ライフサイエンスコーパス: pollinator

1 ogical study of this costly disease of a key pollinator.

2 c signature that is highly salient to insect pollinators.

3 gy of resource identification for generalist pollinators.

4 oward sustainable management of our nation's pollinators.

5 closely related plant species with different pollinators.

6 ey role in reproductive isolation imposed by pollinators.

7 isitation rates and community composition of pollinators.

8 Wild bees are highly valuable pollinators.

9 also in shifts in seasonal abundance of bee pollinators.

10 se phytochemicals that can reduce disease in pollinators.

11 n co-evolutionary process between plants and pollinators.

12 ith climate to drive local decline of native pollinators.

13 resources of generalist plants to specialist pollinators.

14 conspicuous display that filters prospective pollinators.

15 ctory and visual signals to communicate with pollinators.

16 ked with experiments and also scarce for bee pollinators.

17 re virus prevalence between wild and managed pollinators.

18 fee-suitable areas will also be suitable for pollinators.

19 ies important to ecosystem functioning, like pollinators.

20 ollen placement on, and stigma contact with, pollinators.

21 crop pollination services and are key native pollinators.

22 uding many bees which have economic value as pollinators.

23 bate because of their detrimental effects on pollinators.

24 nimals for the purpose of attracting them as pollinators [2,3].

25 al resources to produce nectar that attracts pollinators [3], but toxins in this reward could disrupt

26 hment-level insect taxa richness (2.6-fold), pollinator abundance (3.5-fold), native bird species ric

27 de floral and nesting resources to undermine pollinator abundance and diversity, and ultimately polli

28 During early and peak apple bloom, pollinator abundance and yield were reduced in landscape

29 Following peak apple bloom, pollinator abundance was greater on farms with high appl

30 lly based cues and strategies for attracting pollinators across diverse environments.

31 the most ecologically important alternative pollinators after bees and bumblebees.

32 We discuss the interaction between flower, pollinator and gravity, and how petal surface structure

33 to explore the brain of an important insect pollinator and model organism, the bumblebee (Bombus ter

34 versity led to the gain of approximately one pollinator and one flowering plant species and nearly tw

35 tegies, which makes the relationship between pollinator and plant less mutualistic and more exploitat

36 fects of disparate stresses in this critical pollinator and social insects more broadly.

37 In mutualistic pollinators and antagonistic herbivores, past experience

38 crossing rates for three, separately tested, pollinators and both traits increase oviposition by a ha

39 ial for coupled impacts of climate change on pollinators and crops.

40 ction to be easily learned and remembered in pollinators and difficult to learn in herbivores.

41 compounds to repel antagonists or to attract pollinators and enemies of herbivores.

42 manipulate physical forces to attract animal pollinators and ensure reproductive success.

43 manipulate physical forces to attract animal pollinators and ensure reproductive success.

44 Mass bloom attracts pollinators and it is unclear how this affects the polli

45 hange will cause geographic range shifts for pollinators and major crops, with global implications fo

46 rsification exerted the strongest effects on pollinators and predators, suggesting these management s

47 ower and was also visited more frequently by pollinators and robbers.

48 ecosystem services, acting, for example, as pollinators and seed dispersers.

49 nt responses can be implemented to safeguard pollinators and sustain pollination services.

50 Honey bees (Apis mellifera) are important pollinators and their health is threatened worldwide by

51 y the availability and abundance of suitable pollinators and/or the presence of co-flowering relative

52 are ecologically and economically important pollinators, and many species are in decline.

53 ce evolutionary interactions between plants, pollinators, and pollinator disease, but testing direct

54 are also invaluable natural and agricultural pollinators, and there is widespread concern over recent

55 Pollinators are considered primary selective agents acti

56 the most morphologically specialized living pollinators are diverse, long-proboscid flies.

57 The idea that pollinators are in large part responsible for the divers

58 has not received attention, although shared pollinators are likely to mediate several types of bioti

59 oduce from a single individual when mates or pollinators are not available.

60 re consistent with the hypothesis that, when pollinators are unreliable, floral traits promoting auto

61 With the tip of their tongue, pollinators assess the advertisement of individual flowe

62 ne of which involves proliferation of insect pollinator associations in the transition from gymnosper

63 er, most evidence supports gymnosperm-insect pollinator associations, buttressed by direct evidence o

64 of the predators of pests during the day and pollinators at night.

65 ecosystem function and the global decline in pollinators attenuates the resistance of natural areas a

66 ellum and a showy, patterned calyx - enhance pollinator attraction by exploiting the visual and chemo

67 l plant traits traditionally associated with pollinator attraction, (2) floral VOCs, and (3) the visi

68 tively more important than visual traits for pollinator attraction, particularly under shifting envir

69 electrostatic forces in pollen transfer and pollinator attraction.

70 portance of physical and structural means of pollinator attraction.

71 and increase outcrossing but this depends on pollinator behavior within inflorescences.

72 iers, particularly flower colour influencing pollinator behaviour, is well understood in some species

73 g of wildflower gardens in cities to sustain pollinator biodiversity is on the rise, without full con

74 bat flowers or negative correlations between pollinator body size and average concentration.

75 We investigate the effects of pollinator body size, plant size (as a proxy of floral d

76 owers specialized for long-tongued bumblebee pollinators (Bombus hortorum) but are occasionally robbe

77 florescences of A. gymnandrum attracted more pollinators, but did not increase the number of flowers

78 ed to have many effects on plants and insect pollinators, but it is unknown if effects on pollination

79 s and volatile organic compounds as cues for pollinators, but recent reports have demonstrated the im

80 represent a potential threat to other insect pollinators, but the extent of this threat is poorly und

81 d over different angiosperm families, entice pollinators by deception [1].

82 rsonii is specialized on kleptoparasitic fly pollinators by deploying volatiles linked to the flies'

83 These results demonstrate that competing pollinators can take advantage of alarm signal informati

84 Two pollinators characterized by low and high bolting tenden

85 Volatile emissions can influence pollinator choice, but how they act in combination with

86 may negatively affect the richness of plant-pollinator communities across large spatial scales.

87 we find evidence that fire diversity buffers pollinator communities against the effects of drought-in

88 ropriation of ecosystems is disrupting plant-pollinator communities and pollination function through

89 considerable concern over declines in insect pollinator communities and potential impacts on the poll

90 se and management trends currently degrading pollinator communities and potentially causing widesprea

91 ses is critical for conserving and restoring pollinator communities and the ecosystem services and fu

92 on records, we explore the assembly of plant-pollinator communities at native plant restoration sites

93 increasingly cultivated and might influence pollinator communities in MFC fields and nearby semi-nat

94 Focusing on plant-pollinator communities in mixed-conifer forest with freq

95 by helping to restore phenotypically diverse pollinator communities, small-scale restorations such as

96 may act to reduce spatial turnover of plant-pollinator communities.

97 heterogeneity (beta-diversity) of plant and pollinator communities.

98 d the effects of mass flowering apple on the pollinator community and yield of co-blooming strawberry

99 and pollen-dispersal ability for the entire pollinator community of a common tropical tree using a s

100 ng in reproduction differentially across the pollinator community.

101 ota, changes that may have lasting impact on pollinator conservation efforts.

102 On one hand, pollinators could employ a specific set of floral cues r

103 Alternatively, wild pollinators could recognize an exclusive signature of cu

104 ine in the abundance and diversity of insect pollinators could result from habitat loss, disease, and

105 whether wildflower gardens, while benefiting pollinators, could also hasten the extinction of native

106 Using a long-term pollinator dataset, comprising approximately 9,800 speci

107 c alternative to ameliorate these drivers of pollinator decline while supporting sustainable food pro

108 reby counteracting a possible contributor to pollinator decline.

109 can contribute to mitigating the drivers of pollinator decline.

110 We estimated pollinator-decline-dependent changes in micronutrient-de

111 Worldwide pollinator declines are attributed to a number of factor

112 Recent concern over global pollinator declines has led to considerable research on

113 In recent decades pollinator declines have been linked to the effects of i

114 n of neonicotinoid insecticides to worldwide pollinator declines have focused on honey bees and the c

115 ew insights into the links between plant and pollinator declines, and offers considerable opportuniti

116 ecological intensification as a solution to pollinator declines, and we discuss ways to promote it i

117 Among the multiple pressures facing pollinators, decreasing floral resources due to habitat

118 d how landscape-scale cover of MFCs affected pollinator densities in 408 MFC fields and adjacent SNHs

119 EIO) model and network analysis with data on pollinator dependence of crops to understand the economi

120 We quantified nutrient composition and pollinator dependence of foods to estimate the size of p

121 ed area) for pollination comprise 39% of the pollinator-dependent crop area in the United States.

122 densities might negatively affect yields of pollinator-dependent crops and the reproductive success

123 bee abundances correspond to large areas of pollinator-dependent crops.

124 nteractions between plants, pollinators, and pollinator disease, but testing direct effects of phytoc

125 t for the maintenance of flowering plant and pollinator diversity and predicted shifts in fire regime

126 These findings concur with trends in pollinator diversity, which declined in the mid-twentiet

127 however, because the interests of plants and pollinators do not always align, there exists the potent

128 erse and was superseded by new pollenivorous pollinators during the Cretaceous co-evolution of insect

129 pulses that may be important determinants of pollinator dynamics.

130 edictions, we surveyed visitation frequency, pollinator effectiveness (pollen deposition ability) and

131 Bees had the highest levels of pollinator effectiveness, with Apis, Andrena, Lasiogloss

132 edea and conducted field experiments to test pollinator effectiveness.

133 , creating a yellow highlight at the site of pollinator entry.

134 Yet, the mechanisms by which pollinators evaluate volatiles of single flowers remaine

135 ical tree using a series of individual-based pollinator-exclusion experiments followed by molecular-b

136 Generalist pollinators experience a high level of environmental var

137 ress non-crop plants as a potential route of pollinator exposure to neonicotinoid and other insectici

138 Pollinators face numerous threats, including changes in

139 We hypothesize that this pollinator filtering behavior constitutes a crucial mech

140 e results demonstrate that alkaloids enhance pollinator flower constancy, opening new perspectives in

141 is positively related to the richness of the pollinators, flowering plants, and plant-pollinator inte

142 Most efforts to increase services by wild pollinators focus on management of natural habitats surr

143 export by encouraging the upward movment of pollinators from female to male flowers and by reducing

144 Although MFC fields apparently attracted pollinators from SNHs, in landscapes with large areas of

145 deep corolla tubes, whereas shorter-tongued pollinators generalize across tube lengths.

146 nown pollination syndrome(s) with functional pollinator group(s) that are attracted to blue flowers,

147 e enabled plants to exploit many specialized pollinator groups.

148 heir specialized interactions with different pollinator guilds (e.g., bees, butterflies, birds), moti

149 ectar is, however, ultimately constrained by pollinator gustatory sensitivity.

150 and national initiatives aimed at restoring pollinator habitats and populations have been developed.

151 Declining animal pollinator health and diversity in the U.S. is a matter

152 ation efforts highlighted in the US national pollinator health strategy by identifying areas that sup

153 , permitting preventative actions to improve pollinator health.

154 e-induced chemical defenses and signaling on pollinators (herbivore-induced pollinator limitation).

155 ionum has the potential to interact with its pollinators (honeybees, other bees, butterflies and flie

156 n about the welfare of both wild and managed pollinators, however, has prompted recent calls for nati

157 As parasitoids, predators, and pollinators, Hymenoptera play a fundamental role in virt

158 ffectiveness (pollen deposition ability) and pollinator importance (the product of visitation frequen

159 nity specialisation (H2') were higher in the pollinator importance network than the visitation networ

160 With these data we constructed the largest pollinator importance network to date and compared it wi

161 s, which is an important wild and commercial pollinator in eastern North America.

162 out the season have positive effects on wild pollinators in agricultural landscapes.

163 documented declines in some wild and managed pollinators in several regions of the world.

164 represent a new floral cue that could assist pollinators in the recognition and learning of rewarding

165 nd the unexpected importance of small-bodied pollinators in the recruitment of plant genetic diversit

166 pact the innate immune function of bumblebee pollinators in wild and agricultural habitats.

167 Bumblebees are important pollinators in wild and agricultural settings.

168 Pollinators, including honey bees, routinely encounter p

169 thus variation in the strength of the plant-pollinator interaction might drive variation in the oppo

170 Plant-pollinator interactions are complex because they are aff

171 for restoration to re-establish native plant-pollinator interactions critical for production of outcr

172 ntifying the within-season turnover of plant-pollinator interactions from weekly censuses across 3 ye

173 s of frost mediated through changes in plant-pollinator interactions have rarely been explored.

174 s owing to a greater predictability of plant-pollinator interactions in the tropics; however, these i

175 hypothesis that impacts of climate on plant-pollinator interactions operate through changes in water

176 hanges in water availability to impact plant-pollinator interactions through pollinator responses to

177 latitudes rather than the strength of plant-pollinator interactions.

178 y provide volatile cues that influence plant-pollinator interactions.

179 the pollinators, flowering plants, and plant-pollinator interactions.

180 organic compounds (VOCs) and, in turn, plant-pollinator interactions.

181 ct with the generalized nature of most plant-pollinator interactions.

182 es' and determine how they influenced flower-pollinator interactions.

183 mptions about the cognitive abilities of bat pollinators, invoke Weber's law inappropriately, and can

184 such substances on the foraging behaviour of pollinators is poorly understood.

185 Inadvertent exposure to foraging insect pollinators is usually sub-lethal, but may affect cognit

186 How can a pollinator, like the honey bee, perceive the same colors

187 Pollinator limitation was prevalent at unrestored sites

188 signaling on pollinators (herbivore-induced pollinator limitation).

189 Pollinator lineages bearing these pollination modes were

190 to attract and elicit mating behavior in its pollinators, males of the cellophane bee Colletes cunicu

191 , pesticides and genetically modified crops, pollinator management and pathogens, and invasive alien

192 e been genetically silenced and its hawkmoth pollinator, Manduca sexta, were used in semi-natural ten

193 uction of two alkene classes may have led to pollinator-mediated deleterious pleiotropy.

194 Finally, there was significant pollinator-mediated direct selection for this pattern of

195 We examined the direct and pollinator-mediated indirect effects of frost on three w

196 plants exhibited species-specific direct and pollinator-mediated indirect responses to frost, thus su

197 pecies, contributing to pollinator shift and pollinator-mediated reproductive isolation and speciatio

198 At each site, we quantified pollinator-mediated selection on floral display area, in

199 play and rewards, pollinator visitation, and pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits.

200 On the other hand, pollinators memorize floral colors as consistent adverti

201 of early-flowering plants not through plant-pollinator mismatch but through the direct impacts of ex

202 A recurring feature uniting these pollinator modes is host associations with ginkgoalean,

203 variation in the interacting traits of plant-pollinator mutualism can lead to local adaptive differen

204 cts ecological interactions with herbivores, pollinators, neighboring plants, and microbes.

205 We analyse 64 plant-pollinator networks and the reproductive performance of

206 ion between the nested structure of 59 plant-pollinator networks and the temperature seasonality pres

207 interactions forming the structure of plant-pollinator networks are typically more nested than expec

208 his suggests that nested structures of plant-pollinator networks could be more advantageous under hig

209 Yet, it has been shown that some plant-pollinator networks may be more nested than others, rais

210 (e.g., social networks) or more (e.g., plant-pollinator networks) classes of nodes.

211 itecture to determine the stability of plant-pollinator networks.

212 cilitating coevolution in multispecies plant-pollinator networks.

213 a subset of the plant community accompanies pollinator niche specialisation, congruent with our hypo

214 Honey bees are economically important pollinators of a wide variety of crops that have attract

215 Desmometopa flies (Milichiidae) as the main pollinators of C. sandersonii.

216 ng been hypothesized to act as long-distance pollinators of many low-density tropical plants.

217 such substances in floral nectar means that pollinators often encounter them when foraging.

218 We found strong linear selection imposed by pollinators on corolla tube length at all sites, but the

219 loss of interactions with mutualists such as pollinators or seed dispersers may be compensated throug

220 tals can be large and showy so as to attract pollinators (or people!).

221 To improve measurements of pollinator performance underlying such predictions, we s

222 Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and man

223 vent the establishment of this threat to the pollinator population.

224 ation services continues to increase even as pollinator populations exhibit global declines.

225 Effective monitoring of wild pollinator populations is urgently needed to inform mana

226 ity (communities across fields) of arthropod pollinators, predators, herbivores, and detritivores.

227 ctar microbes and examine their influence on pollinator preference.

228 r cosmopolitan status to understand how wild pollinator preferences change across different continent

229 gene controlling floral chemicals influenced pollinator preferences, likely resulting in speciation,

230 Wild and managed pollinators provide a wide range of benefits to society

231 A fundamental question is how generalist pollinators recognize "flower objects" in vastly differe

232 increase confidence in existing measures of pollinator redundancy at the community level using visit

233 in the fitness benefits of specialized plant-pollinator relationships.

234 is by assessing geographic covariation among pollinator reliability, outcrossing rates, heterozygosit

235 s of pollen arrival on stigmas, a measure of pollinator reliability.

236 in adaptive optima generated by variation in pollinator reliability.

237 impact plant-pollinator interactions through pollinator responses to differences in floral attractant

238 sing detectability but also by enhancing the pollinator's foraging efforts.

239 in plant populations experiencing unreliable pollinator service.

240 In the latter case, competition for pollinator services and costs of hybridization can selec

241 Our results show that while large-bodied pollinators set more seeds per visit, small-bodied bees

242 he orchid to perfect its chemical mimicry of pollinator sex pheromones by escape from deleterious ple

243 ong closely related species, contributing to pollinator shift and pollinator-mediated reproductive is

244 estoration intervention and the proximity to pollinator source populations in the surrounding landsca

245 Long-tongued pollinators specialize on flowers with deep corolla tube

246 we quantify pollen dispersal for individual pollinator species across more than 690 ha of tropical f

247 The most persistent pollinator species are also the most variable in their n

248 ed by drought across forb species (i.e. some pollinator species were deterred by drought while others

249 vealed that: (1) PGF varied depending on the pollinator species, and was highest with B. ignitus (10.

250 restoration resulted in a marked increase in pollinator species, visits to flowers and interaction di

251 Pollinator strips were tested for clothianidin contamina

252 Pollinators such as bees provide a critical ecosystem se

253 ely simple yet highly efficient strategy for pollinators such as bees to find best quality resources

254 Insect pollinators such as bumblebees (Bombus spp.) are in glob

255 sults provide insights into how cosmopolitan pollinators such as hoverflies identify flowers and offe

256 expansion of MFCs needs to be accompanied by pollinator-supporting practices in agricultural landscap

257 find that the crops most highly dependent on pollinators tend to experience more severe mismatches be

258 The higher levels of dietary generalism in pollinators than in herbivores may be an explanation for

259 r inputs, can alter the temporal dynamics of pollinators that depend on them.

260 These bees are vital tropical pollinators that exhibit high trait diversity, but are u

261 nter losses of the most important commercial pollinator, the Western honeybee, a major concern in the

262 diversity in ecological function mediated by pollinators, the influential role that plant and populat

263 zle: if the function of petals is to attract pollinators, then flowers might be expected to optimize

264 This behaviour enables generalist pollinators to preferentially forage on the most special

265 e used choice tests to compare attraction of pollinators to species hypothesized to be biotically vs

266 part morphology, is present for one of these pollinator types, the long-proboscid pollination mode [1

267 potential distributions of coffee and coffee pollinators under current and future climates in Latin A

268 y deceptive orchids lure their specific male pollinators using volatile semiochemicals that mimic fem

269 lude buzz pollination (sonication), in which pollinators, usually bees, use innate and learned behavi

270 r animal pollination, understanding how wild pollinators utilize resources across environments can en

271 severe frost damage (early treatment) or low pollinator visitation (late treatment) relative to contr

272 hroughout the flowering season, we monitored pollinator visitation and collected seeds to measure pla

273 in Aconitum spp. nectar affect rates of both pollinator visitation and robbery but may have co-evolve

274 red effects on vegetative and floral traits, pollinator visitation and seed set.

275 Larger floral displays increase pollinator visitation as well as among-flower self-polli

276 ttractants, and that the effects of water on pollinator visitation can be nonlinear.

277 Pollinator visitation patterns and strength of pollen li

278 ility, in this bumblebee-pollinated species, pollinator visitation peaked at intermediate water level

279 eatment that escaped frost damage had higher pollinator visitation rates and reproduction than contro

280 sition of compounds produced, and subsequent pollinator visitation rates.

281 g an 8-year dataset comprising nearly 20 000 pollinator visitation records, we explore the assembly o

282 rovided that they do not significantly alter pollinator visitation to the detriment of plant fitness

283 duction through changes in floral traits and pollinator visitation, along with direct effects.

284 drum by studying floral display and rewards, pollinator visitation, and pollinator-mediated selection

285 on of flowers producing fruit increased with pollinator visitation, approaching the higher levels see

286 impacts of frost mediated through changes in pollinator visitation, one species, Erigeron, incurred i

287 We measured flowering phenology, pollinator visitation, plant reproduction (fruit and see

288 Pollinator visits to flowers were much more frequent tha

289 to increased vegetative biomass and enhanced pollinator visits to flowers.

290 tomato, Solanum peruvianum, herbivory limits pollinator visits, which reduces individual plant fitnes

291 can influence the offspring sex ratio of the pollinator wasp.

292 , mating systems, quantitative genetics, and pollinators, we show that Allee effects can potentially

293 d a much larger effect in the extended plant-pollinator webs.

294 The densities of all pollinators were generally unrelated to the cover of SNH

295 Hawkmoth pollinators were tested for preference between flowers o

296 How do plants use scent to attract pollinators while preventing herbivory?

297 n pollination, plants provide food reward to pollinators who in turn enhance plant reproduction by tr

298 und that, apart from a few abundant species, pollinators with original traits either had few interact

299 n the context of balancing the attraction of pollinators with the protection of reproductive structur

300 The decline of pollinators worldwide is of growing concern and has been