ライフサイエンスコーパス: photorefractive keratectomy

1 linking (CXL), penetrating keratoplasty, and photorefractive keratectomy.

2 rning to surface ablation techniques such as photorefractive keratectomy.

3 ty and safety of the procedure compared with photorefractive keratectomy.

4 vantages of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.

5 re obtained from healthy patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy.

6 thickness, and subepithelial haze following photorefractive keratectomy.

7 ions, laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy and conductive keratoplasty

8 Photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomile

9 lasty and epikeratophakia, and more recently photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomile

10 e is one of the most common complications of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomile

11 s one of the most common complications after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomile

12 In the past decade, photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomile

13 hed data from ongoing studies in the area of photorefractive keratectomy and laser-assisted in-situ k

14 With a recent change in Air Force policy, photorefractive keratectomy and laser-assisted in-situ k

15 tomileusis, laser epithelial keratomileusis, photorefractive keratectomy, and refractive intraocular

16 Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy are safe and effective resul

17 followed by laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy (bioptics) provides another

18 Photorefractive keratectomy continues to be the most com

19 ic surgical uses, is now widely employed for photorefractive keratectomy corrections of greater than

20 Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy creates a nonvascular wound

21 ocedure with intracorneal ring segments, and photorefractive keratectomy for ectasia, corneal edema,

22 res such as phototherapeutic keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy has grown over the last deca

23 Laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy have proven to be much more

24 ults and the theoretical elastic response of photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with asymmetrical co

25 potential of troglitazone in a cat model of photorefractive keratectomy-induced corneal injury.

26 tromal corneal ring segment implantation and photorefractive keratectomy, is a promising therapeutic

27 cades after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy may be similar, and yet the

28 Wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy offers better acuity and les

29 hich the epithelium is absent, such as after photorefractive keratectomy or chemical burn.

30 t, relaxing incisions, wedge resections, and photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileu

31 t reports on the use of contact lenses after photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted in situ ke

32 he overall risk of retinal disease following photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted in situ ke

33 Which technique (photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted in-situ ke

34 ce ablation using the excimer laser, such as photorefractive keratectomy or laser-assisted subepithel

35 ation of surface ablation procedures such as photorefractive keratectomy or phototherapeutic keratect

36 corneal examinations of a normal human and a photorefractive keratectomy patient are presented to dem

37 Photorefractive keratectomy, previously problematic for

38 Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in-situ kera

39 lcohol is used for epithelial removal during photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser subepithelia

40 Laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) can otherwise successf

41 accuracy, efficacy, stability, and safety of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) enhancement using the

42 detectable in the regenerating stroma after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in rabbit or in cornea

43 Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) is the most widely per

44 asured wavefront error (WFE) data from a cat photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) model.

45 arried out by performing an alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) procedure with applica

46 Haze in the rabbit cornea was produced with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using excimer laser.

47 Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was performed using an

48 ein was immunolocalized in rat corneas after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and the presence of C

49 low myopia who are considering conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), in patients with thin

50 tatively after traditional epithelial scrape-photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), transepithelial PRK,

51 y sensation in patients undergoing LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

52 profile is superior for patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

53 of laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

54 error after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

55 es and was re-treated with topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

56 brosis after excimer laser surface ablation (photorefractive keratectomy [PRK]).

57 ced warpage, pellucid marginal degeneration, photorefractive keratectomy, radial keratotomy, and pene

58 Analysis of sub-basal nerve density after photorefractive keratectomy reported that the nerve dens

59 tromal fibroblasts (pHCSFs) and in vivo in a photorefractive keratectomy-treated rabbit model of corn

60 imation in challenging eyes with prior LASIK/photorefractive keratectomy was most accurately predicte

61 after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy were enrolled.

62 echanical stability and associated safety of photorefractive keratectomy with the visual results and

63 rior myopic laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy, with no need for preoperati