1  of 92% for distinguishing a calculus from a phlebolith.

2 that a suspicious calcification represents a phlebolith.

3 lical CT can help differentiate calculi from phleboliths.

4 s seen in eight (21%) calculi but not in any phleboliths.

5  the mean attenuation of calculi and that of phleboliths.

6                          Of the remaining 24 phleboliths, 17 (25%) were associated with a negative ta

7                                   Forty-five phleboliths (65%) were associated with a positive tail s

8  136 ureteral calculi (77%) and in 20 of 259 phleboliths (8%) and yielded a sensitivity of 77% and a

9                            Each calculus and phlebolith along the course of the ureter were evaluated

10 of 82; 95% CI: 96%, 100%) in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi.

11                                        Among phleboliths, none had a mean attenuation greater than 27

12 ication along the ureter was classified as a phlebolith or a ureteral calculus on the basis of clinic

13                                   Sixty-nine phleboliths were present in 35 patients.