コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 oes not preclude the creation of nonsurgical portosystemic shunt.
2 ion or stenosis and the presence of a patent portosystemic shunt.
3 ter placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.
4 erance of liver to warm ischemia injury with portosystemic shunt.
5 is increase was significantly reversed after portosystemic shunt.
6 Five had variceal bleeding, and 2 had portosystemic shunts.
7 , liver transplants, choledocholithiasis, or portosystemic shunts.
8 ctive placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.
9 r, eNOS (-/-) mice did develop a substantial portosystemic shunt (0.33% +/- 0.005% vs 84.53% +/- 0.19
10 2 +/- 0.003 vs 0.227 +/- 0.005 mL/min/g) and portosystemic shunt (0.47% +/- 0.01% vs 84.13% +/- 0.09%
12 band ligation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, almost every acute variceal bleed c
13 evaluate race as a predictor of undergoing a portosystemic shunt and LT and of dying in the hospital.
14 th vehicle, JWH-015 significantly alleviated portosystemic shunting and mesenteric vascular density i
15 s alternative treatment options to operative portosystemic shunts and devascularization procedures.
20 be successfully used as a bridge to surgical portosystemic shunting, as well as liver transplantation
21 e hepatocytes after liver warm ischemia with portosystemic shunt, compared with liver ischemia withou
30 g and placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, have improved preoperative assessm
31 modalities such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting, hemodialysis, and in some cases,
32 paracentesis with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of refractory asci
33 iography, which disclosed virtually complete portosystemic shunting in Fut2(-/-)(high) mice, discrete
34 c shunting in Fut2(-/-)(high) mice, discrete portosystemic shunting in Fut2(-/-)(low) mice, and no sh
36 ocumented the frequency of large spontaneous portosystemic shunts in patients with moderate or severe
39 amics, presence of CB receptors, severity of portosystemic shunting, mesenteric vascular density, vas
42 vein embolization, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement, balloon retrograde transv
46 ic artery flow, mesenteric vascular density, portosystemic shunting (PSS), intrahepatic angiogenesis,
47 urements, including portal pressure (PP) and portosystemic shunts (PSS), and collected tissues for hi
49 t2(-/-) mice is dominated by consequences of portosystemic shunting resulting in microcirculatory dis
52 ve been treated by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, surgical exploration, or peritoneov
54 lity and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as a treatment for BCS with d
55 thoracentesis and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as second-line therapeutic op
56 ter placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) correlates with the absence o
57 ailure (ELF) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in patients with cir
58 d complications of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation performed by using a
59 and bare stent in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for cirrhotic portal hyperten
60 ibe the results of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for the management of VOD aft
62 the placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been reported in up to 10
63 on human patients, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been worldwide considered
64 ients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) have lower rebleeding rates c
65 s, and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in a series of patients with
67 cacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in this population are unknow
71 ansplantation, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on patient selection and outc
72 The effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on portal hemodynamics, esoph
73 ty and efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) performed semiemergently and
74 disease underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement for control of vari
77 nts undergoing the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure in patient groups w
78 cations related to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) stents found in the portal ve
79 converting failed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to distal splenorenal shunt (
83 ble on the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with covered stents in patien
88 paracentesis, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)], but refractory hydrothorax
89 ility, before/after transvenous intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS), and before/after yogurt t
90 catheter-directed thrombolysis, transjugular portosystemic shunting (TIPS), and liver transplantation
91 asty/thrombolysis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS), and orthotopic liver tran
94 after creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) has been attributed to hemol
95 re of infection of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) has not been described previ
97 ts with the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in the treatment of these pa
102 ver the ability of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) to increase survival times o
103 ver the ability of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) to increase survival times o
104 linical utility of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) vis-a-vis total paracentesis
105 (CT) angiograms of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), helical CT angiography was
108 previously placed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt underwent successful liver transplan
109 andomized trial of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt using covered stents and another pil
114 tes, the adjusted odds ratios of receiving a portosystemic shunt were 0.37 (95% CI: 0.27-0.51) and 0.
115 l stenosis and the presence of a spontaneous portosystemic shunt whose successful endovascular treatm
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。