1 relationships within Aculeata, including the
phylogenetic affinities of ants and bees [5-7].
2 Establishing the
phylogenetic affinities of ants and bees helps us unders
3 The morphology and previously suggested
phylogenetic affinities of Parvancorina are also re-eval
4 es long reads with sufficient depth for many
phylogenetic analyses and can therefore provide insights
5 sing studies, bulk-segregant RNA sequencing,
phylogenetic analyses and functional tests to identify t
6 ella The remaining six isolates are shown by
phylogenetic analyses based on four loci to represent tw
7 Genomic and
phylogenetic analyses can give insight into a patient's
8 Additionally, Bayesian
phylogenetic analyses corroborate several lineage-specif
9 Recent
phylogenetic analyses have retrieved aglaspidids within
10 lowly than those from the United States, and
phylogenetic analyses indicated that isolates from Europ
11 means of nucleotide sequencing and extensive
phylogenetic analyses of a 400-nucleotide region of the
12 Our
phylogenetic analyses of miRNAs in bryophytes, lycophyte
13 Phylogenetic analyses of the 11 available membracoid mit
14 Here we used
phylogenetic analyses of the vision genes involved in th
15 In silico and
phylogenetic analyses of these protein families revealed
16 Phylogenetic analyses of three concatenated nucleotide d
17 d microRNA (miRNA) candidates, and performed
phylogenetic analyses on small RNA pathways as well as m
18 Phylogenetic analyses placed this population from northe
19 Phylogenetic analyses resolve C. kroegeri as a stem-grou
20 Phylogenetic analyses reveal that the ISC and CIA pathwa
21 Phylogenetic analyses revealed several cryptic Hepatocys
22 Comprehensive
phylogenetic analyses revealed that ISE2 is a non-canoni
23 The
phylogenetic analyses show the presence of several disti
24 Phylogenetic analyses suggest it diverged from a human S
25 Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the origin of rebound
26 Our
phylogenetic analyses suggest that this major retroviral
27 Phylogenetic analyses suggest that titin, the largest kn
28 Phylogenetic analyses suggested that G-LSR2 was acquired
29 Phylogenetic analyses support co-speciation as having a
30 cialized characteristics, and the results of
phylogenetic analyses that support the hypothesis that h
31 Phylogenetic analyses used maximum likelihood estimation
32 of protein characterization, expression and
phylogenetic analyses we identified a novel class of Ara
33 WGS and
phylogenetic analyses were performed on a sample of USA3
34 In this study, we have used a combination of
phylogenetic analyses with syntenic alignment of mammali
35 mily classification, transcriptome analyses,
phylogenetic analyses, and pathogenicity experiments wer
36 A combination of
phylogenetic analyses, gene silencing, and biochemical a
37 In
phylogenetic analyses, partitioning strategies involve e
38 were identified as Sapajus apella, based on
phylogenetic analyses, pelage pattern and geographic pro
39 Using homology modeling and
phylogenetic analyses, we present evidence that SDH6 and
40 By sequence and
phylogenetic analyses, we show that it is a betaherpesvi
41 ransmission dynamics were investigated using
phylogenetic analyses.
42 A
phylogenetic analysis based on protein sequences showed
43 Phylogenetic analysis based on whole-genome sequencing o
44 A
phylogenetic analysis combined with an analysis of the s
45 Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated high similarity with
46 Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that 58% (7 of 12) of
47 Phylogenetic analysis found close clustering of strains
48 Phylogenetic analysis identified a clade of MHC-B, defin
49 Phylogenetic analysis indicated that Rv2633c is a member
50 Phylogenetic analysis indicates that the outbreak was ca
51 novel approach to this problem, performing a
phylogenetic analysis indicating that family living is a
52 leotide dataset, implying that probabilistic
phylogenetic analysis methods are needed.
53 Here, we performed a whole-genome
phylogenetic analysis of 368 IAV circulating in swine fr
54 Our
phylogenetic analysis of 37 GET3 orthologs from 18 diffe
55 Genome sequencing and
phylogenetic analysis of 387 isolates, representing the
56 Phylogenetic analysis of all coding genes showed a close
57 Phylogenetic analysis of apple bHLH (MdbHLH) genes and t
58 cal contact tracing of patients and Bayesian
phylogenetic analysis of bacterial WGS data were used to
59 angiosperms and gymnosperms were used for a
phylogenetic analysis of end wall types, calculation of
60 nd CISD3, Miner2) as our guides to conduct a
phylogenetic analysis of eukaryotic NEET proteins and th
61 Phylogenetic analysis of metagenome sequences indicated
62 The
phylogenetic analysis of NucS indicates a complex evolut
63 Kingdom-wide
phylogenetic analysis of over 400 CYP716s from over 200
64 HTS and
phylogenetic analysis of paired specimens confirmed shed
65 Phylogenetic analysis of plastid and mitochondrial genes
66 Phylogenetic analysis of SNAP genes from 22 diverse plan
67 Phylogenetic analysis of the algal fermentative enzyme s
68 Temporal
phylogenetic analysis of the emergence of ST69 and ST131
69 Phylogenetic analysis of the whole genome identified a c
70 Phylogenetic analysis of translation system components,
71 Phylogenetic analysis revealed that all NPC-EBV genomes
72 Metagenomic binning and
phylogenetic analysis revealed that two anammox populati
73 Phylogenetic analysis showed distinct GII.4 variants in
74 Phylogenetic analysis showed most of the HRSVA sequences
75 Phylogenetic analysis showed that disease flares were as
76 Phylogenetic analysis showed that in the structural regi
77 Phylogenetic analysis suggested that SbCYP82D2 might hav
78 Phylogenetic analysis supported close relationships amon
79 its relationships by designing an inclusive
phylogenetic analysis that broadly incorporates definiti
80 Then, using a
phylogenetic analysis to examine actin evolution, we sho
81 We used whole-genome sequencing and
phylogenetic analysis to investigate the patterns of glo
82 Here, Grabowski and Jungers use comparative
phylogenetic analysis to reconstruct the likely size of
83 The accuracy of
phylogenetic analysis was 100%.
84 In support of RNA mutation and
phylogenetic analysis, a web server (RNA-TVcurve) was de
85 were performed with hierarchical clustering,
phylogenetic analysis, and principal component analysis.
86 ural and mechanistic insights, together with
phylogenetic analysis, suggest convergent evolution of p
87 In this study, based on homology search and
phylogenetic analysis, we identified three homologs of A
88 Phylogenetic and demographic analyses indicate that Chin
89 Finally, using a combination of
phylogenetic and distance-based approaches, we showed th
90 ally variable RNA virus populations, but for
phylogenetic and evolutionary analyses, longer sequences
91 We conducted
phylogenetic and expression analysis for eight SEP-like
92 proteins from 4,650 samples, improving their
phylogenetic and functional interpretation.
93 Phylogenetic and genetic evidence suggests that the comp
94 Their
phylogenetic and genomic diversity suggests ecological n
95 ass of 69 notoungulate taxa, placed in their
phylogenetic and geological contexts.
96 nd those isolated from humans, comprehensive
phylogenetic and molecular analyses of viruses collected
97 Phylogenetic and motif analyses indicated that XND1 and
98 Interestingly,
phylogenetic and physiological studies suggest that homo
99 ee key dimensions of biodiversity-taxonomic,
phylogenetic,
and traits-and (ii) determine the overlap
100 doubled due to progress of the Gene Ontology
Phylogenetic Annotation Project.
101 Our multimodel inference
phylogenetic approach showed that the barriers that need
102 Currently, widely accepted
phylogenetic approaches are based on multiple sequence a
103 d for continued synthesis between fossil and
phylogenetic approaches to macroevolution.
104 tification of homologs between species using
phylogenetic approaches, a consideration of the inter- a
105 We assessed the temporal and
phylogenetic associations between the serogroup W outbre
106 d the potential associations (functional and
phylogenetic)
between host plants and butterflies in 561
107 Genetic,
phylogenetic,
bioinformatics, structural, and biochemica
108 (N), syntenies, and tuning sites along each
phylogenetic branch during evolution.
109 profiling of tumours depends on the earliest
phylogenetic branching event during tumour growth.
110 Phylogenetic character analysis demonstrates that high A
111 gly, partial 'un-scoring' of the problematic
phylogenetic characters was proposed.
112 Based on their
phylogenetic closeness and the similarity of their MTL (
113 ture) had lower alpha diversity and midrange
phylogenetic clustering, characteristic of ecosystem dis
114 Candidate phyla (CP) are broad
phylogenetic clusters of organisms that lack cultured re
115 Two
phylogenetic clusters were suggestive of interclass MRSA
116 tives within Brassicaceae identified a clear
phylogenetic co-occurrence between ER bodies and IGs, bu
117 Based on
phylogenetic comparative analyses on 3,005 bird species,
118 Here we report results from a
phylogenetic comparative analysis of over 1000 species o
119 Here, we develop a
phylogenetic comparative framework for testing if and ho
120 Using state-of-the-art
phylogenetic comparative methods, we show that successfu
121 zed karyotype evolution in Agrodiaetus using
phylogenetic comparative methods.
122 tly between all three land use types, as did
phylogenetic composition.
123 The hypothesis of a
phylogenetic connection between protorespect in primate
124 When placed in a
phylogenetic context, our new taxon indicates that filte
125 Phylogenetic,
cytogenetic, and genomic analyses implied
126 cess combined with targeting rRNA to exploit
phylogenetic differences for sensitive and unambiguous s
127 Determination of
phylogenetic dis(similarities) showed that the bacterial
128 argely comparable and generally unrelated to
phylogenetic distance among hosts.
129 Here, we show how the use of
phylogenetic distance based redundancy analysis provides
130 Consistent with their
phylogenetic distance from described subgroups, the geno
131 during an immunological challenge, we used a
phylogenetic distance metric to analyze Ig heavy-chain t
132 nsory ecology plays a stronger role than the
phylogenetic distance of the three species in structurin
133 ose a hybrid approach that also incorporates
phylogenetic distance to provide greater resolution.
134 ther potentially explanatory traits, such as
phylogenetic distance, as well as female reproductive sc
135 yrmecoid clades are separated by substantial
phylogenetic distances-as much as 105 million years.
136 Based on its
phylogenetic distribution and sequence clustering, Anbu
137 e disparate biosynthetic origins and distant
phylogenetic distribution implies these loops evolved in
138 We review the
phylogenetic distribution of plant feeding in the Crusta
139 ein family, and shed additional light on the
phylogenetic distribution of selenoprotein containing ge
140 acid polymerase families, (b) the origin and
phylogenetic distribution of TBP, TFB, and TFE transcrip
141 t microbiotas was independent of dietary and
phylogenetic divergence among hosts.
142 tial mechanistic diversity, underscoring the
phylogenetic divergence of related CRISPR-Cas systems.
143 es in microbial composition, alpha, beta and
phylogenetic diversity associated with a higher radiativ
144 body sites; it also quantified species with
phylogenetic diversity under-represented in isolate geno
145 mate change-mediated range shifts can reduce
phylogenetic diversity within high latitude communities,
146 ent analyses targeting the genetic identity,
phylogenetic diversity, and spatial distribution of Balt
147 Bacterial diversity (Faith
phylogenetic diversity, P = .003) and composition change
148 e in novel protein families as a function of
phylogenetic diversity.
149 ition increased ecological stochasticity and
phylogenetic diversity.
150 o account slope estimation error and examine
phylogenetic,
ecological and geographic predictors of in
151 Furthermore, we demonstrate that community
phylogenetic ecology coupled with phylodynamic technique
152 We then linked genomic,
phylogenetic,
epidemiologic, and clinical data in order
153 proaches often use static representations of
phylogenetic,
epidemiological, statistical and evolution
154 This represents unambiguous
phylogenetic evidence for a single origin of the group's
155 uction of protein ancestry in the absence of
phylogenetic evidence.
156 ombination of factors such as anatomical and
phylogenetic evolutionary constraints, and further empir
157 Here we test this hypothesis using a solid
phylogenetic framework of Neotropical Catasetinae, the a
158 Some network parameters are similar within
phylogenetic groups (e.g., non-primates, strepsirrhines,
159 mportance of incorporating biogeographic and
phylogenetic history in predicting community and ecosyst
160 leles throughout the tumour we can infer the
phylogenetic history of the tumour, identify epialleles
161 The lasting imprint of
phylogenetic history on current day ecological patterns
162 To evaluate support for this
phylogenetic hypothesis at the molecular level, we seque
163 cate reticulate evolution as a main cause of
phylogenetic incongruence.
164 On the basis of three existing
phylogenetic inference algorithms, we built an integrate
165 - and compute-intensive applications such as
phylogenetic inference for large-scale sequences.
166 Phylogenetic inference is an attractive means to reconst
167 Because
phylogenetic inference is an important basis for answeri
168 Phylogenetic inference typically invokes nocturnality as
169 tes for computationally intensive methods of
phylogenetic inference using (for example) maximal likel
170 s and assess the effects of recombination on
phylogenetic inference.
171 components analysis, incorporated modulated
phylogenetic information and enhanced interpretation thr
172 Inclusion of
phylogenetic information provides a powerful framework f
173 , knowing that there is unexplained residual
phylogenetic information should spur the search for addi
174 es to selection arising from fluctuations in
phylogenetic integration, thus influencing differential
175 ed the computational burden for even routine
phylogenetic investigations.
176 uction method to visualize large multi-locus
phylogenetic landscapes and demonstrate that 3D projecti
177 oaches to aid in the comparison of different
phylogenetic landscapes are presented.
178 ical characterization of orthologs along the
phylogenetic lineage from cassava to A. thaliana, sugges
179 tepping that are conserved among these three
phylogenetic lineages of the Rad51/RecA family and also
180 d others unique to their specific species or
phylogenetic lineages.
181 lative representation and abundance of grass
phylogenetic lineages.
182 Specifically,
phylogenetic linear mixed models show that the formation
183 ection has been relatively under-employed in
phylogenetics,
mainly due to the cost of sequencing geno
184 ernal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as the
phylogenetic marker for HRM, we observed complex melt cu
185 applied for taxonomic classification of any
phylogenetic marker gene sequences.
186 ferent regions of the 16S rRNA gene or other
phylogenetic marker genes.
187 We conducted a
phylogenetic meta-analysis of 342 host-parasite interact
188 build a viral tree of life using traditional
phylogenetic methods based on conserved proteins.
189 ata from 20 historical outbreaks and applied
phylogenetic methods to assess genetic relatedness and t
190 In this review we discuss
phylogenetic methods used to study the emergence of drug
191 Using several different
phylogenetic methods, we analyzed viral gp120 sequences
192 Our
phylogenetic models indicate that Dinocephalosaurus dete
193 e we quantify faunal cosmopolitanism using a
phylogenetic network approach for 891 terrestrial verteb
194 Here, Button et al. develop a
phylogenetic network approach to test this hypothesis an
195 itionally, fimH subtyping was evaluated on a
phylogenetic network of 122 sequence type 131 (ST131) E.
196 the patient sample titre was compared to the
phylogenetics of RSV, emergent clades were identified th
197 nth has shown considerable potential for the
phylogenetics of this and other groups.
198 We use whole-genome
phylogenetics on 182 strains from 17 countries to provid
199 han triple the protected range of species or
phylogenetic or functional units.
200 ongly supported the hypothesis that ERA is a
phylogenetic orthologue of Ls, although it plays a broad
201 Phylogenetic placement was concordant between direct and
202 DNA barcoding, as well as the morphology and
phylogenetic position of each symbiont, all three repres
203 The characteristics of its symbionts, its
phylogenetic position within Teredinidae, the reduction
204 Such a
phylogenetic position would indicate the presence of a s
205 Consistent with its unique
phylogenetic position, small RNA sequencing revealed 29
206 Depending on its exact
phylogenetic position, the meiofaunal habit of Saccorhyt
207 e also tested alternative hypotheses for the
phylogenetic positions of ants and bees.
208 Longidorus and Paralongidorus and different
phylogenetic possibilities for the three Xiphinema speci
209 Overall, species and
phylogenetic priorities are more similar to each other t
210 m compatibility is a useful tool for certain
phylogenetic problems, such as inferring the relationshi
211 anging this paradigm, particularly given the
phylogenetic range and relatively unknown characteristic
212 loid populations spanning the geographic and
phylogenetic range of the Campanula rotundifolia polyplo
213 Phylogenetic reconstruction indicates that these two vir
214 Phylogenetic reconstruction of the linker set was consis
215 sequence divergence from active copies, and
phylogenetic reconstruction suggests that they represent
216 Maximum compatibility is a method of
phylogenetic reconstruction that is seldom applied to mo
217 ombination of tools that include large-scale
phylogenetic reconstruction to determine the sequence, s
218 We apply Bayesian
phylogenetic reconstruction to infer the time point at w
219 We performed
phylogenetic reconstruction, resurrection and biophysica
220 he choice of loci can have a major impact on
phylogenetic reconstruction.
221 Comparative analyses and
phylogenetic reconstructions revealed that fungal Fzo1 a
222 nd hence, random signals of relationships in
phylogenetic reconstructions.
223 more often than retrotransposons, and unveil
phylogenetic relatedness and geographical proximity as m
224 measures of functional trait similarity and
phylogenetic relatedness and that transcriptomics has th
225 6S-based ecological datasets, accounting for
phylogenetic relatedness of the taxa.
226 We controlled for
phylogenetic relatedness, body mass and the size of the
227 Using
phylogenetic relatedness, climatic ranges, growth form a
228 lades within human body sites increases with
phylogenetic relatedness.
229 stance-abundance slope and species traits or
phylogenetic relatedness.
230 single fovea, controlling for the effects of
phylogenetic relatedness.
231 ome sequence analysis was used to assess the
phylogenetic relationship among LA-MRSA CC398 isolates f
232 kmer ID results were explained by the close
phylogenetic relationship between the two species and we
233 ns in major tetraconate taxa suggest a close
phylogenetic relationship of Remipedia, Cephalocarida, a
234 However, given their close
phylogenetic relationship, geographic proximity, and tem
235 Despite the close
phylogenetic relationship, Hepatocystis parasites lack t
236 t orders of birds did not strictly depend on
phylogenetic relationship.
237 Phylogenetic relationships among Laverania species are c
238 Phylogenetic relationships among major lineages of the E
239 The
phylogenetic relationships among these variants as well
240 tes; however, their evolutionary origins and
phylogenetic relationships are obscure, thus hampering c
241 between TB&S and WGS data, revealed the true
phylogenetic relationships between different species of
242 nocturnality has long been inferred from the
phylogenetic relationships of crown Mammalia, which is p
243 dge on the identity, function, genomics, and
phylogenetic relationships of insect-bacteria symbioses
244 However, the
phylogenetic relationships of the genes that convert Ca(
245 o more accurately identify subclones, define
phylogenetic relationships, and probe genotype-phenotype
246 Based on bioinformatic properties and
phylogenetic relationships, we named the new families OC
247 otential contingencies on species traits and
phylogenetic relationships.
248 clans, which attested its usefulness in the
phylogenetic representation of the evolutionary relation
249 Examining the system with higher
phylogenetic resolution revealed a moderate contribution
250 velopmental events in organisms spanning the
phylogenetic scale.
251 Considering microbiomes at appropriate
phylogenetic scales allows us to model their evolution a
252 f species, that their expression has varying
phylogenetic signal among lineages, and that the crown s
253 nitrogen concentration showing the strongest
phylogenetic signal and specific root length showing int
254 Finally, we detect a clear
phylogenetic signal from one ochrophyte subgroup, the li
255 We find a strong
phylogenetic signal in the non-autoregressive co-varianc
256 The present study analyzes the
phylogenetic signal of genomic regions with different in
257 Traits were linked but showed no
phylogenetic signal, suggesting that syndromes were envi
258 und that chromosome numbers possess a strong
phylogenetic signal.
259 logists have increasingly sought to quantify
phylogenetic signals in environmental niche preferences
260 ne data set, including traits eliminated all
phylogenetic signals in the residual variation of both a
261 their stability in biological fluids, their
phylogenetic similarities, and their tissue specificity.
262 wledge about the geographic distribution and
phylogenetic structure of mitochondrial lineages that ha
263 hange can help to predict future patterns in
phylogenetic structure.
264 Phylogenetic structuring accounts for most of the variat
265 to which these controls are confounded with
phylogenetic structuring remains unclear.
266 Phylogenetic studies have shown that ZIKV has evolved in
267 Furthermore,
phylogenetic studies indicated that it was evolutionaril
268 Phylogenetic studies revealed a patchy distribution of b
269 Phylogenetic studies, transport assays with the recombin
270 ing nuclear data for polyploids have impeded
phylogenetic study of these groups.
271 A multilocus
phylogenetic study was carried out to assess species ide
272 mpositions differ systematically between the
phylogenetic subgroups, indicating high potential for ch
273 Phylogenetic survey suggests that reduced dependence on
274 Namely, that they are conserved across deep
phylogenetic timescales, are associated with gene/genome
275 Using
phylogenetic '
tip-dating' analysis with fossils, we show
276 Structural alignment and
phylogenetic tree analysis indicate that StnA represents
277 cture of individual genes; (ii) genes in the
phylogenetic tree can now be also grouped according to K
278 This package aims to improve the quality of
phylogenetic tree construction especially in instances o
279 community-onset and HO-USA300 strains on the
phylogenetic tree indicates that these strains derive fr
280 When the
phylogenetic tree is mis-specified or non-informative, o
281 Our dated
phylogenetic tree places Macrauchenia as sister to Peris
282 Maximum parsimony
phylogenetic tree reconciliation is an important techniq
283 greedy alignment-free distance estimator for
phylogenetic tree reconstruction based on the concept of
284 s somatic mutations into clones and infers a
phylogenetic tree that describes the evolutionary histor
285 etermined because the branching order in the
phylogenetic tree was inconsistent with the order of iso
286 orrelation of viral loads in cherries of the
phylogenetic tree, showing that both models of character
287 A Bayesian
phylogenetic tree, together with associated dating analy
288 s only when inconsistent with most taxa in a
phylogenetic tree.
289 torial constraints defined by the underlying
phylogenetic tree.
290 patients were more widely distributed in the
phylogenetic tree.
291 ures: (i) a new viewer was developed to show
phylogenetic trees displayed along with the structure of
292 We constructed
phylogenetic trees for 794 subtype A1 and 64 subtype B s
293 Analyses of
phylogenetic trees generated by cgMLST displayed a high
294 t was associated with more unbalanced tumour
phylogenetic trees, suggesting the need of denser sampli
295 the interpretation of the relationship among
phylogenetic trees.
296 approaches from ancestor-descendant pairs to
phylogenetic trees.
297 relationship among a large set of competing
phylogenetic trees.
298 e DNA regions to reconstruct high-confidence
phylogenetic trees.
299 press disturbance (long-term) influences the
phylogenetic turnover of soil microbial communities resp
300 In
phylogenetics,
we often seek to reconcile gene trees wit