ライフサイエンスコーパス: photography

1 CT, pseudocolor, and autofluorescence fundus photography.

2 y (OCT), fundus autofluorescence, and fundus photography.

3 objective refraction and stereoscopic fundus photography.

4 for the presence or absence of AMD by fundus photography.

5 Presence or absence of AMD by fundus photography.

6 he standard method, 7-field mydriatic fundus photography.

7 posterior segments, lens grading and fundus photography.

8 tical coherence tomography (OCT), and fundus photography.

9 nular deep retinal whitening on color fundus photography.

10 ed a mean 1.50x the area captured by montage photography.

11 mplished via the examination of recreational photography.

12 unlight exposure, and diet; underwent fundus photography.

13 ted off and mounted on microscope slides for photography.

14 el detection of leukocoria from recreational photography.

15 metry, visual acuity measurement, and fundus photography.

16 isual field testing, and stereoscopic fundus photography.

17 cantly more prominent than changes on fundus photography.

18 xamination, intraocular pressure, and fundus photography.

19 on by an ophthalmologist and digital retinal photography.

20 l photocoagulation (FP) compared with fundus photography.

21 articipants, which were not seen with fundus photography.

22 systemic and ocular examinations and retinal photography.

23 mated perimetry, and stereoscopic optic disc photography.

24 ld electroretinography (ffERG), OCT, and FAF photography.

25 Flaps were followed by serial photography.

26 ), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and fundus photography.

27 e performed annual examinations with retinal photography.

28 ungradable and 6 eyes did not complete ETDRS photography.

29 rved on clinical examination or color fundus photography.

30 ible on clinical examination or color fundus photography.

31 cence shifts, which were recorded by digital photography.

32 an eye examination and digital retinal color photography.

33 SD OCT, near-infrared reflectance, and color photography.

34 and compared censusing techniques to ground photography.

35 and chronic, underwent OCTA and color fundus photography.

36 mated visual field testing; and fundus color photography.

37 images on par with standard mydriatic fundus photography.

38 digital dermoscopy in addition to total-body photography.

39 ocular examination, including dilated fundus photography.

40 applanation tonometry, gonioscopy and fundus photography.

41 Time-lapse microscopic-photography allows in-depth phenotyping of microorganism

42 Compared with color fundus photography alone, FA may improve the sensitivity of dia

43 AMD than can be detected using color fundus photography alone.

44 Retroillumination photography analyses were suggestive of mild severity wh

45 lopathy Staging system based on color fundus photography and a masked grader.

46 ent an examination under anesthesia in which photography and AS-OCT were performed.

47 the basis of ocular examinations and fundus photography and categorized as control (n = 221), interm

48 Retinal photography and clinical examinations were performed dur

49 Disease progress was recorded by digital photography and clinical scoring, cytokine levels were d

50 Overview back photography and dermoscopic imaging of up to 4 index bac

51 n electrochemical potential using high-speed photography and digital image correlation.

52 tabases were performed in January 2013 using photography and digital imaging, standardization, and me

53 images compare favorably with dilated ETDRS photography and dilated fundus examination in determinin

54 e assessed by masked grading of color fundus photography and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Stu

55 resolution landcover map derived from aerial photography and eddy covariance.

56 ete ophthalmic evaluation, with fundus color photography and enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain o

57 Color fundus photography and fluorescein angiography (FA) images were

58 Masked readers graded scar and GA on fundus photography and fluorescein angiography and graded SHRM

59 status using standard 7-field stereo fundus photography and fluorescein angiography, respectively.

60 ted by repeated ophthalmoscopy, color fundus photography and fluorescein fundus angiography, before a

61 enrolled in the study (n = 2691) had fundus photography and genotyping of single nucleotide polymorp

62 Diabetic retinopathy was assessed by fundus photography and graded using modified Airlie House class

63 ns consisted of ocular examination with lens photography and grading; medical history; and measuremen

64 Subjects completed retinal photography and had vCDR determined in both eyes, with v

65 at the time of clinical examination, fundus photography and Heidelberg Retinal Tomography.

66 Aerial photography and high resolution satellites can capture s

67 Fundus photography and histology were performed as well.

68 d (ONH) and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) photography and imaging with Scanning Laser Ophthalmosco

69 All eyes had stereoscopic optic disc photography and in vivo LC imaging using enhanced depth

70 Fundus photography and indirect ophthalmoscopy.

71 Fundus photography and macular spectral-domain optical coherenc

72 olor and pattern perception, we used digital photography and models of bird vision to quantify egg pa

73 tics, visual acuity, morphologic features on photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT), and

74 ind and might allow the model to accommodate photography and painting.

75 egree of staining was visually documented by photography and quantitatively determined by extraction

76 An intercomparison between the aerial photography and satellite remote sensing demonstrated th

77 ically confirmed RAH were imaged with fundus photography and SD OCT.

78 All eyes underwent color fundus photography and spectral-domain OCT examination comprisi

79 These patients had all undergone fundus photography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomogr

80 fore to capture such data using aerial night photography and to undertake a case study of urban light

81 istics that indicated AMD revealed by fundus photography and trained raters.

82 d ciliary body cysts with high-quality color photography and ultrasound biomicroscopy.

83 structure-function relationship using fundus photography and visual field sensitivity are examined.

84 ography, fluorescein angiography, and fundus photography) and therapeutic interventions (argon laser

85 hone fundus photography, nonmydriatic fundus photography, and 7-field mydriatic fundus photography fo

86 ity, hepatic ultrasonography, retinal fundus photography, and an analysis of heart rate variability.

87 velopment of optical systems for microscopy, photography, and computer vision.

88 degree and 200-degree imaging, dilated ETDRS photography, and dilated fundus examination by a retina

89 Fundus photography, and electroretinography were performed in 1

90 intraocular pressure (IOP) tonometry, fundus photography, and electroretinography were performed over

91 best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus photography, and FAF imaging by confocal scanning laser

92 including dilated fundus examination, fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography (FA).

93 s determined by clinical examination, fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography.

94 oherence tomography, wide-field color fundus photography, and fluorescein angiography.

95 as evaluated by clinical examination, fundus photography, and fundus autofluorescence imaging, and vi

96 cluded logMAR visual acuity, digital retinal photography, and grading of images at Moorfields Eye Hos

97 ve systemic and ocular examinations, retinal photography, and laboratory investigations for all parti

98 complete ophthalmologic examination, fundus photography, and multimodal fundus imaging, including Fo

99 ed with Placido-ring topography, Scheimpflug photography, and OCT on the day of their surgery.

100 ndirect ophthalmoscopy, digital color fundus photography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

101 man spectroscopy, stereoscopic colour fundus photography, and serum sampling were performed every 6 m

102 underwent standardized refraction and fundus photography, and SiMES and SINDI subjects also completed

103 examination, fluorescein angiography, fundus photography, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomog

104 Case notes, digital fundus photography, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomog

105 e evaluated by fundus examination and fundus photography, and the abnormal retinal function observed

106 ion was mapped with infrared image and color photography, and the characteristics of the retina and o

107 ical coherence tomography (OCT), Scheimpflug photography, and the scanning peripheral anterior chambe

108 VF testing, quantitative imaging, optic disc photography, and tonometry at 11 visits.

109 g laser ophthalmoscopy, nonmydriatic digital photography, and tonometry on 429 participants.

110 underwent visual acuity examination, fundus photography, and visual field testing with screening fre

111 l acuity, 30-2 Humphrey visual field, fundus photography, and wide-field SD-OCT, a montage technique

112 Smartphone and nonmydriatic fundus photography are each able to detect DR and sight-threate

113 ) and whole-mount sectioning with block-face photography as intermediate steps.

114 ed by vital microscopy combined with digital photography at specified times.

115 rosis Risk in Communities) underwent retinal photography at visit 3 (1993-1995).

116 infrared reflectance (NIR), and color fundus photography, at baseline and every follow-up visit.

117 tions included eye examination, color fundus photography, autofluorescence imaging, spectral-domain o

118 dergoing major advances including wide-field photography, autofluorescence, and high-resolution optic

119 imaging with B-scan ultrasonography, fundus photography, autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography (

120 view and multimodal imaging including fundus photography, autofluorescence, infrared reflectance, ult

121 POAG was defined as repeatable visual field, photography-based optic disc changes, or both.

122 An automated, photography-based system could provide an archival and h

123 rehensive history, slitlamp examination, and photography before excision biopsy.

124 Advances in smartphone photography (both quality and image transmission) may im

125 Patients underwent photography by all 3 modalities, and photographs were ev

126 Nonmydriatic fundus photography by non-ophthalmic-trained personnel has rece

127 Parent-operated smartphone photography can accurately be used as a method to provid

128 Results suggest that recreational photography can be used in combination with the fusion o

129 biomicroscopy, noncontact tonometry, fundus photography, central corneal thickness measurement, and

130 ed Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) color fundus photography (CFP) grading.

131 ssion of atrophy should include color fundus photography (CFP), confocal fundus autofluorescence (FAF

132 Spectral-domain OCT, color fundus photography (CFP), near-infrared reflectance, and fundus

133 ndus autofluorescence (FAF) and color fundus photography (CFP).

134 Case notes and retinal imaging (color fundus photography [CFP], spectral-domain [SD] optical coherenc

135 ries of canopy greenness from repeat digital photography, citizen science data from the USA National

136 itivity and specificity of smartphone fundus photography, compared with 7-field mydriatic fundus phot

137 pearance of geographic atrophy (GA) on color photography (CP) is preceded by specific features on spe

138 Compressed ultrafast photography (CUP), a computational imaging technique, is

139 amic imaging technique, compressed ultrafast photography (CUP), which can capture non-repetitive time

140 Furthermore, akin to traditional photography, CUP is receive-only, and so does not need t

141 goscelis adeliae) population based on aerial photography data.

142 Ophthalmologic examination, color fundus photography, detailed electrophysiological assessment, a

143 Photography detected retinal changes in 11 of 12 patient

144 Addition of FA to color fundus photography did not affect intergrader agreement signifi

145 Success of photography did not differ between right and left eye.

146 recruitment of EPC were assessed with serial photography, DiI perfusion, confocal microscopy, and imm

147 istochemistry, Western blot analysis, fundus photography, electron microscopy, and in vitro phagocyto

148 d visual acuity, biomicroscopy, color fundus photography, electroretinography analysis, and visual-ev

149 (CMOS) technology revolutionized high-speed photography, enabling acquisition rates of up to 10(7) f

150 her odds of an AMD diagnosis based on fundus photography evaluation compared with those not self-repo

151 s had the AMD grade assigned based on fundus photography, examination, or both.

152 apparent lesion on color and red-free fundus photography, FAF, or SD OCT.

153 Multimodal imaging, including fundus photography, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiograp

154 operative visual acuity measurements, fundus photography, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiograp

155 almologic examination including color fundus photography, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiograp

156 nation, including visual acuity (VA), fundus photography, fluorescein angiography (FA), fundus autofl

157 ual acuity (VA), Amsler grid testing, fundus photography, fluorescein angiography (FA), spectral-doma

158 d clinical evaluation, which included fundus photography, fluorescein angiography and ICGA.

159 based on clinical examination, color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and optical cohere

160 dus images for each patient, including color photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluores

161 t imaging techniques, including color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluores

162 Multimethod imaging comprised color photography, fluorescein angiography, fundus autofluores

163 e imaging with various combinations of color photography, fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green

164 h-resolution digital color imaging, red-free photography, fluorescein angiography, near-infrared refl

165 ultimodal imaging findings, including fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, spectral-domain op

166 or 2 diabetes underwent nonmydriatic fundus photography for a diabetic retinopathy screening examina

167 n uveitis, OCT is more sensitive than fundus photography for identification of ERM.

168 ormation exists regarding the role of mosaic photography for ROP telemedicine diagnosis.

169 miological studies rely on monoscopic fundus photography for the detection of clinically significant

170 itivity and specificity of smartphone fundus photography for the detection of vision-threatening DR w

171 us photography, and 7-field mydriatic fundus photography for their abilities to detect and grade diab

172 aphy, compared with 7-field mydriatic fundus photography, for the detection of any DR were 50% (95% c

173 trends in visual field (VF) testing, fundus photography (FP), and other ocular imaging (OOI) testing

174 , fluorescein angiography (FA), color fundus photography (FP), and VA testing were performed periodic

175 ound using electroretinography (ERG), fundus photography (FP), fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA),

176 underwent visual field (VF) testing, fundus photography (FP), other ocular imaging (OOI), or none of

177 tellite imagery from 1973 onwards and aerial photography from 1947 onwards.

178 landscapes by comparing very high-resolution photography from the Cold War-era 'Gambit' and 'Corona'

179 meras may transform the central challenge of photography from the question of where to point the came

180 rected visual acuity, ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, full-field electroretinography (ffERG), Gol

181 ted ophthalmologic examination, color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, spec

182 Detailed ophthalmologic examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, spec

183 almic examination together with color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), and spectral

184 visual acuity (BCVA), ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein

185 sting, indirect ophthalmoscopy, color fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), high-resolut

186 complete ophthalmologic examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), infrared ima

187 imaging including color and red-free fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), near-infrare

188 uding full-field electroretinography, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, and optica

189 characterized clinically by wide-field color photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, and spectr

190 copy, dilated fundus examination, wide-field photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, sedated el

191 cluded bilateral color fundus and optic disc photography, fundus autofluorescence, automated perimetr

192 acuity, color vision, ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, Goldmann perimetry, and full-field standard

193 ants underwent dilated stereo-digital fundus photography graded according to the International Classi

194 xaminations, automated perimetry, and fundus photography grading.

195 5 studies demonstrating that digital retinal photography has high accuracy for detection of clinicall

196 Nonmydriatic ocular fundus photography has notable advantages over direct ophthalmo

197 Wide-angle digital retinal photography has the potential to complement standard ROP

198 d adults were similar between UAV and ground photography, however the UAV detected up to 52.4% more c

199 ed to be normal based on conventional fundus photography, IIN is postulated to arise from abnormal co

200 imal mydriasis, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and photography, imaging of the anterior capsule and zonules

201 was more sensitive than nonmydriatic retinal photography in our asymptomatic individuals.

202 orn screening via wide-angle digital retinal photography in the Newborn Eye Screen Test study.

203 acuity, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and fundus photography, including fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and

204 rom clinical history and examination, fundus photography, infrared imaging, fundus autofluorescence,

205 All subjects underwent color fundus photography, infrared reflectance, red-free reflectance,

206 g techniques that included 35 degrees fundus photography, infrared, fundus autofluorescence (FAF), an

207 modalities: color and red-free fundus camera photography; infrared reflectance scanning laser ophthal

208 No statistically significant effect of photography instructions on concordance was detected (gr

209 were blinded to whether parents had received photography instructions.

210 essful implementation of nonmydriatic fundus photography into the ED.

211 Nonmydriatic ocular fundus photography is more sensitive than direct ophthalmoscopy

212 tions ranging from mirrors to eyeglasses and photography lenses.

213 cluded a full ophthalmic examination, fundus photography, macular spectral-domain optical coherence t

214 cluded a full ophthalmic examination, fundus photography, macular spectral-domain optical coherence t

215 g availability of nonmydriatic ocular fundus photography may allow replacement of direct ophthalmosco

216 d of ocular examination with lens and fundus photography, medical history, measurements of blood pres

217 CSME by the following 2 stereoscopic fundus photography (method 1) and dilated biomicroscopy in comb

218 is was a prospective, comparative study of 3 photography modalities.

219 Based on ETDRS photography (n = 200), the results were as follows: no D

220 indirect ophthalmoscopy (n = 44) and fundus photography (n = 29).

221 Patients underwent color fundus photography, near-infrared (NIR) imaging, fundus autoflu

222 sive multimodal imaging that included fundus photography, near-infrared reflectance, blue autofluores

223 d the ability of UWFI vs nonmydriatic fundus photography (NMFP) to detect nondiabetic retinal finding

224 We compared smartphone fundus photography, nonmydriatic fundus photography, and 7-fiel

225 ultrawide field 100-degree imaging and ETDRS photography occurred in 84%, with agreement within 1 lev

226 Fundus photography, OCT, fluorescein angiography (FA), and OCT

227 acular edema, as well as stereoscopic fundus photography of 7 standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retin

228 eye examinations, including detailed retinal photography of both eyes.

229 el predictions and (ii) using repeat digital photography of forest canopies that observe and integrat

230 D patients, we carried out three-dimensional photography of patient faces and analysed these using de

231 Fundus photography, optical coherence tomography and fundus flu

232 disc examination, visual fields, stereo disc photography, optical coherence tomography, and measureme

233 c nerve imaging-particularly retinal digital photography, optical coherence tomography, and MRI techn

234 follow-up, the animal eyes underwent fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, and multifoca

235 Clinical investigations included fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, fundus autofl

236 2)/year), assessed primarily by color fundus photography or fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging.

237 ase was determined by ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, or SD OCT.

238 Noncontact imaging using OCT, Scheimpflug photography, or SPAC makes these methods more attractive

239 ime was less than half that of dilated ETDRS photography (P < .0001).

240 e commonly with IR-SLO imaging than in color photography (P = .014) and ribbon pseudodrusen were seen

241 ost-LASIK change in MRx and both Scheimpflug photography (P = 0.714) and OCT (P = 0.216).

242 n, conjunctival ultraviolet autofluorescence photography, participant questionnaire.

243 ciduous forest model based on repeat digital photography performed comparably to the upscaled species

244 Fundus imaging included color photography, red-free imaging, blue autofluorescence ima

245 cognized classifications systems with fundus photography reported the lowest prevalences of AMD takin

246 Addition of FA to color fundus photography resulted in a significant improvement in sen

247 It is likely that OCT will be added to photography screening for chorioretinal diseases in the

248 It is likely that OCT will be added to photography screening in the near future for chorioretin

249 pa statistic, addition of FA to color fundus photography significantly improved intergrader agreement

250 ed to lift off heated surfaces by high speed photography similar to the Leidenfrost effect in hot, vo

251 ical coherence tomography (OCT) and slitlamp photography (SLP) with fluorescein staining.

252 Here, we employed fundus photography, spectral domain optical coherence tomograph

253 Review of ophthalmic studies (fundus photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomograph

254 Digital fundus photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomograph

255 atient satisfaction questionnaires, clinical photography, subjective clinical improvement, light micr

256 Photography success was classified as "complete" if both

257 ocated at near-surface layers (undetected by photography techniques) were unveiled in detail by LF BS

258 andards for specific-use cases in total body photography, teledermatology, and dermoscopy are describ

259 uorescence emission is detected using simple photography through an orange filter.

260 The use of wide-angle digital retinal photography to detect clinically significant ROP has bee

261 phthalmologists was supplemented with fundus photography to determine the proportion of eyes with var

262 We use time-lapse photography to investigate how fire ants S. invicta link

263 le with diabetes aged 12 or over for retinal photography to screen for the presence of diabetic retin

264 Indirect ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, ultrasonography, and ultrasonic biomicrosco

265 Indirect ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, ultrasonography, and ultrasonic biomicrosco

266 Review of chart, fundus photography, ultrasonography, fundus autofluorescence (F

267 Review of chart, fundus photography, ultrasonography, fundus autofluorescence, i

268 omplete ophthalmic examination, color fundus photography (used for AMD staging), and spectral-domain

269 All participants underwent color fundus photography, used for AMD diagnosis and staging, accordi

270 means of a 3-mm OCTA scan and 7-field fundus photography using the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scal

271 included 350 patients enrolled in the Fundus photography versus Ophthalmoscopy Trials Outcomes in the

272 creening examination and nonmydriatic fundus photography via the Intelligent Retinal Imaging System (

273 sual acuity and objective refraction, fundus photography, visual field perimetry, and optical coheren

274 ic macular edema (DME) from monocular fundus photography vs optical coherence tomography (OCT) centra

275 graders in detecting CMV retinitis on fundus photography was 30.2% (95% CI, 10.5%-52.4%), and mean sp

276 nd 35-mm cameras, the field of modern fundus photography was born.

277 Conjunctival UV autofluorescence (CUVAF) photography was developed to detect and characterize pre

278 ance of areas of drusen regression on fundus photography was mostly unremarkable, with a majority of

279 Serial photography was performed at each 3-month follow-up visi

280 ions and Complications (EDIC) study, retinal photography was performed at intervals of 6 months to 4

281 nce tomography, and wide-field ocular fundus photography was performed on -1, 0, and 3 days after tre

282 analysis of patient medical records and skin photography was performed; 104 adult patients with TSC w

283 Retinal photography was taken at diabetes annual screening and i

284 plete success, but in only 6% initial fundus photography was unsuccessful, indicating its value in as

285 and in 13 (6%; 95%CI, 3-10) patients fundus photography was unsuccessful.

286 to quantify choroidal thickness, and fundus photography was used to classify eyes into categories us

287 as used to measure disc rim area, and stereo photography was used to evaluate cup/disc (C/D) ratios.

288 0), respectively, and of nonmydriatic fundus photography were 54% (95% CI, 40-67) and 99% (95% CI, 98

289 7), respectively, and of nonmydriatic fundus photography were 81% (95% CI, 75-86) and 94% (95% CI, 92

290 a for pressure, temperature, pH and seafloor photography were collected over 431 days using a benthic

291 Clinical features on color photography were detected in 174 eyes (73.1%): periphera

292 n of DR for both smartphone and nonmydriatic photography were determined by comparison with the stand

293 isual field testing, and stereoscopic fundus photography were performed at both baseline and the 4-ye

294 and glycemic control at the time of initial photography were unassociated with complete success.

295 , fluorescein angiography, as well as fundus photography, were also recorded.

296 ine screening typically use monocular fundus photography, while treatment of DME uses OCT CST.

297 Here, by combining high-speed photography with high-precision laser profilometry, we i

298 Nonmydriatic fundus photography with remote interpretation by an expert.

299 Retinal photography with the camera used in this study was not h

300 , Cirrus SD-OCT, and stereoscopic optic disc photography within 6 months.