コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 Oregon have faced the prospect of legalized physician-assisted suicide.
2 nd experiences in relation to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.
3 egon's 1997 Death with Dignity Act legalizes physician-assisted suicide.
4 P-ASIM) does not support the legalization of physician-assisted suicide.
5 7) the 1997 Supreme Court decisions outlawed physician-assisted suicide.
6 ]) were less likely to support euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
7 ; and patient consideration of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
8 In 1997, Oregon legalized physician-assisted suicide.
9 ing the line between relief of suffering and physician-assisted suicide.
10 less likely to have performed euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
11 performed euthanasia and 10.8% had performed physician-assisted suicide.
12 s, and clinicians who are morally opposed to physician-assisted suicide.
13 On October 27, 1997, Oregon legalized physician-assisted suicide.
14 terpretation of referendums and requests for physician-assisted suicide.
15 er, the ACP does not support legalization of physician-assisted suicide.
16 n 8-step approach to respond to requests for physician-assisted suicide.
17 Netherlands are the result of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
18 on these 2 principles alone does not include physician-assisted suicide.
19 ill patients have a constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide.
20 en oncologists had carried out euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
21 ists had received requests for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
22 patients who express interest in or request physician-assisted suicide.
24 king were older than 55 patients who died by physician-assisted suicide (74 vs. 64 years of age, P<0.
25 patients and the public found euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide acceptable for patients with
27 of death itself, 2) the relationship between physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia and withholdin
31 is to explore core ethical issues related to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia from the persp
32 ly, the increasingly common debate regarding physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia holds implicat
33 eas of ethical tension central to evaluating physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in medical pra
34 gement of conscientious objection related to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the critica
36 States report that they receive requests for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia, and about 7 p
38 eyed HIV-infected patients' attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide and examined the relationship
39 ts had seriously thought about euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide and nearly 12 percent had ser
40 xamined the relationship between interest in physician-assisted suicide and physical and psychosocial
41 ach could resolve a majority of requests for physician-assisted suicide and should be tested further
42 legal controversy about the acceptability of physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanas
43 ly and clinically more complex and closer to physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanas
44 s received one or more explicit requests for physician-assisted suicide, and 4% received one or more
45 t having received requests for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide, and 5% or less have complied
46 of the patients supported policies favoring physician-assisted suicide, and 55% acknowledged conside
47 edical futility, responding to a request for physician-assisted suicide, and guiding patients and fam
48 quests for and performance of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, and sociodemographic charact
55 e a more favorable attitude toward legalized physician-assisted suicide, are more willing to particip
56 ed suicide, and 55% acknowledged considering physician-assisted suicide as an option for themselves.
57 tanding patients' motivations for requesting physician-assisted suicide, assessing mental status, dia
58 nfected patients supported policies favoring physician-assisted suicide at rates comparable to those
59 e patients have been receiving euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide at rates higher than those in
62 ing that it would find state legalization of physician-assisted suicide constitutional, invited the n
63 promoting advance directives and legalizing physician-assisted suicide depends on patients' understa
65 ge of intractable end-of-life suffering than physician-assisted suicide (even if it were legal) and c
67 logists surveyed, 22.5% supported the use of physician-assisted suicide for a terminally ill patient
68 questions on attitudes toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide for a terminally ill patient
69 1994 and enacted in October 1997, legalized physician-assisted suicide for competent, terminally ill
70 luids has been proposed as an alternative to physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients w
71 1994, of Oregon's ballot measure legalizing physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill persons, t
72 ebate over the deeply controversial issue of physician-assisted suicide has been complicated by confu
73 and strong public support for euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide has been reported; in Central
76 ndard palliative care interventions and from physician-assisted suicide, illustrate them with a real
77 of all deaths are reported as euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide in jurisdictions where they a
80 as compared with the first year of legalized physician-assisted suicide in Oregon, the number of pati
82 Regardless of the controversy surrounding physician-assisted suicide in the United States, the nee
83 nd their authority in this area suggest that physician-assisted suicide is a far too narrow construct
86 ill, the Supreme Court unanimously held that physician-assisted suicide is not a fundamental liberty
88 primary purposes of PRPA are to override the physician-assisted suicide law currently in effect in Or
89 patients and the public found euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide least acceptable in vignettes
90 n practice of a policy change with regard to physician-assisted suicide must be carefully considered.
92 physicians prefer either the legalization of physician-assisted suicide or no law at all; fewer than
98 Oregon became the first US state to legalize physician-assisted suicide (PAS) as an option for end-of
99 amining the details of actual euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) cases in the United Sta
100 own that about half would like the option of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) to be available for pos
104 hat the ethical arguments against legalizing physician-assisted suicide remain the most compelling.
105 ted strongly, on the basis of autonomy, that physician-assisted suicide should be a legal option at t
106 ll of which included questions about whether physician-assisted suicide should be banned in Michigan
107 Sixty percent of the respondents thought physician-assisted suicide should be legal in some cases
108 these venues it is commonly referred to as "physician-assisted suicide." This paper defines both the
110 been the experience of efforts to implement physician-assisted suicide using consensus guidelines?
114 In addition, we found that the choice of physician-assisted suicide was not associated with level
116 egon Death with Dignity Act, which legalized physician-assisted suicide, was approved by Oregon voter
120 44 of the 56 agreed with the statement, "If physician-assisted suicide were legal, I would request a
122 he increasing legalization of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide worldwide makes it important
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。