ライフサイエンスコーパス: photopic

1 A photopic, 3 Hz flashing light increased ACh release, and

2 dard and bright-flash a-wave implicit times, photopic 30-Hz flicker and single-flash b-wave implicit

3 The photopic 30-Hz flicker ERG was delayed in all group B ey

4 These retinas produce significantly higher photopic a-wave and b-wave amplitudes than do those of R

5 area is similarly associated with age under photopic achromatic and selective S-cone conditions in p

6 ular areas of abnormal high-density AF under photopic and dark-adapted conditions.

7 HA-1077 increased photopic and flicker ERG response amplitudes in R6/2 mic

8 ferences were observed in defocus curves for photopic and mesopic conditions (p < 0.0001).

9 g, binocular contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic and mesopic conditions, and a questionnaire on

10 r and binocular uncorrected visual acuity in photopic and mesopic conditions, for far (4 m), intermed

11 Contrast sensitivity was high and similar in photopic and mesopic conditions.

12 Defocus curve testing was performed in photopic and mesopic conditions.

13 Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) under both photopic and mesopic conditions.

14 cus testing; contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic and mesopic conditions; and a questionnaire on

15 Photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) by Pelli-

16 Overall, the difference in photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity function betwe

17 The photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity values of domi

18 advantage for aspheric IOLs was found under photopic and mesopic light conditions (photopic: Hedges'

19 A- and B-wave amplitudes) or tended toward (photopic and scotopic B-wave amplitudes) a higher mean r

20 CN) of the rat to retinal illumination under photopic and scotopic conditions to identify the types o

21 (pRF) modeling with moving bar stimuli under photopic and scotopic conditions to measure the effects

22 ion was altered with elevated IOP under both photopic and scotopic conditions.

23 Photopic and scotopic electroretinograms were reviewed.

24 icant neuroretinal dysfunction, with reduced photopic and scotopic ERG responses and reduced b-wave/a

25 Photopic and scotopic ERGs were recorded in R439H trypto

26 Photopic and scotopic fine matrix mapping (FMM) were per

27 ng the nasal horizontal meridian, under both photopic and scotopic levels of lighting.

28 ated firing across cell types was similar at photopic and scotopic light levels, although additional

29 The D1R-KO mice showed anomalies in photopic and scotopic maximal amplitude, whereas D2R-KO

30 Photopic and scotopic multifocal electroretinograms (mfE

31 15 had normal amplitudes, and 11 had reduced photopic and/or scotopic amplitudes at their first visit

32 aluated using electroretinography (scotopic, photopic, and pattern).

33 Images were obtained under mesopic, photopic, and pharmacologically dilated conditions.

34 l as a 50% improvement of the ERG amplitude (photopic b wave responses) (both P < 0.01).

35 driven scotopic a and b wave and cone-driven photopic b wave responses.

36 Photopic b-wave amplitude increased monotonically with s

37 Rp2h(-/-) scotopic a-wave and photopic b-wave amplitudes declined at 1 mo of age and c

38 pha' were present at very low levels and the photopic b-wave amplitudes were reduced by 70%.

39 n the rising phase of the ERG b-wave, larger photopic b-wave amplitudes, and increased scotopic thres

40 ce had diminished scotopic a- and b-wave and photopic b-wave amplitudes.

41 uced rod b-wave amplitudes, and extinguished photopic b-wave and flicker responses.

42 ONTx reduced the photopic b-wave and OPs.

43 An increase in photopic b-wave implicit time was observed in Tph2-KI mi

44 t and significantly delayed falling phase of photopic b-wave of electroretinogram (ERG).

45 electroretinogram recordings revealed normal photopic b-wave responses.

46 to 3 hours after MAR IgG injection, the ERG photopic b-wave was diminished, with far less effect on

47 The photopic b-wave was normal for both lines until the ONL

48 of the scotopic threshold response (STR) and photopic b-wave were observed between IOPs of 30 and 40

49 Cone ERG amplitudes (photopic b-wave) in CNGB3(-/-) mice were reduced to appr

50 characteristic of the children's and adults' photopic b-waves.

51 found that light adaptation using mesopic or photopic background lights resulted in a dramatic increa

52 g pulsed (3-s) spectral modulations around a photopic background.

53 ntre diameters were 5-30 deg measured with a photopic background.

54 ns and in the presence of steady mesopic and photopic backgrounds.

55 e in goldfish increases light sensitivity at photopic backgrounds.

56 uenced scotopic (beta = -0.002, P = .04) and photopic (beta = -0.003, P = .02) contrast sensitivity.

57 ed with scotopic (beta = -0.25, P = .01) and photopic (beta = -0.23, P = .04) contrast sensitivity.

58 bleaching light were used, from 500 to 3000 photopic cd m(-2), and exposures were made sufficiently

59 ERGs were measured for red flashes (0.42 log photopic cd-s/m(2)) on a blue rod-saturating background

60 lenses induce myopia in C57BL/6J mice under photopic conditions (continuous light, 200 +/- 15 lux).

61 ditions (range 0.2-17.2 Hz) and higher under photopic conditions (range 0.6-40 Hz) for any given neur

62 eld stimuli were obtained under scotopic and photopic conditions and were used to categorize the CSNB

63 sitivity deficits of patients with MAR under photopic conditions are not specific to the MC pathway,

64 The similar values achieved in mesopic and photopic conditions in binocular uncorrected visual acui

65 ion' (32 of 48, 62.5 %), which changed under photopic conditions to an on-excitation followed by a mo

66 Mean binocular uncorrected visual acuity in photopic conditions was 0.03 LogMAR for far, 0.12 for in

67 Irbp(-/-) mice are retinoid-deficient under photopic conditions, and it is possible that 11-cis-reti

68 s the light response under both scotopic and photopic conditions, but it does not eliminate it.

69 spectacle lenses induce myopia in mice under photopic conditions, during the susceptible period in po

70 Under photopic conditions, high-contrast visual acuities (HCVA

71 ays, which control vision under scotopic and photopic conditions, respectively.

72 Under photopic conditions, SCN neurones showed rhythmic electr

73 bre electrode and ganzfeld stimulation under photopic conditions, so as to extract the parameters of

74 Under photopic conditions, the contrast sensitivity values of

75 Under photopic conditions, the ON and OFF ganglion cells show

76 e of 0.133 mm motion between the mesopic and photopic conditions, with the pupil diameter changing fr

77 induced by diffusers and -25 D lenses under photopic conditions.

78 -field stimuli were obtained in scotopic and photopic conditions.

79 lved in setting background sensitivity under photopic conditions.

80 sin at a range of temporal frequencies under photopic conditions.

81 alities were detected in the Rp2(null) mice, photopic (cone) and scotopic (rod) function as measured

82 progressive dysfunction of the day vision or photopic (cone) system with preservation of night vision

83 significantly better values were observed in photopic contrast sensitivity for high spatial frequenci

84 These devices exhibit photopic contrasts up to ca. 38%, high neutrality, color

85 ng asymmetry in their temporal adaptation to photopic (day) and scotopic (night) conditions and that

86 Photopic distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (

87 When compared with wild-type (WT) controls: photopic electroretingraphic (ERG) responses were decrea

88 ds to mislocalization of cone opsin, loss of photopic electroretinogram (ERG) responses and loss of c

89 segments resulting in complete absence of a photopic electroretinogram and progressive cone degenera

90 of the human eye to record the a-wave of the photopic electroretinogram elicited in response to dim r

91 Scotopic and photopic electroretinogram responses declined progressiv

92 (-/-) mice exhibited absence of scotopic and photopic electroretinogram responses, a phenotype that r

93 s expressing S- and M-opsins and a preserved photopic electroretinogram.

94 ell death and increased the amplitude of the photopic electroretinogram.

95 d from 10.9 +/- 5.6 to 45.8 +/- 15.2 muV for photopic electroretinogram.

96 tors within the retina, and the scotopic and photopic electroretinograms (ERG) and retinal morphology

97 Scotopic and photopic electroretinograms as well as pupillary constri

98 rs, leading to abnormalities of scotopic and photopic electroretinograms with decreased b-wave amplit

99 ome preservation of cone function based upon photopic electroretinograms.

100 Consistently, the scotopic and photopic electroretinographic (ERG) responses to single-

101 ated rd10 mice were examined by scotopic and photopic electroretinography and then killed for biochem

102 sed a- and b-wave amplitudes of scotopic and photopic electroretinography responses 4 months after di

103 zygous KI mice, their scotopic, maximal, and photopic electroretinography responses were comparable t

104 ceive little influence from GCs; (3) the rat photopic ERG also reflects GC signals and may serve as a

105 37217 had no adverse effects on scotopic and photopic ERG amplitude and latency parameters at any of

106 und in cKO mice, evidenced by a reduction in photopic ERG amplitudes and loss of cone cells.

107 Scotopic and photopic ERG analysis did not reveal significant deficit

108 ange over 18-month duration, as evidenced by photopic ERG and optomotor tests.

109 Treated eyes showed photopic ERG b-wave amplitudes similar to those of the n

110 By contrast, the photopic ERG b-waves in KO mice were hardly affected at

111 The cornea-negative PhNR of the photopic ERG depends on spiking activity and is reduced

112 We report that whilst the a-wave of the photopic ERG does not alter, there are profound effects

113 The full-field, photopic ERG most closely resembles the mfERG responses

114 Photopic ERG PhNR amplitudes in MS patients are signific

115 ion; (4) TTX had dramatic effects on the rat photopic ERG that were not attributable to GC currents,

116 The photopic ERG was the most specific criterion to distingu

117 The variations in the primate photopic ERG with eccentricity are due to spike-driven o

118 TTX had dramatic effects on the photopic ERG, surpassing the effects of ONTx.

119 Photopic ERG, visual evoked potentials, IHC and cell cou

120 s loss of a spike-driven contribution to the photopic ERG.

121 The photopic ERGs showed a delay in b-wave time to peak, but

122 Bilateral, full-field scotopic and photopic ERGs were made at 1, 7, and 14 days after a sin

123 ormed 3, 7, and 14 days after injection, and photopic ERGs were performed on day 14.

124 Photopic ERGs were recorded (1.2-2.7 log cd-s/m2) after

125 Photopic ERGs were recorded to brief- (< or = 5 msec) an

126 All patients had severely reduced photopic ffERG responses, including those exhibiting pre

127 Both scotopic and photopic ffERG values were abnormal and affected to a si

128 All founders had abnormal scotopic and photopic ffERGs after 3 months.

129 The photopic flash electroretinogram (FERG) and visual evoke

130 Full-field photopic flash ERGs also were recorded.

131 Photopic flash ERGs were recorded differentially, with D

132 The relation between early changes in the photopic flicker electroretinogram (ERG) and photopic ps

133 Monkey photopic flicker ERGs were elicited with sine wave stimu

134 mplitudes were measured in response to 30-Hz photopic flicker stimulation before and after OAC treatm

135 -to-peak ERG amplitudes in response to 30-Hz photopic flicker stimulation.

136 omatous optic neuropathy were recruited, and photopic full-field electroretinograms (ERG) were perfor

137 The photopic full-field ERG was not significantly affected.

138 ransient pattern-reversal ERG (pERG) and the photopic full-field ERG, for detection of local GC damag

139 Photopic full-field ERGs were measured for red flashes (

140 Gaithersburg, MD); and photopic full-field flash (ff)ERG (Utas-E3000; LKC Techn

141 humans, to produce waveforms similar to the photopic full-field flash ERG.

142 Photopic full-field flash ERGs were recorded from anesth

143 stimulated area looked similar to a standard photopic, full-field ERG, with a- and b-waves and OPs.

144 reduction in scotopic function compared with photopic function.

145 Scotopic and photopic Ganzfeld ERGs were recorded from homozygous Pcd

146 ERG b-wave amplitudes were reduced (photopic > scotopic) in FeSO(4)-injected eyes compared w

147 under photopic and mesopic light conditions (photopic: Hedges' g 0.42, 95% CI 0.24-0.61 (3 cycles per

148 The lack of a photopic hill is hypothesized to result from immaturity

149 4- and 10-week-old infants did not show the photopic hill that was characteristic of the children's

150 owed a delay in b-wave time to peak, but the photopic hill, i.e. the relative variation of time to pe

151 n CSNB patients rather than showing a normal photopic hill.

152 fills a crucial role in neural adaptation to photopic illumination, but the pathway that carries cone

153 Photopic increment sensitivity in the fovea was measured

154 Photopic increment thresholds not determined by the pi-1

155 ble of driving circadian photoentrainment at photopic intensities at which they were incapable of sup

156 ON or OFF brisk-transient ganglion cells at photopic intensities, we confirmed that this overlap cau

157 mination, are thought to saturate at higher (photopic) irradiances.

158 eses to explain the tetrasensitivity at high photopic levels in the human peripheral field.

159 ts deviate from trichromatic theory; at high photopic levels, sensitivity is explained by absorptions

160 roximately 100 ms phototransduction delay at photopic light levels, gave a approximately 230 ms visuo

161 n the macaque monkey retina in vitro that at photopic light levels, when an identified rod input is e

162 d dopaminergic agonist treatment rescued the photopic light response deficits.

163 Mild photopic losses close to the internal edge of the ring w

164 restore retinal sensitivity at scotopic and photopic luminances.

165 eks, reducing the blind spot at scotopic and photopic luminances.

166 Photopic mfERGs were recorded with Dawson-Trick-Litzkow

167 Scotopic and photopic microperimetry (MP-1S; Nidek Technologies) was

168 itivities for each category for scotopic and photopic microperimetry.

169 P1 implicit times and N1-P1 amplitudes from photopic multifocal electroretinograms within the centra

170 ll patients showed reduced amplitudes of the photopic negative response (PhNR) (P < 0.001).

171 Consistent with previous studies, the photopic negative response (PhNR) amplitude was signific

172 and background colors that best isolate the photopic negative response (PhNR) and maximize its ampli

173 To compare the sensitivity of the photopic negative response (PhNR) from the shortwave (S)

174 ng the scotopic threshold response (STR) and photopic negative response (PhNR) of the electroretinogr

175 To determine whether the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the electroretinogr

176 es leads to an improvement in the full-field photopic negative response (PhNR) of the electroretinogr

177 ertension group, the N95 and the L&M-pathway photopic negative response (PhNR) were significantly att

178 shes on a blue background used to assess the photopic negative response (PhNR).

179 The photopic negative response of the diffuse flash electror

180 ests that the pattern electroretinogram, the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram, and

181 ERG N95 component (-70%, P = 0.007), and the photopic negative response of the ffERG (-44%, P = 0.005

182 s transient ERGs to uniform fields contained photopic negative responses (PhNR) after the b-wave and

183 vere experimental glaucoma or TTX eliminated photopic negative responses, N95, and N2; glaucoma elimi

184 hese parameters were extracted; in addition, photopic negative-response (PhNR; originating from retin

185 coma removed a cornea-negative response, the photopic-negative response (PhNR), from the ERG.

186 The nSTR and photopic OPs declined by 50% at IOP <61 mmHg.

187 at the negative STR component (nSTR) and the photopic OPs were the most sensitive to acute IOP elevat

188 lexiform layers and in both the scotopic and photopic pathways in the mammalian retina.

189 photopic flicker electroretinogram (ERG) and photopic psychophysical changes in retinitis pigmentosa

190 Paradoxically, raising irradiance across the photopic range increases the robustness of rod responses

191 me studies report rod activity well into the photopic range.

192 mbient light levels covering the scotopic to photopic regimes.

193 Electrophysiology revealed a nonrecordable photopic response with later attenuation of the scotopic

194 Photopic responses were also obtained (0.97-2.72 log cd-

195 Photopic responses were near normal or supernormal from

196 As expected, photopic responses were nondetectable in patients with A

197 Photopic responses were preserved better than scotopic r

198 Electroretinography showed that scotopic and photopic responses were reduced and delayed, but were pr

199 llary atrophy, dyschromatopsia, extinguished photopic responses, and reduced scotopic responses obser

200 resulted in markedly diminished scotopic and photopic responses.

201 l numbers were reduced, as were scotopic and photopic responses.

202 Consequently, in photopic retinae, the application of APB disrupts the ON

203 ke, light cycles showed enduring deficits in photopic retinal light responses and visual contrast sen

204 lus and physiological factors that influence photopic rod-driven responses.

205 related with the lateral extent of preserved photopic sensitivity (r=0.86) and PERG data.

206 Consistent with past reports, photopic sensitivity declined significantly with age for

207 with reticular drusen (RDR) have focused on photopic sensitivity testing but have not specifically a

208 For older subjects, photopic sensitivity was positively related to MP densit

209 Photopic sensitivity was preserved over central macular

210 acuity, demarcate areas of preserved central photopic sensitivity.

211 However, the reduced photopic signal arose only from lost inner retinal neuro

212 ponents were extracted from responses to the photopic single flash.

213 Highest estimates were for photopic single-flash a-wave and b-wave amplitudes (0.84

214 At P25, cone function was assessed with photopic single-flash and flicker ERGs.

215 Cone-driven responses to photopic single-flash or 30-Hz stimuli were nonrecordabl

216 Photopic slow-sequence mfERGs were recorded from anesthe

217 In photopic stimulus paradigms, activity of ON- and OFF-CBC

218 frequency doubling perimetry [FDP], Humphrey photopic Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm 24-2

219 evation of IOP significantly accelerated the photopic temporal tuning of RGC center responses in both

220 For photopic testing, the mean threshold values were 16.8 dB

221 ly less-pronounced differences were seen for photopic testing.

222 gely coincident with progressive centripetal photopic threshold elevation led by worsening of rod pho

223 Photopic thresholds were normal over the fovea; threshol

224 circulating current declined to half at 3000 photopic trolands, and to a quarter at 20 000 photopic t

225 hotopic trolands, and to a quarter at 20 000 photopic trolands.

226 Mean photopic uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), distance

227 rrected visual acuity values were similar to photopic values.

228 input to MT+ is either weak or silent during photopic vision in S cone monochromats.

229 e bipolar cell differentiation and regulates photopic vision perception.

230 good until old age, disproportionate loss of photopic vision with frequent complaints of glare necess

231 e rotating gratings above -2.0 log cd m(-2) (photopic vision), and Gnat1-/- mice (threshold, -4.0 log

232 changes in cone ERG and retinal morphology, photopic vision-guided behaviour is comparable between n

233 y, accentuating features that are salient to photopic vision.

234 hotoreceptors with ganglion cells to mediate photopic vision.

235 acuity, but poor contrast sensitivity during photopic vision.

236 es necessary to serve the ganglion cells for photopic vision.

237 24 months in functional variables (Humphrey photopic visual field testing using the Swedish interact

238 However, it is not clear what role the photopic visual input plays in this process and whether

239 cking response was used to test scotopic and photopic visual performance.

240 ry different from the classical scotopic and photopic visual systems.

241 ne dysfunction) was defined by the extent of photopic vs scotopic abnormality.

242 from this patient showed typ ical large slow photopic waveforms and was unchanged from recordings mad