コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 delayed until he completed several weeks of physical therapy.
2 of obstetric risk factors, and pelvic-floor physical therapy.
3 18 to 60 years of age, who were referred to physical therapy.
4 s of individuals with knee osteoarthritis to physical therapy.
5 de oral medications, injections, bracing, or physical therapy.
6 y for 3 months, where he underwent intensive physical therapy.
7 to routine care interventions, such as chest physical therapy.
8 propofol, could blunt the responses to chest physical therapy.
9 nt received two successive sessions of chest physical therapy.
10 added to a regimen of antibiotics and chest physical therapy.
11 namic and metabolic stresses caused by chest physical therapy.
12 after the stroke onset, aside from rest and physical therapy.
13 and extent of soft tissue injuries prior to physical therapy.
14 tion (NMES) are common interventions used in physical therapy.
15 Guidelines recommend delaying referrals for physical therapy.
16 subacromial CSI versus 6 sessions of manual physical therapy.
17 e series of patients with ICUAW who received physical therapy.
18 curred at 1 center with patients referred to physical therapy.
19 oid injections (38% vs. 20%), and 19% needed physical therapy.
20 g, home hazard modification, and exercise or physical therapy.
21 d muscle relaxants) (P< 0.001) and used less physical therapy (0.2 percent vs. 2.6 percent, P<0.05).
22 Chi, 167 points [95% CI, 145 to 190 points]; physical therapy, 143 points [CI, 119 to 167 points]).
23 ized patients received 6 weeks of outpatient physical therapy 2 or 3 times per week through 1 of 2 in
24 (2 times per week for 12 weeks) or standard physical therapy (2 times per week for 6 weeks, followed
25 y (16% vs. 35%, p < .0001) and initiation of physical therapy (28% vs. 42%, p < .0001) compared with
26 vitamins and herbs (62.6%), and movement and physical therapies (59.2%) and predicted (P <.001) by se
27 rticipants in the study who were assigned to physical therapy alone (30%) had undergone surgery, and
28 er, 30% of the patients who were assigned to physical therapy alone underwent surgery within 6 months
30 to weekly acupuncture versus usual care (eg, physical therapy, analgesia, and/or anti-inflammatory dr
31 s with low back pain, the McKenzie method of physical therapy and chiropractic manipulation had simil
32 ly assigned to 6 months of either supervised physical therapy and exercise training (n = 46) or home
33 d power density of insonation are within the physical therapy and medical imaging windows; thus the a
34 s considerable variability surrounding early physical therapy and mobilization goals for patients wit
35 iderations when applying a strategy of early physical therapy and mobilization to this distinctive pa
37 es, nutritional deficiencies and the role of physical therapy and rehabilitation, are under recognize
40 ome-based intervention program that included physical therapy and that focused primarily on improving
43 s were involved in active rehabilitation and physical therapy and, ultimately, were ambulatory on ext
44 were no significant differences between the physical-therapy and chiropractic groups and no signific
45 r passive range of motion, 5.0 (3.0-8.0) for physical therapy, and 3.0 (1.0-5.0) for progressive resi
46 d to safely allow for active rehabilitation, physical therapy, and ambulation of patients being manag
47 laims, and extracted claims for medications, physical therapy, and healthcare visits for the 6 months
48 arge, consisting of passive range of motion, physical therapy, and progressive resistance exercise.
49 nistration of minocycline and by the type of physical therapy applied reached statistical significanc
51 four reviews were published concerning using physical therapy as treatment, and two reviews reported
53 may include medication, nerve blocks, active physical therapy, behavioural interventions, and assista
55 ch is needed to support meaningful shifts in physical therapy care in line with the best practice rec
56 ve single interventions include exercise and physical therapy, cataract surgery, and medication reduc
57 primary care visit to the McKenzie method of physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation, or a minima
58 ated to waiting, which involved, waiting for physical therapy clearance, physician orders, risks to d
60 cline), a neurotrophic agent (LM11A-31), and physical therapy consisting of assisted exercise with or
63 ted in actions related to collaborating with physical therapy, determining the appropriateness of act
64 mong adults with painful hip osteoarthritis, physical therapy did not result in greater improvement i
66 tal length of stay in survivors who received physical therapy during intensive care unit treatment co
69 ired to determine whether shortening time to physical therapy evaluation and treatment in a cardiotho
70 arch was to examine variables that influence physical therapy evaluation and treatment in the intensi
72 gression model determined that time to first physical therapy evaluation, Charlson Comorbidity Index
73 ts with ICUAW who did not receive structured physical therapy, evidence suggested those who receive p
77 is widely available, one-to-one conservative physical therapy for men who are incontinent after prost
78 ogram to allow for active rehabilitation and physical therapy for patients requiring life support wit
79 e was a significant positive effect favoring physical therapy for the critically ill to improve the q
81 complications include use of analgesics and physical therapy for treatment of avascular necrosis, an
82 r time in the PPT and FSQ scores favored the physical therapy group (P =.003 and P =.01, respectively
85 bility after 3 months (mean ODI score: early physical therapy group, 41.3 [95% CI, 38.7 to 44.0] at b
86 group and 18.5 (95% CI, 15.6 to 21.5) in the physical-therapy group (mean difference, 2.4 points; 95%
87 od, the mean costs of care were $437 for the physical-therapy group, $429 for the chiropractic group,
88 tainability of the increased ankle ROM after physical therapy has ended or if VLU reoccurrences are p
89 vidence of arterial compression and for whom physical therapy has failed should receive surgery to al
90 ting knee osteoarthritis with analgesics and physical therapy has not been shown to alter the natural
93 approaches have to be seen in the context of physical therapy in order to maximize functional outcome
94 ome was the proportion of patients receiving physical therapy in patients surviving to hospital disch
97 present review, we will focus on the role of physical therapy in the management of vestibular symptom
99 cts similar to those of a standard course of physical therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis
100 ess this problem, it has not been shown that physical therapy initiated in the intensive care unit of
101 oration, interdisciplinary therapy, massage, physical therapies (interferential therapy, low-level la
102 y-weight support in treadmill stepping, is a physical therapy intervention used to improve recovery o
104 s suggest a combinatorial effect of drug and physical therapy interventions that was not evident by u
105 ses on a program of standardized nursing and physical therapy interventions to prevent delirium in th
109 toms can be managed, not cured, with complex physical therapy, low-level laser therapy, pharmacothera
111 ing data indicating that swallow therapy and physical therapy may prevent or ameliorate long-term fun
112 The areas of acupuncture and pelvic floor physical therapy/myofascial release have received increa
114 approach to patient care, involving nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and respiratory
115 onmechanically ventilated patients receiving physical therapy/occupational therapy (48% vs 26%; p </=
119 ring for acute respiratory failure patients, physical therapy/occupational therapy-provided mobility
123 t studies with small sample sizes, that used physical therapy or exercise for patients with open or h
124 ver, little is known regarding the effect of physical therapy or exercise on healing and quality of l
126 ries who remain symptomatic despite adequate physical therapy or if the PCL deficiency is part of a m
128 ed 351 patients to surgery and postoperative physical therapy or to a standardized physical-therapy r
129 were referred for ophthalmologic screening, physical therapy, or nursing input and a diagnosis of JI
130 ain-following conservative treatment such as physical therapy, oral medications, and lumbar spine inj
131 ggests the need for further investigation on physical therapy-oriented exercise on wound healing and
132 ectrolyte repletion (p < .01), initiation of physical therapy (p < .05), and documentation of restrai
134 The efficacy and optimization of poststroke physical therapy paradigms is challenged in part by a la
135 Champions from each profession-nursing, physical therapy, physician, and respiratory care-were i
136 nts such as posture adjustment, acupuncture, physical therapy, physiotherapy, yoga, and chiropractic
137 e not sufficient to determine which specific physical therapy program should be recommended, physicia
142 litation intervention and 469 (88%) required physical therapy (PT) and/or occupational therapy (OT).
143 ht to determine the utilization of inpatient physical therapy (PT) for patients recovering from criti
144 targeting psychosocial factors compared with physical therapy (PT) for primary care patients with low
148 rative physical therapy or to a standardized physical-therapy regimen (with the option to cross over
149 cological therapy of ankylosing spondylitis, physical therapy remains an essential part of the manage
150 Among adults with recent-onset LBP, early physical therapy resulted in statistically significant i
152 More Protocol patients received at least one physical therapy session than did Usual Care (80% vs. 47
156 ic pain medications, chronic opioid therapy, physical therapy, spinal manipulation, and multidiscipli
157 ropathic pain, opioids, and cannabinoids, to physical therapy strategies and preventive assistive dev
159 ved with combinations of pharmacological and physical therapies that maximize cortical reorganization
160 anism of action of interventions employed in physical therapy that can improve our understanding of h
161 using a mobility protocol initiated earlier physical therapy that was feasible, safe, did not increa
162 1.8 degrees ], P =.01), with shorter time in physical therapy to achieve effective joint range of mot
164 the important considerations when providing physical therapy to these patients in the ICU setting.
165 lectrical stimulation, pharmacologic agents, physical therapy training programs) may all share a comm
166 arlson Comorbidity Index score, mean days of physical therapy treatment and mechanical ventilation we
167 care unit and the hospital, and mean days of physical therapy treatment associated with hospital leng
168 factors may influence the responsiveness to physical therapy treatment for individuals with knee ost
171 research related to the mode of delivery of physical therapy treatment, and (3) identify characteris
177 ystolic blood pressure associated with chest physical therapy were attenuated with the low dose and s
179 two shoulders were successfully treated with physical therapy, whereas 28 eventually required surgery
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。