ライフサイエンスコーパス: plant community

1 xperiencing competition from the surrounding plant community.

2 nance of a competitive annual species in the plant community.

3 er warming but did not respond to changes in plant community.

4 anaerobic decomposition, and changes in the plant community.

5 number of species changing phenology in this plant community.

6 sity or to the functional composition of the plant community.

7 stence with field measurements of an invaded plant community.

8 l communities do not merely reflect the host plant community.

9 ed by shifts in the overall structure of the plant community.

10 will serve as an expandable resource for the plant community.

11 tity of nutritional resources from a diverse plant community.

12 ibutions and patterns of rarity in worldwide plant communities.

13 ily, warming-induced changes in forest floor plant communities.

14 proaching the higher levels seen in restored plant communities.

15 erformance of exotics and natives in invaded plant communities.

16 ants to understand their role in structuring plant communities.

17 il N cycle and ecosystem functions in extant plant communities.

18 , and the development of, and/or changes in, plant communities.

19 es, and the proportion of exotics in invaded plant communities.

20 ct the performance of exotics and natives in plant communities.

21 ignificant thermophilization of ground-layer plant communities.

22 d plants compared to natural or semi-natural plant communities.

23 of plants and has the potential to structure plant communities.

24 thod was biased toward site-number-dominated plant communities.

25 off and its role in maintaining diversity in plant communities.

26 r the structure and functioning of temperate plant communities.

27 lter the abundance and composition of entire plant communities.

28 he abundance, diversity, and productivity of plant communities.

29 ent-poor white sands each harbor distinctive plant communities.

30 itous, yet cryptic, component of terrestrial plant communities.

31 ry, explain many of the patterns observed in plant communities.

32 ed microorganisms, soil thermal regimes, and plant communities.

33 nt on the ecological functioning of dominant plant communities.

34 ly shape the composition and architecture of plant communities.

35 g stable pollination to agriculture and wild plant communities.

36 died, yet may have important implications in plant communities.

37 narrowing of interactions to a subset of the plant community accompanies pollinator niche specialisat

38 s and species richness for temperate wetland plant communities across continents, latitudes, and migr

39 es of 22 factorial experiments in herbaceous plant communities across Europe and North America, we sh

40 We used species-level abundance data from 62 plant communities across five continents to assess mecha

41 , based on an analysis of NPP for 1247 woody plant communities across global climate gradients, that

42 ovide a synthesis of 727 tests of the SGH in plant communities across the globe to examine its genera

43 Responses were rapid and detected in whole plant communities after only two growing seasons.

44 For all four traits, plant community alone was the strongest predictor of tra

45 transplanted alpine plant species and intact plant communities along a climate gradient in the Swiss

46 Here, we reciprocally transfer plant communities along an elevation gradient to investi

47 icrobial communities, soil temperatures, and plant communities also contributing to this reduction.

48 Global change is exerting a major effect on plant communities, altering their potential capacity for

49 t interactions between site and treatment on plant communities, although uncommon, suggested that dif

50 d sampling data from 48 herbaceous-dominated plant communities and concluded that "Productivity is a

51 Fungi play an important role in plant communities and ecosystem function.

52 importance of allelopathy in shaping natural plant communities and for agricultural production, the u

53 pathogens have both in structuring tropical plant communities and in maintaining their remarkable di

54 irect and indirect temperature controls over plant communities and soil properties in seven contrasti

55 tical role in determining warming effects on plant communities and species invasions.

56 for species richness dynamics of fragmented plant communities and tested them in experimental landsc

57 mass and net primary production (NPP) at the plant community and functional type levels.

58 a(2)H values in paleoapplications; when both plant community and growth form are known, this study al

59 deposition have led to widespread changes in plant community and microbial community composition, but

60 Plant community and soil properties provide a major cont

61 in, carbon dioxide enrichment in terrestrial plant communities, and nitrogen deposition.

62 ly useful concept for forecasting changes in plant communities, and their associated ecosystem servic

63 such as grasshoppers have subtle effects on plant communities, and their most significant impacts ar

64 ammalian herbivores (LMH) strongly influence plant communities, and these effects can propagate indir

65 o parasitism, impacts of parasites on native plant communities, and ways in which human intervention

66 ve abundance of a species across a grassland plant community, and that this rare-species advantage ha

67 insight into the effects of leaf wetting on plant, community, and ecosystem function.

68 Although many plant communities are invaded by multiple nonnative spec

69 iring degraded soil conditions and restoring plant communities are likely necessary for restoring gra

70 Plant communities are not stable over time and biologica

71 aunal extinctions and the formation of novel plant communities are well-known features of the last de

72 We assessed PCS of alpine plant communities around the world, both within cushion

73 regimes are creating novel environments for plant communities around the world.

74 mate change is expected to have an impact on plant communities as increased temperatures are expected

75 y between the montane and pre-montane forest plant communities, as well as among species within a for

76 We added a pulse of (15) N to grassland plant communities assembled to represent a range of comm

77 In this study, we analyse a simple model of plant community assembly incorporating competition for s

78 raits to help uncover the mechanisms driving plant community assembly.

79 rd with the rules and interactions governing plant community assembly.

80 ollows the biogeographic history of disjunct plant communities associated with early Cenozoic mesophy

81 reserved in a soil horizon resolve different plant communities at meter scales across a contiguous 25

82 changes in the diversity and composition of plant communities at the local scale cause ecosystem fun

83 esults of a long-term study of two different plant communities at two sites in the Inner Mongolia gra

84 Shrubs facilitated the annual plant community at all levels of soil moisture through r

85 e, we tested under glasshouse conditions how plant community attributes, including variations in the

86 e directly the productivity and structure of plant communities because they cause harm to particular

87 ng been recognized as a major factor shaping plant community biodiversity, metabolic processes, and e

88 Ecological theory and evidence suggest that plant community biomass and composition may often be joi

89 d precipitation on the temporal stability of plant community biomass in an alpine grassland located o

90 es explained significantly more variation in plant community biomass than other measures of diversity

91 aving a dramatic impact on marine animal and plant communities but little is known of its influence o

92 a global threat to the biodiversity of many plant communities, but its impacts on grassland soil see

93 Drought can cause major damage to plant communities, but species damage thresholds and pos

94 ersal determine the potential composition of plant communities, but the eventual assemblage is determ

95 enemies, can influence species diversity of plant communities, but the generality of this process is

96 cits short- and long-term changes in coastal plant communities by altering the physical conditions th

97 nts may determine abundance and diversity in plant communities by influencing fitness and competitive

98 vern the assembly and composition of natural plant communities can be divided into two broad categori

99 mechanism of shrub facilitation on an annual plant community can change with precipitation extremes i

100 esponding to rapid acidophilic to halophilic plant community change and a carbon accumulation decline

101 gnificantly underestimated if feedbacks from plant community change are not considered.

102 there may be generality in the mechanisms of plant community change with N enrichment.

103 ations increased NPP and soil C storage, but plant community changes and GHG emissions decreased, and

104 ifera provides a strong demonstration of how plant community changes can dramatically impact the supp

105 es distribution models) rarely consider that plant community changes could substantially lag behind c

106 species differently and that they may drive plant community changes, we demonstrate that plant commu

107 We measured changes in perennial plant community characteristics (cover, species richness

108 and bacteria in the nectar of a coflowering plant community, characterize the volatiles produced by

109 e growing season and plants growing in mixed plant communities composed of annual and perennial hosts

110 of native species at all sites, we measured plant community composition (i.e., cover, richness, and

111 inundation, disturbance and dispersal shape plant community composition along key environmental grad

112 ity, linking changes in both to stability in plant community composition and biomass production.

113 e are expected to have widespread effects on plant community composition and diversity in coming deca

114 nder different nutrient regimes, influencing plant community composition and ecosystem dynamics.

115 cies, and (iii) assessed postfire understory plant community composition and flammability.

116 Shipley et al. predicted plant community composition and relative abundances with

117 lue of the ecosystem is largely dependent on plant community composition and the relative abundance o

118 re selected to be highly similar in terms of plant community composition and tidal influence.

119 ing effects, Se hyperaccumulators may affect plant community composition and, consequently, higher tr

120 If controls over primary productivity and plant community composition are mainly environmental, as

121 ches by comparing the degree to which tundra plant community composition changes (i) in response to i

122 We analyzed changes in plant community composition from repeat sampling (85 pla

123 We investigated plant community composition in 10 pairs of organic and c

124 Our results show that plant community composition is a significant modulator o

125 ility in a herbaceous brackish wetland where plant community composition is dominated by a C(3) sedge

126 Although it is generally accepted that plant community composition is key for predicting rates

127 In contrast, where herbivores grazed, plant community composition on warmed plots did not diff

128 is a high-resolution tool useful for linking plant community composition to below-ground soil microbi

129 all, we found that the observed shift in the plant community composition ultimately suppresses the CO

130 mate change, may change soil functioning and plant community composition via the modification of plan

131 Plant community composition was impacted by both asymmet

132 Plant community composition was influenced only by nitro

133 rannual precipitation, while the response of plant community composition was more sensitive to experi

134 ng and the resultant drying of soils altered plant community composition, decreased native diversity,

135 closer to that of the old growth forest; (3) Plant community composition, edaphic parameters, and geo

136 ade plot-level measurements of CO2 exchange, plant community composition, foliar nitrogen concentrati

137 However, barring large shifts in plant community composition, future increases in old soi

138 he Arctic is already experiencing changes in plant community composition, so understanding the contri

139 ion and surface fires also connected through plant community composition, via the species' traits?

140 ces, and ecological processes that depend on plant community composition.

141 nvironmental nutrient supplies can determine plant community composition.

142 ve drought stress and had minimal effects on plant community composition.

143 predicting successional dynamics and future plant community composition.

144 asion, our results indicate clear changes in plant community composition: cover of graminoids and non

145 wide range of nutrient inputs, soil pH, and plant community compositions during the last century.

146 d litter traits among invaded and noninvaded plant communities control the magnitude and direction of

147 Large decline in plant community cover, primarily caused by the reduction

148 g exotics and suppressing natives in invaded plant communities, depending on the type, frequency, and

149 ich is likely to have important feedbacks on plant community development.

150 In contrast, plant communities did not exhibit a uniform phylogenetic

151 is able to capture detailed statistics of a plant community distributed across a vast semiarid area

152 did a worldwide test of the hypotheses that plant community divergence in antiherbivore traits resul

153 feedback plays primary roles in maintaining plant community diversity, whereas positive plant-soil f

154 , specific leaf area and lateral spread - of plant communities dominated by a cushion-forming foundat

155 that had been conditioned by model grassland plant communities dominated by either slow- or fast-grow

156 A collapse of drought-tolerant C(4) plant communities during these warm, dry intervals indic

157 backs with respect to microbial mediation of plant community dynamics.

158 ng how landscape conservation actions affect plant community dynamics.

159 e and long-lasting effects of disturbance on plant community dynamics.

160 ductivity and is an important determinant in plant community ecology and biodiversity.

161 namics of plant-soil feedbacks and therefore plant community ecology.

162 ystems, transitional areas between different plant communities (ecotones) are formed by steep environ

163 Most terrestrial plant communities exhibit relatively high species divers

164 r Brassica genotypes in constructed mesocosm plant communities exposed to insect herbivores (Plutella

165 er set should be a valuable resource for the plant community for such co-localization studies.

166 Positive interactions can buffer plant communities from abiotic stress and consumer press

167 the late Miocene coincident with a shift in plant communities from C3 to C4 grasses.

168 ing feedback mechanisms--which often protect plant communities from invasion--may therefore be sensit

169 We surveyed paired invaded and uninvaded plant communities from three biomes.

170 Consequently, warming shifted the plant community from invader-dominated to native-dominat

171 ore body C:N content, the C:N content of the plant community from which grasshoppers select their die

172 We used experimental wetland plant communities grown from seed banks as model systems

173 , although it is likely that the recovery of plant communities has been facilitated by the twice-year

174 change is expected over the coming century, plant communities have on average sixfold more biomass b

175 Intensive arable plant communities have previously been shown to contain

176 Trait-based approaches to terrestrial plant communities have shown that functional traits can

177 that these direct effects of R. minor on the plant community have marked indirect effects on below-gr

178 res have tight, one-to-one interactions with plants, communities have a strong pattern of chemical di

179 Especially for perennial plant communities, however, the long-term effects of div

180 mmunity composition from repeat sampling (85 plant communities in 28 regions) and experimental warmin

181 Whether plant communities in a given region converge towards a p

182 phylogenetically paired native and nonnative plant communities in a glasshouse experiment to test div

183 forecast the impacts of multiple drivers on plant communities in an era of rapid change.

184 respiration through altering composition of plant communities in grassland ecosystems.

185 ssification to quantitative determination of plant communities in nature.

186 stimates of primary productivity from fossil plant communities in North America and Europe.

187 We suggest that the standard assumption that plant communities in remote locations are primarily shap

188 nerally found no effect of elevated [CO2] on plant communities in this arid ecosystem.

189 and ecosystem nitrogen, and distribution of plant communities in this brackish wetland.

190 gical fitness of progeny or the structure of plant communities in which transgenic progeny may become

191 Although the plant community in a pristine salt marsh was found to be

192 o address this deficit we studied an aquatic plant community in an ecosystem subject to gradients in

193 deposition on a Mediterranean-type shrubland plant community in southern California from 2011 to 2016

194 nipulative field experiment in a subtropical plant community in the subsiding Mississippi River Delta

195 As global changes reorganize plant communities, invasive plants may benefit.

196 the effects of global change on terrestrial plant communities is crucial because of the ecosystem se

197 ms controlling interspecific interactions in plant communities is important for explaining patterns o

198 st how important dispersal is in structuring plant communities is nevertheless an open question becau

199 compared to interspecific trait variation in plant communities is still missing.

200 ast 75 years, and flowering phenology of the plant community is advanced in years with warmer tempera

201 cies abundance changes (demography) nor with plant community-level responses to long-term climate tre

202 ent (i.e. not differing from single-plant to plant-community levels) and (3) soil and microbial bioma

203 ts on plant C pools at both single-plant and plant-community levels; (2) plant C pool responses to in

204 crease or reduce evolutionary relatedness in plant communities, making it difficult to generalize res

205 ther, these results demonstrate that invaded plant communities may accumulate additional non-native s

206 ithout considering how concurrent changes in plant communities may alter such effects.

207 We used metaanalysis on plant community measurements from standardized warming e

208 In peatland ecosystems, plant communities mediate a globally significant carbon

209 may be amplified by the shift toward forest plant communities more susceptible to fire-driven diebac

210 g stoichiometric convergence of ground-layer plant community nitrogen to phosphorus ratios across all

211 hich human activity has impacted the natural plant communities of Madagascar is of critical and endur

212 ng a detailed functional description of many plant communities on Earth.

213 dardized sampling in 48 herbaceous-dominated plant communities on five continents.

214 change may have relatively little effect on plant communities on nutrient-poor soils.

215 * The influence of plant communities on symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fu

216 nk suggest a grassy pineland as the dominant plant community on Abaco in the Late Pleistocene, with a

217 ctional change may change the composition of plant communities over time.

218 y, it resulted in an increasingly dissimilar plant community over the 5-year experiment compared with

219 of biotic and abiotic factors varied between plant community properties and between different phases

220 atterns in the relative importance of ITV in plant communities, providing practical guidelines for wh

221 low abundance thresholds needed to suppress plant community recovery, and much higher levels needed

222 Functional composition of the plant community regulated warming-induced increases in s

223 However, studies of plant community regulation have seldom considered how re

224 eriment to explore the mechanisms underlying plant community regulation on feedbacks of soil respirat

225 In experimental plant communities, relationships between biodiversity an

226 ence resource acquisition across species and plant communities remains obscure.

227 es of montane ecosystems, particularly where plant community reorganization outpaces treeline advance

228 Two sources of complexity make predicting plant community response to global change particularly c

229 ooked influences of vertebrate herbivores on plant community response to warming and emphasize that c

230 5-year experimental investigation of arctic plant community response to warming.

231 Understanding plant community responses to combinations of biotic and

232 Models forecasting plant community responses to global change incorporate s

233 these shifts was related to the magnitude of plant community responses to nutrient inputs.

234 nitrogen enrichment, accelerated directional plant community responses to warming, increasing the dom

235 d landscapes, with novel ornamental and crop plant communities, result not only in changes to local c

236 Furthermore, under warming alone, the plant community shifted after 5 years away from graminoi

237 viduals explain the lack of strong perennial plant community shifts after a decade of elevated [CO2].

238 plant community changes, we demonstrate that plant community shifts can act as a feedback effect that

239 osystem-level processes may be influenced by plant community shifts.

240 nges within the recipient community, such as plant community shifts.

241 ulations--irrigation and drought--to dryland plant communities situated along a steep climatic gradie

242 * Mimulus guttatus in adjacent contrasting plant community situations harbored distinct AMF communi

243 We used a tundra plant-community-specific leaf area index (LAI) model to

244 ition, and increased winter precipitation on plant community structure and aboveground net primary pr

245 ught events could have profound influence on plant community structure and ecosystem function, and ha

246 time warming have the potential to influence plant community structure and ecosystem functions.

247 ce of seasonal patterns in the regulation of plant community structure and function by multiple facto

248 es have occurred in parallel with impacts on plant community structure and may have contributed to th

249 vated CO2, warming, and summer irrigation on plant community structure and productivity, linking chan

250 Herbivores are critical in determining plant community structure and the transfer of energy up

251 human-caused alteration of biodiversity and plant community structure at the global scale.

252 t the influence of parasitic plant litter on plant community structure can be of equal importance to

253 In addition, herbivory modulates shifts in plant community structure caused by warming.

254 nt-microbe dynamics and, in doing so, modify plant community structure directly and indirectly.

255 mount of growing season rainfall will impact plant community structure in annually burned, native tal

256 erstanding the effects of elevated [CO2 ] on plant community structure is crucial to predicting ecosy

257 However, little is known about how plant community structure regulates responses of soil re

258 Parasitic plants have major impacts on plant community structure through their direct negative

259 hese significant treatment effects, ANPP and plant community structure were highly resistant to these

260 st mortality has important ramifications for plant community structure, ecosystem function, and the e

261 However, experiments in plant communities suggest that many communities are unsa

262 dels, which encode a very simplified view of plant communities, suggesting that the potential for nic

263 have more serious negative implications for plant communities than is currently assumed.

264 vaded was lawn or wooded, but the marsh-edge plant communities that developed in these two environmen

265 enhanced fire regimes and the development of plant communities that have no modern analogs.

266 d use can create altered soil conditions and plant communities that persist for decades, although the

267 he severe negative effects of N pollution on plant communities that threaten the stability of populat

268 improvement and their extensive study by the plant community, the molecular mechanisms controlling th

269 Here, we show that across eight plant communities, there is a significant positive relat

270 diverse portfolio of urban green spaces and plant communities therein to facilitate complex microbia

271 In old-fields and other plant communities, these soil feedbacks appear common, f

272 ersity stabilises productivity in herbaceous plant communities through a combination of overyielding,

273 ommonly held notion that consumers structure plant communities through a competition-defense tradeoff

274 ure, and could also contribute to changes in plant communities through hitchhiking of unselected trai

275 significantly enhance the nutrient uptake of plant communities through two different mechanisms relat

276 or cloches to examine the response of Arctic plant communities to artificially elevated temperatures.

277 nt estimates of the magnitude of response of plant communities to climate warming.

278 vated [CO2], but the response of intact arid plant communities to elevated [CO2 ] is largely unknown.

279 we use a case study of three North American plant communities to explore the implications of variabi

280 ay also explain why a comparable response of plant communities to reduced N inputs has yet to be obse

281 design allows upscaling from root anatomy to plant community to estimate the following: resource cost

282 ed biotic interactions and dispersal lags to plant community turnover along an elevational gradient f

283 Here, we sampled five plant community types characteristic of interior Alaska,

284 modeled predictions for the distribution of plant community types in the Alaskan arctic foothills re

285 rost may play an important role in affecting plant communities under climate change.

286 anding of how plant-soil feedbacks structure plant communities, underlie invasive species dynamics, o

287 Understanding how and why plant communities vary across space has long been a goal

288 ecosystem productivity of diverse grassland plant communities was more resistant, changing less duri

289 bution of the key CH4 emitting and consuming plant communities was possible from satellite, allowing

290 ith relative sea-level rise showed that this plant community was experiencing an elevation deficit (i

291 owered mean soil water content, overall this plant community was remarkably resistant to altered prec

292 For a long time, part of the plant community was sceptical about the importance of PA

293 k/cores, twigs, leaves/needles) of the local plant community were taken, namely silver birch (Betula

294 however, would have a massive impact on all plant communities, which are found to exhibit clear thre

295 n entire landscapes that are now occupied by plant communities wholly created by humans, in which div

296 nd, rapid glacier retreat is exposing intact plant communities whose radiocarbon dates demonstrate en

297 models of pollination networks suggest that plant communities will be resilient to losing many or ev

298 gical impacts of a disease through a natural plant community will depend strongly on the phylogenetic

299 In a glasshouse experiment we constructed plant communities with different levels of barley (Horde

300 the relative extent of ITV within and among plant communities worldwide, using a data set encompassi