戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 left main CAD from 77% (pretest) to 95-100% (posttest).
2 asis from 15% to 44% (pretest) to 3% to 18% (posttest).
3  a different intraoperative crisis scenario (posttest).
4 c patients (P < 0.0001; analysis of variance posttest).
5                  All visitors were offered a posttest.
6 a pretest and again, 2 weeks later, during a posttest.
7 - and between-group differences from pre- to posttest.
8 ap or in striatal activation from pretest to posttest.
9 task, and crowding ratios were reduced after posttest.
10 nswer, was chosen by >20% of students on the posttest.
11 rained residents also took a written pre and posttest.
12 sical function were assessed at baseline and posttest.
13 ng during the 8-10 d between the pretest and posttest.
14  Fellows' knowledge was assessed by pre- and posttest.
15          Six fellows completed both pre- and posttests.
16 dards and deviants at both early and delayed posttests.
17 etecting) oddball tasks in a pretest and two posttests (1 and 9 weeks after training).
18 we examined pretest (before instruction) and posttest (after instruction) responses from 751 students
19 ance was compared to residents' baseline and posttest (after simulation training) performance.
20 aining and the transfer task from pretest to posttest and an increase in striatal activation in both
21 ness significantly decreased from pretest to posttest and follow-up after recall+EMs relative to the
22  service use, and general psychopathology at posttest and follow-up.
23  ROP tutorial, ROP educational chapters, and posttest), and 29 of 58 trainees (50%) were randomized t
24 left main CAD from 23% (pretest) to 65-100% (posttest), and NI values <10 increased the probability o
25 created using clinical cases (20 pretest, 20 posttest, and 25 training chapter-based) developed from
26                      Written pretest, 6-week posttest, and 6-month followup tests measured pain ratin
27 ased clinical cases of ROP during a pretest, posttest, and training chapters.
28                                              Posttest assessment of diagnostic performance of MDCT fo
29 es increased from the 10-item pretest to the posttest by 3.1 items for measles, 3.8 for influenza, 1.
30                         Although pretest and posttest communications were not standardized, overall s
31 AST tended to have larger increases in PA at posttest compared with participants who received health
32 cored 100% on first and second trials of the posttest, compared to those receiving the routine proced
33  expressing the human A1 receptor (ANOVA and posttest comparison, P<0.01).
34 st (CCPA, 10 nM)-treated myocytes (ANOVA and posttest comparison, P<0.01).
35                                       Single posttest comparisons of independent samples were perform
36                  Subjects completed pre- and posttest confidence questionnaires and feedback forms.
37 ents, we tested listeners on a pretest and a posttest consisting of auditory relative-timing conditio
38                         A randomized pretest/posttest control group design with a standardized videot
39 nducted in 2012 and had a randomized pretest-posttest controlled design with a 10-week follow-up.
40 icts, we enrolled 98 in a randomized pretest-posttest controlled experiment starting August 15, 2010,
41  gynecologist for pretest education (11%) or posttest counseling (22%).
42 nts identified with HBV (HBsAg-positive) for posttest counseling and hepatitis B-directed care.
43                                          For posttest counseling, 38% of women preferred an oncologis
44                  We used a one-group pretest-posttest design and national survey data from 1996 (base
45 veloping 6-y-olds in a 3-mo pretest-training-posttest design that was ecologically deployed (at schoo
46                      The study was a pretest-posttest design with qualitative data collected at 3 poi
47 perimental study with a single group pretest/posttest design.
48  conducted in 2012 used a randomized pretest-posttest design.
49  groups, and 405 used a single-group pretest-posttest design.
50 t values for E=8.7 [3.0] and 5.4 [2.8]; mean posttest difference between conditions=3.4; P<.001; 95%
51 sks among those with versus without elevated posttest estimated risk.
52 pated in a cross-sectionally sampled pretest-posttest evaluation of brochures, posters, and messages
53 e measure was mean participant scores at the posttest evaluation, which was conducted 4 months after
54 ecreased significantly (P<0.05) from pre- to posttest for 7 of 12 foods (trained group) by both calcu
55 ele-education system performed better on the posttest for accurately diagnosing plus disease (67% vs.
56 mologists-in-training during the pretest and posttest for both groups.
57                                              Posttest fracture probabilities were calculated from bas
58 uding judicious genetic testing, pretest and posttest genetic counseling, interpretation and applicat
59 content and process of pretest education and posttest genetic counseling.
60                                          The posttest geriatric consultation (GC) group (n = 85) was
61 m]; 95% CI, 82-86 to 74 bpm; 95% CI, 72-76), posttest HR (mean, 128 bpm; 95% CI, 125-131 to 113 bpm;
62 ght in meters squared), and surgical center (posttest HR and HR difference were further adjusted for
63                                              Posttest HR further improved from 6 months to 12 months
64 test HR, and HR difference (resting HR minus posttest HR) were measured and musculoskeletal pain conc
65 mpletion, resting heart rate (HR), immediate posttest HR, and HR difference (resting HR minus posttes
66 etest; website participants also completed a posttest immediately after viewing Informate.
67              All subjects completed pre- and posttesting, in which they described works of art, retin
68 itude of the P3 component to deviants across posttests, indicating a long-lasting effect of discrimin
69       Genetic counseling both pretesting and posttesting is essential to accurate, cost-efficient car
70                                  Pretest and posttest knowledge mean scores were 58% and 69%, respect
71 dents showed improvement between pretest and posttest knowledge scores (p < .05).
72 ed to similar and significant changes in the posttest likelihood of cancer for both dense and fatty b
73 to 0.99), which, when present, increases the posttest likelihood of EAS to 74%, assuming a pretest pr
74         We evaluated the likelihood of (1) a posttest management change and (2) an indication for add
75                                  Fasting and posttest meal glucose, lipid, and insulin concentrations
76 met or exceeded the minimum passing score at posttest: mean (internal jugular) = 93.9%, SD = 10.2; me
77                                            A posttest measured comprehension of consent-relevant info
78 posttest only (n = 10), single-group pretest/posttest (n = 2), nonrandomized 2-group (n = 13), and ra
79 patient interventional (n = 13), pretest and posttest (n = 9), randomized clinical trials (n = 9), an
80 gns included single-group cross-sectional or posttest only (n = 10), single-group pretest/posttest (n
81 e randomized to a control group (pretest and posttest only).
82 TT versus exercise MPI yields similar 2-year posttest outcomes while providing significant diagnostic
83 knowledge score increase between pretest and posttest (P < 0.001).
84 mance significantly improved from pretest to posttest (P = 0.008) regardless of the type of debriefin
85 sed from 85.1% to 87.0% overall (pretest vs. posttest; P<0.001) and from 80.6% to 82.0% for teenagers
86                                           At posttest, participants who received Ex + AST had signifi
87                                     Resident posttest performance after simulation training was signi
88 sts used and it is recommended they estimate posttest probabilities according to likelihood ratios as
89                                  Plotting of posttest probabilities against prevalence for both disea
90 ange an individual's pretest disease odds to posttest probabilities and can confirm vCJD infection.
91 eria for IgM immunoblot interpretation yield posttest probabilities of 4%-32%.
92                                              Posttest probabilities of deep myometrial invasion for g
93     Use of functional MR increased the final posttest probabilities of hemispheric language dominance
94 e of functional MR increases importantly the posttest probabilities of hemispheric language dominance
95 rst-case-scenario (pretest probability, 50%) posttest probabilities were 94% and 13% for positive and
96                        Positive and negative posttest probabilities were calculated and plotted again
97 g specific populations, strongly influencing posttest probabilities.
98 inance or ambidexterity, there was very high posttest probability (>or=95%) of a correlation between
99 dless of hand dominance, there was very high posttest probability (>or=96%) of a correlation between
100 opulation with ambidexterity, there was high posttest probability (80%-87%) of correlations between f
101 t-handed epilepsy population, there was high posttest probability (80%-97%) of a correlation between
102 handed nonepileptic subjects, there was high posttest probability (81%-83%) of a correlation between
103 s in peripheral blood failed to increase the posttest probability above 90% in this setting of Campyl
104 t probability of 17.8% (low BI-RADS 4B) to a posttest probability of 2% (BI-RADS 3).
105  sensitivity and 61% specificity, yielding a posttest probability of 72%.
106 cy" group of 36 patients with a low pre- and posttest probability of CAD.
107 nhanced MR imaging significantly affects the posttest probability of deep myometrial invasion in pati
108 mogram was provided to assist calculation of posttest probability of disease from the calculated like
109 rinalysis are not able to reliably lower the posttest probability of disease to a level where a UTI c
110 ratios, which were analyzed to determine the posttest probability of language dominance by using func
111 ng out Campylobacter infection, defined as a posttest probability of less than 10%, was similarly obs
112 y showed only moderate increases in positive posttest probability of lymph node metastasis for all me
113        With a negative V/Q SPECT result, the posttest probability of PE was 0.010, 0.037, and 0.119 f
114        With a positive V/Q SPECT result, the posttest probability of PE was 0.531, 0.814, and 0.939 f
115                                          The posttest probability of tuberculosis following a negativ
116  thresholds that can be derived from pretest-posttest probability plots.
117 e evaluated to determine their impact on the posttest probability, defined as the likelihood of a dia
118 tes (0.3%/y and 4.9%/y for low and high risk posttest, respectively).
119 pecificity calculations from the pretest and posttest results of the educational intervention group v
120                                  Pretest and posttest results were obtained on a total of 1122 learne
121                                              Posttest risk stratification is based on the Duke treadm
122 .5 minutes), and sleep duration baseline and posttest scores for C=5.8 [1.1] and 6.0 [1.0]; for E=6.0
123  single imputation were used to estimate the posttest scores of patients who left treatment before co
124  of 1.06 (95% CI, 0.81-1.31) indicating that posttest scores were approximately 1 SD above pretest sc
125  training regimen, which was followed by two posttest sessions, separated by another week without tra
126 nd masked to group assignment and pretesting/posttesting status.
127    Data are presented from a 1-group pretest-posttest study examining the role of extensive counselin
128                              In this pretest-posttest study, patients with AMS from PLCs at 2 academi
129                              In this pretest-posttest study, the pretest control group (n = 37) was r
130 mbined (symptoms, self-harm, and suicide) at posttest, the investigated psychotherapies were moderate
131 nd of potentially failing to determine which posttest therapeutic approach optimizes treatment benefi
132 roved its use as a means to identify optimal posttest treatment.
133 p quality, sleep-onset latency (baseline and posttest values for C=26.1 [20.0] and 23.8 [15.3]; for E
134 for C=8.93 [3.1] and 8.8 [2.6]; baseline and posttest values for E=8.7 [3.0] and 5.4 [2.8]; mean post
135 global sleep score at 16 weeks (baseline and posttest values in mean [SD] for C=8.93 [3.1] and 8.8 [2
136  + WT showed greater improvements on pretest-posttest variables of executive function, working memory
137 nswered correctly on the pretest was 62% and posttest was 77% (P = 0.02).
138          Differential treatment retention at posttest was analyzed, reporting odds ratios.
139     Average knowledge scores for pretest and posttest were 3.32 and 5.88, respectively (maximum 10).
140 nd capillary blood collections, and pre- and posttests were offered during HCW training.
141 res between the initial pretest and the last posttest with performance increments following both expo
142 intervention group had better results at the posttest, with a mean (SD) score (out of a possible 160.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top