戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tion of STKR1 function, SnRK1 signaling, and plant immunity.
2 n expression of genes, including R genes, in plant immunity.
3 signaling is an early and necessary event in plant immunity.
4 t of BON1 (BONZAI1), a negative regulator of plant immunity.
5  as mediators of CW integrity maintenance in plant immunity.
6 AD4), which encodes another key regulator of plant immunity.
7 tic link between Ca(2+) and ROS signaling in plant immunity.
8 by FLAGELLIN SENSING2 (FLS2), which promotes plant immunity.
9 roteins and inside plant cells it suppresses plant immunity.
10 layers in the signaling networks involved in plant immunity.
11 hogens, substantiating a role for eNAD(+) in plant immunity.
12 s as a critical step in the establishment of plant immunity.
13 of antagonism between cytokinin and auxin in plant immunity.
14 roteins, indicating that KEG plays a role in plant immunity.
15 n as a critical component in fine control of plant immunity.
16 e plant MAPKs are required for activation of plant immunity.
17 een characterized for their specific role in plant immunity.
18 nimals, as a critical regulator of inducible plant immunity.
19 olymorphisms that are critical to activating plant immunity.
20 substrate and highlights the role of GRP7 in plant immunity.
21 ctional link between the circadian clock and plant immunity.
22 argely independently of NPR1 in establishing plant immunity.
23 d stimulating gene transcription to regulate plant immunity.
24 uggest that AtSR1 is a negative regulator of plant immunity.
25 based regulator underpins the development of plant immunity.
26 iggered redox changes and gene regulation in plant immunity.
27  intrinsic E3 Ub ligase activity to suppress plant immunity.
28  programmed cell death (PCD) associated with plant immunity.
29 her with CBM1-containing proteins manipulate plant immunity.
30 almodulin-like (CML) proteins is critical to plant immunity.
31  kinases (MAPKs) are important regulators of plant immunity.
32 tial coexpression was a common phenomenon of plant immunity.
33  plays a previously unknown negative role in plant immunity.
34 eine proteases (PLCPs) being central hubs in plant immunity.
35 sistance (NHR) is the most prevalent form of plant immunity.
36 NASE 1) functions as a negative regulator of plant immunity.
37 tubule-associated protein MAP65-1 to subvert plant immunity.
38 phasizes the importance of Ca(2+) sensing to plant immunity.
39 acterial flagellin epitope flg22 to activate plant immunity.
40 RKs) are transmembrane receptors involved in plant immunity.
41 e identified PRR2 as a positive regulator of plant immunity.
42 echanisms for suppressing effector-triggered plant immunity.
43 ith extra-large G proteins (XLGs) to mediate plant immunity.
44  the transcriptional network associated with plant immunity.
45 derophores also have the ability to activate plant immunity.
46  trigger responses typically associated with plant immunity.
47 per activation underlines a crucial layer of plant immunity.
48 IZATION FACTOR (RALF) propeptides to inhibit plant immunity.
49 cylic acid (SA), an established regulator of plant immunity.
50 M1 and the involvement of 14-3-3 proteins in plant immunity.
51 tive regulator of cell death associated with plant immunity.
52 ct in the same signaling pathway to regulate plant immunity.
53 gae type-III effectors is the suppression of plant immunity.
54 actions are coordinated to achieve effective plant immunity.
55 teraction with MOS1, a negative regulator of plant immunity.
56 tin inducible complex with AtCERK1 to induce plant immunity.
57 rs also play important noncanonical roles in plant immunity.
58 phosphorylates BIK1 and positively regulates plant immunity.
59 icating that NTL9 is a positive regulator of plant immunity.
60 y shown to be required in multiple layers of plant immunity.
61 were also accumulated and may participate in plant immunity.
62 tion are essential signals for activation of plant immunity.
63 nd reversibility to protein-SNO signaling in plant immunity.
64 lso compensates for its absence in enhancing plant immunity.
65 t of alternative splicing in R gene-mediated plant immunity.
66 at are delivered into host cells to suppress plant immunity added sRNAs to the list of pathogen effec
67 lly important residues for its activation of plant immunity, advances our understanding of these proc
68 ic acquired resistance (SAR), a long-lasting plant immunity against a broad spectrum of pathogens, re
69  acquired resistance (SAR) is a long-lasting plant immunity against a broad spectrum of pathogens.
70         Our results reveal a new pathway for plant immunity against bacteria and a role for AvrPtoB E
71  GTP-binding protein 1 (NOG1), functions for plant immunity against bacterial pathogens.
72 iosynthetic enzymes as a means to strengthen plant immunity against biotrophic pathogens.
73 id derivatives are of central importance for plant immunity against insect herbivores; however, major
74 ance of DNA methylation and demethylation in plant immunity against nonviral pathogens.
75                                              Plant immunity against the majority of the microbial pat
76  the integration of selective autophagy into plant immunity against viruses and reveal potential vira
77 s) initiate signaling pathways important for plant immunity and development.
78 ed hormone that regulates diverse aspects of plant immunity and development.
79 l transduction pathways associated with both plant immunity and disease susceptibility share a common
80 fector proteins into plant cells to suppress plant immunity and facilitate fungal infection.
81 onents could have non-redundant functions in plant immunity and gene regulation.
82        Given the reported antagonism between plant immunity and growth, we suggest that these altered
83 hogens secrete effector proteins to modulate plant immunity and promote host colonization.
84 ogrammed cell death has been associated with plant immunity and senescence.
85 ased in vivo act as a DAMP signal to trigger plant immunity and suggest that controlled release of th
86 ome system is involved in several aspects of plant immunity and that a range of plant pathogens subve
87  indicate Bti9 and/or SlLyk13 play a role in plant immunity and the N-terminal domain of AvrPtoB may
88 he established SA impact on transcription in plant immunity and the nontranscriptional effect of SA o
89 two functional units, one acting to suppress plant immunity and the other potentially affecting the h
90 ighlight the importance of BRs in modulating plant immunity and uncover pathogen-mediated manipulatio
91 1 (NPR1), a key transcription coactivator of plant immunity, and regulates the induction kinetics of
92   Pectin is thus an important contributor to plant immunity, and this is due at least in part to the
93        While conceptual principles governing plant immunity are becoming clear, its systems-level org
94 edicted interactions and hormonal effects on plant immunity are confirmed in subsequent experiments w
95                                 Responses to plant immunity are initiated upon the perception of path
96 tance (R) proteins, as central regulators of plant immunity, are tightly regulated for effective defe
97 hese MAPKs may function downstream of ROS in plant immunity because of their activation by exogenousl
98 tion that SAR represents a distinct phase of plant immunity beyond local resistance.
99 Both MED15 and MED16 have been implicated in plant immunity, but the role of MED14 has not been estab
100 animal immune cells, in that it might expand plant immunity by acting as an autonomous, anti-pathogen
101 t AtRAP functions as a negative regulator in plant immunity by characterizing molecular and biologica
102  However, pathogens have evolved to overcome plant immunity by delivering effectors into the plant ce
103 s, two distinct bacterial effectors activate plant immunity by interacting with the same host protein
104 athogen Pseudomonas syringae that suppresses plant immunity by interfering with plant immune receptor
105           Hence, SR1IP1 positively regulates plant immunity by removing the defense suppressor AtSR1.
106 tablishment of the broad-spectrum, inducible plant immunity called systemic acquired resistance (SAR)
107 al requirement of individual SERK members in plant immunity, cell-death control, and brassinosteroid
108  broad involvement of the host proteasome in plant immunity, certain bacterial effectors exploit or r
109 re two independent early signaling events in plant immunity, downstream of FLS2.
110        Nonribosomal lipopeptides such as the plant immunity elicitor surfactin or the highly fungitox
111 ED18 is a multifunctional protein regulating plant immunity, flowering time and responses to hormones
112 entified differential phytochrome control of plant immunity genes and confirmed that far-red enrichme
113  calcium signatures to control expression of plant immunity genes enhanced disease susceptibility 1 (
114         While the important role of PLCPs in plant immunity has become more evident, it remains large
115              Ca(2+) signaling is critical to plant immunity; however, the channels involved are poorl
116  hypothesis that TaADF4 positively modulates plant immunity in wheat via the modulation of actin cyto
117 ation of a small-molecule compound affecting plant immunity indicate that chemical genetics is a powe
118                Recent evidence suggests that plant immunity involves regulation by chromatin remodeli
119                           The first layer of plant immunity is activated by cell surface receptor-lik
120                                            * Plant immunity is activated by sensing either conserved
121                                              Plant immunity is activated through complex and cross-ta
122                    Importantly, we show that plant immunity is activated upon infection of a nuclear-
123 tional data showing that the role of EDM2 in plant immunity is limited and does not include a functio
124  that suppress PCD suggests that suppressing plant immunity is one of the primary roles for DC3000 ef
125 e is to review the progress in understanding plant immunity made so far by applying network modeling
126 ynamic mathematical model of the SA-mediated plant immunity network was developed.
127 nic microbes are capable of hacking into the plants' immunity programs.
128                            Recent studies in plant immunity provide a link between heterotrimeric G p
129 eract with a specific host MAPKKK to perturb plant immunity-related signaling.
130                                Activation of plant immunity relies on recognition of pathogen effecto
131 ng mechanisms by which AtHIRs participate in plant immunity remain elusive.
132  hormones, the detailed role of cytokinin in plant immunity remains to be fully elucidated.
133                                              Plant immunity requires recognition of pathogen effector
134           In addition, Liberibacters trigger plant immunity response via pathogen-associated molecula
135 e signaling, and sugar allocation related to plant immunity, revealing the complex nature of SSR resi
136  tools, cell biology, development, hormones, plant immunity, signaling in response to abiotic stress,
137 decoding of the salicylic acid (SA)-mediated plant immunity signalling network controlling gene expre
138 cted link between cell cycle progression and plant immunity, suggesting that cell cycle misregulation
139  and simple screening of novel components of plant immunity system and is well suited for whole-trans
140 terns (MAMPs) to activate the first layer of plant immunity termed pattern-triggered immunity (PTI).
141 t proteins (NLRs) are important receptors in plant immunity that allow recognition of pathogen effect
142 IENT1 (SARD1), encode positive regulators of plant immunity that promote the production of salicylic
143                     SARD1 is an activator of plant immunity that promotes production of the hormone s
144 ic oxide-dependent host strategy involved in plant immunity that works by directly disarming effector
145                         Here we show that in plant immunity the oxidoreductase Thioredoxin-h5 (TRXh5)
146  functions will enhance our understanding of plant immunity to necrotrophic pathogens.
147 gae type III effectors are known to suppress plant immunity to promote bacterial virulence.
148 gae type III effectors are known to suppress plant immunity to promote bacterial virulence.
149 set of systemic acquired resistance (SAR), a plant immunity, to a broad spectrum of pathogens that is
150 overed MOS7 and Nup98 as novel components of plant immunity toward a necrotrophic pathogen and provid
151 rs, some of which have been shown to inhibit plant immunity triggered upon perception of conserved pa
152 ibute to the execution of different forms of plant immunity upon challenge with diverse leaf pathogen
153        Here, we analyzed the role of PLC2 in plant immunity using an artificial microRNA to silence P
154 oncept, Arabidopsis MAPK4 (MPK4) function in plant immunity was investigated.
155 I1), involved in defense priming in systemic plant immunity, was down-regulated in leaves by joint st
156 To characterize the long-term persistence of plant immunity, we challenged Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis t
157            To promote an integrated model of plant immunity, we discuss analogous viral and nonviral
158 lar underpinnings of GA- and DELLA-modulated plant immunity, we studied the dynamics and impact of GA

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top