ライフサイエンスコーパス: plant disease

1 this class of virulence-related proteases in plant disease.

2 plays a pivotal role in the establishment of plant disease.

3 not been critically linked to resistance to plant disease.

4 cantly helped our understanding of bacterial plant disease.

5 ecreased use of most compounds used to treat plant disease.

6 the infection and epidemiological facets of plant disease.

7 mportant virulence determinant in animal and plant disease.

8 significantly modify the expression of host plant disease.

9 omycin production and the other resulting in plant disease.

10 ology as a science is to address problems of plant disease.

11 pment of novel strategies for the control of plant disease.

12 ncepts that promise to be useful in managing plant disease.

13 to predicting effector targets important in plant disease.

14 Fungi are major causes of human, animal and plant disease.

15 rganism to understand the molecular basis of plant disease.

16 ain how this element reduced the severity of plant diseases.

17 plant pathogens that cause many devastating plant diseases.

18 ls for studying effects of climate change on plant diseases.

19 is also involved in a significant number of plant diseases.

20 a unique niche for the biological control of plant diseases.

21 ible plant species to control important crop plant diseases.

22 e may be welcome additions for mitigation of plant diseases.

23 otoxins that can act as virulence factors in plant diseases.

24 s and developing new methods for controlling plant diseases.

25 nfluences the incidence and severity of many plant diseases.

26 ng developed as biological agents to control plant diseases.

27 for biomass deconstruction and biocontrol of plant diseases.

28 cases, are responsible for the induction of plant diseases.

29 ghts the importance of fungal endophytes for plant disease across a broad range of plant pathosystems

30 rsal of fungal spores by the wind can spread plant diseases across and even between continents and re

31 etween farms can, for vertically-transmitted plant diseases, act as a significant force for dispersal

32 in plants and humans, as well as to control plant diseases, affords a rare opportunity to explore tr

33 sis on their implications for and effects on plant disease and disease management strategies, are sum

34 ope, pioneered biological control of a major plant disease and introduced the term "biological contro

35 se of microbial biocontrol agents to control plant disease and no indication of an increase.

36 infection, suggesting an association between plant disease and prophage transcriptional modulation.

37 cal activities, including the suppression of plant disease and the ability to inhibit prokaryotic and

38 as an environmentally safe method to manage plant disease and to prevent frost damage.

39 Bcc have been used in biological control of plant diseases and bioremediation, while some strains ar

40 Diverse and rapidly evolving pathogens cause plant diseases and epidemics that threaten crop yield an

41 micals could help in early identification of plant diseases and has huge significance for agricultura

42 first described for its capacity to suppress plant diseases and has since been shown to be lethal to

43 ens are of utmost importance for controlling plant diseases and mitigating the economic losses they i

44 abilities to enhance systemic resistance to plant diseases and overall plant growth.

45 Bacterial pathogens can cause multiple plant diseases and plants rely on their innate immune sy

46 arly as they apply to the spatial pattern of plant disease, and highlight some new results that empha

47 Weather affects the severity of many plant diseases, and climate change is likely to alter th

48 l growth, provide protection against various plant diseases, and interact with beneficial soil microb

49 the role of mixed phytoplasmal infections in plant diseases, and molecular/genetic phenomena that und

50 Pseudomonas syringae causes plant diseases, and the main virulence mechanism is a ty

51 uding reduced crop yields and an increase in plant diseases; and mental health disorders, such as pos

52 The origins of many plant diseases appear to be recent and associated with t

53 Epidemics of soil-borne plant disease are characterized by patchiness because of

54 Infectious plant diseases are caused by pathogenic microorganisms s

55 or facilitated my development in research on plant diseases are mentioned.

56 Plant diseases are responsible for substantial crop loss

57 Hypersensitive reactions to plant diseases are typically mediated by R genes.

58 Plant disease arises from the interaction of processes o

59 rally resolved dataset for the invasion of a plant disease, Asiatic citrus canker in urban Miami.

60 tersoaking (ptw) on onion tissue, which is a plant disease-associated trait.

61 ibute to the biological control of soilborne plant diseases by some strains of Pseudomonas fluorescen

62 During the past decade, the plant disease called scab or Fusarium head blight of whe

63 Wildlife and plant diseases can reduce biodiversity, disrupt ecosyste

64 Auxin signaling is also known to promote plant disease caused by plant pathogens.

65 and are also highly effective in controlling plant diseases caused by nematodes and fungi.

66 ized as important marker chemicals to detect plant diseases caused by pathogens.

67 Research in the effects of climate change on plant disease continues to be limited, but some striking

68 ogens are a serious problem for seed export, plant disease control and plant quarantine.

69 termine the effect of direct transmission on plant disease control directed against indirect transmis

70 These peptides have also been implicated in plant disease control for replacing conventional treatme

71 Plant disease cycles represent pathogen biology as a ser

72 which cause many of the world's most serious plant diseases, deliver proteins during plant infection

73 al virulence proteins that are important for plant disease development have remained obscure.

74 ive compost provides an environment in which plant disease development is reduced, even in the presen

75 Environmental conditions profoundly affect plant disease development; however, the underlying molec

76 Accurate plant disease diagnoses and rapid detection and identifi

77 Plant disease diagnostic networks have developed worldwi

78 xisting models for the fungicidal control of plant diseases do not explicitly include the dynamics of

79 This finding raises new questions about plant disease ecology and plant biodiversity, and has ap

80 provides useful tools for phytopathology and plant disease ecology because the traits of both plants

81 usage, this nanotechnology could control the plant disease economically, more significantly, the foll

82 The study of plant disease epidemics at a landscape scale can be exte

83 Plant disease epidemics resulting from introductions of

84 s under future climate with implications for plant disease epidemiology and crop production.

85 nd scale, which are of central importance in plant disease epidemiology and the analysis of spatial p

86 ter understanding of fungal spore dispersal, plant disease epidemiology, and allergy.

87 Catastrophic plant disease exacerbates the current deficit of food su

88 ity of yet unrecognized targets important in plant disease, expanding the search space for off-target

89 , the bacterial pathogen responsible for the plant disease fire blight.

90 present a general epidemiological model for plant diseases, formulated to study the evolution of phe

91 Controlling plant disease has been a struggle for humankind since th

92 Models of plant disease have now been developed to incorporate mor

93 actors enabling microbial pathogens to cause plant diseases have been sought with increasing efficacy

94 em ecologists are now addressing the role of plant disease in ecosystem processes and the challenge o

95 ction is important as first step to manage a plant disease in greenhouses, field conditions and at th

96 growing body of literature on the effects of plant diseases in natural ecosystems.

97 , causes Pierce's disease of grape and other plant diseases in numerous plant species, including impo

98 ere published in the past 20 years comparing plant diseases in organic and conventional crops.

99 n biological control organisms and levels of plant diseases in overgrazed grasslands in northwestern

100 hed the first book written on the subject of plant diseases in the United States, and described a new

101 cts more than 400 plant species and causes a plant disease known as white mold that produces signific

102 eptible, toxic A. inebrians can help control plant disease levels in overgrazed grasslands.

103 f these dispersal scales to assist in making plant disease management decisions, such as the timely a

104 ther studies on the development of effective plant disease management strategies.

105 individual crop insect, weed, nematode, and plant disease management.

106 la fastidiosa is the causal agent of several plant diseases, most notably Pierce's disease of grape a

107 nt in many areas, and his interests included plant diseases, mycology, forest insects, white pine bli

108 ytokinin-mediated regulatory interactions in plant disease networks.

109 Scab is an economically devastating plant disease, not only because it causes significant re

110 y be related to the acidification and severe plant disease of degraded soils.

111 Oomycetes cause devastating plant diseases of global importance, yet little is known

112 weapons by reviewing the costs and impact of plant diseases on crops, pointing out the difficulty in

113 For instance, many bacterial plant disease outbreaks occur after periods of high humi

114 To cause plant disease, pathogenic fungi can secrete effector pro

115 To cause plant diseases, pathogenic micro-organisms secrete effec

116 tance of adopting a multipronged approach to plant disease phenotyping to more fully understand the r

117 of the disease cycle form the basis of many plant disease prediction models.

118 ion serve as the basis for most contemporary plant disease prediction systems.

119 I became involved in researching a number of plant disease problems and solving a few.

120 tructure of Xa21 represents a novel class of plant disease R genes encoding a putative receptor kinas

121 We further predict 82 plant disease-related transcripts that may also response

122 Effective control of plant disease remains a key challenge.

123 ecognized, either directly or indirectly, by plant disease resistance (R) gene products.

124 Plant disease resistance (R) genes confer an ability to

125 Plant disease resistance (R) genes confer race-specific

126 Plant disease resistance (R) genes control the recogniti

127 Many plant disease resistance (R) genes encode proteins predi

128 The majority of plant disease resistance (R) genes encode proteins that

129 The majority of plant disease resistance (R) genes encode proteins that

130 The molecular nature of many plant disease resistance (R) genes is known; the largest

131 Durability of plant disease resistance (R) genes may be predicted if t

132 Plant disease resistance (R) genes mediate specific path

133 Plant disease resistance (R) genes that mediate recognit

134 Plant disease resistance (R) genes trigger innate immune

135 The first plant disease resistance (R) genes were identified and c

136 Active resistance to viruses is afforded by plant disease resistance (R) genes, which encode protein

137 associated with immunity is triggered when a plant disease resistance (R) protein recognizes a corres

138 similarities with the NBD-LRR superfamily of plant disease resistance (R) proteins and are predicted

139 Little is known of how plant disease resistance (R) proteins recognize pathogen

140 Plant disease resistance (R) proteins recognize potentia

141 r-triggered immunity (ETI) is activated when plant disease resistance (R) proteins recognize the pres

142 Pathogen recognition is often mediated by plant disease resistance (R) proteins that respond speci

143 bclass of RING E3 ligases that contribute to plant disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance th

144 cently demonstrated roles of mitochondria in plant disease resistance and animal apoptosis, this rapi

145 fy the impact of cruciferous phytoalexins on plant disease resistance and human health.

146 ggest that CPN1 may represent a link between plant disease resistance and plant acclimation to low-hu

147 s of signal transduction pathways leading to plant disease resistance and the accompanying hypersensi

148 ctions has focused on the molecular basis of plant disease resistance and the role of secreted effect

149 f WIPK expression and the role(s) of WIPK in plant disease resistance are unknown.

150 onal functions for NRT2.1 that may influence plant disease resistance by down-regulating biotic stres

151 f hypersensitive cell death and induction of plant disease resistance by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tom

152 ases (MAPKs or MPKs), play critical roles in plant disease resistance by regulating multiple defense

153 Plant disease resistance can be conferred by constitutiv

154 gene that encodes a protein with homology to plant disease resistance gene products is located in the

155 Plant disease resistance genes (R genes) are key compone

156 Plant disease resistance genes (R genes) encode proteins

157 It has been proposed that cloned plant disease resistance genes could be transferred from

158 The repetitive nature of plant disease resistance genes encoding for nucleotide-b

159 Plant disease resistance genes have been shown to be sub

160 nce genes RPS2 and RPM1 belong to a class of plant disease resistance genes that encode proteins that

161 e repeats found in animal hormone receptors, plant disease resistance genes, and genes involved in un

162 Like many other plant disease resistance genes, Arabidopsis thaliana RPS

163 nce similarities between 2 markers and known plant disease resistance genes, indicating that a resist

164 The diversity of the largest group of plant disease resistance genes, the nucleotide binding s

165 sequences of the mammalian IL-1 receptor and plant disease resistance genes.

166 de binding site-leucine rich repeat class of plant disease resistance genes.

167 4, Nod1, Nod2, and the cytosolic products of plant disease resistance genes.

168 l common themes have shaped the evolution of plant disease resistance genes.

169 es were identified with similarity to cloned plant disease resistance genes.

170 These motifs are characteristic of plant disease resistance genes.

171 Plant disease resistance governed by quantitative trait

172 A central challenge in the study of plant disease resistance has been to identify protein co

173 -transduction components that play a role in plant disease resistance have revealed remarkable simila

174 th is associated with the development of the plant disease resistance hypersensitive reaction (HR).

175 Understanding the fundamental mechanisms of plant disease resistance is of central importance to sus

176 Plant disease resistance is often conferred by genes wit

177 an unusual structure encoding three typical plant disease resistance protein domains: nucleotide-bin

178 riggered by the physical interaction between plant disease resistance protein, Pto, and the pathogen

179 of Arabidopsis thaliana expressing the RPS2 plant disease resistance protein.

180 e of the two large families of homologues of plant disease resistance proteins (R proteins) in Arabid

181 these effectors trigger innate immunity via plant disease resistance proteins as described by the "g

182 these virulence factors can be monitored by plant disease resistance proteins deployed to "guard" th

183 e-rich repeats (LRR) similar in structure to plant disease resistance proteins have been suggested as

184 tween pathogen avirulence (Avr) proteins and plant disease resistance proteins is the exception rathe

185 es (animal apoptosis regulators CED4/Apaf-1, plant disease resistance proteins, and bacterial AfsR-li

186 now provide compelling evidence that certain plant disease resistance proteins, which detect specific

187 he apoptosis regulator Apaf-1 and a class of plant disease resistance proteins.

188 novel role for a RanGAP in the function of a plant disease resistance response.

189 s are consistent with CPN1 playing a role in plant disease resistance responses, possibly as a suppre

190 Whereas the genetic requirement for NDR1 in plant disease resistance signaling has been detailed, ou

191 identified recently as a factor involved in plant disease resistance signaling, and SGT1 from barley

192 may contribute both to the establishment of plant disease resistance, and to the development of cell

193 of processes including endoreduplication and plant disease resistance, but the molecular mechanism un

194 concluded that WIPK plays a positive role in plant disease resistance, possibly through accelerating

195 ibly other signaling molecules in regulating plant disease resistance.

196 to genes previously shown to be involved in plant disease resistance.

197 for MEKK1 kinase activity in this aspect of plant disease resistance.

198 lved in lipid metabolism and modification in plant disease resistance.

199 es thioredoxin activity in the regulation of plant disease resistance.

200 n ligase complexes and is also implicated in plant disease resistance.

201 rsensitive response to pathogen infection in plant disease resistance.

202 nd cooperative functions of SGT1 and RAR1 in plant disease resistance.

203 s now a feasible strategy for enhancement of plant disease resistance.

204 dependent and EDS1-independent components of plant disease resistance.

205 g of signal transduction pathway involved in plant disease resistance.

206 response (HR) is frequently associated with plant disease resistance.

207 , important cues during the establishment of plant disease resistance.

208 ed cell death, is frequently associated with plant disease resistance.

209 on in resistance (R) gene-mediated and basal plant disease resistance.

210 R1 gene is a positive regulator of inducible plant disease resistance.

211 mechanisms resulting in the establishment of plant disease resistance.

212 licylic acid (SA) plays an important role in plant disease resistance.

213 e (HR) is a central feature of gene-for-gene plant disease resistance.

214 n transcriptional activation of PR genes and plant disease resistance.

215 ch for studying genetically complex forms of plant disease resistance.

216 hat are thought to have an important role in plant disease resistance.

217 ular mechanisms underlying MAPK functions in plant disease resistance.

218 the functional role(s) of occlusions in host plant disease resistance/susceptibility remains controve

219 Plant-disease resistance (R) genes mediate the specific

220 In plants, disease resistance mediated by the gene-for-gene

221 te blocks cleavage and inhibits autophagy in plants; disease resistance is also compromised.

222 BD)-leucine-rich repeat (LRR) superfamily of plant disease-resistance (R) proteins and are emerging a

223 Plant disease-resistance (R) proteins are thought to fun

224 olic proteins, termed NODs, with homology to plant disease-resistance gene products has been implicat

225 tein kinase domains, a novel structure for a plant disease-resistance gene.

226 Breeding programs based on plant disease-resistance genes are being optimized by in

227 s in the cloning and sequencing of clustered plant disease-resistance genes are providing information

228 4 family of apoptosis regulators and certain plant disease-resistance genes.

229 hich are differentially required for diverse plant disease-resistance pathways.

230 terleukin 1 receptors and MyD88 factors, and plant disease-resistance proteins recognizes a parallel

231 tor of gene expression during the onset of a plant disease-resistance response known as systemic acqu

232 Recent studies suggest that plant disease-resistance responses use multiple signalin

233 which ultimately activate one or more of the plant disease-resistance responses.

234 Nod1 and Nod2 are mammalian counterparts of plant disease-resistant gene products that may function

235 tosis regulators Apaf-1/Ced-4 and a class of plant disease-resistant gene products.

236 As it was reported for plant disease-resistant R proteins, the leucine-rich rep

237 (Zm-stm1), and three to a gene implicated in plant disease responses (Zm-hir1, Zm-hir2, and Zm-hir3).

238 And (4) Fungal endophyte effects on plant disease severity are context-dependent.

239 i (i.e. endophytes and epiphytes) can modify plant disease severity in controlled experiments.

240 g the biotic environmental factors affecting plant disease severity.

241 rse group of fungal endophytes can influence plant disease severity.

242 a, including those involved in biocontrol of plant diseases, significantly inhibit attachment and pla

243 gent themes: (1) Fungal endophyte effects on plant disease span the full spectrum from pathogen antag

244 are urgently required to protect and prevent plant diseases spreading worldwide.

245 Despite much research on biocontrol of plant diseases, success in field crops has been limited

246 Plant disease suppression is the direct result of the ac

247 te immunity in plants, resulting in enhanced plant disease susceptibility.

248 Plant disease symptoms exhibit complex spatial and tempo

249 Virus infections are the cause of numerous plant disease syndromes that are generally characterized

250 Scab is an economically devastating plant disease that greatly limits grain yield and qualit

251 trade has given rise to emerging infectious plant diseases that add further insecurity and pressure.

252 ia are most prominent among bacteria causing plant diseases that result in a diminution of the quanti

253 fic understanding of plant pathogens and the plant diseases they cause.

254 l level, there is a need to acknowledge that plant diseases threaten our food supplies and to devote

255 t crops is the most effective way to control plant diseases to safeguard food and feed production.

256 riculture with a focus on toxicity concerns, plant disease treatment, and genetic engineering.

257 adication of localised outbreaks of invading plant disease, using citrus canker in Florida as a case

258 tualistic root microbiota can also influence plant disease via iron.

259 His book on plant diseases was one of the first to be published in E

260 that of prior models for vector-transmitted plant diseases where the entire plant is the unit of ana

261 defect in alginate biosynthesis resulted in plant disease with >3-fold more bacteria per plant, sugg

262 Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a plant disease with serious economic and health impacts.

263 ew biosensing systems for early detection of plant diseases with high sensitivity and specificity at

264 l blast disease, one of the most destructive plant diseases worldwide.