ライフサイエンスコーパス: pheromone

1 r molecules (e.g. Ras, yeast a-factor mating pheromone).

2 ircuits determine the sexual identity of the pheromone.

3 functions, as well as near a gene encoding a pheromone.

4 xpressed in the male antenna that detect the pheromone.

5 d morphological responses of opaque cells to pheromone.

6 and decreased attraction to queen mandibular pheromone.

7 ritical neural circuits in response to alarm pheromone.

8 uperfluous mating, using an anti-aphrodisiac pheromone.

9 he release of the proline-derived attraction pheromone.

10 key properties of Sst2 and its induction by pheromone.

11 lay increased gene expression in response to pheromone.

12 ompete to arrive first at a female releasing pheromone.

13 Prg adhesins and render cells insensitive to pheromone.

14 tested the key compounds in V. velutina sex pheromone.

15 as indicated by a lack of growth response to pheromone.

16 ness, suggesting they are unable to perceive pheromones.

17 ctivity or merely by exposing them to female pheromones.

18 siologically relevant concentrations of male pheromones.

19 pond to alkene hydrocarbons that also act as pheromones.

20 hrough a means of proteolysis of SHP peptide pheromones.

21 ursors to produce the short-chain ascaroside pheromones.

22 for their roles in the inhibition of mating pheromones.

23 gulate the production of specific ascaroside pheromones.

24 rated by the concise syntheses of two insect pheromones.

25 ights into their mechanism and regulation by pheromones.

26 oles in insect communication, for example as pheromones.

27 saltator in detecting cuticular hydrocarbon pheromones.

28 olatile semiochemicals that mimic female sex pheromones.

29 s, which respectively express P and M factor pheromones [1, 2], pair during the mating process induce

30 main finding is that rats exposed to the fox pheromone 2,5-dihydro-2,4,5-trimethylthiazoline (TMT), a

31 gnals of females [2-7], especially their sex pheromones [8-11].

32 iments to estimate the diffusion rate of the pheromone a-factor.

33 haromyces cerevisiae, the exposure to mating pheromone activates a prototypic mitogen-activated prote

34 s at some locations and is attributable to a pheromone added by ants to the building material; and (i

35 st evidence for such an anti-antiaphrodisiac pheromone, adding a new element to the communication mec

36 d for viability during prolonged exposure to pheromone and acts through multiple substrates to down-r

37 h a masculinized nervous system secrete male pheromone and are susceptible to male pheromone killing.

38 interaction between an N-terminal Asp of the pheromone and Arg-153 within the proposed pheromone-bind

39 st defenders were triggered by the bee alarm pheromone and live hornet presence to heat-ball the horn

40 volution poses a dilemma: How can the female pheromone and male preference simultaneously change to c

41 p* mutations increased Rgg2Sp sensitivity to pheromone and pheromone variants while displaying decrea

42 to ethologically relevant ligands, including pheromones and fatty acids, in vitro and in vivo.

43 and suggest that bile acids may be mammalian pheromones and kairomones.

44 mosensory genes involved in the reception of pheromones and plant kairomones are consistent with the

45 (i.e. K-Ras4b and the yeast a-factor mating pheromone) and non-prenylated biological peptides (Abeta

46 with the two component H. halys aggregation pheromone, and pheromone synergist, methyl (2E, 4E, 6Z)-

47 ntification of the male-produced aggregation pheromone, and the recognition that BMSB disperses into

48 lar gland components that act as H. saltator pheromones, and a range of more traditional general odor

49 and related behavioral responses to oxygen, pheromones, and food in Caenorhabditis elegans The molec

50 m prey or plants to produce their attractant pheromones, and larval antlion venoms are potentially im

51 rs could eavesdrop upon heterospecific alarm pheromones, and would detect and avoid conspicuous indiv

52 noate, while CpomOR6a responds to the strong pheromone antagonist codlemone acetate (E,E)-8,10-dodeca

53 Since the female and male sex pheromones are biosynthetically related in this and othe

54 These antiaphrodisiac pheromones are gradually released from the female's gono

55 e reproductively compatible, and aggregation pheromones are not capable of preventing gene flow betwe

56 dae), suggests that male-produced long-range pheromones are the norm for the order.

57 We now know that pheromones are used by species all across the animal kin

58 Moth sexual pheromones are widely studied as a fine-tuned system of

59 evolutionarily conserved family of nematode pheromones, are produced not only by a plant-parasitic n

60 tor (OR) genes to perceive hydrocarbon-based pheromones, arguably the most important signals in ant c

61 ed until the second cycle after release from pheromone arrest.

62 ate, and oviposit on food, they perceive the pheromone as a blend against a background of food odors.

63 Second, hermaphrodites recognize pheromone as male if the concentration of ascr#10 is hig

64 ntification of its male-produced aggregation pheromone as the novel compound (E)-2-cis-6,7-epoxynonen

65 ts of agricultural crops, but the use of sex pheromones as attractants is limited by male multiple ma

66 sulting in the overproduction of known queen pheromones as well as some compounds typically linked to

67 dance of heterospecific alarm signals, alarm pheromones, at food sources in bees.

68 and in recently invaded areas of Japan, the pheromone attracted both sexes of the beetle.

69 DL pheromone sensors that respectively drive pheromone attraction and repulsion.

70 me annually deploys a grid of 60,000-100,000 pheromone-baited traps, currently extending from Minneso

71 Taken together, these data suggest that pheromone-based technology will be of global utility for

72 The reality of invisible chemical signals, pheromones, between members of the same species was reco

73 are allosterically regulated through direct pheromone binding to control transcriptional activity; h

74 one receptors sharing a structurally similar pheromone-binding domain that functions allosterically t

75 he pheromone and Arg-153 within the proposed pheromone-binding pocket of Rgg2Sp.

76 , confirming a significant role of PsTPS1 in pheromone biosynthesis.

77 associated with differential regulation of a pheromone biosynthetic enzyme gene.

78 en slight variations in the species-specific pheromone blend are usually rejected by the male.

79 nsor aequorin have shown that in response to pheromone, budding yeast cells undergo a rise of cytosol

80 de ant colonies is orchestrated with diverse pheromones, but it is not clear how ants perceive these

81 also respond to spatially uniform fields of pheromone by polarizing along a single axis.

82 rfect its chemical mimicry of pollinator sex pheromones by escape from deleterious pleiotropy, suppor

83 n, and we show that the alteration of social pheromones can be beneficial to the microbe while detrim

84 Although trace amounts of pheromones can be detected by many insects, context-depe

85 Upon sensing of the peptide pheromone cCF10, Enterococcus faecalis cells carrying pC

86 ection pressure on the long-range female sex pheromone channel and consequently affect the evolution

87 The induction of cell cycle arrest by a pheromone, chemically distinct from the one used to attr

88 The sexual pheromone communication system of moths is a model syste

89 Host searching, pheromone communication, and microclimatic preferences a

90 and SDR epimerisation rates on the ancestral pheromone component RS accounts for the evolution of a n

91 ecies can detect and use a specialized alarm pheromone component, benzyl acetate (BA), to avoid dange

92 y to gamergate extract and a candidate queen pheromone component.

93 P3 from M. viciae can bind to all four alarm pheromone components and the differential ligand binding

94 They are also sex pheromone components of the female Zeleboria.

95 their molecular interactions with the alarm pheromone components.

96 Species differences in female pheromone composition and male response directly reinfor

97 ould detect and avoid conspicuous individual pheromone compounds, defined by abundance and their abil

98 next examined responses to individual alarm pheromone compounds.

99 Pheromone concentration modulates burst frequency in a m

100 Zone lifetimes scale with pheromone concentration.

101 data on spontaneous polarization in uniform pheromone concentration.

102 ients accurately only over a narrow range of pheromone concentrations corresponding to this transitio

103 males led to reduced emission of aggregation pheromone, confirming a significant role of PsTPS1 in ph

104 n moths, females emit a species-specific sex pheromone, consisting of a blend of biochemically relate

105 at, despite their reduced size, fungal alpha-pheromones contain discrete functional regions with a de

106 A new study reveals that additional pheromone cues released only by younger females may prom

107 f local pheromone release and sensing, short pheromone decay length, and pheromone-dependent zone sta

108 absent in C. elegans daf-22 larvae which are pheromone deficient.

109 The first, mediated by conserved ascaroside pheromones, delays the loss of germline progenitor cells

110 he food-leaving behaviour is conspecific and pheromone dependent: C. elegans adults respond more stro

111 urons and the germline are required for male pheromone-dependent male death.

112 d sensing, short pheromone decay length, and pheromone-dependent zone stabilization leads to efficien

113 ed this question in the vomeronasal organ, a pheromone-detecting epithelium containing hundreds of di

114 rmation from the antenna, not differences in pheromone detection by the odorant receptors, are primar

115 y in ants, through their functional roles in pheromone detection that characterizes reproductive stat

116 Whereas a high pheromone dose induces growth arrest and formation of a

117 Patch movement is sensitive to pheromone dose, with wandering reduced on the up-gradien

118 shmoo-like morphology in yeast cells, lower pheromone doses elicit elongated cell growth.

119 anges, the extracellular diffusion of mating pheromones dynamically coupled with cell polarization, a

120 Here, Helms et al. identify the insect pheromone E,S-conophthorin produced by the goldenrod gal

121 We suggest that disruption of both pheromone emission and orientation to sex pheromone may

122 ids adversely affected the calling behavior (pheromone emission) of adult females, and the orientatio

123 projection; it also induces synthesis of "a pheromone," encoded by MFA2.

124 g), the latter a species with only RS in the pheromone, epimerise RS into RR and vice versa with (4R)

125 ide linkages and backbone connectivity using pheromone ER-23 and lysozyme as model proteins.

126 one synaptic connection following early-life pheromone exposure are sufficient to permanently enhance

127 arrested in G1 by nutrient deprivation or by pheromone exposure, but cells that resume cycling after

128 Upon pheromone exposure, these cells overproduce the Prg adhe

129 Indeed, virgin females perfumed with male pheromone extract, or with its main component, mated sig

130 Sex pheromones facilitate reproduction by attracting potenti

131 The first pheromones for green lacewings (Chrysopidae) have been i

132 The alpha pheromone from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisia

133 High resolution structure of synthetic alpha-pheromone from the plant pathogenic ascomycete Fusarium

134 information is currently available for alpha pheromones from filamentous ascomycetes, which are signi

135 Semiquantitative protein analyses of the pheromone glands by tandem mass spectrometry revealed th

136 tatively predicts the yeast cell response to pheromone gradient providing an important step toward un

137 ictive model of yeast polarization towards a pheromone gradient.

138 ng induced polarization and that they detect pheromone gradients accurately only over a narrow range

139 ating cells whose morphologies are driven by pheromone gradients and intracellular signals.

140 example, yeast have been reported to detect pheromone gradients as shallow as 0.1 nM/mum.

141 pends on the ability of cells to polarize up pheromone gradients, but cells also respond to spatially

142 In moths, more long-range female sex pheromones have been identified than in any other animal

143 Pheromones have provided fascinating examples of signal

144 mating, suggesting that MMB might mimic sex pheromone in Caenorhabditis species.

145 ly identified as a male-produced aggregation pheromone in several Phyllotreta species.

146 d the first chemical identification of a sex pheromone in the eusocial hornets.

147 We tested the hypothesis that the male sex pheromone in the noctuid moth Heliothis virescens perfum

148 nes (reproductive females) produced this sex pheromone in the sixth intersegmental sternal glands of

149 gical contexts, from trail, alarm, and queen pheromones in social insects to the mammary pheromone pr

150 th caste-specific biosynthesis of fatty acid pheromones in the MG, including members of cytochrome P4

151 s for the biosynthesis of fatty acid-derived pheromones in the MGs.

152 eptococcus pyogenes (rgg2Sp ) that conferred pheromone-independent transcriptional activation of an R

153 If the presence of mating pheromone indicates that this decision is no longer appr

154 ast fusion through interaction with Fus2p, a pheromone-induced amphiphysin-like protein.

155 tream responses has been demonstrated in the pheromone-induced and osmotic stress-induced MAPK pathwa

156 ily in moth species mediates conspecific sex pheromone information for sexual behaviour.

157 Naturally occurring pheromone insensitivity results in part from previously

158 our model suggests that the lifetime of the pheromone is a highly influential parameter that control

159 For N. ribisnigri this pheromone is a single component (E)-beta-farnesene but M

160 7 ratio of the E and Z isomers of the female pheromone is governed by a single, sex-linked locus.

161 e cycle, and the exploitation of bees' brood pheromones is particularly significant given these compo

162 ervation with mammals, even though the alarm pheromone itself is bee-specific.

163 onochoristic species are susceptible to male pheromone killing.

164 e male pheromone and are susceptible to male pheromone killing.

165 Similarly, zone stabilization at reduced pheromone levels, which occurs in the absence of the pre

166 rendered "blind" to a subset of male-emitted pheromone ligands during diestrus yet fully detect and r

167 tors Map3 and Mam2 [3, 4] with their cognate pheromone ligands leads to activation of the Galpha prot

168 ual fecundity and identify four genes in the pheromone MAPK pathway that are expressed at significant

169 subunit of the G-protein complex (STE4), the pheromone MAPK scaffold (CST5), and the two terminal MAP

170 lts therefore reveal multiple bottlenecks in pheromone MAPK signaling in white cells and that allevia

171 th pheromone emission and orientation to sex pheromone may explain, at least in part, an observed red

172 d advanced forms of sociality that depend on pheromone-mediated communication.

173 Male pheromone-mediated killing is unique to androdioecious C

174 unts of fly odors, including the aggregation pheromones methyl laurate, methyl myristate, and methyl

175 microbials, endocrine disruption, and primer pheromone mimicry.

176 as time-averaging and the internalization of pheromone molecules, have been proposed to explain how y

177 and hermaphrodites secrete similar blends of pheromone molecules, two of which are present in differe

178 an affect accumulation of the AinS-generated pheromone N-octanoyl homoserine lactone, which may accou

179 cerana foragers avoid the distinctive alarm pheromones of A. dorsata and A. mellifera, species that

180 Pheromones of many gram-positive bacteria, such as Bacil

181 receptors that respond to the peptide mating pheromones of the budding yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiaew

182 reates a long-lasting sensory memory for the pheromones of the stud male that alters neuroendocrine r

183 A as strongly as they did to their own alarm pheromone on natural inflorescences.

184 females were less responsive to the male sex pheromone or unable to use it as a cue at all.

185 number of trapped male moths exposed to sex pheromones or by the number of trapped male and female m

186 ensitivity of Or47b neurons to a stimulatory pheromone, palmitoleic acid, is low in young males but h

187 The first article focuses on the mating pheromone pathway in budding yeastSaccharomyces cerevisi

188 the Kss1 and Fus3 MAP kinases of the mating pheromone pathway, which in turn abolishes cellular resp

189 ls very strong purifying selection on the a1 pheromone peptide and corresponding receptor, but signif

190 ificantly less purifying selection on the a2 pheromone peptide that corresponds with more variation a

191 compatibility is based on the recognition of pheromone peptides by corresponding receptor proteins, b

192 ve evolved a large clade of genes to support pheromone perception and that gene duplications have pla

193 It has been proposed that pheromone perception in ants evolved via expansions in t

194 ically dissected, from the enzymes producing pheromones, perception by chemosensory receptors, throug

195 ent RS accounts for the evolution of a novel pheromone phenotype in Nv.

196 es, whereas the B locus consists of a paired pheromone precursor, Mr_Ph4, and receptor, STE3_Mr4.

197 PAT acts to regulate the biosynthesis of sex pheromone precursor, TAG, thus influencing PBAN-induced

198 identified potential A (HD1 and HD2) and B (pheromone precursors and pheromone receptors) mating gen

199 ndividual behaviors to analyze the effect of pheromone presence and strength on construction dynamics

200 On pheromone presence, Ca(2+) burst occurrence increases dr

201 hysiology, connectivity, and contribution to pheromone processing.

202 We analysed the volatile alarm pheromone produced by attacked workers of the most abund

203 In Drosophila melanogaster, the sex pheromone produced by males, cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVA),

204 pheromones in social insects to the mammary pheromone produced by mother rabbits.

205 After describing the ultrastructure of pheromone producing cells, we showed that dry season mal

206 rsor, TAG, thus influencing PBAN-induced sex pheromone production and subsequent mating behavior.

207 lasticity might be an adaptation to minimize pheromone production costs during the stressful dry seas

208 elopmental plasticity and acclimatization in pheromone production in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana i

209 We hypothesized that if male pheromone production is costly, it should be reduced in

210 In highly social bees, queen mandibular pheromone (QMP) is vital for colony life.

211 he genetic basis of male response in the two pheromone races of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nub

212 1, CpomOR3 and CpomOR6a, which belong to the pheromone receptor (PR) lineage, and the co-receptor (Cp

213 A sex pheromone receptor BmOR1 is specifically tuned to bombyk

214 rst direct evidence that a member of the sex pheromone receptor family in moth species mediates consp

215 Engagement of pheromone receptors Map3 and Mam2 [3, 4] with their cogn

216 These proteins are cytoplasmic pheromone receptors sharing a structurally similar phero

217 HD1 and HD2) and B (pheromone precursors and pheromone receptors) mating genes in M. roreri.

218 o large families of biosynthetic enzymes and pheromone receptors, although the factors controlling th

219 oughs in the deorphanization of codling moth pheromone receptors, as well as more broadly into insect

220 ting zone show that the combination of local pheromone release and sensing, short pheromone decay len

221 with pathogenic bacteria leads to increased pheromone release, which attracts healthy flies.

222 reviously unexplored mechanism by which male pheromone response can change in evolution.

223 For the alarm pheromone response gene set, we found a particularly hig

224 ay, measurements of MAPK activity during the pheromone response have remained elusive, and our unders

225 Particularly, recent studies in the yeast pheromone response have shown how positive feedback gene

226 suggested a potential crosstalk between the pheromone response pathway and the target of rapamycin (

227 binding and signaling responses in the yeast pheromone response pathway, a well characterized G prote

228 ed honey bee genes associated with the alarm pheromone response shows overrepresentation of protein m

229 w of spatiotemporal MAPK activity during the pheromone response, elucidating its role in mediating co

230 ly expressed gene sets associated with alarm pheromone response, the difference between old and young

231 rgoes nuclear localization bursts during the pheromone response.

232 ed for persistent serotonergic modulation of pheromone responses in the antennal lobe.

233 We propose that the pheromone-responsive, conjugative plasmids of E. faecali

234 or O2 experience has opposite effects on the pheromone responsiveness of these neurons.

235 ty of the hermaphrodite response to the male pheromone, restricting it to situations in which the pre

236 iency with cells producing the S. cerevisiae pheromone, resulting in low fitness.

237 he discovered route with volatile chemicals (pheromones) secreted on the way back from the food depos

238 gesting that these are sub-cellular zones of pheromone secretion and signaling.

239 ude in another male's territory unless their pheromone-sensing is disabled.

240 of unc-1(dn) in RMG hub neurons, ADL or ASK pheromone-sensing neurons, or URX oxygen-sensing neurons

241 zed olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) in the pheromone sensitive long sensilla trichodea of male silk

242 he polyglutamine domain of Whi3 restored the pheromone sensitivity of old cells.

243 Previous studies identified a QTL for pheromone sensitivity that includes alternative alleles

244 4, a second chemoreceptor gene that modifies pheromone sensitivity.

245 gap-junctionally coupled to the ASK and ADL pheromone sensors that respectively drive pheromone attr

246 ' response and its genetic distance from the pheromone sequence source genome.

247 Thus, the pheromone should find immediate use in worldwide quarant

248 We provide evidence for a pheromone signal produced by C. elegans larvae that modi

249 The mechanisms by which a new pheromone signal-response system could evolve are enigma

250 eptide LL-37 result in modulated activity of pheromone signaling of the Rgg2/3 pathway through a mean

251 rylates and positively regulates Rga2 during pheromone signaling.

252 h multiple substrates to down-regulate yeast pheromone signaling.

253 Vibrio fischeri uses the AinS/AinR pheromone-signaling system to control bioluminescence an

254 In recent years, the chemical identities of pheromone signals that modulate dauer entry have been ch

255 Here, a sex-inducing pheromone (SIP(+)) of the benthic pennate diatom Seminav

256 Here we show that ascaroside pheromones, small glycolipids that signal population den

257 t cells, carrying mating type "a," to "alpha pheromone" stimulates polarized growth resulting in a "s

258 olomics measurements in yeast under salt and pheromone stimulation and developed a machine learning a

259 omponent H. halys aggregation pheromone, and pheromone synergist, methyl (2E, 4E, 6Z)-decatrienoate w

260 monitoring activity of the Rgg2/Rgg3 and SHP-pheromone system in GAS.

261 ontrolled by a complex, yet largely unknown, pheromone system.

262 scomycete fungi produce two types of peptide pheromones termed a and alpha.

263 however, they were less sensitive to mating pheromone than were young cells because of age-dependent

264 season males produced significantly less sex pheromones than wet season males, partly due to acclimat

265 um-sensing systems use extracellular peptide pheromones that are detected by cytoplasmic receptors to

266 Haploid yeast cells secrete mating pheromones that are sensed by the partner which responds

267 to 7% O2 are aroused by CO2 and repelled by pheromones that attract animals acclimated to 21% O2 Thi

268 of C. elegans differ in their sensitivity to pheromones that inhibit exploratory behavior.

269 use cuticular hydrocarbons as components of pheromones that mediate social behaviours, such as caste

270 transient period of competence, triggered by pheromones that they produce, secrete and sense under co

271 al for driving male courtship and identified pheromones that trigger such behaviors in activated fema

272 m species were used to characterize putative pheromones that were synthesized and found to be functio

273 rategies included the polarized secretion of pheromone, the presence of the alpha-factor protease Bar

274 When exposed to a high dose of mating pheromone, the yeast cell undergoes growth arrest and fo

275 exert strong stabilizing selection on female pheromone, these blends seem to have evolved rapidly, as

276 associated with the release of an attraction pheromone to a minimum.

277 particularly the 7-alkenes, in an insect sex pheromone to attract and elicit mating behavior in its p

278 mating types, a and alpha, which use peptide pheromones to communicate with each other during mating.

279 enorhabditis elegans secretes ascarosides as pheromones to communicate with other worms and to coordi

280 Both species use alarm pheromones to warn of dangers.

281 a use diffusible chemical messengers, termed pheromones, to coordinate gene expression and behavior a

282 indicators, we show that both vegetative and pheromone-treated yeast cells exhibit discrete and async

283 The C. elegans ascr#3 (asc-DeltaC9; C9) pheromone triggers avoidance behavior in adult hermaphro

284 or the perception of trisporic acids, mating pheromones unique to Mucoromycotina.

285 Insects communicate with pheromones using sensitive antennal sensilla.

286 provide a physiological correlate of altered pheromone valence.

287 ncreased Rgg2Sp sensitivity to pheromone and pheromone variants while displaying decreased sensitivit

288 tor subfamilies for bitter taste (TAS2R) and pheromones (Vomeronasal, VN1R) in the rhodopsin family,

289 owth inhibitory effect of F. oxysporum alpha-pheromone was independent of the cognate G protein-coupl

290 It could be chemical, such as a pheromone we detect by smell or taste, or it could be ta

291 orientation responses of adult males to sex pheromone were also significantly inhibited by these ter

292 olfactory responses to a food odorant and a pheromone were reduced to a similar degree by OSPW, agai

293 Animal CCDs (mostly insect pheromones) were usually more integrated than those of p

294 Harpegnathos saltator, the queen produces a pheromone which suppresses the development of workers' o

295 for farnesylated peptides, like the a-factor pheromone, which could potentially also transport farnes

296 -4-decanolide (RS) as component of their sex pheromone while only N. vitripennis (Nv), employs additi

297 The pheromone will also be a crucial tool in ongoing efforts

298 ius and pyogenic groups of streptococci, the pheromone XIP is sensed by the intra-cellular regulator

299 In response to pheromones, yeast cells activate a MAPK pathway to direc

300 and males often display with close-range sex pheromones, yet odor-based post-copulatory mate guarding