ライフサイエンスコーパス: physical performance

1 w, oxygen and nutrient delivery and improved physical performance.

2 e of associations of IGF-II, or IGFBP-3 with physical performance.

3 expression, affecting energy production and physical performance.

4 does a more comprehensive summary measure of physical performance.

5 se and carbohydrate supplementation improves physical performance.

6 ional issues, such as emotional distress and physical performance.

7 dysphoria, myalgia, and impaired mental and physical performance.

8 everal measures of higher-level function and physical performance.

9 an are the relations of either of these with physical performance.

10 the association between vitamin D status and physical performance.

11 ere body composition, handgrip strength, and physical performance.

12 nting or delaying the age-related decline in physical performance.

13 n the transfer from mental practice to overt physical performance.

14 ium supplementation affects elderly people's physical performance.

15 keletal muscle adaptation and improvement of physical performance.

16 Surgeons perceived improvements in physical performance (57%) and mental focus (38%); 87% o

17 Surgeons perceived improvements in physical performance (57%) and mental focus (38%); 87% o

18 au Functional Health Scale, and questions on physical performance, adapted from Nagi, as well as info

19 nvestigation was to characterize and compare physical performance among CCSs and a group of siblings

20 The 25(OH)D thresholds were 70-80 nmol/L for physical performance and 55-70 nmol/L for strength.

21 I used super learning in the Study of Physical Performance and Age-Related Changes in Sonomans

22 mimetic amine, ephedrine, is used to augment physical performance and as a weight loss aid, but littl

23 ex neurodegenerative process that may affect physical performance and cognition.

24 rmine the temporal relationship between poor physical performance and cognitive dysfunction.

25 The novel ketone diet, therefore, improved physical performance and cognitive function in rats, and

26 ments in iron status and improve measures of physical performance and cognitive status in female sold

27 Exercise training enhances physical performance and confers health benefits, largel

28 ng cross-sectional relationship between poor physical performance and dementia in people 90 years and

29 ial step in understanding their chemical and physical performance and in exploring their potential ap

30 her ACE inhibitors also prevent reduction in physical performance and in muscle strength in older wom

31 increased risk for functional limitations in physical performance and in participation in activities

32 een mealtime protein-intake distribution and physical performance and its 3-y decline in community-dw

33 Anemia is also prognostic for diminished physical performance and loss of mobility in people 65 y

34 te self-reported functioning for measures of physical performance and omit weight loss or substitute

35 fat mass negatively impacts some domains of physical performance and overall functioning, while lean

36 iosensors could lead to useful insights into physical performance and overall physiological status, h

37 drial respiration provides energy to support physical performance and physiological well-being, where

38 patients according to the patients' overall physical performance and preference.

39 with Stage I COPD experience improvements in physical performance and quality of life as a result of

40 rogram managed by dialysis staff may improve physical performance and quality of life in patients on

41 al muscle provides a mechanism for enhancing physical performance and resistance to fatigue by augmen

42 relative measures of fat and lean mass with physical performance and self-reported functional limita

43 Although physical performance and strength declined over 4 years

44 The 25(OH)D threshold for physical performance and strength was determined, and bo

45 ongitudinal associations between 25(OH)D and physical performance and strength were examined, in men

46 serum 25(OH)D was measured in 1998-1999, and physical performance and strength were measured at basel

47 older adults and are associated with poorer physical performance and strength, but results from long

48 ant concentrations correlate positively with physical performance and strength.

49 definition of frailty that includes measured physical performance and weight loss in a cross-sectiona

50 ts (low muscle mass, quadriceps strength and physical performance) and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD),

51 een linked to sleep disorders, cognitive and physical performance, and chronic disease.

52 WOMAC pain subscale scores (P = 0.126), physical performance, and depressive symptoms did not di

53 ficits in skeletal muscle mass, strength and physical performance, and examine the associations of th

54 eline data in 1993-1994 on body composition, physical performance, and functional limitation.

55 dest improvements in measures of disability, physical performance, and pain from participating in eit

56 m that affects maternal and child mortality, physical performance, and referral to health-care profes

57 Deficits in quadriceps muscle strength and physical performance are common in LTx candidates and fu

58 Depressive symptoms and physical performance are inversely associated, but it is

59 Claims that growth hormone enhances physical performance are not supported by the scientific

60 We measured physical performance as secondary outcomes (four-step st

61 igh-composition measures with disability and physical performance, as measured with the Health Assess

62 In older adults, measurements of physical performance assess physical function and associ

63 D, resembling physiologic aging, but whether physical performance associates with clinical outcome in

64 The main study outcomes included change in physical performance at 6 months, assessed by the 6-minu

65 ticipants with 25(OH)D <50 nmol/L had poorer physical performance at baseline and at 2- and 4-year fo

66 5% confidence interval 1.09-1.25), and Short Physical Performance Battery <10 (hazard ratio = 1.45, 9

67 ts at every outpatient visit using the Short Physical Performance Battery (0 = impaired to 12 = robus

68 treat, was mobility measured with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) 4 months after surge

69 erformance-based measures included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Short Portable S

70 erformance-based measures included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Short Portable S

71 Valued Life Activities (VLAs), and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) instruments, were ex

72 n and women aged 70 to 89 years with a Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score of 9 or less b

73 tcomes were ventilator days, ICU days, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score, 36-item Short

74 the Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).

75 erable Elders Survey (VES-13), and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).

76 he primary outcome was a change in the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB); secondary outcomes

77 Objective PF was assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB, timed 4-m walk, chai

78 n function at 6 months measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB; range 0-12, higher s

79 2 measures of physical functioning (a Short Physical Performance Battery and a 4-meter test of usual

80 ortality risk was similar for the full short physical performance battery and walking speed alone, in

81 d as a loss of at least 1 point in the Short Physical Performance Battery during the 3-year follow-up

82 limitations, defined as a score on the Short Physical Performance Battery of 9 or below, but were abl

83 .03 seconds in chair stands, and -0.16 Short Physical Performance Battery points.

84 justment for potential confounders and Short Physical Performance Battery score at baseline (beta = .

85 was significantly associated with the Short Physical Performance Battery score at follow-up after ad

86 The mean decline in the Short Physical Performance Battery score was 1.1 point.

87 asures included the 6-min walk and the Short Physical Performance Battery score.

88 d (FEV(1)), was associated with poorer Short Physical Performance Battery scores and less distance wa

89 uality of life but did not improve the short physical performance battery scores of PAD participants

90 Neither exercise group improved its short physical performance battery scores.

91 adults aged >/=70 years completed the Short Physical Performance Battery test (SPPB) test and assess

92 % CI 4.64 to 35.55, p < 0.001) for the Short Physical Performance Battery when adjusting for confound

93 omes were objective physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery) and depressive symptoms (P

94 subscale scores, physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery), and depressive symptoms (

95 ed measures: lower extremity function (Short Physical Performance Battery), submaximal exercise perfo

96 Primary measures included a short physical performance battery, a test of walking speed, a

97 ere compared: Fried, Fried+, Rockwood, Short Physical Performance Battery, Bern, Columbia, and the Es

98 was assessed by handgrip strength, the Short Physical Performance Battery, timed up and go, a 6-min w

99 d for older age and lower score on the Short Physical Performance Battery.

100 gth, and physical performance with the Short Physical Performance Battery.

101 imilar in magnitude for models using a Short Physical Performance Battery.

102 vitamin C was significantly associated with physical performance (beta = 0.029, P = 0.04).

103 Outcome measures included physical performance, body composition, bone mineral den

104 s of muscle power are major factors limiting physical performance but little is known about the molec

105 Magnesium deficiency is associated with poor physical performance, but no trials are available on how

106 have been used throughout history to enhance physical performance, but scientific scrutiny with contr

107 ance was measured by a free-recall test, and physical performance by power output on an indoor rowing

108 annually between 0.7% and 2.2% and objective physical performance capacity (standing up from a chair,

109 a detrimental effect of a vegetarian diet on physical performance capacity, especially when carbohydr

110 of insulin were weakly associated with worse physical performance (CaPS and Boyd Orr combined: get-up

111 f exercise on bone health, body composition, physical performance, cardiometabolic risk, fatigue, and

112 for assessing the likelihood and severity of physical performance decrement for a given task as well

113 al step for revealing the many mechanisms of physical performance decrement, but accurate predictive

114 bution and adjusted for potential covariates.Physical performance deteriorated over 3 y with muscle s

115 ly CKD patients are associated with impaired physical performance, disability, poorer quality of life

116 tion may prove to be beneficial for mood and physical performance during the training period.

117 Physical performance emerges from complex interactions a

118 existed between vitamin D concentration and physical performance except for single-leg stands.

119 tion, there was no dose-effect relation with physical performance except for single-leg stands.

120 ne, and related alkaloids have not benefited physical performance except when combined with caffeine.

121 r levels of inflammatory markers, and better physical performance/functioning and sleep quality.

122 e these measures at week 36 and impairments, physical performance, global change, psychological statu

123 Physical activity and physical performance have been linked to fall risk in th

124 sociation functional class, quality of life, physical performance, hospitalization, and event-free su

125 Poor physical performance in all measures was significantly a

126 tioxidants with skeletal muscle strength and physical performance in elderly persons.

127 n between iron deficiency without anemia and physical performance in healthy active women aged 19-36

128 f oral magnesium supplementation can improve physical performance in healthy elderly women.

129 e supplementation for 12 wk seems to improve physical performance in healthy elderly women.

130 (HIIT) is a time-efficient way of improving physical performance in healthy subjects and in patients

131 Muscle strength and physical performance in old age might be related to the

132 in middle-age were associated with improved physical performance in old age, but estimates were impr

133 iated with improved, and insulin with worse, physical performance in old age.

134 SNPs may be associated with a key measure of physical performance in older adults.

135 endicular lean body mass (aLBM) and improves physical performance in older individuals who have had r

136 were strongly associated with disability and physical performance in RA patients, with RA disease fea

137 Vitamin D adequacy has been associated with physical performance in the elderly.

138 pacity for lipogenesis in muscle to preserve physical performance in the setting of disrupted metabol

139 s of insulin, IGF-I, IGF-II and IGFBP-3 with physical performance in the UK-based Caerphilly Prospect

140 eath rate, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), physical performance in three tests and cognitive functi

141 physiological effects of poor iron status on physical performance, including work productivity, volun

142 icipants with poor higher-level function and physical performance increased substantially across the

143 its of calorie restriction, such as improved physical performance, increased insulin sensitivity, and

144 vant beneficial effects on body composition, physical performance, insulin sensitivity, or quality of

145 Physical performance is compromised in mice which lack e

146 le of protein intake and its distribution on physical performance is warranted, as are intervention s

147 ction also increase the risk of developing a physical performance limitation.

148 participation restrictions that result from physical performance limitations among childhood cancer

149 Physical performance limitations are one of the potentia

150 Our review showed that physical performance limitations are prevalent among chi

151 In summary, monitoring of physical performance limitations in an aging cohort of c

152 ortant and will help determine the impact of physical performance limitations on morbidity, mortality

153 ly published from the CCSS cohort related to physical performance limitations were reviewed and the r

154 Therapies that can increase muscle mass and physical performance may be a promising option; however,

155 bjects performed the Get Up and Go test as a physical performance measure of function and completed t

156 association between depressive symptoms and physical performance measured using gait speed is bidire

157 Future studies should examine whether physical performance measures can further improve predic

158 Physical performance measures were compared in regressio

159 Odds of dementia in relation to the physical performance measures were estimated by logistic

160 The independent variables were physical performance measures, including 4-m walk, 5 cha

161 Physical performance measures, such as gait speed, might

162 easures plus little or no difficulty on five physical performance measures.

163 Deficits in quadriceps strength (n = 27) and physical performance (n = 24) were more common than musc

164 der (n = 307) and those with poorer baseline physical performance (n = 328) had better changes in exe

165 This increase in physical performance occurs in both young and adult mice

166 ive symptoms predicted subsequent decline in physical performance (odds ratio for decline, 1.03; 95%

167 The aim of this study was to assess the physical performance of a new PET/CT system, the Discove

168 In summary, impaired physical performance of the lower extremities is common

169 Muscle wasting and diminished physical performance often accompany CKD, resembling phy

170 associated with a faster rate of decline in physical performance or strength.

171 mptoms were predictive of greater decline in physical performance over 4 years (odds ratio for declin

172 s with low 25(OH)D concentrations had poorer physical performance over 4 years of follow-up, but low

173 Higher levels of physical performance persisted over 2 years among high-i

174 ollowing herbs are currently used to enhance physical performance regardless of scientific evidence o

175 ss, but the relation of this distribution to physical performance remains unknown.We examined the rel

176 on (beta = 0.566, P = 0.003) and the summary physical performance score (beta = 0.044, P = 0.008).

177 Caregiving intensity status and physical performance score (sum of quartiles of walking

178 Odds ratios for every unit decrease in physical performance score were 2.1 for 4-m walk, 2.1 fo

179 Secondary outcomes included changes in physical performance, self-reported physical functioning

180 ere WOMAC function and pain subscale scores, physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery

181 ome measures were total scores on a modified Physical Performance Test (PPT), the Functional Status Q

182 The primary outcome was the change in Physical Performance Test score from baseline to 6 month

183 The Physical Performance Test score increased more in the co

184 substantial, but unique, clustering of each physical performance test to a single factor-frailty.

185 Each physical performance test was significantly associated w

186 Linear regression associated each physical performance test with frailty.

187 ntention-to-treat analysis, the score on the Physical Performance Test, in which higher scores indica

188 come was the change in score on the modified Physical Performance Test.

189 rvention) by using the Barthel index and the Physical Performance Test.

190 ance analysis (BIA) offers an alternative to physical performance testing.

191 ty, exhaustion, and shrinking-as measured by physical performance tests and questionnaires.

192 Physical performance tests included an assessment of sta

193 c test, longitudinal circadian analysis, and physical performance tests to characterize relevant slee

194 Tests of treatment effect on physical performance tests were done at a pre-specified

195 all other tests of treatment effect (except physical performance tests) were done at a two-sided alp

196 ed the interrelatedness of frailty and the 5 physical performance tests.

197 from a group of 69 nonanemic women and given physical-performance tests, including determinations of

198 6 subscales, activities of daily living, and physical performance than did those assigned to usual in

199 -intensity caregivers maintained the highest physical performance throughout follow-up.

200 ility to perform activities of daily living, physical performance, utilization of health services, an

201 Physical performance was assessed by handgrip strength,

202 Physical performance was assessed by match analysis in 1

203 Physical performance was assessed by walking speed and g

204 Physical performance was assessed on the basis of walkin

205 Physical performance was compared on reconstructed SPECT

206 Physical performance was evaluated by means of a 6-min w

207 Furthermore, the decrease in physical performance was greater than the decrease in me

208 Physical performance was measured using the get-up and g

209 n activities of daily living, cognition, and physical performance were worse than their male counterp

210 Physical performance, which was measured yearly, was gro

211 d the relation between physical activity and physical performance with incident falls in the Osteopor

212 espiratory muscle and handgrip strength, and physical performance with the Short Physical Performance