コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ing papillae is an integral component of the plant immune response.
2 ted molecular patterns represent a conserved plant immune response.
3 novel effector, MjTTL5, that could suppress plant immune response.
4 the fungus produces proteins to suppress the plant immune response.
5 understand the underlying mechanisms of the plant immune response.
6 1-387 )and is responsible for activating the plant immune response.
7 t discoveries over the last decade about the plant immune response.
8 2 is an SA receptor that is required for the plant immune response.
9 EVs may represent an important component of plant immune responses.
10 n levels and NPR1-dependent transcription in plant immune responses.
11 gulators of differential coexpression during plant immune responses.
12 ferential coexpression tend to be related to plant immune responses.
13 Plant hormones play a vital role in plant immune responses.
14 ble dynamic but tight and precise control of plant immune responses.
15 o the induction of rapid tissue necrosis and plant immune responses.
16 r understanding the molecular basis of these plant immune responses.
17 tion of SA production, is a key component of plant immune responses.
18 e responses is an intrinsic component of the plant immune responses.
19 odule employ distinct mechanisms to regulate plant immune responses.
20 Light is an important modulator of plant immune responses.
21 usible bacterial component that may regulate plant immune responses.
22 ranscriptional reprogramming associated with plant immune responses.
23 ific role in transcription regulation during plant immune responses.
24 d production of reactive oxygen species, two plant immune responses.
25 at can be used to trigger defined subsets of plant immune responses.
26 cylic acid and most known genes required for plant immune responses.
27 ction between cell-cycle progression and the plant immune responses.
28 ive response (HR) associated with successful plant immune responses.
29 LS2 complex, and coordinately act to enhance plant immune responses.
31 these data reveal the importance of PRR2 in plant immune responses against P. syringae and suggest a
32 al surface polysaccharides in the evasion of plant immune responses and elaborate on their role in pr
33 hogen employs type III effectors to suppress plant immune responses and promote disease susceptibilit
34 Here we discuss the roles of cell death in plant immune responses and the tactics pathogens utilize
38 licitors are drug-like compounds that induce plant immune responses but are structurally distinct fro
40 differences in vertebrate, invertebrate, and plant immune responses, comparison of viral evolution fa
42 cule signals such as ascarosides to activate plant immune responses has potential utility to improve
43 race with plants, whereas the need to avoid plant immune responses has resulted in purifying selecti
45 the overexpression of genes involved in the plant immune response in root border-like cells of Arabi
46 itin, and is able to suppress chitin-induced plant immune responses, including generation of reactive
49 cquired resistance (SAR) is a broad-spectrum plant immune response involving profound transcriptional
52 r efficient activation of the broad-spectrum plant immune responses known as localized acquired resis
53 ection massively activates genes involved in plant immune responses, mainly those in the calcium-depe
54 nounced shifts of the following two distinct plant immune responses: pattern-triggered immunity (PTI)
55 dence that activation of EDS1/PAD4-dependent plant immune responses rapidly disrupts ABA signal trans
56 th in rice cells was restricted and elicited plant immune responses that included the formation of ce
57 late important cellular processes, including plant immune responses, through protein-protein interact
62 iew, recent advances in our understanding of plant immune responses to necrotrophs and comparison wit
63 Arabidopsis thaliana protein that regulates plant immune responses to pathogen-associated molecular
64 suggested that this difficulty was caused by plant immune responses triggered by perception of Agroba
65 oot nodule symbiosis requires the evasion of plant immune responses triggered by rhizobial effectors.
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。