ライフサイエンスコーパス: planktonic

1 nment these symbioses occur with unicellular planktonic algae.

2 diments are thought to originate mainly from planktonic, ammonia-oxidizing Thaumarchaeota, the basis

3 cantly earlier eradication of NTHI from both planktonic and adherent populations in the middle ear, d

4 t selective forces determine survival in the planktonic and benthic life stages, but traits establish

5 Sphenodiscidae) co-occur with well-preserved planktonic and benthic organisms at the type locality of

6 Here we analysed the taxonomic diversity of planktonic and benthic protist communities collected in

7 mpatible basic amino acid L-arginine against planktonic and biofilm bacteria both in vitro and in viv

8 y BF8 was found to be effective against both planktonic and biofilm cells of P. aeruginosa PAO1.

9 by MexGHI-OpmD in P. aeruginosa strain PA14 planktonic and biofilm cells.

10 ing the Wohl-Aue reaction, that targets both planktonic and biofilm cells.

11 croenvironment of S. mutans cells under both planktonic and biofilm conditions.

12 compared the profile of proteins secreted by planktonic and biofilm cultures of Pseudomonas aeruginos

13 doglycan, significantly reduced eDNA in both planktonic and biofilm cultures.

14 ing Hg methylation as well as growth in both planktonic and biofilm cultures.

15 ated N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) solution against planktonic and biofilm forms of different multidrug resi

16 to increased lrgAB promoter activity during planktonic and biofilm growth and a change in biofilm mo

17 ered a characteristic distinguishing between planktonic and biofilm lifestyles.

18 ssenger that controls the transition between planktonic and biofilm modes of growth in bacteria in re

19 ndida species and filamentous fungi in their planktonic and biofilm phenotype.

20 sic amino acid L-arginine increases in vitro planktonic and biofilm susceptibility to gentamicin, wit

21 anscriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) analyses of planktonic and biofilm-grown pneumococci showed that met

22 kinetics and efficacy of antibiotics against planktonic and lawn biofilm bacteria.

23 rt term rate of elution and activity against planktonic and lawn biofilms.

24 te to chronic infections, the second type is planktonic and produces the toxins that contribute to ac

25 regulatory player in the transition between planktonic and sedentary biofilm-associated bacterial li

26 h allows cells to rapidly transition between planktonic and sessile states.

27 ption factor that governs the switch between planktonic and sessile states.

28 robiological and imaging evaluations on both planktonic and surface-attached bacteria provided new in

29 sition of V. cholerae between free-swimming (planktonic) and biofilm life-styles is regulated by the

30 eal tetraether lipids from ubiquitous marine planktonic archaea are particularly abundant, well prese

31 surveys have identified four major clades of planktonic archaea but, to date, tetraether lipids have

32 Membrane lipids of marine planktonic archaea have provided unique insights into ar

33 h diversity of metabolism and taxonomy among planktonic archaea.

34 g 5 y indicated that depth stratification of planktonic archaeal groups was a stable feature in the N

35 The membrane lipid composition of the other planktonic archaeal groups--all uncultured Euryarchaeota

36 We extend the known inventory of planktonic archaeal lipids to include numerous unsaturat

37 We discovered that a subpopulation of planktonic bacilli is propelled by flagella to tunnel de

38 Pa-MAP 1.9 was active against Gram-negative planktonic bacteria and biofilms, without being cytotoxi

39 nstituents of mucus, promote the motility of planktonic bacteria and prevent their adhesion to underl

40 hibiting agents that target rapidly-dividing planktonic bacteria but not metabolically dormant biofil

41 ulsion compositions were capable of reducing planktonic bacteria by >4 logs and biofilm bacteria by 1

42 Planktonic bacteria dominate surface ocean biomass and i

43 We propose that some free-living planktonic bacteria have traded their ability to stick t

44 ccharide exhibit protective activity against planktonic bacteria in acute infection models.

45 mparison of RNA profile of root attached and planktonic bacteria revealed extensive metabolic adaptat

46 When HA is present, planktonic bacteria survive and colonize AgNP-laden glas

47 Such blooms can trigger secondary blooms of planktonic bacteria that consist of swift successions of

48 period, comparing routine urine cultures of planktonic bacteria with cultures of shed urothelial cel

49 imurium was significantly less invasive than planktonic bacteria, and we suggest that S.Typhimurium g

50 Unlike individual, free-floating planktonic bacteria, biofilms are surface-attached commu

51 Even with this drop in planktonic bacteria, significant biofilm formation was o

52 persed bacteria were compared with avirulent planktonic bacteria.

53 obilized environments are less virulent than planktonic bacteria.

54 hydrophobic cell surface than that of other planktonic bacteria.

55 ) have shown rapid and potent effect against planktonic bacteria.

56 a precursor to biofilm formation, only when planktonic bacterial inoculum concentrations are less th

57 Surface ocean waters are dominated by planktonic bacterial lineages with highly reduced genome

58 ed on previously published hydroponic plant, planktonic bacterial, and soil microbial community resea

59 spended solids in surface water, a proxy for planktonic biomass at these remote locations.

60 ylon-3 polymers with potent activity against planktonic C. albicans and excellent C. albicans versus

61 ot, responsible for the great extinctions of planktonic calcifiers and ammonites at the end of the Cr

62 , range extent and natural exposure of these planktonic calcifiers to environmental variability; furt

63 e carboys with nitrate or ammonium, tracking planktonic carbon fixation, DOM production, DOM composit

64 udy, we analyzed multicellular-aggregate and planktonic-cell subpopulations that coexist when S. Typh

65 ococcus aureus, achieving 2 log reduction of planktonic cells after 5 days of incubation.

66 osite PVK-SWNT had antibacterial activity on planktonic cells and biofilms at all concentration level

67 L of SWNT, respectively, were determined for planktonic cells and biofilms of Escherichia coli (E. co

68 with this element caused inhibited growth of planktonic cells and impaired biofilm formation.

69 her to attach and form biofilms or remain as planktonic cells are further subject to regulation by sm

70 ike levels (>/= 55 pmol mg(-1) ) resulted in planktonic cells being significantly more resistant to a

71 Increased type three secretion synthesis in planktonic cells correlated with enhanced invasion of a

72 r phenotype similar to wild-type biofilm and planktonic cells exposed to the TORC1 pathway inhibitor

73 IAV, febrile-range temperature, or ATP, and planktonic cells grown at 37 degrees C.

74 activation of brlR rendered biofilms but not planktonic cells grown to exponential or stationary phas

75 eristic gene expression of biofilms, whereas planktonic cells had enhanced expression of numerous vir

76 freely diffusible, and so of little value to planktonic cells in aqueous environments.

77 array of antibiotic compounds upon growth as planktonic cells in isolated cultures under laboratory c

78 populations has been extensively studied for planktonic cells in well-agitated liquid culture, in whi

79 The distribution of mineral elements in the planktonic cells loosely mirrors the media composition;

80 activation of sagS rendered biofilms but not planktonic cells more susceptible to tobramycin, norflox

81 d that pyocyanin production was increased in planktonic cells of mutant strains.

82 rom samples derived from biofilm, as well as planktonic cells of the opportunistic human pathogen Pse

83 Bacteria live either as independent planktonic cells or as members of surface-attached commu

84 Results clearly demonstrate that while planktonic cells that are desiccated rapidly lose viabil

85 d that increasing c-di-GMP levels present in planktonic cells to biofilm-like levels (>/= 55 pmol mg(

86 ved better, and the competitive advantage of planktonic cells was lost.

87 otassium (2-fold) in the biofilm compared to planktonic cells were observed.

88 gically, the enrichment consisted largely of planktonic cells with an average characteristic diameter

89 t differed markedly from growing or starving planktonic cells, highly expressing genes in glycolysis,

90 Similar to planktonic cells, the streptococci in biofilms were also

91 s were more susceptible to phagocytosis than planktonic cells, which corresponded with the decreased

92 but significantly fewer than in response to planktonic cells.

93 of a fraction of the biofilm population and planktonic cells.

94 higher antibiotic tolerance than free-living planktonic cells.

95 not significantly differ between biofilm and planktonic cells.

96 can be up to 1,000-fold greater than that of planktonic cells.

97 n of c-di-GMP levels compared to biofilm and planktonic cells.

98 37 when compared with results obtained using planktonic cells.

99 ilms and their susceptibility to invasion by planktonic cells.

100 more resistant to antibiotics than unadhered planktonic cells.

101 e-deletion mutants cultivated as biofilm and planktonic cells.

102 the viability of starving, freely suspended (planktonic) cells decreased to <10%.

103 erties distinct from those of free-floating (planktonic) cells.

104 ificance for calcifying organisms, including planktonic coccolithophores.

105 t increased when they were grown together in planktonic cocultures and that antibiotic tolerance was

106 Planktonic communities are shaped through a balance of l

107 These results suggest that marine planktonic communities may keep pace with climate change

108 The biogeographic response of oceanic planktonic communities to climatic change has a large in

109 petition is a major force structuring marine planktonic communities.

110 of simultaneous DON additions and warming on planktonic community metabolism in the Baltic Sea, the l

111 ium, comprising between 0.6 and 14.1% of the planktonic community.

112 ive inhibitory concentrations measured under planktonic conditions are not applicable to biofilms, an

113 pe and DeltaaglB strains, are modified under planktonic conditions in an AglB-dependent manner by the

114 Similar tests were also conducted under planktonic conditions to discern how interspecies compet

115 ces expression of the secondary system under planktonic conditions, resulting in formation of one, so

116 s under both laboratory and simulated marine planktonic conditions.

117 We sequenced DNA from complex sediment and planktonic consortia from an aquifer adjacent to the Col

118 Despite high predation pressure, planktonic copepods remain one of the most abundant grou

119 ee dimensions the motion of flow tracers and planktonic copepods swimming freely at several intensiti

120 c properties and functions compared with the planktonic counterpart.

121 ess susceptible to antimicrobials than their planktonic counterparts.

122 typically distinct from their free-swimming, planktonic counterparts.

123 Planktonic culture of S. aureus was exposed to antibioti

124 S rRNA gene copies L(-1) in the bioflocs and planktonic culture, respectively.

125 entrations caused complete viability loss in planktonic culture, suggesting some biofilm tolerance to

126 In a planktonic culture, these molecules diffuse rapidly, suc

127 trolled laboratory conditions as isolates in planktonic culture.

128 wn in numerous different growth states (e.g. planktonic cultures and highly robust biofilm cultures)

129 up to Hg methylating enzymes; methylation in planktonic cultures appears to be independent of this pa

130 ntiating ionic strength effects by analyzing planktonic cultures in parallel.

131 o 1 order of magnitude greater than those in planktonic cultures of a sulfate-reducing bacterium.

132 l-CoA pathway) were conducted on biofilm and planktonic cultures of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans strai

133 While planktonic cultures of microbes have indicated that spac

134 tyl-CoA pathway, was compared in biofilm and planktonic cultures of ND132.

135 alyses of filamentous phage pf1 infection in planktonic cultures of P. aeruginosa K strain (PAK).

136 ted on (1)H NMR data sets of growth media in planktonic cultures of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infected w

137 nstrating that ME kills >99% of S. mutans in planktonic cultures, 8 enamel slabs were harvested from

138 st available data on microorganisms are from planktonic cultures, due to the lack of experimental too

139 Compared to eDNA production of planktonic cultures, eDNA production in 5- and 24-h biof

140 In planktonic cultures, the regulation of important toxins,

141 between biofilm and stationary growth-phase planktonic cultures.

142 pb, were upregulated in biofilms compared to planktonic cultures.

143 ncreased abundance in biofilms compared with planktonic cultures.

144 up to 4 times higher expression of cooS than planktonic cultures.

145 used for methylation in biofilm compared to planktonic cultures.

146 onstrates that vitamin B12 is synthesized by planktonic cyanobacteria as pseudocobalamin, a form not

147 Marine planktonic cyanobacteria contributed to the widespread o

148 This study shows that marine planktonic cyanobacteria evolved from benthic marine and

149 t of the Proterozoic (2,500-542 Mya), marine planktonic cyanobacteria evolved towards the end of the

150 events that led to the appearance of marine planktonic cyanobacteria.

151 onary steps involved in the origin of marine planktonic cyanobacteria.

152 Diverse strains of the marine planktonic cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. show consist

153 larval retention in the nearshore region in planktonic-developing species.

154 Within marine gastropods, species with planktonic development had similar average plastic respo

155 Using the marine planktonic diatom Pseudo-nitzschia multistriata, we inve

156 rovide a new estimate of diversity of marine planktonic diatoms at 4,748 operational taxonomic units

157 odel with a multi-generational case study of planktonic disease.

158 Those environmental changes may modify the planktonic ecosystem with changes from lower to upper tr

159 edators to decrease, a cascading effect on a planktonic estuarine food web would be seen.

160 potential use of uns-AELs as biomarkers for planktonic Euryarchaeota.

161 els in two Sulfolobus species in "biofilm vs planktonic" experiments.

162 accumulated mercury and methylmercury to the planktonic food chain and finally to fish.

163 bioaccumulation near the base of benthic and planktonic food chains.

164 rporation of oil droplets into microbial and planktonic food web, and limited the severity of direct,

165 dinoflagellates, major components of marine planktonic food webs.

166 span a range that includes estimates of the planktonic foraminifera and of the warmer half of the be

167 in both surface- and subthermocline-dwelling planktonic foraminifera from a sediment core located in

168 e (delta(11)B) composition of well preserved planktonic foraminifera from the Tanzania Drilling Proje

169 cies diversity and rates of extinction among planktonic foraminifera have been linked to tectonically

170 n Mg/Ca ratios in a sub-thermocline dwelling planktonic foraminifera in an Eastern Equatorial Atlanti

171 cific sites using measurements of individual planktonic foraminifera shells.

172 Iodine to calcium ratios (I/Ca) in recent planktonic foraminifera suggest that values less than ap

173 fossil record of Cenozoic Era macroperforate planktonic foraminifera, we assess the evidence for alte

174 r comparisons of ice-rafted debris and polar planktonic foraminifera--abrupt transitions to stadial c

175 ods, abundant benthic foraminifera, and rare planktonic foraminifera.

176 laeorecords derived from the geochemistry of planktonic foraminifera.

177 seawater (delta(7)Li(SW)) reconstructed from planktonic foraminifera.

178 n equatorial Pacific (EEP) using benthic and planktonic foraminiferal (14)C.

179 Here we compile and analyze planktonic foraminiferal size-specific stable carbon and

180 Bacteria grow in either planktonic form or as biofilms, which are attached to ei

181 d in species composition between biofilm and planktonic forms for both diatoms and bacteria at variou

182 l hydrocarbons than that by the community of planktonic free-living bacteria.

183 LyeTxI and LyeTxI/betaCD was determined for planktonic Gram-negative periodontopathogens.

184 f exogenous norspermidine eventually inhibit planktonic growth and biofilm formation in an exopolysac

185 ccus mutans and Lactobacillus casei (in both planktonic growth and biofilm formation).

186 t ml1, ml2, ml3 and ml5 are expressed during planktonic growth and in biofilms.

187 roteins expressed in vitro under biofilm and planktonic growth conditions.

188 Although inactive during planktonic growth in urine, T1F expression occurs when U

189 Planktonic growth kinetics and the susceptibility to ant

190 yamine spermidine is not required for normal planktonic growth of Bacillus subtilis but is essential

191 enables biofilm formation and suppresses the planktonic growth of S. elongatus.

192 e water-insoluble glucan, displayed improved planktonic growth on sucrose.

193 any one of these genes alone did not affect planktonic growth on sucrose.

194 to successfully transit from a biofilm to a planktonic growth state and to spawn novel communities i

195 ables the transition from the biofilm to the planktonic growth state in response to various cues.

196 When cells are shifted from photoautotrophic planktonic growth to light-activated heterotrophic growt

197 r to mediate the transition of bacteria from planktonic growth to sessile lifestyle as well as biofil

198 ndent activation of LytR was observed during planktonic growth, with acetyl phosphate acting as a pho

199 ce regulation during both cell adherence and planktonic growth.

200 eased in immobilized bacteria, compared with planktonic growth.

201 A down-core planktonic I/Ca record from south of the Antarctic Polar

202 uted to differences in the cell density, the planktonic inoculum concentration or the surface-area-to

203 n-regulation of reproductive investment in a planktonic key organism causing inappropriately increase

204 Most reef fishes begin life as planktonic larvae before settling to the reef, metamorph

205 ographic connectivity in marine species with planktonic larvae can be surprisingly limited, even in t

206 earshore currents promoting the retention of planktonic larvae in the vicinity of natal sites.

207 ely simple and assumes that the dispersal of planktonic larvae is passive, we find that oceanography

208 plications for the transport and survival of planktonic larvae of marine organisms.

209 rtebrate life cycles, which often consist of planktonic larval and benthic adult stages, settlement o

210 particularly interesting system for studying planktonic larval dispersal, as the hydrodynamic regime

211 connectivity due to potential reductions in planktonic larval duration (PLD) associated with ocean w

212 ariability due to their high adult motility, planktonic larval stages, and low dependence on benthic

213 ulate the circulation pathways that disperse planktonic life stages.

214 In many pathogens, the transition from a planktonic lifestyle to collaborative, sessile biofilms

215 cillus subtilis switches from a free-living, planktonic lifestyle to form a biofilm is called SinR.

216 cate that miniaturization and migration to a planktonic lifestyle were secondary.

217 titutes one of the most abundant and diverse planktonic lineages [1].

218 contributed to the evolution of unicellular planktonic lineages during the middle of the Mesoprotero

219 ents a potential barrier to the transport of planktonic lionfish eggs and larvae across the Straits o

220 tosis, which is not seen until much later in planktonic M. avium subsp. hominissuis infection.

221 vity when added to THP-1 cells infected with planktonic M. avium subsp. hominissuis).

222 by strains of Prochlorococcus, single-cell, planktonic marine cyanobacteria.

223 To investigate the roles of planktonic marine microbes in the biogeochemical cycling

224 Planktonic marine microbes live in dynamic habitats that

225 In contrast to biogeographical patterns of planktonic marine microbial communities, host traits eme

226 w ecosystem properties affect variability in planktonic MeHg concentrations, we develop a model for M

227 e structure, function, and biodiversity of a planktonic metacommunity was altered after five years of

228 In this study, we investigated the planktonic MGII associated with particles and in free-li

229 Planktonic microbial communities in the ocean are typica

230 sed biotic interactions are ubiquitous among planktonic microbial communities worldwide.

231 In marine systems, planktonic microbial community structure is mainly drive

232 ted these with a metagenomic analysis of the planktonic microbial community.

233 iurnally oscillating behaviors among diverse planktonic microbial species regardless of habitat, sugg

234 We propose that marine planktonic microeukaryote assemblages incorporate dynami

235 Recognition of the role of planktonic microgels in aquatic biofilm formation can ha

236 re effective in suppressing E. coli in these planktonic mixed cultures, even though PEf1 reached high

237 The swimming speeds of planktonic mutant MotAB-driven cells was reduced, and ov

238 nitrate loads to the coastal zone may alter planktonic nitrate assimilation efficiency, due to the n

239 Herein, planktonic Nitrospira spp. cultures closely related to C

240 Here we show that upon encounter with planktonic (non-biofilm) C. glabrata, human neutrophils

241 y colonize a host, lactobacilli appear to be planktonic, opportunistic settlers that can gather and m

242 he greatest antimicrobial efficacies against planktonic or biofilm bacteria.

243 ions, as biocidal formulations against both planktonic or biofilm bacteria.

244 wed HCN was not elevated in the headspace of planktonic or biofilm cultures or in the exhaled breath

245 cells regardless of whether the cells are in planktonic or biofilm growth mode.

246 Transparent exopolymer particles (TEPs) are planktonic, organic microgels that are ubiquitous in aqu

247 Facilitation of electron transfer from the planktonic organism to the anode by endogenous redox-act

248 ly increased expression of the nuclease from planktonic organisms compared to those in the biofilm ph

249 Less attention has been given to EET by planktonic organisms in oxic environments where extracel

250 tary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) of non-fossilized planktonic organisms preserved in a 5-m sediment core fr

251 onds and lakes, which are being colonized by planktonic organisms such as the water flea Daphnia.

252 Interactions among microscopic planktonic organisms underpin the functioning of open oc

253 ive oxygen species (ROS) when presented with planktonic organisms, and pharmacologic inhibition of NA

254 Interactions between planktonic organisms, such as detection of prey, predato

255 chanisms that would lead to such a shape for planktonic organisms.

256 etely blocks NET release to both biofilm and planktonic organisms.

257 Planktonic P. aeruginosa diffusible material (PsaDM) ind

258 anaerobiosis-induced alginate production by planktonic PAO1 requires the diguanylate cyclase (DGC) S

259 ination of L-arginine and gentamicin against planktonic persisters through time-kill curves of late s

260 ied many kilometers by currents during their planktonic phase.

261 , 8], both nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria and planktonic picocyanobacteria diversified.

262 ubset of which was found, surprisingly, in a planktonic population.

263 ds to separation of UPEC into low-expression planktonic populations and high-expression sessile popul

264 esiccated streptococci has used broth-grown, planktonic populations.

265 ce mechanisms are shared between biofilm and planktonic populations.

266 ic respiration rates faster than it will for planktonic primary production.

267 een redox-sensitive trace element cycles and planktonic productivity, various models for mid-Proteroz

268 Unicellular, planktonic, prokaryotic and eukaryotic photoautotrophs (

269 Although planktonic protozoans are likely to interact with disper

270 The thecosomes are a group of planktonic pteropods with thin, 1 mm-sized aragonitic sh

271 velopment, and by comparing them to multiple planktonic reference states, we identify patterns of gen

272 that warming of the Baltic Sea will enhance planktonic respiration rates faster than it will for pla

273 es on the spatial distribution of non-motile planktonic species and particulate drifters.

274 years of weekly samples encompassing c. 250 planktonic species from three trophic levels, sampled in

275 sess the robustness of projections of marine planktonic species under climate change.

276 onsistent with biofilm formation and minimal planktonic spread of infection.

277 yochloris marina shifts its lifestyle from a planktonic state under white light to an immobilized sta

278 We assume that conversion of bacteria to the planktonic state within the cap occurs in response to th

279 are in the form of biofilms rather than the planktonic state, and at concentrations of physiologic r

280 ible to antibiotics than are bacteria in the planktonic state, biofilm-associated infections pose a m

281 ostly in a social community rather than in a planktonic state.

282 ment content of this pathogen in biofilm and planktonic states.

283 imum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in all planktonic strains.

284 ation of the EET processes operating in this planktonic system assists in understanding the means and

285 ts reveal an ecological state change in this planktonic system.

286 In similar planktonic tests with more competing soil bacteria speci

287 ng 30 Mbp) likely derived from environmental planktonic Thaumarchaea.

288 lammation, yet the impact of the switch from planktonic to biofilm growth on host responses is poorly

289 ther bacteria, including the transition from planktonic to biofilm growth.

290 ions in bacteria, including transitions from planktonic to biofilm lifestyles, virulence, motility, a

291 were able to map critical nodes that govern planktonic to biofilm transition and identify 8 new regu

292 ral reef-fishes, the movement of larvae from planktonic to reef environments (recruitment) represents

293 nt role in regulating the transition between planktonic to sessile cell states as a response to stres

294 ium Bacillus subtilis, the transition from a planktonic to sessile state is mediated by mutually excl

295 development by enabling the switch from the planktonic to the biofilm mode of growth, and by facilit

296 signaling to change gene expression from the planktonic to the biofilm phenotype.

297 n of sRNAs in regulating the switch from the planktonic to the sessile bacterial lifestyle by highlig

298 initiated by bacteria transitioning from the planktonic to the surface-associated mode of growth.

299 eralding the first appearance of both marine planktonic unicellular nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria and

300 PNAG was present in both pellicle and planktonic wild-type B. subtilis cells and in strains wi