ライフサイエンスコーパス: permanent teeth

1 interventions in adults/children and primary/permanent teeth.

2 complex, particularly in necrotic, immature permanent teeth.

3 tients have a history of delayed eruption of permanent teeth.

4 on of alveolar bone, and loss of primary and permanent teeth.

5 ring extraction of two contralateral erupted permanent teeth.

6 udies examining caries progression in sealed permanent teeth.

7 odontitis resulting in loss of deciduous and permanent teeth.

8 -1.8) tooth surfaces in deciduous but not in permanent teeth.

9 11 erupted permanent teeth, and 14 unerupted permanent teeth.

10 n primary teeth is correlated with caries in permanent teeth.

11 risk indicator for predicting caries in the permanent teeth.

12 on revealed taurodontism in both primary and permanent teeth.

13 and represents failure to develop 1 or more permanent teeth.

14 e affected with several congenitally missing permanent teeth.

15 mposite resin restorations in primary versus permanent teeth.

16 enotype characterized by delayed eruption of permanent teeth.

17 ial cost of infection or loss of primary and permanent teeth.

18 n and youth ages 5-17 had one or more sealed permanent teeth.

19 d for about 80% of the caries experienced in permanent teeth.

20 reproduce the hybrid layer thickness seen in permanent teeth.

21 ximal, or free smooth surfaces in primary or permanent teeth; 3) had a reference standard; and 4) rep

22 Humans replace their milk teeth with permanent teeth and then lose their ability for tooth re

23 Tooth agenesis was assessed in permanent teeth and was defined based on the age of the

24 the innervation density of human primary and permanent teeth and whether caries or painful pulpitis w

25 ion consisted of 7 primary teeth, 11 erupted permanent teeth, and 14 unerupted permanent teeth.

26 t, increased caries, and delayed eruption of permanent teeth are the main complications of drug-induc

27 g should be started at least one year before permanent teeth erupt.

28 tin of primary teeth compared with dentin of permanent teeth; however, no information is available re

29 of affected surfaces for both deciduous and permanent teeth in all age groups, even after adjusting

30 disease trajectory of dentinal caries in the permanent teeth in groups defined by the presence or abs

31 gested minor differences between primary and permanent teeth in terms of dentin composition and morph

32 the present study was to compare primary and permanent teeth in terms of the thickness of the hybrid

33 Sealing non-cavitated caries in permanent teeth is effective in reducing caries progress

34 The long-term outcome of replanted avulsed permanent teeth is frequently compromised by lack of rev

35 humans, as opposed to mice, which have only permanent teeth (monophyodont dentition), some of which

36 craniofacial syndromes, prior extraction of permanent teeth, multiple effect size estimates, and stu

37 ies, focusing mainly on adults ( n = 17) and permanent teeth ( n = 24).

38 er profile of the impact of dental caries on permanent teeth of US adults.

39 and calibrated dentist examiners assessed 28 permanent teeth or tooth spaces for each of 6,767 subjec

40 is significantly thicker in primary than in permanent teeth (p = 0.0001), suggesting that primary to

41 ted with cleft palate (CP) with impaction of permanent teeth (p<10(-6)).

42 al and mid-buccal sites of all fully erupted permanent teeth present in two randomly selected quadran

43 Dentin in permanent teeth rarely undergoes resorption in developme

44 human or animal pulpless models in immature permanent teeth, recent studies have highlighted their r

45 times more likely to develop caries in their permanent teeth (relative ratio = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.4-4.7;

46 operative tooth-root development in immature permanent teeth represents a generalized challenge to re

47 ssions for untreated caries in deciduous and permanent teeth, respectively, using modeling resources

48 t II, wear findings for primary molar versus permanent teeth, respectively, were as follows (in micro

49 were divided into 4 groups: 5 primary and 5 permanent teeth restored with All-Bond 2/Bisfil P system

50 -Bond 2/Bisfil P system; and 5 primary and 5 permanent teeth restored with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose/Z

51 Using image analysis, we found permanent teeth to be significantly more densely innerva

52 ol-A-diglycidyl-dimethacrylate composite for permanent teeth, urethane-dimethacrylate compomer for pr

53 Nyanzapithecus on the basis of its unerupted permanent teeth, visualized by synchrotron imaging.

54 3.9 billion people, and untreated caries in permanent teeth was the most prevalent condition evaluat

55 In 2010, untreated caries in permanent teeth was the most prevalent condition worldwi

56 Permanent teeth were examined for erosion into dentin, e

57 mpared the success of direct pulp capping in permanent teeth with MTA (mineral trioxide aggregate) or

58 clinic to obtain apical closure of immature permanent teeth with thin dentinal walls.