ライフサイエンスコーパス: physical distance

1 allowing a direct comparison of cRay6000 to physical distance.

2 l candidate genes, showed a rapid decay with physical distance.

3 zero in the ideal limit irrespective of the physical distance.

4 e disequilibrium is not a simple function of physical distance.

5 mbination rate, specifically the genetic and physical distance.

6 w rates of recombination over a considerable physical distance.

7 onemal complex, reflects genetic rather than physical distance.

8 ximizes the ratio of genetic map distance to physical distance.

9 t maps, and correlate genetic distances with physical distances.

10 stances from the probability distribution of physical distances.

11 any such markers can be studied within short physical distances.

12 t our notion of travel depth, simply put the physical distance a solvent molecule would have to trave

13 t near-constant female, recombination versus physical distance across 21q, explaining the gender-spec

14 recombination is not a constant function of physical distance across chromosomes.

15 terologies, recombination is proportional to physical distance across the bz gene.

16 modes of all paired plastid genes and their physical distances across user-defined lineages, which a

17 strings are copied and reinserted over large physical distances, allowing for a duplication block to

18 tion in the relationship between genetic and physical distance along the chromosome.

19 Structural barriers such as physical distance also featured as a challenge to interp

20 used for comparative mapping and to estimate physical distances among markers in many Poaceae species

21 tes quality control, linkage disequilibrium, physical distance and gene ontology to identify authenti

22 s, in terms of their close relationship with physical distance and recombination rate, their small va

23 ce in body methylation levels increases with physical distance and synonymous (Ks) substitution rates

24 These interactions reflected the physical distances and orientation tuning properties of

25 This model predicts actual physical distances and to what extent chromosomal contac

26 We found that LD declined with physical distance approximately five times faster on the

27 calizing expressed sequences, and reflecting physical distance are essential for disease gene identif

28 with a resolution of better than 100 kb, and physical distances are determined.

29 of these assumptions for the calculation of physical distances are investigated.

30 een origin and destination, rather than pure physical distance, as considered in some previous works.

31 The order of and physical distance between 180 polymorphic markers, many

32 The physical distance between an eQTN and its associated tra

33 of compensatory evolution decreases with the physical distance between base-pairing residues.

34 nels (CaV2.1) and is highly dependent on the physical distance between CaV2.1 and synaptic vesicles (

35 re of segregated topology; and the Euclidean physical distance between connected nodes, a proxy marke

36 of the YACs, BAC, and PAC revealed that the physical distance between D14S250 and D14S78 is less tha

37 on between the probability of conversion and physical distance between duplicates after controlling f

38 by limits to bacterial dispersal imposed by physical distance between hosts.

39 tween inserts on homologues decreased as the physical distance between insert sites was increased.

40 lations, pairwise LD decayed with increasing physical distance between loci in two of the three chrom

41 ced breakage of chromosomes to determine the physical distance between markers, as well as their orde

42 ypes and either contracting or expanding the physical distance between markers.

43 measuring the overlap between clones or the physical distance between non-overlapping contigs.

44 To investigate the physical distance between S4 and the pore domain in func

45 the stem-loop structure opens increasing the physical distance between the donor and acceptor moietie

46 The physical distance between the healed telomeric end and t

47 of meioses observed, the heterozygosity and physical distance between the loci studied, and the stat

48 The physical distance between the transcription start sites

49 y point (3-4 microm) is not dependent on the physical distance between the two centromeres, indicatin

50 The physical distance between the two markers is 1.0 Mb.

51 e data address the overlooked problem of the physical distance between the vitamin's reducing hydroge

52 esent on the ancestral chromosome versus the physical distance between them, was compared with a plot

53 rred to play alone, work alone, and put more physical distance between themselves and a new acquainta

54 10-kb restriction fragment, representing the physical distance between these markers.

55 ot fixed, but are modulated by the real-time physical distances between body parts.

56 d has been providing valuable information on physical distances between loci (via image analysis) for

57 aging allows the construction of maps of the physical distances between occurrences of the sequence m

58 The PESM approach compares the physical distances between paired-end sequencing reads o

59 tribution whose intensity decreases with the physical distances between the loci.

60 This analysis made it possible to estimate physical distances between the majority of chromosome 4

61 (CL) model that has these features when the physical distances between the marker loci are known or

62 markers, but also accurate estimates of the physical distances between them.

63 ant across the chromosome, good estimates of physical distance can be derived using simple models of

64 Anatomical connectivity, rather than physical distance, determined the coupling strength of t

65 This regulation can operate over physical distances encompassing half the genome.

66 ond operons, there is a relationship between physical distance, expression similarity, and sequence s

67 y affect the correlation between genetic and physical distance for the same interval in maize.

68 neral, EST density increased relative to the physical distance from the centromere.

69 d onto a moveable screen placed at different physical distances from the animal.

70 mes, although at the present time only short physical distances have been examined.

71 The ratio of genetic to physical distance in the hot spot is 85 cM/Mb, two order

72 he Genethon and CHLC genetic linkage maps to physical distance in the metric map is approximately 1.7

73 nable correlation between disequilibrium and physical distance in the region (r=-.540, P=.001, one-ta

74 dication of a decline of disequilibrium with physical distance in this region.

75 nterpersonal space (e.g., IPS) refers to the physical distance individuals maintain from others durin

76 Finally, (e) controlling for physical distance, introns of proximate genes are most d

77 nt measurements, and their relationship with physical distance is highly noisy.

78 sons; in this region the ratio of genetic to physical distance is less than 0.5% of the genome's aver

79 regions where the rate of crossing over per physical distance is restricted.

80 y complex (MHC) fall into regions of limited physical distance known as hot spots of meiotic recombin

81 re separated by at least the average 3600 kb physical distance mapped across the DXZ1 array.

82 wever, in the age of whole-genome sequences, physical distances measured in base pairs of DNA provide

83 al spans a genetic distance of 5.41 cM and a physical distance of 15.1 Mb that overlaps the DFN2 locu

84 ion was refined to <3 cM, corresponding to a physical distance of 3.5 megabasepairs.

85 to 3 cM, corresponding to a maximum possible physical distance of 4.0 Mb.

86 en D10S1237 and D10S1723, corresponding to a physical distance of 9.5 megabases.

87 ecombination cold spot, and corresponds to a physical distance of about 15 Mb.

88 , BAC, PAC, and cosmid resources and spans a physical distance of approximately 0.3 Mb.

89 le BAC contig which spans the Vf region at a physical distance of approximately 1,100 kb has been con

90 ic distance of 8.9 cM which corresponds to a physical distance of approximately 1.44 Mb, representing

91 In this region, 1 cM represents a physical distance of approximately 160 kb.

92 The BAC contig spans a physical distance of approximately 300 kb corresponding

93 ert within an interval that corresponds to a physical distance of approximately 390 kb.

94 ey genetic distance of 0.6 cM and a rice DNA physical distance of ca. 70 kb.

95 nificant signals of recombination across the physical distance of the genes.

96 of tactile localization as a function of the physical distance of the tactile stimuli from the partic

97 The close physical distance of these genes and the interrelated fu

98 th paralogs decays to background levels over physical distances of less than 1 kb.

99 Selection of tagSNP using physical distance or linkage disequilibrium information

100 These data may indicate a much larger physical distance or suppression of recombination in the

101 The average physical distance per genetic distance was estimated at

102 tion and significant variation in genetic to physical distance ratios.

103 al, size, and shape of the nanoparticle, the physical distance separating the metal nanoparticle from

104 o 0.32 by 5.5 kbp in the former, the maximum physical distance surveyed), a difference attributed to

105 thin SNPs by linkage disequilibrium at large physical distances to obtain unbiased results.

106 Estimates of physical distance using in situ hybridization to cells i

107 l, the distribution of r(2) as a function of physical distance was in close agreement with neutral co

108 tion in the relationship between genetic and physical distance was measured over the avrCO39 chromoso

109 However, physical distance was not the only factor determining th

110 The decay of linkage disequilibrium with physical distance was slower than expected from previous

111 these, the relationship between genetic and physical distances was examined and the genome-wide reco

112 rley cross-overs in relation to the rice DNA physical distances was extremely uneven.

113 ulations, disequilibrium decays rapidly with physical distance, which is consistent with this interva

114 s primarily due to two large gaps of unknown physical distance within the known yeast and bacterial a

115 has determined that the ratio of genetic to physical distance within wx was one to two orders of mag