ライフサイエンスコーパス: person-to-person

1 rees of separation (from person to person to person to person).

2 t judgments and behaviors can propagate from person to person.

3 fatality ratio, and potential to spread from person to person.

4 wealthy countries and is mainly spread from person to person.

5 process, and its yield is less variable from person to person.

6 tine, evades host immunity, and spreads from person to person.

7 experience of pain varies considerably from person to person.

8 iors and the way these behaviors spread from person to person.

9 ly hantavirus known to be transmissible from person to person.

10 the only hantavirus known to be transmitted person-to-person.

11 uld be a route of transmission of HHV-8 from person to person, although other routes cannot be ruled

12 , hepatitis A may have been transmitted from person to person among methamphetamine users through the

13 ove from cell to cell, tissue to tissue, and person to person and even across species.

14 As exposome and interactome vary from person to person and influence disease process, each dis

15 coevolved with humans to be transmitted from person to person and to persistently colonize the stomac

16 ssion of respiratory pathogens may be due to person-to-person and environmental contributions.

17 5 outbreaks with a known transmission route, person-to-person and food-borne transmissions were repor

18 een less fit, have not been transmitted from person to person, and have retained susceptibility to za

19 they all share the ability to transmit from person to person, and their human transmissibility is in

20 evolutionary drivers causing variation from person to person are not clear.

21 nse to statin treatment can vary widely from person to person as a result of inherited traits (genoty

22 xplore how social media can be used to study person-to-person communication about health and health c

23 Furthermore, person-to-person contact and the proliferation of the us

24 o explicitly model the trade-offs that drive person-to-person contact decisions.

25 e the most frequently reported settings, and person-to-person contact was the most common mode of tra

26 To evaluate the impact of continuous person-to-person contact within families on an individua

27 as rotavirus infectious intestinal disease: person-to-person contact.

28 Person-to-person contacts drive human disease dynamics.

29 seases that explicitly considers patterns of person-to-person contacts within a community.

30 suggested that 1) transmission directly from person to person contributed 10% (95% confidence interva

31 o dopaminergic drugs vary substantially from person to person due to individual-, drug- and disease-r

32 ce that these mutations are transmitted from person to person either directly or through a common env

33 ricin intoxication is not transmittable from person to person, even a single ricin molecule can lead

34 We considered illness to result from person-to-person H3N2v transmission if swine contact was

35 We identified limited person-to-person H3N2v virus transmission, but found no

36 ic environmental sources or transmitted from person to person has not been determined.

37 However, >90% of the person-to-person HCV RNA level variability was not expla

38 These findings indicate that person-to-person heterogeneity of antigen recognition, r

39 success relies on airborne transmission from person to person; however, the viral properties governin

40 uantifying influenza transmissibility at the person-to-person level during that most lethal of pandem

41 are common in patients with CF, but neither person-to-person nor nosocomial acquisition explained th

42 They are transmitted either by stool from person to person or through contaminated water or food b

43 Person-to-person or hospital-based epidemiologic links w

44 ease inhibitor mutations suggests a risk for person-to-person propagation.

45 ir interactions in the network of real-world person-to-person proximity measured via Bluetooth, as we

46 There was evidence of person-to-person spread and transmission of VTEC O157 in

47 tion, highlighting a potential reservoir for person-to-person spread and vaccine escape.

48 ity can prevent invasive disease, control of person-to-person spread is probably dependent on immunit

49 ive analysis of the nature and extent of the person-to-person spread of obesity as a possible factor

50 We examined the extent of the person-to-person spread of smoking behavior and the exte

51 Transmission of measles is dependent on person-to-person spread through respiratory droplets or

52 In an outbreak where person-to-person spread was thought to predominate, six

53 disease prevalence was low, suggesting that person-to-person spread, not waterborne spread, is proba

54 ection from a common environmental source or person-to-person spread.

55 s equipment should be undertaken to minimize person-to-person spread.

56 The data rule out the possibility of person-to-person strain transmission among these patient

57 The extent of heart disease varies from person to person, suggesting that genetic background is

58 eads up to three degrees of separation (from person to person to person to person).

59 tive and uncooperative behaviors spread from person to person to person.

60 known about the dynamics of the virus during person-to-person to transmission or whether multiple dis

61 oses such as examination of the potential of person-to-person transmission and recurrent infections b

62 infections originate from a common source or person-to-person transmission but that infection from in

63 tly known, but there is growing concern that person-to-person transmission could occur.

64 ta alone provide only limited information on person-to-person transmission dynamics.

65 arcinica outbreak to document the source and person-to-person transmission epidemiologically and mole

66 npasteurised dairy products, suggesting that person-to-person transmission had occurred.

67 oducing CRE clusters have been attributed to person-to-person transmission in health care facilities.

68 total of 21 of the 23 cases were acquired by person-to-person transmission in hemodialysis units, int

69 ot been possible to assess the importance of person-to-person transmission in the epidemiology of PCP

70 den settings and a renewed focus on reducing person-to-person transmission in these communities is ne

71 Person-to-person transmission is a potential pathway of

72 Person-to-person transmission is central to seasonal and

73 are rare but may have pandemic potential if person-to-person transmission is efficient.

74 ted the virus mutation rate, determined that person-to-person transmission is typically associated wi

75 Person-to-person transmission is very rare.

76 e illness outbreaks, indicating that limited person-to-person transmission likely occurred.

77 lates of S. maltophilia and A. xylosoxidans, person-to-person transmission may occur, there are not a

78 ould explain its preferential use by HIV for person-to-person transmission of disease.

79 Because person-to-person transmission of E. coli O157:H7 is not

80 We identified 15 cases of possible person-to-person transmission of H3N2v.

81 Person-to-person transmission of MERS-CoV can occur in h

82 This investigation documents person-to-person transmission of Norwalk virus among pla

83 We describe the first confirmed person-to-person transmission of oseltamivir-resistant p

84 butions of treatment-related acquisition and person-to-person transmission of resistance to incident

85 g for both treatment-related acquisition and person-to-person transmission of resistance.

86 andemic, based on its potential as a site of person-to-person transmission of the virus as well as a

87 tbreak response, which allowed for prolonged person-to-person transmission of the virus.

88 t, reflecting the host-adapted lifestyle and person-to-person transmission of this species and differ

89 Person-to-person transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jak

90 d generate misleading results when examining person-to-person transmission regarding this organism.

91 The authors estimated a low probability of person-to-person transmission relative to comparable est

92 ytopenia syndrome cases provided evidence of person-to-person transmission through blood contact to t

93 The reports of its person-to-person transmission through close contacts hav

94 es into the human population was followed by person-to-person transmission with little accumulation o

95 ugh four decades, and the potential to trace person-to-person transmission within a hospital environm

96 bone marrow transplant unit was followed by person-to-person transmission within the unit rather tha

97 To estimate the risk of person-to-person transmission, a retrospective cohort st

98 rain isolates, including those isolated from person-to-person transmission, and also highlighted how

99 Because of high case fatality proportions, person-to-person transmission, and potential use in biot

100 y, indicating the importance of in-household person-to-person transmission, likely via saliva.

101 exposure, temporal or geographic clustering, person-to-person transmission, or an association with re

102 arios in which a biological agent capable of person-to-person transmission, such as smallpox, is inte

103 e responsible for infections associated with person-to-person transmission, we conducted a cohort sur

104 at estimated for wild-type poliovirus during person-to-person transmission.

105 tients, including identification of possible person-to-person transmission.

106 likely acquired the organisms through direct person-to-person transmission.

107 ne and other animals and to assess potential person-to-person transmission.

108 ylaxis may be necessary to prevent sustained person-to-person transmission.

109 exposure, including 2 clusters of suspected person-to-person transmission.

110 ve phenotype, and the capacity for sustained person-to-person transmission.

111 found no evidence of efficient or sustained person-to-person transmission.

112 scales consistent with the spatial scale of person-to-person transmission.

113 ance, incidence of nosocomial infection, and person-to-person transmission.

114 an cause outbreaks of invasive infection via person-to-person transmission.

115 influenza viruses rarely result in sustained person-to-person transmission; however, the potential fo

116 of critical importance that we know how much person-to-person variability affects the results, in ord

117 To test the hypothesis that person-to-person variability in blood levels of hepatiti

118 morphism may also play a significant role in person-to-person variability in metastasis frequency, ra

119 We found substantial person-to-person variability in mutation replacement rat

120 Why this happens, and why there is so much person-to-person variability in these changes, is not kn

121 However, <6% of person-to-person variance was explained by the factors e

122 uggest that sporadic CJD is transmitted from person to person via blood transfusion, but this evidenc

123 e in the environment and be transferred from person to person via fomites contaminated with oropharyn

124 r pylori infection and exposures relevant to person-to-person, waterborne, foodborne, and zoonotic tr