ライフサイエンスコーパス: photograph

1 ndardized ETDRS severity scale (using fundus photographs).

2 individuals (91.1%) had at least 1 gradable photograph.

3 meter view similar to the standard published photograph.

4 posterior pole based on a standard published photograph.

5 r across viewing of dynamic videos and still photographs.

6 r extracting penguin information from aerial photographs.

7 retinopathy was graded using standard fundus photographs.

8 these entities were registered to UWF color photographs.

9 hemotherapy by unblinded patient review of 5 photographs.

10 ssessed optic disc progression in optic disc photographs.

11 3 clinicians of visual fields and optic disc photographs.

12 nt cases and presented online using text and photographs.

13 fluorescence not presenting with GA on color photographs.

14 ed concerns about pseudonym use or falsified photographs.

15 and diabetic macular edema in retinal fundus photographs.

16 elt represented the emotion expressed in the photographs.

17 with the existing model in which FPs assess photographs.

18 ified Wisconsin grading of 4-field mydriatic photographs.

19 using trained technicians to assess retinal photographs.

20 ssed via grading of color stereo film fundus photographs.

21 h and smiled more intensely and genuinely in photographs.

22 es and presented online using text and wound photographs.

23 a experts on masked evaluation of optic disc photographs.

24 8750 participants (94.0%) had gradable lens photographs.

25 ralized, blinded evaluations of standardized photographs.

26 AREDS system for classifying cataracts from photographs.

27 determined from graded, stereoscopic fundus photographs.

28 d agreement to those obtained using red-free photographs.

29 spite the lack of evidence other than fundus photographs.

30 follow-up DR severity were graded from ETDRS photographs.

31 acular degeneration was assessed from fundus photographs.

32 tic resonance (MR) images, illustrations and photographs.

33 validation compared with validation on test photographs.

34 d compared with the clinical and macroscopic photographs.

35 earch Institute, Singapore) from the retinal photographs.

36 m in-person dental examinations or intraoral photographs.

37 rson examination and those based on parental photographs.

38 pants annually using stereoscopic optic disc photographs.

39 rea of HEs in the digital colour fundus (CF) photographs.

40 ) underwent 5- and 10-year follow-up retinal photographs.

41 ticipants, 9978 (99.5%) had gradable retinal photographs.

42 zation with gradable DRSS on baseline fundus photographs.

43 nopathy (NPDR) to PDR based on graded fundus photographs, (2) panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), or (

44 E and CSME prevalences from monocular fundus photographs (28.5% and 21.0%, respectively) approximated

45 of stromal infiltrates measured on slit-lamp photographs 30 days after treatment.

46 Among 1165 participants with gradable photographs, 724 (62.1%) had retinal or subretinal hemor

47 cted in 68.4% versus 0.0% using color fundus photographs, 73.3% versus 9.1% using FAF images, and 84.

48 ources ratings of "scenicness" for geotagged photographs across Great Britain, in combination with da

49 tinal pathologies were observed in 55.6 % of photographs (age-related macular degeneration: 34.2 %; d

50 Aerial photographs allowed detection of dramatic geomorphic cha

51 orrect diagnoses in clinical scenarios where photographs alone were adequate, but when basic addition

52 case presented, first based on color fundus photographs alone, and then based on color fundus photog

53 Severity performs better in person than with photographs, an important consideration in the design of

54 A color photograph and B-scan ultrasound confirmed a 4.31 mm fre

55 ynamics requires ability to trap, observe or photograph and to recapture study individuals consistent

56 Two posterior fundus photographs and 1 anterior segment photograph were captu

57 Growth rate of GA was 1.45 mm(2) from color photographs and 1.43 mm(2) from FAF images.

58 Thirty-two sets (16 color fundus photographs and 16 color fundus photographs paired with

59 r of the macula was involved in 51% of color photographs and 56% with FAF images.

60 elated Maculopathy Grading System on retinal photographs and adjusted for age, sex, and the Y402H pol

61 Masked assessment of clinical photographs and analysis of 3-dimensional volumetric dat

62 Facial photographs and body odor samples were taken from the sa

63 graphs alone, and then based on color fundus photographs and corresponding FA images.

64 s alone versus interpreting the color fundus photographs and FA images was 47% (range, 35.3% to 59.3%

65 ssion of GA area is comparable between color photographs and FAF images, but evaluating involvement o

66 Digital color photographs and fluorescein angiograms at baseline and 1

67 rapy, including examination of RetCam fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms.

68 Digital fundus photographs and fluorescein angiography (FA) using the R

69 ework-level approach that inputs shape image photographs and genetic and environmental data, and then

70 Then, color fundus photographs and Humphrey Visual Field tests (HVF) of the

71 Based on the analysis of fundus photographs and HVF tests, 25% of these were misdiagnose

72 e in 28 (62%) of 45 cases using color fundus photographs and in 31 (69%) of 45 cases using FA images.

73 ed segmentation of live corals in coral reef photographs and juvenile coral surveys.

74 rule is only valid for about a third of disc photographs and less than half of RNFL measurements in n

75 gy, emergency medicine, and physiatry, using photographs and live patient assessments.

76 udy of DME grading based on monocular fundus photographs and OCT images obtained from patients with d

77 ma suspect) of 99 patients with stereoscopic photographs and OCT scans of the optic discs taken durin

78 oup 1 had preoperative and postoperative ONH photographs and OCT; Group 2 had preoperative clinical O

79 the stenotic lacrimal punctum with infrared photographs and optical coherence tomography (OCT) and t

80 940s, assessed using newly discovered aerial photographs and remotely sensed imagery.

81 uding color, red-free autofluorescent fundus photographs and spectral-domain optical coherence tomogr

82 that could be geolocalized, and used retinal photographs and standardized grading classifications, we

83 condary outcomes included the quality of the photographs and the agreement between surgeons and CHWs

84 photographs compared with using color fundus photographs and the corresponding FA images.

85 Here we combine historical data with aerial photographs and tree-ring records to reconstruct the evo

86 Comparisons of fundus photographs and ultrasound measurements were performed t

87 Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) photographs and UWF images were obtained.

88 lesions were graded from stereoscopic color photographs and were classified according to the AREDS s

89 or other covariates or had ungradable fundus photographs and were excluded, leaving 9481 participants

90 masked grading of stereoscopic color fundus photographs), and NEI-VFQ-25 subscale scores.

91 Participants were examined and photographed, and IVCM was performed.

92 ied from in-person dental exams or intraoral photographs, and case-control differences were tested us

93 Best-corrected visual acuity, fundus photographs, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomog

94 Facial photographs annotated with automated measurements of eye

95 Photographs are invaluable dermatologic diagnostic, mana

96 set of 20 live patient scars with associated photographs, as well as a separate set of 60 photographs

97 Plates were photographed at 72 hours and custom software measured ba

98 ds were defined and AKs counted, mapped, and photographed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 9 months.

99 ssion of lens opacities on stereoscopic lens photographs at 2 years, cataract surgery, and visual acu

100 lated macular degeneration (AMD) using color photographs at annual visits over a 5-year study period.

101 Concordance between photograph-based vs in-person diagnosis in the intervent

102 6 [5.23] years), overall concordance between photograph-based vs in-person diagnosis was 83% (95% CI,

103 Each maxillary anterior area was photographed before and 3 months after treatment.

104 Lesions were photographed before and after staining.

105 nt of retinal pathologies observed on fundus photographs between an ophthalmologist and two-mid level

106 ttings: one that utilized scoring of 60 test photographs by 10 dermatologists, and one with in-person

107 sis, determined from the diagnosis of fundus photographs by 3 experienced readers in combination with

108 mined from the diagnosis of the color fundus photographs by 3 experienced readers in combination with

109 e AMD was determined from enrollment retinal photographs by graders at a centralized Reading Center,

110 MD (AREDS stage 3) was determined from these photographs by graders at a centralized Reading Center,

111 Photographs by Oystein Paulsen (left), and Institute of

112 'The dress' is a peculiar photograph: by themselves the dress' pixels are brown an

113 combination of questions and representative photographs can ascertain cases of CLE with high sensiti

114 researchers used standardized techniques to photograph case and control participant outdoor location

115 e, fundus autofluorescence, and color fundus photographs (CFP).

116 Diagnosis by the mosaic photographs compared with diagnosis by multiple individu

117 ce in zone diagnosis when using color fundus photographs compared with using color fundus photographs

118 With use of the kappa statistic, mosaic photographs, compared with multiple individual photograp

119 Review of charts and photographs comprised best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA

120 Relevance: Compared with multiple individual photographs, computer-generated mosaic photographs were

121 mined clinical notes, pathology reports, and photographs, confirming diagnoses via predetermined crit

122 0.88) in a subgroup of 37 participants with photographs considered of high enough quality to make a

123 the presence and size of GA in digital color photographs (CPs) and fluorescein angiograms (FAs) taken

124 sive eye examination in which dilated fundus photographs (disc and macula centered) were obtained and

125 t Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) 7-field photographs (ETDRS photos).

126 After viewing the mosaic photographs, experts altered their choice of management

127 e analysis of high-resolution digital facial photographs, facial pigmented spots were quantified as t

128 center staff evaluated digital color fundus photographs, fluorescein angiography (FA) images, and op

129 ine and follow-up morphology in color fundus photographs, fluorescein angiography (FA), and optical c

130 procedure, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, fundus photographs, fluorescein angiography, and optical cohere

131 Data gathering included fundus color photographs, fluorescein angiography, spectral-domain op

132 eriolar equivalent adjusting for refraction, photograph focus, age, systolic blood pressure, height,

133 variant rules, with 70.9% and 76.4% of disc photographs following the IST rule and the IS rule, resp

134 ects, 2877 (28.7%) had diabetes and gradable photographs for analysis.

135 ions obtained from patients and in obtaining photographs for presentations.

136 Ps and the ophthalmologist in grading fundus photographs for retinal hemorrhages and maculopathy.

137 Trained readers evaluated photographs for the presence and size of retinal or subr

138 sked ophthalmologists independently examined photographs from 100 participants and assessed clinical

139 A total of 3042 photographs from 281 participants randomized to apply to

140 ng [BOP], and clinical attachment level) and photographs from 53 participants (26 males and 27 female

141 Fundus photographs from 7 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy

142 Six examiners assessed photographs from a subset of 100 consecutive participant

143 evance: In this evaluation of retinal fundus photographs from adults with diabetes, an algorithm base

144 We used retinal photographs from the DCCT/EDIC study to develop a ration

145 ing side-by-side comparisons of color fundus photographs from the initial and final visit as remainin

146 After viewing vivid photographs from two categories (famous faces and places

147 Color fundus photographs, fundus autofluorescence, and spectral-domai

148 oxidized low-density lipoprotein and fundus photographs gradable for diabetic retinopathy and macula

149 classification system based on color fundus photographs graded by experienced and masked evaluators.

150 ted macular degeneration according to fundus photographs graded using a modified Wisconsin Age-Relate

151 Diabetic retinopathy was based on fundus photograph grading, using the Early Treatment Diabetic R

152 assessed by annual masked centralized fundus photograph grading.

153 iagnoses that are reliant on parent-provided photographs has not been formally compared with diagnose

154 s not having DME or CSME on monocular fundus photographs have DME on OCT.

155 ed as having DME or CSME on monocular fundus photographs have no DME based on OCT CST, while many eye

156 to care much more after having seen Aylan's photograph; however, this newly created empathy waned ra

157 nd 1643 indigenous) participants had retinal photographs in at least 1 eye that were gradable for AMD

158 To assess the reliability of using photographs in lieu of live patient scar rating assessme

159 was 54% (interquartile range, 51%-56%) from photographs in which prevalence was 32%.

160 related features visible on SD OCT and color photographs, including drusen volume, geographic atrophy

161 Landcover change in aerial photographs indicates that E. umbellata expanded aggress

162 tion (slit lamp), Amsler chart, color fundus photographs, infrared reflectance, red-free images and b

163 Adult smokers (n=40) photographed locations personally associated with smokin

164 lls were also counted in magnified slit beam photographs masked to molecular diagnosis when obtainabl

165 ng scale for postoperative linear scars, and photographs may reliably be used in lieu of live patient

166 In the photograph: Michael Polanyi at the Fritz Haber Institute

167 Fundus photographs, near infrared reflectance and enhanced dept

168 ions and multimodal imaging, including color photographs, near-infrared reflectance, fluorescein angi

169 ing techniques, including color and red-free photographs, near-infrared reflectance, fluorescein angi

170 ndardized, high-resolution retroillumination photographs obtained annually for the first 5 postoperat

171 Retinal emboli were ascertained from retinal photographs obtained from both eyes of all participants

172 ading algorithm can be used to screen fundus photographs obtained from diabetic patients and to ident

173 ng in 1878 of a horse in motion and the 1887 photograph of a supersonic bullet.

174 nnaire, obtaining GPS data, and submitting a photograph of an incision.

175 Photographs of 12 ethnically diverse models (black, whit

176 dardized grading of macular SD OCT scans and photographs of 3 standard fields.

177 e area was quantified digitally using facial photographs of 3,831 northwestern Europeans (51-98 years

178 CF photographs of 30 eyes (20 patients) with diabetic macul

179 Fundus photographs of 500 eyes of 500 subjects were assessed.

180 is multicenter study, 260 wide-field digital photographs of 52 patients were presented to 7 recognize

181 On September 2, 2015, photographs of a young Syrian child, Aylan Kurdi, lying

182 We showed twelve professional jazz pianists photographs of an actress representing a positive, negat

183 Baseline and annual lens photographs of AREDS participants (n = 3466/4757; 73%) w

184 , fast amygdala responses were not evoked by photographs of arousing scenes, which is indicative of s

185 Phenotypical features on fundus photographs of both eyes of patients were graded by 2 in

186 full-body physical examination, and clinical photographs of cutaneous lesions were obtained.

187 art, retinal pathology images, and external photographs of eye diseases.

188 s in a pattern consistent with how they view photographs of faces [13].

189 e and healthy control subjects while viewing photographs of food and nonfood objects.

190 nd 29.4% reported not incorporating clinical photographs of lesions sampled for biopsy in the medical

191 ence task [11, 12], monkeys looked longer at photographs of objects that elicited face pareidolia in

192 We reviewed the clinical photographs of patients with Behcet uveitis (n = 259), o

193 To assess whether smartphone photographs of pediatric skin conditions taken by parent

194 Mate-seekers rapidly flipped through photographs of potential sexual/date partners, selecting

195 d face pareidolia in human observers than at photographs of similar objects that did not elicit illus

196 re is replete with descriptions of obtaining photographs of skin disease, but universal imaging stand

197 Stereoscopic disc photographs of subjects with and without glaucomatous op

198 Macroscopic photographs of the enucleated eyes of patients with reti

199 were 40 years and older with gradable fundus photographs of the Fourth and the Fifth Korea National H

200 Retinal photographs of the macula were acquired digitally and ev

201 Fundus photographs of the remaining eyes showed that 18/47 eyes

202 -life (but unknown) candidates based only on photographs of their faces.

203 at horses spontaneously discriminate between photographs of unknown conspecifics portraying different

204 >/=3 fields and 20 computer-generated mosaic photographs) of wide-angle retinal images from infants w

205 o winter in West Africa; this adult male was photographed on migration near Gibraltar.

206 otential effect of computer-generated mosaic photographs on the diagnosis and management of ROP.

207 Prevalence of DME based on monocular fundus photographs or OCT.

208 nance and concern that eye trauma might make photographs or videos less conclusive.

209 ures and showed strikingly different ways of photographing other people.

210 color fundus photographs and 16 color fundus photographs paired with the corresponding FA images) of

211 hs were examined in alternating blocks of 70 photograph pairs for each method, with the starting view

212 Twenty photograph pairs from each group were duplicated to dete

213 o 45 degrees nonstereoscopic retinal digital photographs per eye according to RETINODIAB protocol.

214 In the photograph: Polanyi in 1931.

215 ans and by independent evaluation of retinal photographs provided by the physicians.

216 ts were used to assess the agreement between photograph reading and OCT in estimating CDR.

217 uted significantly larger VCDR and HCDR than photograph reading before and after stratifying eyes bas

218 OCT and photograph reading by clinicians agree poorly in CDR ass

219 (BMO) algorithm and stereoscopic optic disc photograph readings by glaucoma specialists.

220 Sickness status presented by odor and facial photograph resulted in increased neural activation of od

221 mpared with diagnosis by multiple individual photographs resulted in improvements in sensitivity for

222 otographs, compared with multiple individual photographs, resulted in improvements in intergrader agr

223 he ISNT rule is only valid for 37.0% of disc photograph rim assessments and 43.8% of RNFL measurement

224 o interacting actors and (2) visually varied photographs selected from the internet involving differe

225 participants take, share, and evaluate self-photographs ("selfies"), we show that, paradoxically, th

226 a brief interaction or exposure to a static photograph, single persons have very little time to make

227 We use aerial photographs spanning a 51-year period to compare shrub c

228 point Committee in the OHTS, and 50 more had photographs taken a few minutes apart, which were negati

229 Wound healing was assessed using serial photographs taken at 3, 6, and 12 months after grafting.

230 only which in turn will reduce the number of photographs taken at a given time.

231 Standardized digital frontal occlusion photographs taken before and at least 1 year after AOT w

232 nter's selected stimuli, which are generally photographs taken by people without autism.

233 assessed from grading of stereoscopic fundus photographs taken in 2001-2004.

234 pants relived their own experiences, cued by photographs taken with a custom lifelogging device.

235 e of a notch or disc hemorrhage) from fundus photographs taken with a nonmydriatic portable camera an

236 ding FDT perimetry screening, and had fundus photographs taken.

237 t-lamp examinations, and stereoscopic fundus photographs that were centrally graded for development o

238 d particle size distribution of wheat flour, photographed the scattered flour for 60 seconds every 10

239 The phone camera then photographs the capillary tube and analyzes the color co

240 In a clinical photograph, the lowest point of the interdental contact

241 bretinal hemorrhage detected on 1- or 2-year photographs; these hemorrhages were not associated with

242 We captured mosaic fundus photographs through a dilated pupil using a digital fund

243 therapy based on epidemiologic surveys using photographs to diagnose DME.

244 iating with one trawler and some individuals photographed up to seven times over 12 capture periods.

245 nt macular edema (CSME), on monocular fundus photographs used definitions from the Multi-Ethnic Study

246 s, 2 independent dermatologists graded these photographs using 4 validated photonumeric scales.

247 3-step instruction sheet on how best to take photographs using a smartphone (intervention group); the

248 GR area (GRA), was measured in standardized photographs using a special device and software.

249 diagnosed as having DME on monocular fundus photographs using MESA and NHANES definitions, respectiv

250 aving either DME or CSME on monocular fundus photographs using MESA and NHANES definitions, respectiv

251 AMD was diagnosed based on fundus photographs using the Rotterdam Classification.

252 A single photograph was assessed for each patient's scar.

253 Based on stereoscopic fundus photographs, we evaluated diabetic macular edema (DME) p

254 Diagnoses of glaucoma by disc photograph were 1.6% (3 of 180) in the CDR less than 0.6

255 or fundus photographs and 1 anterior segment photograph were captured per eye in each participant, us

256 d stereoscopic 35mm 30 degrees 7-field color photographs were acquired on the same visit.

257 Baseline and annual stereoscopic fundus photographs were assessed centrally by masked graders fo

258 idual photographs, computer-generated mosaic photographs were associated with improved accuracy of im

259 Gradable fundus photographs were available for 1809 participants who att

260 derwent photography by all 3 modalities, and photographs were evaluated by 2 retina specialists.

261 Photographs were examined in alternating blocks of 70 ph

262 The SCAR scale ratings using photographs were found to be largely equivalent to live

263 Fundus photographs were gradable for 665 (90.4%) of these parti

264 Photographs were graded centrally for retinopathy severi

265 Baseline and annual lens photographs were graded centrally.

266 Fundus photographs were graded for drusen and retinal pigment e

267 At follow-up, digital macular color photographs were graded for early, intermediate, and lat

268 Fundus photographs were graded for the presence or absence of A

269 The macula-centered 45-degree photographs were graded twice by one ophthalmologist and

270 Retinal photographs were graded using the modified Airlie House

271 Fundus photographs were graded using the Wisconsin AMD grading

272 sed on MESA definitions for monocular fundus photographs were greater than the DME prevalence based o

273 nt refraction, and digital retroillumination photographs were obtained 1 month and 1 year after surge

274 Follow-up ETDRS photographs were obtained 4.2+/-0.3 years after baseline

275 Color retinal photographs were obtained and comprehensive questionnair

276 Color retinal fundus photographs were obtained at each examination.

277 Nonmydriatic fundus photographs were obtained of each eye and graded accordi

278 Optic disc photographs were read by 2 masked glaucoma specialists f

279 A subset of optic nerve photographs were regraded by 3 glaucoma specialists in D

280 Fundus photographs were reviewed to assess the presence of a ye

281 A total of 9395 stereoscopic disc photographs were reviewed.

282 selected for further analysis, and clinical photographs were reviewed.

283 Bilateral, 7-field fundus photographs were scored by masked readers for diabetic r

284 High quality photographs were submitted for 101 of 117 visits (86.3%)

285 Photographs were taken at baseline and at numerous time

286 mals corneal opacity was studied and digital photographs were taken at day 7 before doing euthanasia.

287 Wound photographs were taken for a double-masked clinical asse

288 Digital iris photographs were taken from eyes of each participant and

289 Digital lens photographs were taken from eyes of each participant and

290 cal measurements, radiographs, and intraoral photographs were taken over prescribed time points.

291 e ocular evaluation was conducted and fundus photographs were taken to measure the size of the subhya

292 Color retinal photographs were taken, and comprehensive questionnaires

293 in up to 4 subsequent examinations, retinal photographs were taken.

294 Retinal photographs, were graded for the presence and severity o

295 photographs, as well as a separate set of 60 photographs, were rated; 10 patients were assessed twice

296 eted 40 sets (20 sets with individual fundus photographs with >/=3 fields and 20 computer-generated m

297 ice and was documented by clinical score and photographs with a slit lamp.

298 Comparison of fundus photographs with fluorescein angiograms showed that in 1

299 nts with diabetes received retinal screening photographs with remote expert interpretation to determi

300 to receive instructions on how best to take photographs with smartphones.