ライフサイエンスコーパス: peripheral vision

1 ight blindness, and 56% (14/25) with loss of peripheral vision.

2 ld defects specifically affecting central or peripheral vision.

3 re proposed as treatments for PDR that spare peripheral vision.

4 de field of view, involving both central and peripheral vision.

5 n-specific role difficulties and general and peripheral vision.

6 stic explanation for orientation crowding in peripheral vision.

7 primary factor limiting shape perception in peripheral vision.

8 al vision and a dependence on low-resolution peripheral vision.

9 the GVF the measure of choice for changes in peripheral vision.

10 least "some" difficulty with tasks requiring peripheral vision.

11 i may provide an objective measure of VA and peripheral vision.

12 tory targets using a laser pointer guided by peripheral vision.

13 ng, emotional distress, general lighting, or peripheral vision.

14 a selective loss of chromatic sensitivity in peripheral vision.

15 o an increase in reading speed in central or peripheral vision.

16 gested as an explanation for slow reading in peripheral vision.

17 t a different location, within the region of peripheral vision.

18 severely limited in clutter, particularly in peripheral vision.

19 8 for all subscales (P < 0.0001), except for peripheral vision (0.46; P = 0.0003), which also exhibit

20 te integration of the target and flankers in peripheral vision [1, 2].

21 rstanding of object recognition breakdown in peripheral vision [2].

22 outcomes: (1) reading and seeing detail, (2) peripheral vision, (3) darkness and glare, (4) household

23 ), color vision (90 vs. 97; P < 0.0001), and peripheral vision (85 vs. 91; P = 0.0496).

24 al environments and the fundamental limit on peripheral vision, affecting identification within many

25 motional distress, general dim lighting, and peripheral vision), all with good internal consistency (

26 veal a complex pattern of visual deficits in peripheral vision and indicate a significant role of att

27 Besides the fundus appearance restricted peripheral vision and scotopic electroretinogram confirm

28 rsonal knowledge and deeply held values, use peripheral vision and subsidiary awareness to become awa

29 chromatic and selective S-cone conditions in peripheral vision and whether any association relates to

30 rized by late-onset night blindness, loss of peripheral vision, and diminished or absent electroretin

31 tional distress, mobility, extreme lighting, peripheral vision, and general dim lighting.

32 y-of-life measures increased for general and peripheral vision, and near and distance activities, imp

33 ffectively enhances object discrimination in peripheral vision at the goal of the intended saccade.

34 lties (beta = 0.04; R2 = 0.20; P = .01), and peripheral vision (beta = 0.03; R2 = 0.17; P = .03).

35 driving (beta = 0.05; R2 = 0.24; P < .001), peripheral vision (beta = 0.03; R2 = 0.18; P = .02), and

36 ther reading speed can be improved in normal peripheral vision by increasing the letter spacing.

37 hat central retinal damage leads to enhanced peripheral vision by sensitizing the visual system for m

38 le classes of object recognition failures in peripheral vision can be accounted for by a single mecha

39 Impaired peripheral vision can persist in late disease stages.

40 iously unknown dichotomy between central and peripheral vision could support accurate analysis of att

41 ifference, 16.3; 95% CI, 0.9-31.7; P = .04), peripheral vision (difference, 11.6; 95% CI, 0.8-22.4; P

42 , interphalangeal joint stiffness, decreased peripheral vision, diminished tactile sensation, and hal

43 (RP) in which there are prominent night and peripheral vision disturbances.

44 ll, general vision, distance activities, and peripheral vision domains of theVFQ-25 (partial correlat

45 ibutor to the restoration of both foveal and peripheral vision during fixation.

46 e measures are needed to estimate changes in peripheral vision during future treatment clinical trial

47 aired individuals often seem to underutilize peripheral vision, even in absence of obvious peripheral

48 ns that afflict the fovea and thus use their peripheral vision exclusively, the signature properties

49 The presence of eyes in peripheral vision fails to activate the eye cells.

50 e well-known decline in visual resolution in peripheral vision; however, the main bottleneck for read

51 visual processing speed, visual search, and peripheral vision in driving, especially among patients

52 of focus for resolution acuity measured for peripheral vision indicates that spatial resolution is l

53 tolerance of these place tags in foveal, and peripheral vision is about half the separation of the fe

54 tleneck for reading or object recognition in peripheral vision is crowding.

55 Peripheral vision is fundamentally limited by the spacin

56 Peripheral vision is fundamentally limited not by the vi

57 Our ability to recognize objects in peripheral vision is impaired when other objects are nea

58 The model also explains deficits of peripheral vision known as crowding, and provides a quan

59 target to protect cone-mediated central and peripheral vision loss in patients with retinitis pigeme

60 ver, PRP can damage the retina, resulting in peripheral vision loss or worsening diabetic macular ede

61 vioral alterations emerging after central or peripheral vision loss suggest that cerebral reorganizat

62 isorder characterized by night blindness and peripheral vision loss, and in many cases leads to blind

63 f people, compensatory recruitment of spared peripheral vision may give rise to cortical thickening.

64 e of this study was to examine the impact of peripheral vision on emmetropization.

65 Peripheral vision, on the other hand is rather inefficie

66 sion," "distance activities," "dependency," "peripheral vision," "self-image," "daily living," and "d

67 These results indicate that peripheral vision should be considered when assessing th

68 Visual acuity and peripheral vision testing were frequently relied on (per

69 onid), providing them with as much, or more, peripheral "vision" than the vespertilionids, but ensoni

70 Compared to peripheral vision, the fovea displays decreased sensitiv

71 the association of choroidal thickness and "peripheral vision." The strongest association was the LL

72 However, in peripheral vision this single-cone input to the receptiv

73 our vision that retains chromatic quality in peripheral vision, thus supporting the cone-selective hy

74 Experts are able to use peripheral vision very efficiently.

75 nce activities, mental health, and color and peripheral vision, with an overall adjusted mean differe