ライフサイエンスコーパス: perioperative care

1 tep forward in advancing the cause of global perioperative care.

2 of clinically challenging scenarios such as perioperative care.

3 lent behavior remain significant concerns in perioperative care.

4 and health choices are important for optimal perioperative care.

5 ell tolerated, efficient, and cost-effective perioperative care.

6 idney, is not uncommon, further complicating perioperative care.

7 to the mainstream of today's anesthesia and perioperative care.

8 ome after surgery is a new safety concern in perioperative care.

9 ns and medications most likely to complicate perioperative care.

10 Advances in perioperative care and immunosuppression have enabled cl

11 Europe, we conducted a prospective study of perioperative care and outcomes of 637 consecutive patie

12 9-9 levels should be included in a patient's perioperative care and should be considered for prognost

13 ted to (i) patients, (ii) involvement, (iii) perioperative care, and (iv) impact.

14 high despite advances in surgical technique, perioperative care, and adjuvant therapy.

15 Efforts to standardize perioperative care, and thus minimize FTR, will have val

16 0 min to complete, with approximately 2 h of perioperative care, and tissue collection is generally p

17 c agents, pain control, and the evolution of perioperative care are the main reasons why ambulatory a

18 A colectomy perioperative care bundle in Michigan is associated with

19 We will expand efforts to implement perioperative care bundles in Michigan to improve outcom

20 Perioperative care bundling has been designed to improve

21 hiatric disorders need not unduly complicate perioperative care, but they present certain challenges;

22 fered the 'surgical home' as a new model for perioperative care delivery in which the anesthesiologis

23 eview presents an evidence-based approach to perioperative care designed to optimize management.

24 Further inquiry into why advanced perioperative care did not reduce cardiac complications

25 f multiple sclerosis from the perspective of perioperative care, emphasizing interactions between the

26 are well positioned to become leaders in the perioperative care environment of the future.

27 ate process measures to achieve high quality perioperative care for elderly surgical patients.

28 Optimization of perioperative care has been a common strategy for improv

29 Advances in diagnostic techniques and perioperative care have greatly improved the outcome of

30 Increasing experience and advances in perioperative care have led to improvement in outcomes.

31 ic imaging, staging, surgical technique, and perioperative care have led to marked improvement in the

32 Advancements in surgical technique and perioperative care have significantly improved the survi

33 rgan preservation, preoperative support, and perioperative care have significantly reduced the early

34 tive psychiatric morbidity should be part of perioperative care in complex cancer patients.

35 Perioperative care in these patients requires that radio

36 natal assessment and management; 2) Stage I: perioperative care, interstage monitoring, and managemen

37 preoptimization and attention to appropriate perioperative care is associated with a substantial decr

38 To assess the value of bundling perioperative care measures in colon surgery.

39 A Medline search using "perioperative care," "morbid obesity," "thromboembolic c

40 nalysis of 21 trials in intensive care unit, perioperative care, myocardial infarction, and stroke or

41 Perioperative care necessitates that radiologists have a

42 nterologists to understand their role in the perioperative care of bariatric surgical patients, to re

43 Improvement in the perioperative care of children has reduced both the inci

44 e evidence-based modifications for improving perioperative care of cystectomy patients.

45 examine the potential challenges and optimal perioperative care of patients with an ICD.

46 tion, surgical and anesthetic management and perioperative care of patients with liver disease.

47 The perioperative care of the clinically severe obese patien

48 Despite advances in perioperative care of the recipient, RHF persists as a c

49 art disease and trends in the anesthetic and perioperative care of these patients presenting for nonc

50 Many factors cause confusion regarding perioperative care of these patients, since conventional

51 tic approach as described here will simplify perioperative care of these patients.

52 Improvement of perioperative care outside the acute hospital setting an

53 applied to the development of individualized perioperative care packages.

54 Different perioperative care plans have been recommended to decrea

55 In Michigan, several perioperative care practices are independently associate

56 ects, suggesting that dissemination of these perioperative care practices may decrease SSI rates.

57 Several perioperative care practices were independently associat

58 ociety, the implementation of evidence-based perioperative care programs for the elderly patients wil

59 on, operative and anesthetic techniques, and perioperative care result in a low frequency of utilizat

60 After Surgery (ERAS) is a paradigm shift in perioperative care, resulting in substantial improvement

61 with RHC, the impact of this intervention in perioperative care should be evaluated in randomized tri

62 Perioperative care should include prophylaxis with antib

63 (ERP) have been major changes in colorectal perioperative care that have improved clinical outcomes

64 e basis of the testing's potential to modify perioperative care, the prior probability of advanced co

65 Anesthetic management and perioperative care were not standardized.

66 morbidity and mortality despite advances in perioperative care, whereas patients with CAD without HF

67 hysiology of the disease and developments in perioperative care, which may help to understand the dif

68 possible in this setting, provides excellent perioperative care, with high patient satisfaction and i