ライフサイエンスコーパス: portion size

1 the size of eating events (i.e., determined portion size).

2 consumed coffee, with 1 cup as the standard portion size.

3 ected to evaluate familial susceptibility to portion size.

4 energy, nutrient, and food group intakes or portion sizes.

5 ules to learn how to self-select appropriate portion sizes.

6 g low-calorie or low-fat diets, and limiting portion sizes.

7 an fat reduction coupled with restriction of portion sizes.

8 in prevention among the females was to limit portion sizes (-1.9 kg; 95% CI: -2.6, -1.1) combined wit

9 oss the meals, the vegetable was served in 3 portion sizes (180, 270, or 360 g) and 2 energy densitie

10 ubjects design was used to manipulate entree portion size (250 compared with 500 g) and ED (1.3 compa

11 als, a first course of raw carrots varied in portion size (30, 60, or 90 g), and no first course was

12 /g), each of which was served in 3 different portion sizes (500, 700, or 900 g).

13 decreased meal energy intake independent of portion size (55 +/- 9 kcal; P < 0.0001).

14 and weight among adolescents should address portion sizes, adolescent maturation, and dieting behavi

15 n moderation, with special attention to food portion size and content of non-complex carbohydrates wh

16 These findings provide new evidence that portion size and ED act additively to promote energy int

17 Compared with the reference portion size and ED condition, children consumed 76% mor

18 We aimed to test the effects of portion size and ED on children's food and energy intake

19 When the portion size and energy density (in kcal/g) of a food ar

20 2 daily menus, but all foods were varied in portion size and energy density between a standard level

21 Reductions in both portion size and energy density can help to moderate ene

22 We aimed to determine how the effects of portion size and energy density combine to influence ene

23 Reductions in portion size and energy density independently decreased

24 Increases in portion size and energy density led to independent and a

25 ts on food and energy intakes of varying the portion size and energy density of a vegetable that was

26 Reducing the portion size and energy density of all foods led to sign

27 Increases in both the portion size and energy density of food have both been s

28 e moderated the positive association between portion size and entree intake (P < 0.01); overweight ch

29 ish a causal relationship between increasing portion size and obesity, data indicate that portion siz

30 , respectively, and analyses of questions on portion size and supplement use showed few differences.

31 (p < or = 0.001) in the DHQ for questions on portion size and use of vitamin/mineral supplements, res

32 Portion sizes and energy intake for specific food types

33 stically to an obesogenic one with increased portion sizes and limited access to healthy food choices

34 an increase in BMI, resting heart rate, food portion size, and a decrease in the number of eating occ

35 We found a significant interaction of phase, portion size, and body mass index on the pattern of oper

36 bility, the opportunity to order extra-large portion sizes, and general weight gain.

37 While general consensus holds that food portion sizes are increasing, no empirical data have doc

38 take of all food sources of soy, considering portion size as well as other dietary and nondietary fac

39 inal product is compromised requiring double portion sizes, as compared to 2006, in order to satisfy

40 t of absorbable monosaccharides of foods for portion size calculation.

41 individuals potentially affected by a 16-oz portion-size cap on SSBs and the potential effect on cal

42 d collapsing strategies for small age-gender-portion size cells, 4) excluded outliers in a regression

43 e reinforcing value with the 0- and 100-kcal portion-size conditions.

44 For each survey year, average portion size consumed from specific food items (salty sn

45 Control of portion size, consumption of a diet low in fat and energ

46 , sex, BMI, and responsiveness to increasing portion size (defined as individual slope estimates rela

47 We also investigated whether the response to portion size depended on which person, the subject or th

48 Portion sizes differed significantly between HHANES and

49 portion size and obesity, data indicate that portion size does influence energy intake.

50 Increasing portion size, eating away from home, and consuming a var

51 Children who were more responsive to portion-size effects were likely to self-serve and eat l

52 s such as genetics, protein and weight loss, portion size, energy density, and behavior; the need for

53 es between energy, nutrient, food group, and portion size estimates based on true and reported intake

54 ddler energy and nutrient intakes because of portion size estimation errors.

55 ent ways: Dietary counseling and training on portion-size estimation could improve self-report accura

56 Training in portion-size estimation is known to improve the accuracy

57 ained), testing the hypotheses that a 45-min portion-size estimation training session would reduce ch

58 g the number and types of food-related cues, portion sizes, food availability, and food advertising.

59 ty factors, distribution of dietary intakes, portion sizes, food prices, greenhouse gas emission, aci

60 ood composition data, recipe information and portion sizes for ethnic foods are commonly reported pro

61 assessed usual frequency of consumption and portion sizes for the previous 12 months.

62 Entree portion size has been shown to influence energy intake a

63 nergy density (ED) in children's response to portion size, however, is unknown.

64 was to use food composition data to validate portion sizes, identify important sources of nutrients a

65 nded to be overweight and more responsive to portion size (ie, greater increases in entree intake as

66 nsumed a more-energy-dense (kcal/g) lunch as portion size increased (P < 0.0001).

67 Increasing portion size increased children's entree intake (P < 0.0

68 greater increases in entree intake as plated portion size increased).

69 Between 1977 and 1996, food portion sizes increased both inside and outside the home

70 generally tend to eat proportionally more as portion size increases.

71 Portion size influences children's energy intakes at mea

72 Incorporation of portion size information was unhelpful.

73 Portion size is a modifiable determinant of energy intak

74 One strategy to address the effect of portion size is decreasing the energy density (kilojoule

75 A policy to cap portion size is likely to result in a modest reduction i

76 We measured trends in portion sizes (kcal, g, and mL) of selected foods [sugar

77 A 25% decrease in portion size led to a 10% decrease in energy intake (231

78 gstone and Pourshahidi examine the impact of portion size manipulations on energy intake and weight m

79 s with respect to Os concentration at a test portion size of 0.2 g.

80 The portion size of 3 entrees (lunch, dinner, and breakfast)

81 The energy density and the portion size of a food act independently to affect energ

82 Increasing the portion size of a vegetable served as a first course can

83 y recently proposed a restriction to cap the portion size of all sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) sol

84 ble consumption at the meal increased as the portion size of carrots increased (P < 0.0001).

85 Tripling the portion size of carrots, however, did not lead to a furt

86 The energy intake and portion size of salty snacks increased by 93 kcal (from

87 Doubling the portion size of several entrees and a snack served durin

88 Doubling the portion size of the first course increased carrot consum

89 We investigated whether increasing the portion size of vegetables served at the start of a meal

90 We investigated trends in portion sizes of energy-dense foods and energy intakes a

91 Larger portion sizes of foods and beverages could affect overal

92 rticularly at fast-food restaurants), larger portion sizes of foods and beverages, increased consumpt

93 of obesity has coincided with an increase in portion sizes of foods both inside and outside the home,

94 Portion sizes of other foods and beverages did not vary

95 In all age groups, larger portion sizes of pizza coincided with higher energy inta

96 uals and to examine the effects of different portion sizes of snack foods on food reinforcement.

97 nergy intakes at meals coincided with larger portion sizes of SSBs, French fries, or salty snacks.

98 Adolescent boys consumed larger portion sizes of the selected foods and had higher energ

99 e the combined effects of energy density and portion size on energy intake in women.

100 However, data on the effects of portion size on food intake in adults are limited.

101 We examined the effect of portion size on intake during a single meal.

102 The effect of portion size on intake was not significantly influenced

103 es of 6 lunches, which varied only in entree portion size, once per week.

104 Effects of portion size (P<0.0001) and ED (P<0.0001) on entree ener

105 have examined the brain response to the food portion size (PS).

106 Previous portion size research in children has focused on the imp

107 An increase in the vegetable portion size resulted in greater vegetable consumption i

108 Portion size significantly influenced energy intake at l

109 eighted median nutrient density x age-gender-portion size-specific median gram weights (Block method)

110 dolescents are more susceptible to increased portion sizing than are younger children.

111 h our food frequency questionnaire specified portion size, the assessment of diet using any method wi

112 We used frequency and portion size to estimate grams of meat consumed per day

113 Portion sizes vary by food source, with the largest port

114 al energy intakes from other foods for which portion size was not altered did not differ across condi

115 The response to the variations in portion size was not influenced by who determined the am

116 experimental design with reference and large portion sizes was used in a study of 59 low-income Hispa

117 Portion sizes were calculated for 140 food samples, base

118 Portion sizes were compared across HHANES and the Second

119 instructed to reduce fat intake and decrease portion sizes, with a targeted energy deficit of 500 to