ライフサイエンスコーパス: periprosthetic

1 dless of location or intensity; criterion 2: periprosthetic activity on the (18)F-FDG image, without

2 e interpreted as positive for infection when periprosthetic activity was present on the labeled leuko

3 using 4 different criteria: criterion 1: any periprosthetic activity, regardless of location or inten

4 er implantation (p = 0.02), and post-implant periprosthetic aortic regurgitation grade >/=2 of 4 (p <

5 nce of stroke was 4.1%, and the incidence of periprosthetic aortic regurgitation was 64.5%.

6 ity to allow spatial resolution of localized periprosthetic BMD change at the hip was assessed in an

7 Evaluation of BMD change in a model of periprosthetic bone loss demonstrated large but highly f

8 volved in osteoclastogenesis and pathologic (periprosthetic) bone resorption.

9 A periprosthetic FDG uptake was present in 47 (87%) and 30

10 the treatment of biofilm related orthopaedic periprosthetic infections; however the effects of antibi

11 subset in patients with OA and patients with periprosthetic inflammation and display a quiescent phen

12 Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most

13 Streptococci are not an infrequent cause of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

14 Periprosthetic joint infections are a devastating compli

15 Late-onset chronic (low-grade) periprosthetic joint infections are often accompanied by

16 of surgical site infections in general, and periprosthetic joint infections particularly, has prompt

17 ained from patients with OA or patients with periprosthetic joint inflammation.

18 The incidence of periprosthetic leak >2+/4 after TAVI was higher in group

19 l were SVD (n = 4), endocarditis (n = 4) and periprosthetic leak (n = 1).

20 on (SVD) (n = 25), endocarditis (n = 4), and periprosthetic leak (n = 2).

21 , logistic euroSCORE, and moderate-to-severe periprosthetic leakage after TAVI.

22 Periprosthetic masses were detected by MDCT in 46 patien

23 s to cobalt have been found in patients with periprosthetic osteolysis after second generation metal-

24 mising new alternative for the prevention of periprosthetic osteolysis and aseptic loosening.

25 and thus treat OC-related diseases, such as periprosthetic osteolysis and osteoporosis.

26 imaging scans for detecting and quantifying periprosthetic osteolysis have been validated in cadaver

27 similar advances in the medical treatment of periprosthetic osteolysis have not occurred.

28 To identify a soluble mediator of periprosthetic osteolysis we first showed that implant p

29 significant advances in our understanding of periprosthetic osteolysis, imaging technology to quantif

30 particular importance to disorders, such as periprosthetic osteolysis, in which granulomatous inflam

31 e implanted materials, causing inflammation, periprosthetic osteolysis, osteomyelitis, and bone damag

32 th osteoarthritis (OA) and particle-mediated periprosthetic osteolysis.

33 This review will update the state of periprosthetic osteolysis.

34 inhibits 3 processes critically involved in periprosthetic osteolysis: 1) wear debris-induced proinf

35 fety were demonstrated in an animal model of periprosthetic osteomyelitis, where a single dose of 10

36 Clinically significant periprosthetic paravalvular leak is an uncommon but seri

37 ure of a consecutive series of patients with periprosthetic paravalvular leaks referred to our struct

38 to determine the outcome of trivial or mild periprosthetic regurgitation (PPR) identified by intraop

39 apical TAVI approach, and a higher amount of periprosthetic regurgitation were significantly associat

40 as found for the detection of vegetations or periprosthetic regurgitation.

41 ia from explant cultures of synovial tissue, periprosthetic soft tissue (interface membranes), titani

42 a prolonged 28-day culture incubation to all periprosthetic specimens received for bacterial culture

43 aerobic and anaerobic culture media for all periprosthetic specimens.

44 The sensitivities of periprosthetic tissue and sonicate fluid cultures for th

45 14 days before surgery, the sensitivities of periprosthetic tissue and sonicate-fluid culture were 45

46 osis was established with PCR and culture of periprosthetic tissue and synovial fluid (and serology).

47 Periprosthetic tissue and/or synovial fluid PCR has been

48 inite prosthetic shoulder infection cases by periprosthetic tissue culture (38.9%) and sonicate fluid

49 an automated blood culture bottle system for periprosthetic tissue culture [T.

50 nicate fluid culture was more sensitive than periprosthetic tissue culture for the detection of defin

51 the results to those with sonicate fluid and periprosthetic tissue culture obtained at revision or re

52 For conventional periprosthetic tissue culture techniques, the greatest a

53 We compared periprosthetic tissue culture to implant sonication foll

54 an automated blood culture bottle system for periprosthetic tissue culture.

55 the prosthesis with conventional culture of periprosthetic tissue for the microbiologic diagnosis of

56 In conclusion, culture of periprosthetic tissue in blood culture bottles is not on

57 Culturing of samples of periprosthetic tissue is the standard method used for th

58 Culture of multiple periprosthetic tissue samples is the current gold standa

59 rgoing revision arthroplasty from whom 1,437 periprosthetic tissue samples were collected and process

60 noculated into blood culture bottles or four periprosthetic tissue specimens are obtained and culture

61 racy of PJI diagnosis is obtained when three periprosthetic tissue specimens are obtained and inocula

62 Culture of periprosthetic tissue specimens in blood culture bottles

63 research by examining the optimal number of periprosthetic tissue specimens required for accurate PJ

64 thetic-joint infection, the sensitivities of periprosthetic-tissue and sonicate-fluid cultures were 6

65 stheses was more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic-tissue culture for the microbiologic diag

66 ry staff time viewpoint were used to compare periprosthetic tissues culture processes using conventio

67 Herein, we examined the impact of culture of periprosthetic tissues in blood culture bottles on labor

68 to 100%), whereas when using inoculation of periprosthetic tissues into blood culture bottles, the g

69 The amount and type of wear debris in periprosthetic tissues were similar in patients with and