戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 uclear imaging, nonobstetric ultrasound, and plain radiography).
2 pain after an inversion injury and underwent plain radiography.
3 g tool in multiple myeloma (MM) patients was plain radiography.
4 mpared with 37.2 minutes for combined US and plain radiography.
5 .86 compared with $57.60 for combined US and plain radiography.
6 k pain to undergo either rapid MR imaging or plain radiography.
7                          Five also underwent plain radiography.
8 g studies, and was lower for nonmammographic plain radiography.
9                         In deceased victims, plain radiography aided identification, and in many othe
10 the quantum of disease may be difficult with plain radiography alone.
11                       All patients underwent plain radiography and an ultrasound study.
12                               The utility of plain radiography and computerized tomography (CT) of th
13 iant rs143383 was associated with LDD, using plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging to iden
14 ose whose findings suggest systemic disease, plain radiography and simple laboratory tests can almost
15  and computed skin exposures in fluoroscopy, plain radiography, and digital imaging was generally wit
16                                              Plain radiography can demonstrate destructive changes in
17 thin reasonable time ranges, combined US and plain radiography cannot be cost equivalent to spiral CT
18            Imaging-by skeletal scintigraphy, plain radiography, computed tomography, or magnetic reso
19  hemarthrosis and lipohemarthrosis underwent plain radiography, CT, and MR imaging.
20 east one normal advanced (imaging other than plain radiography) diagnostic study or with an unconfirm
21          In addition, evidence suggests that plain radiography for evaluation of blunt thoracic traum
22 nce imaging has been shown to be superior to plain radiography in demonstrating destructive changes.
23  imaging is a cost-effective replacement for plain radiography in patients with low back pain.
24 ound may be better in experienced hands than plain radiography in the diagnosis of slipped capital fe
25                                              Plain radiography is key in diagnosing bone diseases.
26                                              Plain radiography is of limited value for aiding the dia
27                                              Plain radiography is the first-line, essential screening
28 in the knee; in these cases, evaluation with plain radiography is warranted.
29                                              Plain radiography of the abdomen showed normal air-fluid
30                  Radiologic studies included plain radiography of the skull (n = 5), computed tomogra
31 e of systemic disease underwent imaging with plain radiography or computed tomography (CT) and magnet
32 mbing-related radiologic studies were either plain radiography or CT.
33            MATERIAL/METHODS: Eight different plain radiography pictures of ribs were performed with t
34                       Participants underwent plain radiography (posteroanterior, skyline, and lateral
35 of the imaging studies performed were either plain radiography, primarily of the extremities and ches
36                                     However, plain radiography, the traditional method of detecting t
37                                              Plain radiography, three-dimensional endosonography, and
38                  The combined cost of US and plain radiography was compared with the cost of spiral C
39                                      MRI and plain radiography were performed at baseline and week 26
40 ive children with skull fractures visible at plain radiography were referred to child protective serv
41 s direct technical cost than combined US and plain radiography when used to examine patients after ES

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。