戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 rom an in-house screening library of a major pharmaceutical company.
2 een demonstrated on the example of a Spanish pharmaceutical company.
3  combinations through collaborations with 18 pharmaceutical companies.
4 s of $100 or more were made to physicians by pharmaceutical companies.
5 f intensive research both in academia and in pharmaceutical companies.
6 cientific meetings and contacted experts and pharmaceutical companies.
7 tracts; and contacting authors, experts, and pharmaceutical companies.
8  current perception at the majority of large pharmaceutical companies.
9  (NGDO) support, and donations of drugs from pharmaceutical companies.
10 CR5 antagonists identified by five different pharmaceutical companies.
11 tself has stimulated the interest of several pharmaceutical companies.
12 published trials, contacting researchers and pharmaceutical companies.
13 ns to the US Food and Drug Administration by pharmaceutical companies.
14  to patients, managed care organizations and pharmaceutical companies.
15 d academic scientists hoping to partner with pharmaceutical companies.
16 tor ligands from discovery programs in major pharmaceutical companies.
17 en intensely pursued both in academia and in pharmaceutical companies.
18 eved from ClinicalTrials.gov and websites of pharmaceutical companies.
19  data from completed studies sponsored by 13 pharmaceutical companies.
20 egard they have attracted much interest from pharmaceutical companies.
21  attention from the scientific community and pharmaceutical companies.
22 arisons of two drugs in studies sponsored by pharmaceutical companies.
23 t, and protons were developed by a number of pharmaceutical companies.
24  therapeutics under investigation in various pharmaceutical companies.
25 nd contact with study authors and device and pharmaceutical companies.
26 cal trials were systematically identified by pharmaceutical companies.
27 disclosure of payments made to physicians by pharmaceutical companies.
28 d no disclosure (43%) or did not mention the pharmaceutical company (40%).
29 er the federal government (75/117; 64.1%) or pharmaceutical companies (46/117; 39.3%) to perform gene
30 ntibacterial research shifts away from large pharmaceutical companies, a wave of biotechnology compan
31                    The 13 (4%) cases against pharmaceutical companies accounted for $3.6 billion (39%
32                                           As pharmaceutical companies adapt their business models, a
33 rt interfering RNAs (siRNA), researchers and pharmaceutical companies alike have devoted immense time
34                 Researchers in the field and pharmaceutical companies also were contacted to try to i
35 rnational collaboration of academic centres, pharmaceutical companies and a private foundation, to di
36 f recent national meetings, and contact with pharmaceutical companies and content experts.
37 analysis (MMPA), we combined data from three pharmaceutical companies and generated ADMET rules, avoi
38                                              Pharmaceutical companies and other trial sponsors must s
39 ed HAE expert physicians, representatives of pharmaceutical companies and representatives of HAE pati
40 basis for study protocol discussions between pharmaceutical companies and the FDA in advancing the de
41 commitment to patient care and the desire of pharmaceutical companies and their representatives to se
42 ermittent dosing or between trials funded by pharmaceutical companies and those independently funded.
43    Here I describe how partnering works in a pharmaceutical company and offer advice on how to make a
44 dentified on MEDLINE, inquiry of experts and pharmaceutical companies, and data presented at recent n
45 s, development of commercial vaccines by the pharmaceutical companies, and participation of many pati
46 gencies, policy-setting bodies, governments, pharmaceutical companies, and philanthropic organization
47  and Current Content, inquiry of experts and pharmaceutical companies, and preliminary data presented
48 lished evidence was from trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies, and publication bias may have
49 medical and scientific databases, approached pharmaceutical companies, and reviewed citations of rele
50 ves from the NHLBI, patient advocacy groups, pharmaceutical companies, and the U.S. Food and Drug Adm
51 a research project with representatives of a pharmaceutical company, and they propose a model for tea
52         For these reasons, investigators and pharmaceutical companies are actively exploring novel st
53                           By contrast, other pharmaceutical companies are developing microbial vector
54 nies, federal payers, medical societies, and pharmaceutical companies are increasingly utilizing heal
55                      As a result, many large pharmaceutical companies are leaving the area of pain me
56                        At the same time, big pharmaceutical companies are losing interest in new anti
57                     At the present time five pharmaceutical companies are planning or conducting clin
58                                              Pharmaceutical companies are reducing their investments
59 cs, why academic researchers and biotech and pharmaceutical companies are so excited, and what the ob
60 environment, and insufficient investments by pharmaceutical companies are some of the clear reasons b
61                                        Major pharmaceutical companies are strategically shifting gear
62                                              Pharmaceutical companies are targeting adipocyte metabol
63 r persons ineligible for such subsidies, and pharmaceutical company assistance may be a better altern
64 tures; they realized a superior savings with pharmaceutical company assistance programs.
65                                Compared with pharmaceutical company assistance, Medicare drug discoun
66 tion participation, positive phase II trial, pharmaceutical company-based trials, and shorter time pe
67                                           As pharmaceutical companies bring more fully humanized ther
68 ity of the C-CASA ratings and agreement with pharmaceutical company classification were estimated.
69 etween a voluntary health organization and a pharmaceutical company, complemented by academic investi
70  compounded by the fact that there are fewer pharmaceutical companies conducting research to discover
71 second shows how they restricted to whom the pharmaceutical company could market its transdermal nico
72 ion of brain striatal signaling, and several pharmaceutical companies currently investigate PDE10A in
73                                     Multiple pharmaceutical companies currently test CDK4/6 inhibitor
74 ents were not released to the public because pharmaceutical companies designated them as trade secret
75                                           As pharmaceutical companies develop fewer truly novel agent
76                  On the basis of these data, pharmaceutical companies developed many Met inhibitors,
77                                        Three pharmaceutical companies developing CDI treatments came
78  a pharmacological perspective, with several pharmaceutical companies developing NR2B subtype-selecti
79 , dexketoprofen, deflazacort) handled by the pharmaceutical company employees in the making of tablet
80                                              Pharmaceutical companies find drug development programs
81 atology conferences and contacted respective pharmaceutical companies for additional studies.
82                                              Pharmaceutical companies frequently seek approval of ant
83  to progress and discourages researchers and pharmaceutical companies from investing resources to dev
84 e statements for accuracy, determine whether pharmaceutical companies from which the authors received
85  from newspaper and online sources about all pharmaceutical company-funded medication studies publish
86 g on medication studies often fail to report pharmaceutical company funding and frequently refer to m
87 tors who indicate that their articles report pharmaceutical company funding; the percentage of editor
88 tions of safe and effective drugs by several pharmaceutical companies, funds for delivering these don
89                     In contrast, since 2000, pharmaceutical companies have become increasingly profit
90                                         Many pharmaceutical companies have been active in the search
91                  Several academic groups and pharmaceutical companies have been developing a series o
92 opulations that might have adverse outcomes, pharmaceutical companies have been reluctant to use a st
93                                              Pharmaceutical companies have considerable flexibility i
94         During the past 15 years, most large pharmaceutical companies have decreased the screening of
95 g pocket on the protein surface, and several pharmaceutical companies have developed compounds and pe
96                                              Pharmaceutical companies have developed many novel inhib
97                                     Multiple pharmaceutical companies have exploited the physiologica
98 greatly expanded as clinical researchers and pharmaceutical companies have focused their efforts on d
99 quent dissolutions of in-house facilities by pharmaceutical companies have had media channels pronoun
100               Studies from both academia and pharmaceutical companies have identified compounds that
101             Litigation documents reveal that pharmaceutical companies have paid physicians to promote
102                                Several large pharmaceutical companies have selectively downsized thei
103  influence of physicians' practice patterns, pharmaceutical companies, health maintenance organizatio
104                 The authors urge clinicians, pharmaceutical companies, health maintenance organizatio
105                                              Pharmaceutical companies hope to find new and useful pol
106 ntagonists is under investigation by several pharmaceutical companies in an effort to identify novel
107 These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion.
108 These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion.
109 These parameters are not designed for use by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotion.
110 considerable interest from both academia and pharmaceutical companies in the discovery and developmen
111 ograms have been terminated at several major pharmaceutical companies in the past decade.
112              Due to the continual decline of pharmaceutical companies investing in new antibiotic dev
113  fragmented market that may discourage major pharmaceutical company investment.
114                  Currently, a major focus of pharmaceutical companies is to develop ever more potent
115 undertake the task of picking up where large pharmaceutical companies left off have failed to survive
116 ls, Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.
117 more common when authors have FCOIs with the pharmaceutical company marketing that drug.
118 nterest in antibacterial discovery and large pharmaceutical companies may look to these as a source o
119                          Rheumatologists and pharmaceutical companies might work together to develop
120 of three support disclosures: funding from a pharmaceutical company, NIH funding, or none.
121  even in some brand name products from major pharmaceutical companies not of natural oyster shell der
122 ird case, we show how subsidiary tobacco and pharmaceutical companies of a parent company collaborate
123 examined industry-wide trends in spending by pharmaceutical companies on direct-to-consumer advertisi
124 edication research has received funding from pharmaceutical companies or how frequently news articles
125 which has led to disputes with international pharmaceutical companies over prices and patents.
126 espiratory diseases remains the goal of many pharmaceutical companies over the past 20 years.
127                Intact animal data contradict pharmaceutical company policies that routinely test drug
128  available P2RX7 knock-out mice generated by pharmaceutical companies possess certain splice variants
129 urred without assistance and with the use of pharmaceutical company programs for the cohort and FPL c
130 re population without prescription coverage, pharmaceutical company programs offered considerable sav
131 greement was observed between the C-CASA and pharmaceutical company ratings, with the C-CASA reportin
132                                         Many pharmaceutical companies recognise the advantages of rev
133 ture and US Food and Drug Administration and pharmaceutical company reports on these therapies.
134 ed medications were obtained directly from a pharmaceutical company representative.
135  The effects of health economics research on pharmaceutical company revenue make drug investigations
136  that drug, and, under the current system, a pharmaceutical company's appraisal of SADRs may be influ
137 hat have been reported by Merck and Shionogi pharmaceutical companies, served as model ADK leads.
138 ntre study independent from the influence of pharmaceutical companies should be commissioned to compa
139                                              Pharmaceutical companies spent US$1.8 billion on direct-
140  results were not significantly different in pharmaceutical company-sponsored (6/20 [30%]) vs nonprof
141                                              Pharmaceutical company-sponsored studies were less likel
142 vidual studies, these findings indicate that pharmaceutical company sponsorship of economic analyses
143 eeding trials, clinical studies conducted by pharmaceutical companies that are designed to seem as if
144 s has been referred to as the "graveyard for pharmaceutical companies." That is now set to change, as
145  bridging the gap between academia and large pharmaceutical companies, the biotech firms have been ef
146 atient advocacy groups, medical oncologists, pharmaceutical companies, the US Food and Drug Administr
147 y or had at least 1 author affiliated with a pharmaceutical company; the remaining trials did not rep
148 ith academia, health-care professionals, and pharmaceutical companies, this initiative aims to streng
149 e recent low annual output of new drugs from pharmaceutical companies, this review will provide a tim
150 prove drug development, as it would pressure pharmaceutical companies to become more innovative and a
151 ractions in their prescriptions and will aid pharmaceutical companies to design large-scale clinical
152 is driven by four factors: the commitment of pharmaceutical companies to provide free drugs; the scal
153    One shows how tobacco companies pressured pharmaceutical companies to scale back their smoking ces
154 erial (or antibiotic) agents from the larger pharmaceutical companies to the entrepreneur-like small
155                                              Pharmaceutical companies typically perform prospective,
156                                   Every year pharmaceutical companies use significant resources to mi
157 d lowest when consent was not obtained and a pharmaceutical company used data for marketing (weighted
158     The percentage of successful trials from pharmaceutical companies was significantly higher compar
159 rmidable drug development resources of large pharmaceutical companies were deployed into Phase 3 tria
160  12 events originally labeled as suicidal by pharmaceutical companies were eliminated, which resulted
161                         Only a few years ago pharmaceutical companies were excited about the potentia
162 tion) that were not originally identified by pharmaceutical companies were identified in the C-CASA,
163        Economic analyses that were funded by pharmaceutical companies were more likely to report favo
164 currently under investigation by a number of pharmaceutical companies with only a few reaching early
165 cals, and pharmaceuticals; all international pharmaceutical companies with sales volumes similar to t
166 ides the promise of increased efficiency for pharmaceutical companies, with higher confidence in the
167 on of methods for distinguishing biotech and pharmaceutical companies yields a dynamic, more accurate

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top