ライフサイエンスコーパス: photoresponse

1 it is unclear what physics will dominate the photoresponse.

2 ovement and prolonged the termination of the photoresponse.

3 le conductance and capacitance and broadband photoresponse.

4 a critical level, essentially saturating the photoresponse.

5 that dPIS was essential for maintaining the photoresponse.

6 ching the photo-excited rhodopsin during the photoresponse.

7 g cascade to desensitize cones and speed the photoresponse.

8 DE6 by transducin, thereby desensitizing the photoresponse.

9 plitude, kinetics and reproducibility of the photoresponse.

10 the light sensitivity or the kinetics of the photoresponse.

11 psin in vivo and disrupts termination of the photoresponse.

12 s consistent with their participation in the photoresponse.

13 emical cascade that underlies the electrical photoresponse.

14 gamma-TRPL heteromultimers contribute to the photoresponse.

15 TP by Galphat and for normal recovery of the photoresponse.

16 ling complex is in rapid deactivation of the photoresponse.

17 nsduction cascade during the recovery from a photoresponse.

18 defects in adaptation and termination of the photoresponse.

19 to 2.62 eV, which are crucial for broadband photoresponse.

20 n be injected into phosphorene to induce its photoresponse.

21 r solar light derives from the visible light photoresponse.

22 ne photoreceptor (P3) cell components of ERG photoresponses.

23 found that the two pigments produced similar photoresponses.

24 iquitination by COP1, thereby enhancing phyA photoresponses.

25 mentary fly mutants with slow termination of photoresponses.

26 m signal transducer and thus enhancing plant photoresponses.

27 ors for regulating certain non-image forming photoresponses.

28 ith lambda(max) of 492 nm that supported rod photoresponses.

29 definitively linking phyA signaling to these photoresponses.

30 A mutant allele, cry(b), inhibits circadian photoresponses.

31 ng to circadian phase shifting and other NIF photoresponses.

32 transducin inactivation in the course of the photoresponse, a requisite for normal vision.

33 se range compression, sensitivity shift, and photoresponse acceleration.

34 ain > 1,000) and fast (response time < 1 ms) photoresponse allow us to study, for the first time, the

35 ng reduction in the amplification of the rod photoresponse, allowing rods to operate in illumination

36 stricted spots of light, the duration of the photoresponse along the OS does not increase linearly wi

37 The loss of photoresponse amplitude with age in the mutant mice para

38 receptor function (despite the low saturated photoresponse amplitude) and anomalous postreceptor reti

39 one morphology but reduced visual acuity and photoresponse amplitudes.

40 ations in NINAC have been shown to alter the photoresponse and compromise photoreceptor survival, the

41 ations in NINAC have been shown to alter the photoresponse and compromise photoreceptor survival.

42 as responsible for delaying the onset of the photoresponse and for attenuating its amplification.

43 re classical preparations for studies of the photoresponse and its modulation by circadian clocks.

44 applications, it is desirable to obtain the photoresponse and positional sensitivity over a much lar

45 The rod photoresponse and rod recovery were derived by using a p

46 Few-layered CuIn7 Se11 has a strong photoresponse and the potential to serve as the active m

47 -activating proteins (GCAPs) regulate visual photoresponse and trigger congenital retinal diseases in

48 n cone photoresponses, we have characterized photoresponses and GTPase regulatory components of cones

49 ignificantly shortened the duration of ipRGC photoresponses and reduced the number of light-evoked sp

50 eases in the magnitude of ocular type B cell photoresponses and the frequency of light-elicited actio

51 nificantly inhibited in vivo recovery of rod photoresponses and the rate of recovery of functional rh

52 oreceptors can both contribute to non-visual photoresponses, and that both melanopsin and cryptochrom

53 er-dispersed SWCNTs demonstrated significant photoresponse, apparently due to photoinduced charge tra

54 Inner retinal photoresponses are mediated by melanopsin-expressing, in

55 These photoresponses are mediated by two phototropins, phot1 a

56 pRGCs) generate endogenous, melanopsin-based photoresponses as well as extrinsic, rod/cone-driven res

57 is not rate limiting for recovery of the rod photoresponse, as it is in Drosophila.

58 pensions display interesting shape-dependent photoresponse behavior under white light illumination fr

59 course and pharmacology as the physiological photoresponse, but with a much shorter latency.

60 Substrate removal was found to enhance the photoresponse by four-fold compared to substrate-support

61 recovery phase abnormalities of rod-isolated photoresponses by electroretinography (ERG); photoactiva

62 onstrates high photoconductive gain and fast photoresponse can be achieved simultaneously and a clean

63 The same photoresponse changes occurred in exaggerated form in ce

64 These photoresponse changes were accompanied by increases and

65 t good light-harvesting ability and enhanced photoresponses compared with the reverse rainbow photoca

66 de and slowed the kinetics of mouse M/L-cone photoresponses, cone adaptation in bright, steady light

67 ed with age-matched WT mice: recovery of the photoresponse, COX and SDH activity, retinal morphology,

68 A basic model of photoresponse deactivation consistent with established p

69 Reduced AIPL1 delayed the photoresponse, decreased its amplification constant, slo

70 in, PIF4, in a pif4 null mutant, rescued the photoresponse defect in this mutant, whereas mutated PIF

71 on, which correlates with the performance of photoresponse devices.

72 highlight how the kinetics of the melanopsin photoresponse differentially regulate distinct light-med

73 ndings is that the recovery phase of the rod photoresponse does not contribute significantly to visua

74 The photoresponse does not degrade for optical intensity mod

75 The devices exhibit a strong photoresponse down to the limit of a monolayer organic c

76 trates the photothermoelectric origin of the photoresponse due to gradients in the nanotube Seebeck c

77 In addition, the photoresponse due to the different photoexcited-charge-c

78 rating protein complex, which determines the photoresponse duration of photoreceptors, is composed of

79 One critical component which regulates the photoresponse duration on the molecular level is the com

80 The GFET shows a nonlocal photoresponse even when the SiC substrate is illuminated

81 addition to accelerating the recovery of the photoresponse, faster PDE6C deactivation may blunt the r

82 ncy by characterizing the sensitivity of rod photoresponses following exposure to bright bleaching li

83 -studied reduction in the sensitivity of rod photoresponses following pigment bleaching.

84 It consistently shows broadband photoresponse from the ultraviolet (255 nm) to the mid-i

85 hotosensor, yet is a fundamental link in the photoresponses from blue light perceived by the conserve

86 Many plant photoresponses from germination to shade avoidance are m

87 ed for the timely inactivation of mouse cone photoresponse, gradually increasing its expression progr

88 The underlying mechanism of the photoresponse has been a particular focus of recent work

89 channel subunits required for the Drosophila photoresponse; however, our understanding of the identit

90 al electric field can dynamically extend the photoresponse in a 5 nm-thick BP photodetector from 3.7

91 affects the post-bleach recovery of the rod photoresponse in ABCR-deficient (abcr-/-) mice.

92 ere, we report the spatial dependence of the photoresponse in backgated graphene field-effect transis

93 e one of the mechanisms mediating a stronger photoresponse in dark-adapted cells.

94 photovoltaic effect, dominates the intrinsic photoresponse in graphene.

95 y kinetics of the intrinsic melanopsin-based photoresponse in ipRGCs, the duration of the PLR, and th

96 rollable and wavelength-selective bolometric photoresponse in macroscale assemblies of chirality-sort

97 the DNA interfacial layer that enhances the photoresponse in n-type field-effect transistors (FET) a

98 of biliverdin (BV) chromophore triggers the photoresponse in native Agp1 bacteriophytochrome.

99 conclude that the slower termination of the photoresponse in retin(1) resulted from a requirement fo

100 The photoresponse in retinal photoreceptors begins when a mo

101 The intensity dependence of the photoresponse in rods lacking arrestin further suggests

102 Impurity-mediated sub-band gap photoresponse in silicon is an alternative to these meth

103 Room-temperature infrared sub-band gap photoresponse in silicon is of interest for telecommunic

104 urity-mediated room-temperature sub-band gap photoresponse in single-crystal silicon-based planar pho

105 The photoresponse in the electrical conductivity of a single

106 ended with fullerene derivatives show a high photoresponse in the near-infrared (NIR) and good photov

107 A high photoresponse in the near-infrared (NIR) region with exc

108 eurotrophin expression, and it preserved the photoresponse in the phototoxicity model of retinal dege

109 proteins (GCAPs) control the recovery of the photoresponse in vertebrate photoreceptors, through thei

110 ential factor in determining the duration of photoresponse in vertebrate rods and cones.

111 transretinal recordings revealed normal cone photoresponses in all RDH10-deficient mouse lines.

112 y account for faster and less sensitive cone photoresponses in darkness, whereas a reduced rise of st

113 vated cryptochrome (CRY) regulates circadian photoresponses in Drosophila melanogaster.

114 The physiology of nonimage-forming (NIF) photoresponses in humans is not well understood; therefo

115 te collar-2 genes, both global regulators of photoresponses in Neurospora, encode DNA binding protein

116 aining photoreceptors that regulate numerous photoresponses in plants and microorganisms through thei

117 ship between phytochrome kinase activity and photoresponses in plants.

118 However, melanopsin photoresponses in RPE-separated rat retinas became more

119 Unexpectedly, the early activation phase of photoresponses in Rpe65(-/-) mice accelerated with age a

120 d-type rods and may explain the decay of rod photoresponses in the presence of nonhydrolyzable analog

121 Whole-cell patch-clamp recording showed photoresponses in these cells even after degeneration of

122 ant of decay of the rate-limiting species in photoresponse inactivation (activated rhodopsin or the a

123 nd INAD did not appear to have a role in the photoresponse independent of localization of multiple si

124 risingly, there was little change in the rod photoresponse, indicating that dynamic Ca2+-dependent re

125 mma dominantly suppressed the TRPL-dependent photoresponse, indicating that TRPgamma-TRPL heteromulti

126 gap of 1.7 eV and display an electrochemical photoresponse indicative of a p-type semiconductor.

127 ubstitutes equally for rTalpha in generating photoresponses initiated by either rhodopsin or S-cone o

128 -night (dawn), indicating that the circadian photoresponse is a network property and therefore non-ce

129 Activation of the Drosophila photoresponse is a rapid process that results in plasma

130 whether PKC-mediated desensitization of the photoresponse is accompanied by ultrastructural changes

131 Tunable photoresponse is achieved by controlling the nature of s

132 Rapid termination of the photoresponse is achieved in part by shuttling proteins

133 s on top of perovskite to further extend its photoresponse is considered as a simple and promising wa

134 yclic GMP concentration is decreased and the photoresponse is initiated.

135 Moreover, the photoresponse is studied at the heterointerface of the W

136 ole of phyA in mediating the blue light/UV-A photoresponses is a new function for phyA in chloroplast

137 The reduction in photoresponses is due to defective association of crucia

138 n the membrane sets the rate of onset of the photoresponse, it was later argued that the subsequent p

139 e for GTPase acceleration in obtaining rapid photoresponse kinetics.

140 Their synaptically driven photoresponses lack direction selectivity and show highe

141 external quantum efficiency of 25% and fast photoresponse <15 mus.

142 d dysfunction, detectable as reduced rod ERG photoresponse maximum amplitude, even in heterozygotes w

143 catalyst/electrolyte interfaces, and surface photoresponse measurements also demonstrated slow carrie

144 Photoresponse measurements on interfaces between perylen

145 m30a in adult mice led to a reduced scotopic photoresponse, mislocalization of ATP8A2 to the inner se

146 [Ca2+]i, PKC activators did not speed up the photoresponse, nor did PKC inhibitors antagonize the acc

147 A spectacular improvement of the photoresponse observed experimentally for mixed pyrite/m

148 me, temperature, and power dependence of the photoresponse of a bi-metal contacted graphene photodete

149 resulted in a maximum power-producing ionic photoresponse of approximately 100 muA/cm(2) and approxi

150 bit enhanced current stability and a maximal photoresponse of approximately 860 microA cm(-2) , a fiv

151 esonance frequencies selectively amplify the photoresponse of graphene to light of different waveleng

152 unprecedented ambipolar (positive/negative) photoresponse of MCC-capped InAs NC solids that changed

153 fects, which may be exploited to enhance the photoresponse of nanoscale optoelectronic devices.

154 The photoresponse of suspended SWNT films is sufficiently hi

155 We compared the photoresponse of the as-exfoliated device with annealed

156 copy to assess the role of coherences in the photoresponse of the bacterial reaction center of Rhodob

157 function, it is necessary to understand the photoresponse of the chromophore.

158 The photoresponse of the coating is induced by a small amoun

159 pectra show that the Ti(3+) here extends the photoresponse of TiO(2) from the UV to the visible light

160 We have measured the photoresponse of two purple nonsulfur bacteria, Rhodobac

161 stand their functions better, we studied the photoresponses of all five cell types, by whole-cell rec

162 ype rcaE gene can rescue red and green light photoresponses of an rcaE null mutant, a gene in which t

163 The intrinsic photoresponses of M1 cells were lower threshold, higher

164 Photoresponses of mouse rods expressing lowered amounts

165 Melanopsin-based photoresponses of rat ipRGCs were remarkably sustained w

166 Spectrally resolved photoresponses of these devices reveal a weakly conducti

167 We compare the photoresponses of wild-type cones with those of cones th

168 In this study, the photoresponses of Xenopus rods rendered constitutively a

169 sed photodetectors demonstrated to date, the photoresponse only comes from specific locations near gr

170 fied this parameter as rate-limiting for the photoresponse onset.

171 on, may play a role in the activation of the photoresponse or a component thereof, probably in synerg

172 ing to realize photodetectors with ultrafast photoresponse over a wide spectral range from far-infrar

173 response parameters were compared to the rod photoresponse parameters (S(ROD) and R(ROD)) in the same

174 Attenuation of the rod photoresponse parameters does not result simply from sho

175 The cone photoresponse parameters were compared to the rod photor

176 The mean rod photoresponse parameters were considerably less mature,

177 idual suspended VO(2) nanobeams we observe a photoresponse peaked at the metal-insulator boundary but

178 Because these photoresponse processes are recoverable following the re

179 rols, in part, the cGMP-triggered changes in photoresponse properties during light adaptation.

180 aps at the interface can dominate the device photoresponse properties.

181 asured spatial and density dependence of the photoresponse, provide strong evidence that nonlocal hot

182 a variety of conjugated polymers covering a photoresponse range from UV to NIR.

183 increased functionality in the form of fast photoresponse rates and the low defect density suggest C

184 The photoresponse reaches up to 50% external quantum efficie

185 king amacrine interneurons with sustained ON photoresponses receive gap-junction input from intrinsic

186 ransduction activation contributes to faster photoresponse recovery after a moderate pigment bleach i

187 Therefore, the speed of photoresponse recovery can affect temporal resolution an

188 GS9 anchor protein) proteins mediating rapid photoresponse recovery impair patients' ability to see m

189 nism for feedback control of the kinetics of photoresponse recovery in both rods and cones, with this

190 However, in brighter light, slow photoresponse recovery in rods and cones impaired visual

191 eveal that the dominant time constant of rod photoresponse recovery is 1/(V(max)/K(m)) for the RGS9 r

192 ovide strong physiological evidence that rod photoresponse recovery is shaped by the sequential recru

193 rprisingly, RGS9-2 not only supported normal photoresponse recovery under moderate light conditions b

194 ssing R9AP in rods, which causes accelerated photoresponse recovery.

195 ing functional performance, and facilitating photoresponse recovery.

196 n of the GPCR rhodopsin but has no effect on photoresponse recovery.

197 The melanopsin photoresponse relies on the presence of cis-isoforms of

198 Photoresponses revealed that the lifetime of R* is signi

199 tebrate cone photoreceptors, Ca(2+) controls photoresponse sensitivity, kinetics, and light adaptatio

200 Retinal photoresponses severely declined with age in beta5-/- mi

201 or quantum dots sensitizers, obtaining fast photoresponse simutaneously remains a challenge that mus

202 ed, but previous attempts to account for the photoresponse solely in terms of downstream products of

203 Photoresponse studies reveal that photoresponsivity in o

204 nses was comparable to that of the intrinsic photoresponse, suggesting that synaptic contacts are mad

205 has less effect on the cone than on the rod photoresponses, suggesting that cones are more resistant

206 es responsible for both vision and circadian photoresponse systems.

207 To explain the residual photoresponse that remains in the trp mutant, a third TR

208 ght receptor kinases that control a range of photoresponses that serve to optimize the photosynthetic

209 r ipRGC photosensitivity and for behavioural photoresponses that survive disrupted rod and cone funct

210 ndings reveal that the modification of ipRGC photoresponses through a cAMP/PKA pathway is a general f

211 Ts play an important role in controlling the photoresponse time and photocurrent improvement.

212 nd adaptation, suggesting that modulation of photoresponse time course may involve a separate Ca2+-de

213 ultra-high carrier mobility and ultra-short photoresponse time has shown remarkable potential in ult

214 current, a higher sensitivity, and a faster photoresponse time, exhibiting a promising candidate usi

215 of expression of RGS9 is required for normal photoresponse timing.

216 t-adapted conditions and the recovery of the photoresponse to a bright flash.

217 as, thus indicating the reversibility of the photoresponse to charging effects.

218 The circadian photoresponse to constant light was impaired in rh7 muta

219 in the BHJ layer not only need to have broad photoresponse to increase JSC , but also possess suitabl

220 phototransduction deactivation, causing rod photoresponses to appear light adapted, with reduced dar

221 We show that NCKX4 shapes the cone photoresponse together with the cone-specific NCKX2: NCK

222 Mutations that affect termination of the photoresponse typically lead to a reduction in levels of

223 Such photoresponse was attributed to photothermal effect inst

224 Its effect on the photoresponse was investigated by dialyzing the recombin

225 We found that the temporal loss of the photoresponse was paralleled by a gradual decline in the

226 The onset of the rising phase of the photoresponse was significantly delayed (P < 0.004) at 9

227 Prior to the onset of cell death, rod photoresponse was significantly reduced along with a rob

228 nock-out rods to regulate retGC and generate photoresponses was tested.

229 in GTP hydrolysis kinetics in mammalian cone photoresponses, we have characterized photoresponses and

230 The extended photoresponse, well-matched energy levels, and high hole

231 nd saturated amplitude (R(CONE)) of the cone photoresponse were calculated by fit of a model of the a

232 Analogous to bleaching adaptation, the photoresponses were desensitized (10- to 20-fold) and fa

233 The rod photoresponses were desensitized, and the response time

234 Photoresponses were unaffected when arrestin expression

235 Electroretinogram (ERG) photoresponses were used to investigate activation kinet

236 ed that single PDI fibers exhibit the higher photoresponse when compared to more poorly organized fil

237 amic range over 100 decibels (dB) and a fast photoresponse with 3-dB bandwidth up to 3 MHz.

238 l irradiation, this p-n diode shows a strong photoresponse with an external quantum efficiency of 52.

239 Intracellular IBMX enhanced the photoresponse with little effect on the baseline current

240 oelectronic characterizations show prominent photoresponse, with a fast response time of 500 mus, fas

241 ee unannealed films displays a strong p-type photoresponse, with up to 0.1 mA/cm(2) measured under mi

242 he junction to create the narrowest NIR-band photoresponses yet demonstrated.