

205 ruction and no perforation vs obstruction or perforation or both).

206 p, whereas there was no incidence of corneal perforation or recurrence of the infection in the PACK-C

207 mycin-treated cases were less likely to have perforation or require therapeutic penetrating keratopla

208 Intraoperative scleral perforation or retinal redetachment related to the remov

209 11% of cases develop intraoperative scleral perforation or retinal redetachment.

210 risk of aspiration pneumonia, but not bowel perforation or splenic injury.

211 ary outcome of the trial was rate of corneal perforation or the need for therapeutic penetrating kera

212 outcome of the trial was the rate of corneal perforation or the need for therapeutic penetrating kera

213 verall, no difference in the rate of corneal perforation or the need for TPK was determined for oral

214 s secondary analysis was the rate of corneal perforation or the need to undergo TPK.

215 conazole had a 0.43-fold decreased hazard of perforation or therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty comp

216 arium species might have a decreased rate of perforation or TPK in the oral voriconazole-treated arm;

217 Perforations or severe bleeding did not occur.

218 morrhage, portal vein thrombosis, bowel wall perforation, or dehydration.

219 sks of stricture, gastrointestinal bleeding, perforation, or hospitalization (P > .05).

220 final visual acuity (VA) </= 20/80, corneal perforation, or need for keratoplasty.

221 Lead failure was defined as fracture, perforation, or sensing failure necessitating revision.

222 ned as final visual acuity </=20/80, corneal perforation, or the need for keratoplasty.

223 Tympanic membrane perforation/otorrhea rates gradually increased (from 372

224 Although tympanic membrane perforation/otorrhea rates steadily increased during tha

225 eems that thicker SMT might be more prone to perforation (P = 0.14).

226 them, 47 patients had Schneiderian membrane perforation (perforation group).

227 were covered with a surface film, but vessel perforation plate openings and intervessel pits were fil

228 w diameter vessels, compared with the simple perforation plates in older secondary xylem, which may f

229 Perforation plates were dimorphic, with more steeply ang

230 essel pits first, followed by bubbles within perforation plates, which hold the last volumes of air w

231 evaluate undiagnosed cases of silent gastric perforations presenting with non-specific acute abdomen.

232 es that of neutralizing antibodies, membrane perforation presents a brief opportunity for a new strat

233 f neurological sequelae, sequelae of gastric perforation, pulmonary embolus, and disease progression.

234 The Canadian perforation rate fell in the middle between privately in

235 The Canadian perforation rate was lower in the 0- to 5-year age group

236 al, the association between SMT and membrane perforation rate was studied.

237 data were obtained when correlating SMT and perforation rate, although it seems that thicker SMT mig

238 Perforation rate, normal appendix rate, and length of ho

239 s assessed were stent migration rates, stent perforation rates, duration of hospital stay, time to st

240 yocardial bridge unroofing, and 1 myocardial perforation repair (3 patients had multiple procedures).

241 a simplified method of Schneiderian membrane perforation repair with amnion-chorion membranes and res

242 one and implant survival in sinuses that had perforations repaired during surgery versus a non-perfor

243 tive lipid extraction mechanism for membrane perforation represents another distinct process that con

244 veness and response to dilations, esophageal perforation, requirement for surgery, and mortality.

245 ithout corticosteroids, increase the risk of perforation requiring tympanoplasty following tympanosto

246 r drops is associated with increased risk of perforations requiring tympanoplasty, which appears to b

247 several case reports published on abdominal perforation resulting from stercoral colitis.

248 Endovascular perforation SAH rat model, brain slices and cultured per

249 Intraoperative perforation seems to be an important risk factor for loc

250 metallic stents and anastomotic leaks versus perforations separately.

251 cascade of events which started with gastric perforation, spillage of highly destructive gastric juic

252 ), T-status (T1-3 vs T4), and obstruction or perforation status (no obstruction and no perforation vs

253 No perforations, steam pops, or thrombus were noted.

254 dds ratio for 12-month mortality of 1.35 for perforation survivors compared with matched nonperforati

255 dds ratio for 12-month mortality of 1.60 for perforation survivors compared with matched nonperforati

256 hospitalization for worsening heart failure, perforation, tamponade, or sustained ventricular arrhyth

257 chnoid hemorrhage induction via endovascular perforation technique or sham surgery, a breathing gas m

258 group was subjected to a cecal ligation and perforation technique, whereas the control (sham) group

259 ary analysis, the CXL group experienced more perforations than the non-CXL group (4 vs 0, respectivel

260 naling events activated upon plasma membrane perforation that lead to bacterial internalization.

261 umber of nanopores, the septal peptidoglycan perforations that likely accommodate septal junctions.

262 tion, and surgery is necessary to repair the perforation to prevent an abdominal abscess or sepsis.

263 fined as 1 or more of the following: colonic perforation, toxic megacolon, colectomy, admission to an

264 or perforation status (no obstruction and no perforation vs obstruction or perforation or both).

265 he relationship between in-hospital time and perforation was adjusted for potential confounding using

266 Perioperative perforation was also associated with an increased risk o

267 transmittance of the hybrid construct after perforation was approximately 15-fold higher than before

268 Perforation was associated with adverse outcomes, with a

269 Schneiderian membrane perforation was associated with decreased residual bone

270 Perforation was defined by its diagnosis code followed b

271 Corneal perforation was more common in cases (52.17% [12 of 23])

272 Descemet membrane perforation was observed in 8 eyes (72.7%); lens damage

273 ntraoperatively a small infected left atrial perforation was oversewn and a fistula to the right main

274 Colorectal perforation was present in 42 patients.

275 Patients with perforation/impending corneal perforation were excluded from the study.

276 In graft PCI, predictors of perforation were history of stroke, New York Heart Assoc

277 Factors associated with perforation were male sex, increasing age, 3 or more com

278 zing enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation were significantly associated with increasin

279 Hemorrhage, abdominal pain, and perforation were the most common causes of unplanned hos

280 Overall, larger and deeper perforations were found in the skin models with increasi

281 geal perforations, and iatrogenic esophageal perforations were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and P

282 al of 104 sinus augmentations, in which nine perforations were noted.

283 ion cases were aborted midprocedure, and all perforations were repaired with amnion-chorion membranes

284 Patients with complicated disease (abscess, perforation) were at increased risk of readmission than

285 cy ulcer surgery (775 for bleeding, 2374 for perforation) were included for data analysis.

286 3, including one diagnosed after intestinal perforation, were diagnosed before the present analyses.

287 forth the role of a radiologist in cases of perforation which present with indirect signs involving

288 ir because of an adverse event (diverticular perforation), which was not considered treatment related

289 In contrast to procedure-related perforation, which favors the right colon, spontaneous p

290 ded as a key factor for influencing membrane perforation, which may jeopardize the final clinical out

291 dness comparable to diamond, is resistant to perforation with a diamond indenter and shows a reversib

292 ictors of perforation and the association of perforation with other major complications, length of st

293 nagement of esophageal anastomotic leaks and perforations with the use of esophageal stents is techni

294 to quinolone ear drops had a higher risk of perforation, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.61 (95%

295 A continued excess mortality occurred after perforation, with an odds ratio for 12-month mortality o

296 was comparable for detection of appendiceal perforation, with MR imaging (n = 103) sensitivity of 90

297 ion; luminal obstruction leads inexorably to perforation without timely intervention.

298 oring well and the zones above and below the perforation zone had low permeability, which created a p

299 e release point was at the same depth as the perforation zone of the monitoring well and the zones ab

300 preferred tracer migration pathway along the perforation zone.