ライフサイエンスコーパス: pollination

1 traits related to reproduction itself (e.g., pollination).

2 evolution of intercellular communication in pollination.

3 compatible pollination but self-incompatible pollination.

4 ctions in plant reproduction through reduced pollination.

5 a heights that promote insect-mediated cross-pollination.

6 ly redundant roles in pollen development and pollination.

7 tubes that fail to fully elongate following pollination.

8 s were most abundant around 11 to 16 d after pollination.

9 initiation of floral organs until 3 d after pollination.

10 rnels at silking, pollination, and 3 d after pollination.

11 non-self S-RNases to allow cross-compatible pollination.

12 have the potential to influence each other's pollination.

13 t periods, leading to asynchrony and reduced pollination.

14 uccessive stages during the first 12 d after pollination.

15 non-self S-RNases to allow cross-compatible pollination.

16 ly, ROS are detected in synergid cells after pollination.

17 appears to be the main source of ROS before pollination.

18 ways that maintain effective oviposition and pollination.

19 ecause seeded fruits were obtained by manual pollination.

20 ell cycle in the stressed ovary at 1 d after pollination.

21 ile, but were able to produce seeds by cross pollination.

22 em is important for synergid function during pollination.

23 of female P. alba x P. glandulosa flowers to pollination.

24 sk to bees and mechanisms of exposure during pollination.

25 ecause coffee production is dependent on bee pollination.

26 pecifically the removal of exotic shrubs, on pollination.

27 ver two subdioecious species capable of wind pollination.

28 production of mature pollen thus blocked the pollination.

29 story for various roles in plant defense and pollination.

30 natural pollination and to supplemental hand pollination.

31 e growth and seed production from controlled pollinations.

32 in Arabidopsis stigmas following compatible pollinations.

33 radation occurs preferentially in compatible pollinations.

34 and sometimes exclusively, dependent on the pollination activity of honeybees.

35 Controlled pollinations also showed a varied ability to self among

36 ri during self-pollination and interspecific pollination and during infection with Fusarium graminear

37 nting and maintenance strategies to maximize pollination and establish resilience in the face of envi

38 actions are critical early events regulating pollination and fertilization and involve many signaling

39 large part by its large chromosomes, ease of pollination and growing agricultural importance.

40 thaliana and Arabidopsis halleri during self-pollination and interspecific pollination and during inf

41 Pru p 3 may inhibit a second pollination and may keep away herbivores until seed matu

42 Following successful pollination and ovule fertilization, heat-stress modifie

43 uga - genera that represent diverse modes of pollination and seed dispersal - we conducted in-depth r

44 ate fauna provide critical services, such as pollination and seed dispersal, which underpin functiona

45 Most pollination and seed establishment occurred within 450 m

46 e change on >700 plant and animal species in pollination and seed-dispersal networks from central Eur

47 lycopersicum (tomato) fruit have shown that pollination and subsequent fertilization induce the bios

48 ion gradients for flowers exposed to natural pollination and to supplemental hand pollination.

49 many plants, a feature important for optimal pollination and yield.

50 ators and it is unclear how this affects the pollination and yields of other co-blooming crops.

51 tree cover, revealed interacting effects on pollination and, ultimately, crop production.

52 sugars in leaf, cob, and kernels at silking, pollination, and 3 d after pollination.

53 We find new complexities in buzz pollination, and conclude that the impacts of field-real

54 uding methane consumption, pest suppression, pollination, and conservation of grassland birds, were h

55 carbohydrates to obtain nutrients, defense, pollination, and dispersal.

56 ing floral morphologic features, specialized pollination, and distinctive ecological strategies.

57 lowers with dry stigmas, pollen development, pollination, and pollen tube growth require spatial and

58 In Arabidopsis, floral organs abscise after pollination, and this cell separation event is controlle

59 nt on temperatures during the first 4 d post pollination, and yield is increased if average daily hig

60 pollinators, but it is unknown if effects on pollination are mediated by changes in water availabilit

61 We use live-cell imaging and a novel mixed-pollination assay that can detect multiple pollen tubes

62 underlining the complexity of interspecific pollination barriers.

63 However, while the opportunities for cross-pollination between neuroscience and computer science ar

64 iprocal herkogamy with insect-mediated cross-pollination between pin and thrum form flowers.

65 d movement between trees and increased cross pollination between varieties which is required for succ

66 is to assess the likelihood of 'legitimate' pollinations between compatible morphs, and hence reprod

67 We report the pollination biology of six northern European species of

68 ch develops sympetalous flowers with complex pollination biology, to examine the coordinating functio

69 This ROS burst depends on stigma pollination but precedes fertilization, suggesting that

70 cialization in bees occurs not for efficient pollination but rather in the corbiculate Electrapini as

71 tube, thereby resulting in cross-compatible pollination but self-incompatible pollination.

72 is improved by ecosystem services, including pollination, but this should be set in the context of tr

73 ation of pollen grains and likely gymnosperm pollination by 110-105 million years ago, possibly consi

74 Abundant pollination by a previously unknown native moth in exper

75 h levels of gene flow, probably due to cross-pollination by bees.

76 hragm encloses the reproductive organs where pollination by carrion flies occurs.

77 y are poor pollinators, and can also disrupt pollination by deterring other flower visitors, or by st

78 The model is applied to almond pollination by honey bees and other pollinators with env

79 Pollination by insects is essential to many ecosystems.

80 Pollination by insects, an ecosystem service of immense

81 ndance in four large-scale data sets on crop pollination by native bees.

82 hat street lighting potentially impacts upon pollination by nocturnal invertebrates.

83 pollinator services of honey bees, although pollination by other insects, mainly solitary wild bees,

84 Manual heterospecific pollination by S. admonitor resulted in a high flower-to

85 ts of climate change on crop suitability and pollination can help target appropriate management pract

86 panallergens shared by them and overlapping pollination complicates the recognition of allergy-causi

87 abundance) and demand (cultivated area) for pollination comprise 39% of the pollinator-dependent cro

88 arison of DEGs between infection and various pollination conditions showed that up to 79% of down-reg

89 species that autonomously reproduce via self-pollination consistently have larger geographic ranges t

90 need to integrate emerging theories such as pollination constraints, defense syndromes, tolerance, m

91 tem, the results suggest novel strategies of pollination control for the generation of hybrid cultiva

92 t phenological responses to climate warming, pollination could fail.

93 has raised concern about a potential global pollination crisis.

94 cing of whole kernels at 0, 3, and 5 d after pollination (DAP) and endosperms at 7, 10, and 15 DAP, u

95 arly endosperm proliferation at 8 days after pollination (DAP) and late embryo development at 13 DAP.

96 ion and involves deregulation 5 to 8 d after pollination (DAP) of agamous-like genes and retroelement

97 from endosperm cellularization at 3 d after pollination (DAP) through differentiation to the mature

98 ping barley grain endosperm 3 d to 8 d after pollination (DAP).

99 BETL, AL, or SE at 8, 12, and 16 days after pollination (DAP).

100 mmunities and potentially causing widespread pollination deficits.

101 ecific floral traits associated with oil-bee pollination, demonstrating that developmental constraint

102 ion service to support increasing demand for pollination-dependent crops poses risks for the U.S. eco

103 the production of ethylene decreased during pollination-dependent fruit set in wild-type tomato and

104 atially explicit landscape model to simulate pollination, dispersal, establishment, and mortality in

105 eproductive organs for pollen feeding and/or pollination during the late Middle Jurassic, much earlie

106 However, recent attention by pollination ecologists has focused on the broad spectra

107 ut a single interaction type (e.g., feeding, pollination), ecologists are beginning to consider netwo

108 ested empirically and implicitly assume that pollination efficacy is unaffected by interactions with

109 as well as its evolutionary drivers, such as pollination efficiency, abundance of seed dispersers, an

110 ses of several in vivo mutants (iv) of these pollination-enhanced transcripts revealed partial pollin

111 ertilized florets has identified a cohort of pollination-enriched transcripts that facilitated the id

112 patterns had direct and positive effects on pollination, especially on the relative and total fruit

113 Colony losses following a major pollination event in the United States, almond pollinati

114 sitively identify the source tree for 90% of pollination events (n=287 of 318 events).

115 First, controlled pollination experiments indicate that CYP78A9 responds t

116 Cytological analysis and cross-pollination experiments revealed that the slcer6 mutant

117 studied the pollination process by combining pollination experiments, video monitoring, and detailed

118 guard orchard production against the risk of pollination failure in Great Britain over the next 50 ye

119 nation-enhanced transcripts revealed partial pollination/fertilization and seed formation defects in

120 disrupting plant-pollinator communities and pollination function through habitat conversion and land

121 t-pollinator phenological synchrony and thus pollination function.

122 Thus, the ability of pollination functions to resist or recover from disturba

123 sets describing three types of interactions: pollination, fungal association, and insect herbivory.

124 ator visitation as well as among-flower self-pollination (geitonogamy) in self-compatible species.

125 Bird pollination has evolved repeatedly among flowering plant

126 Iconic examples of insect pollination have emphasized narrowly specialized pollina

127 llination event in the United States, almond pollination, have been characterized by brood mortality

128 c gymnosperms and the significance of insect pollination in angiosperm success.

129 Experimental assessment of pollination in divergent species and quantitative evalua

130 Most pollination in large-scale agriculture is dependent on m

131 imate that the ratio of self: heterospecific pollination in open-pollinated flowers was at least 22:1

132 ill evolve towards increased autonomous self-pollination in plant populations experiencing unreliable

133 The inhibition of self-pollination in self-incompatible Brassicaceae is based o

134 ated during senescence induced by preventing pollination in the B73 genotype of maize (Zea mays).

135 umulate at the highest levels in response to pollination in the transmitting tract and stigma, male a

136 ng a potential allergenic role of Parietaria pollination in this non-Mediterranean area.

137 ght to be essential for the success of cross pollinations in self-incompatible plants.

138 aceous and shrubby neighbors, herbivory, and pollination) in less stressful mesic areas than in more

139 tion is managing ecosystem services, such as pollination, in ways that maximize crop yields.

140 ent fruit set in wild-type tomato and during pollination-independent fruit set in the auxin hypersens

141 ycle genes was coordinately regulated during pollination-induced reproductive development.

142 critical evolutionary parameters covary with pollination intensity across wild populations of the bie

143 on analyses to test for interactions between pollination intensity and selection gradients for five f

144 ection, our study suggests that variation in pollination intensity drives variation in selection acro

145 We quantified pollination intensity in each of nine S. angularis popul

146 er the opportunity for selection varied with pollination intensity.

147 lection intensity for all traits depended on pollination intensity.

148 in this unique example of sexual deception, pollination is achieved by co-opting and regulating two

149 Pollination is an important ecosystem function and the g

150 Pollination is an important event in plant sexual reprod

151 A shift from biotic to abiotic pollination is clearly implicated in the diversification

152 Self-pollination is common in plants, and limited seed and po

153 n plants, the shift from outcrossing to self-pollination is common, providing the opportunity for com

154 Pollination is important for both agriculture and biodiv

155 Pollination is one ecosystem service that may be threate

156 Biotic pollination is the presumed ancestral condition, but thi

157 community composition in the tropics, where pollination limitation is most severe and land use chang

158 ful seed set (pseudogamy) and therefore risk pollination-limitation, particularly in self-incompatibl

159 Shifts in pollination may drive adaptive diversification of reprod

160 In this study, we report an alternative bird pollination mechanism involving bulbous stamen appendage

161 Melastome, Axinaea, demonstrate a novel bird pollination mechanism.

162 phrys is remarkable for its pseudocopulatory pollination mechanism; naive male pollinators are attrac

163 Animal pollination mediates both reproduction and gene flow for

164 f these pollinator types, the long-proboscid pollination mode [10], representing minimally ten family

165 We report such a specialized pollination mode from Early Cretaceous amber of Spain, w

166 Each group represents a distinctive pollination mode linked to a unique mouthpart type and f

167 , the impact of these factors depends on the pollination mode of plants, e.g. bee or fly pollinated.

168 otically dispersed lineages, especially when pollination mode was held constant.

169 evolutionary transition between the distinct pollination modes of I. guttata and I. tenuifolia likely

170 Pollinator lineages bearing these pollination modes were categorized into four evolutionar

171 in chemical diversity to those described in pollination mutualisms between flowering plants and inse

172 ding specialization versus generalization in pollination mutualisms.

173 During pollination, NaStEP is taken up by pollen tubes, where p

174 The average effective pollination neighborhood area between plants was 1.51 ha

175 Simulation models of pollination networks suggest that plant communities will

176 arasitoid webs, seed dispersal networks, and pollination networks) have been studied separately.

177 tualisms is difficult to obtain from complex pollination networks.

178 atest importance in the functioning of plant-pollination networks.

179 Bees are essential for the pollination of a wide variety of crops and the majority

180 Interspecific pollination of A.thaliana significantly up-regulated thi

181 The pollination of BnCysP1 male-sterile (female-fertile) pla

182 tor communities and potential impacts on the pollination of crops and wildflowers.

183 esources and ecosystem services, such as the pollination of crops.

184 Pollination of flowers with long corolla tubes by long-t

185 uality in 223 aviary experiments, successful pollination of Heliconia tortuosa (measured as pollen tu

186 Self-pollination of heterozygous ospal4 mutant lines produced

187 Using a large data set on bee pollination of watermelon crops, we predict how pollinat

188 rmed by multiple-partner mutualisms, such as pollination or seed dispersal by animals, than in small

189 ractices and environmental conditions, shape pollination outcomes.

190 ambient during their approximately two week pollination period.

191 t declines among animal species that provide pollination, pest control and cultural values.

192 fically decomposition, carbon sequestration, pollination, pest control and cultural values.

193 In pollination, plants provide food reward to pollinators w

194 esting similarities in senescence induced by pollination prevention and sugar application.

195 abitat divergence, floral isolation and post-pollination prezygotic barriers.

196 We studied the pollination process by combining pollination experiments

197 , Fringillidae), are bifunctional during the pollination process.

198 patial variation in intensity of grazing and pollination produces a selection mosaic, and that change

199 en introduced into South America (Chile) for pollination purposes.

200 etwork structure is a suitable indicator for pollination quality, highlighting the usefulness of inte

201 y to overwhelm seed predators or to maximise pollination rates.

202 stent with the earlier observation that post-pollination reproductive barriers develop between 5 and

203 ctors involved in the shift from bee to moth pollination reside in particularly dynamic regions of th

204 anding the molecular mechanism of early post-pollination response in this hybrid poplar reproduction.

205 event in plant sexual reproduction, and post-pollination response is an essential process for reprodu

206 n from male P. tomentosa, but the early post-pollination response of flowers at the molecular levels

207 neither case did we observe an effect on the pollination responses of SRKb-expressing stigmas toward

208 y of the plants remained unaffected as cross pollination resulted in fruit setting.

209 Self pollination resulted in lower seed set, germination and

210 involves highly specific interactions during pollination, resulting in the rejection of incompatible

211 a lower TSS during pollen challenges and the pollination season.

212 ]) in the ACC; a subset recorded TSSs in the pollination seasons.

213 riven processes that benefit people, such as pollination, seed dispersal, and pest consumption.

214 tners in five different types of mutualisms: pollination, seed dispersal, plant protection, rhizobial

215 Our results also indicate that reduced pollination service delivery is not due to pesticide-ind

216 Accurate predictions of pollination service delivery require a comprehensive und

217 potential consequences for bee declines and pollination service delivery.

218 ht the critical importance of animal-induced pollination service for the U.S. economy, and the need t

219 Flowering plants could lose their pollination service if climate warming potentially uncou

220 onomic dependence of agricultural sectors on pollination service is significant (US$14.2-23.8 billion

221 ors) that are most vulnerable to scarcity of pollination service provided by various animal species.

222 Failure to maintain adequate animal-mediated pollination service to support increasing demand for pol

223 f U.S. industrial sectors on animal-mediated pollination service.

224 ex of pollinator availability as a proxy for pollination service.

225 of wild bees and their potential impacts on pollination services across the coterminous United State

226 vironmental change among species, stabilises pollination services against land-use change.

227 t Asian honey bees, which provide vital crop pollination services and are key native pollinators.

228 ledge that pesticide exposure can reduce the pollination services bumblebees deliver to apples, a cro

229 As demand for pollination services by greenhouse growers inevitably in

230 under the most extreme IPCC scenario (A1F1), pollination services by managed honey bees are expected

231 ty of pesticide risk to honey bees providing pollination services came from residues in non-focal cro

232 Human reliance on insect pollination services continues to increase even as polli

233 Honey bees provide critical pollination services for many agricultural crops.

234 Quantity and quality of pollination services have declined through time.

235 Honey bees are highly valued for their pollination services in agricultural settings, and recen

236 Similarly, we found response diversity in pollination services in two of the systems.

237 These results suggest that pollination services matter, but managing the asynchrony

238 lination of watermelon crops, we predict how pollination services might change under various climate

239 esulting in an estimated aggregate change in pollination services of +4.5% by 2099.

240 We investigated the impact of pollination services on coffee production, considering v

241 es are expected to decline by 14.5%, whereas pollination services provided by most native, wild taxa

242 We measured crop pollination services provided by native bees across land

243 Bees provide essential pollination services that are potentially affected both

244 ybee's foraging efficiency and therefore the pollination services that they provide.

245 ct effects on bees themselves and not on the pollination services they provide.

246 of their plant partners which increases the pollination services to specialist plants and cedes the

247 g could result in indirect impacts upon crop pollination services via an overlooked mechanism, namely

248 Colonies performing pollination services were subject to increased pesticide

249 A 50% loss of pollination services would be associated with 700,000 ad

250 the impacts of climate change, because crop pollination services would decline more steeply without

251 ing plants can reap the benefits of enhanced pollination services, they do so at the cost of increase

252 trait-based data into the quantification of pollination services, we highlight the diversity in ecol

253 re can impair the ability of bees to provide pollination services, with important implications for bo

254 eaten bee populations worldwide, imperilling pollination services.

255 r seeds, demonstrating a reduced delivery of pollination services.

256 study floral traits as if they only mediated pollination services.

257 erefore identify areas vulnerable to loss of pollination services.

258 ator abundance and diversity, and ultimately pollination services.

259 ncing biodiversity and the spatial extent of pollination services.

260 emented to safeguard pollinators and sustain pollination services.

261 ective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species tha

262 s had exserted stigmas, thus preventing self-pollination, similar to wild-type pistils treated with G

263 Bees contribute approximately 80% of insect pollination, so it is important to understand and mitiga

264 Such behaviours may include buzz pollination (sonication), in which pollinators, usually

265 pollination via reversion to more generalist pollination strategies.

266 frequency of pseudocopulation and thus lower pollination success rate in the orchid.

267 show that vegetation restoration can improve pollination, suggesting that the degradation of ecosyste

268 Pollination syndrome and fruit type, both biotic traits

269 allows genes that contribute to a multitrait pollination syndrome to be inherited together as a unit.

270 oradic in angiosperms, and flax has no known pollination syndrome(s) with functional pollinator group

271 ery expands our knowledge of flowering plant pollination systems and provides the first report of hig

272 Pollination systems within intensive grassland communiti

273 able diversity of floral colour patterns and pollination systems.

274 was a more effective tool for securing good pollination than maintaining high shade tree densities a

275 Despite the efficacy of heterospecific pollination, the contribution of S. admonitor trees to p

276 injected into the TT-ablated style prior to pollination, the growth of incompatible pollen tubes of

277 of seed weight accumulation from the time of pollination through 30 d of grain filling showed an earl

278 bes a new example of how a plant can achieve pollination through chemical mimicry of the food sources

279 TT-ablated N. tabacum styles at various post-pollination times and developmental stages.

280 ritical ecosystem service by ensuring stable pollination to agriculture and wild plant communities.

281 However, many apomicts require pollination to develop functional endosperm for successf

282 showed these herbivory-induced decreases in pollination to individual plants best match a Type II fu

283 s that can easily stick to hairy insects for pollination to nanoscale virus particles that are highly

284 etophytes after pollen reaches stigmas links pollination to ovule fertilisation, governing subsequent

285 d microsatellite paternity analysis and hand pollinations to investigate pollen-limitation in Sorbus

286 ds provides a unique evolutionary model with pollination-triggered ovule development and megasporogen

287 owering plant species specialized for animal pollination, understanding how wild pollinators utilize

288 oidy could provide an escape from specialist pollination via reversion to more generalist pollination

289 tion of time-lapse photographic sequences of pollination viewed on surgically manipulated flowers sho

290 rst in the stigma/style and petals following pollination was also suppressed by heat-stress.

291 mentally limited to the first two days after pollination whereas polycotyly was induced when the leve

292 n the inner integument was apparent prior to pollination, while expression in the outer integument st

293 and the solitary bee on which it depends for pollination will diverge in phenology with increasing sp

294 transcriptional changes in the stigma during pollination with both compatible and incompatible pollen

295 Reports of endosperm development following pollination with irradiated pollen at dosages that cause

296 Through pollination with magnetofected pollen, transgenic plants

297 om mating and seed yield, we performed mixed pollinations with genetically marked Col-0 and RIL polle

298 om mating and seed yield, we performed mixed pollinations with genetically marked Col-0 pollen and Va

299 llen immigration and the average distance of pollination within the population was 81 m.

300 basis of fitness of progeny produced by hand pollinations within and between populations.