戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 r lavage fluid, hypoxemia, and altered nasal potential difference.
2 driven by an inside-negative apical membrane potential difference.
3 urfaces separated with a small electrostatic potential difference.
4 ither drug alone has a significant effect on potential difference.
5 y 8.5 mV hyperpolarization in ocular surface potential difference.
6 correcting for it to obtain true interfacial potential differences.
7 y related to the field-induced supramembrane potential differences.
8 ctive electrodes upon application of a small potential difference (1 V) and is capable of achieving o
9 al electrical resistance (750 Omega cm2) and potential difference (15.3 mV), with an inward short-cir
10         Contrary to our expectation, a large potential difference (-70 mV) slowly evolved across the
11  of amino acids and peptides are driven by a potential difference a countercurrent to a flow of heate
12               On the basis of this oxidative potential difference, a strategy for isomeric purificati
13 ladder of the rabbit maintains an electrical potential difference across its wall as a result largely
14 odiesterases, increases the magnitude of the potential difference across nasal epithelium of mice hom
15 e force, the sum of the pH gradient, and the potential difference across the bacterial membrane.
16 d electric field (PEF) increases the natural potential difference across the cell membrane until a cr
17     These charged segments relocate when the potential difference across the membrane changes, contro
18                             Application of a potential difference across the membrane resulted in mig
19 enough to develop a sufficiently significant potential difference across the membrane.
20 ntial represent the overall/averaged surface potential difference across the nanopore.
21                                      Maximum potential difference after 2 wk off treatment in the aff
22                                The change in potential difference after topical application of 10(-)4
23 bipolar electrode stabilizes the interfacial potential difference along its length.
24  (APDR) curves as well as augmented membrane potential differences among different cell types during
25  be avoided because it obscures the known or potential differences among the various types of TMA.
26  spectrum of effects of COX-2 inhibitors and potential differences among them.
27 is characterized by a higher transepithelial potential difference, an increase of amiloride-sensitive
28 ual mice over time by using rectal and nasal potential difference analyses and in vitro by Ussing cha
29 in those on placebo when assessed by in-vivo potential difference and chloride efflux.
30 e-lumen catheter technique allowing baseline potential difference and chloride secretion to be assess
31 of Evans blue and increased transendothelial potential difference and electrical resistance of this B
32 l period, as were serial measurements of the potential difference and resistance values of the ileal
33                          The transepithelial potential difference and short-circuit current were moni
34  of the membrane reduces the transepithelial potential difference and short-circuit current with an I
35 e tissue caused reproducible changes in both potential difference and short-circuit current.
36                  Their large conduction band potential difference and the inner electrostatic field f
37 g, in the same scanning area, of the contact potential difference and the second derivative of the ca
38 g in homozygous mutant mice, restoring nasal potential differences and improving survival.
39  on all 62 samples to examine the groups for potential differences and the ability of the gene list t
40  proximal convoluted tubule, transepithelial potential differences and transepithelial potassium conc
41 antly increases mouse nasal trans-epithelial potential difference, and hindered the ability of excise
42 ctrolyte solutions, applying a transmembrane potential difference, and measuring the resulting ionic
43  water, formed under the influence of a high potential difference (approximately 15 kV).
44 the neuroendocrine mechanisms governing this potential difference are not fully established.
45 ickness in the paralimbic cortex and whether potential differences are evident only during a depressi
46 ice produces changes in the nasal epithelium potential difference assay, consistent with corrected CF
47 opposing effects, one generated by the redox potential difference between a reducing substrate and th
48                                              Potential difference between colonic lumen and a periphe
49 ble effect (approximately 3 mV) on the redox potential difference between cyt f and PC.
50 of approximately one-half of the 70 mV redox potential difference between cytochrome f of P. laminosu
51 in its structure and is altered in the redox potential difference between heme a and Cu(A): +18 mV fo
52 to be proportional to the one-electron redox potential difference between laccase's type 1 copper sit
53                       Rapid switching of the potential difference between sampling cone and skimmer i
54 yte solution in which a BPE is immersed, the potential difference between the BPE and the solution dr
55 table level of cob(I)alamin due to the large potential difference between the NADPH/NADP+ couple and
56                     These data highlighted a potential difference between the role of Slit2 in guidin
57 reshold that would nevertheless minimize the potential difference between the sample and extraction s
58                             The open circuit potential difference between the two aqueous compartment
59 redox potential of the bL-heme, shifting the potential difference between the two b-hemes from 140 mV
60 r expectation was that the net electrostatic potential difference between the two chambers should be
61                   At this point, there is no potential difference between the two reference electrode
62 tput, we propose the systems with the lowest potential difference between the working and the counter
63 imity of the potential of the RE so that the potential difference between these two electrodes become
64 a four-electrode potentiostat to control the potential difference between two microreference electrod
65                                          The potential difference between two microreference electrod
66                                          The potential difference between two or more nESI emitters i
67 comparative efficacy studies to evaluate the potential differences between anti-TNF and non anti-TNF
68                             Understanding of potential differences between approaches aids interpreta
69                      Our data also highlight potential differences between behaviors regulated by sta
70 tional studies are required to determine the potential differences between chronic, intraventricular
71 les at the 3 different periods and to assess potential differences between cyclosporine and tacrolimu
72 aracterize risk factors, long-term outcomes, potential differences between eyes having primary IOL vs
73  nondrinkers, the dose-response relation and potential differences between former and current drinkin
74                       To further control for potential differences between hospitals, a within-hospit
75  human study component and the impact of the potential differences between human and mouse immune res
76 e of a shared genetic liability and examined potential differences between low- and high-functioning
77 l opioid antinociceptive activity emphasizes potential differences between men and women in their res
78                         Here, we discuss the potential differences between peripheral and CNS lymphat
79                       To further investigate potential differences between rAAV-2 and rAAV-5 that mig
80 spite a large rural US population, there are potential differences between rural and urban regions in
81 the active site of this protease, suggesting potential differences between species.
82 s study is to review disease progression and potential differences between subgroups of children with
83 (3D) geometry of mesophyll cells, leading to potential differences between the estimated and actual c
84                                              Potential differences between the Ku70(-/-) and Ku80(-/-
85 ident memory T cell (TRM), and emphasize the potential differences between the migratory patterns of
86 dues not covered in the structural model and potential differences between the modeled and solution h
87                                         Peak potential differences between the rescuer's wrist and th
88                                   To explore potential differences between the two receptors, site-di
89 of the two groups of hyperthermophiles; some potential differences between these habitats include flu
90 ement of host proteins in Ac/Ds activity and potential differences between these proteins among plant
91 ts of several previous studies and highlight potential differences between transcriptional and transl
92 ive ion fluxes driven by the electrochemical potential differences, but also primary or secondary act
93 oposed architecture, the variance of surface-potential difference can be determined by electrical dou
94  defined subsets of progenitor cells, and if potential differences correlate with the receptor densit
95 mpled to a single measurement of the contact potential difference (CPD) per pixel.
96 orrected these animals' characteristic nasal potential difference defect.
97 reduction of PutA by proline is favored by a potential difference (Delta E degrees ') of more than 0.
98 rd one-way fluxes J = J+ - J-, with chemical potential difference deltamu = RT ln(J-/J+).
99                                        Nasal potential differences demonstrated a clear response to l
100                                The effective potential difference deviates from the applied value due
101 f the electric double layer that affects the potential difference driving the electrode reaction.
102 nduced asymmetric stresses generate chemical potential difference, driving lithium ion flux from the
103 channels can be modulated by a transmembrane potential difference, due to alterations on ion-mobility
104                                     Membrane potential difference (Em), intracellular water and Na+ a
105                                          The potential difference, EOE - ERE, between the oxidizing e
106 f vector-specific CFTR DNA and mRNA, in-vivo potential difference, epifluorescence assay of chloride
107                             To test for such potential differences, especially in the context of the
108                                     Electric potential differences exist around the vascular endothel
109 Pdeb was expressed after Crx, highlighting a potential difference for the role of PDEB in human eye d
110                           In addition to the potential differences for oxidation and reduction reacti
111                           Our data highlight potential differences for the catalytic mechanism of NOH
112  technology that produces an electrochemical potential difference from a salinity gradient.
113 bsence of "looking back" behavior suggests a potential difference from the abilities shown by the gre
114 within these core zone communities to assess potential differences from peripheral communities in the
115 us Ag-mediated clonal deletion and highlight potential differences from their reported roles in tissu
116 low of electrons in the presence of electric potential difference, has been an important goal in the
117  severity of lung disease, we measured nasal potential difference in 51 young people with CF using a
118 ot on any RAG-2 -/- thymocytes, suggesting a potential difference in activation state or mechanism of
119 s can be controlled by an externally applied potential difference in an electrochemical cell.
120  isoprenaline led to a significant change in potential difference in children without CF, whereas no
121 uency in the p53 tumor suppressor gene and a potential difference in gender, we analyzed primary smal
122          CFTR activity was measured by nasal potential difference in mice and by Ussing chamber elect
123 asound at baseline and 9 months indicating a potential difference in neointimal area at follow-up (O-
124 icated by rises in short-circuit current and potential difference in rat jejunal tissue mounted in Us
125 tory of Alzheimer disease and evidence for a potential difference in the pathophysiology of the devel
126 rferi in the infection cycle and highlight a potential difference in the requirements for purine salv
127   Survival analyses were used to account for potential differences in age, comorbidity, or intensity
128 ms may be clinically meaningful, given their potential differences in antifungal susceptibilities.
129 al membrane and soluble proteins, indicating potential differences in associated PAT specificity and
130 alizations among the Neandertals, indicating potential differences in behavior compared with modern h
131 ) or "Swedish" mutant betaPP (betaPP-sw) for potential differences in betaPP processing.
132                                              Potential differences in cell signaling triggered by VEG
133                      These results highlight potential differences in contextual encoding schemes by
134 rent oligomeric states among P5CDHs suggests potential differences in cooperativity and protein-prote
135 ator (CFTR)-deficient organoids and by nasal potential differences in DeltaF508 mice.
136 ctly different cytokine profiles, suggesting potential differences in disease pathogenesis and/or dis
137 pression of mGluR1 in DA neurons, suggesting potential differences in eCB synthesis between DA and GA
138     Medical educators should be aware of the potential differences in effectiveness for various CBE t
139 tate plus supplemental 5 mmol/L glucose, any potential differences in endogenous carbohydrate availab
140 dle-to-gate lifecycle assessment focusing on potential differences in energy use, blue water footprin
141                  In this study, we evaluated potential differences in epigenetic markers, i.e., histo
142 target biomarkers varied greatly, suggesting potential differences in exposure between the investigat
143 ndrosarcoma cell lines were used to test for potential differences in gene expression.
144                                   To explore potential differences in growth factor expression betwee
145 uration, medication, whole brain volume, and potential differences in hemispheric and anatomical subr
146                               Accounting for potential differences in home and away performance, trav
147                We used simulation to examine potential differences in how palliative care specialists
148 wever, little attention has been directed to potential differences in hypertension between Europe and
149                                This suggests potential differences in immune surveillance of primary
150 out the prevalence of insulin resistance and potential differences in intracellular lipid distributio
151 d by using regression analysis corrected for potential differences in laboratory equipment and by usi
152                           To investigate the potential differences in matrix properties between these
153                                     However, potential differences in mechanisms of motor learning an
154                                        Nasal potential differences in mice were measured in response
155 between AGM plasma and milk SIV populations, potential differences in milk cytokine profiles of natur
156  who no longer worked in nursing and testing potential differences in motivation with the likelihood
157                                              Potential differences in myotoxicity between agents may
158               However, little is known about potential differences in native versus minimal ribozyme
159               However, little is known about potential differences in network architecture that under
160 ltreated individuals but have not focused on potential differences in network architecture.
161 terventions lead to clinical improvement and potential differences in network modulation are not full
162 tion of hemorrhage and lesion types suggests potential differences in origin.
163       A larger study might better define the potential differences in our secondary outcome measures
164                          : Identification of potential differences in outcome associated with residen
165                                  To identify potential differences in outcomes, hospitals were divide
166                              We contrast the potential differences in prevention of invasive pneumoco
167 re, in addition to analytical uncertainties, potential differences in qPCR data from filtered waters
168         In view of the diverse locations and potential differences in responsiveness between BAT depo
169 ents have been observed, less is known about potential differences in responsiveness to nondrug thera
170 nt condition; however, little is known about potential differences in risk factors by sex and ethnici
171                                Additionally, potential differences in risk of gout posed by different
172                                  To identify potential differences in rumen function that lead to dif
173 nd posterior lateral line system, suggesting potential differences in sensitivity threshold or spatia
174 udies of acute kidney injury should consider potential differences in serum creatinine caused by chan
175 n concentration and duration of exposure and potential differences in signaling between the known E2
176 ensitivity analysis was used to test whether potential differences in smoking could account for the o
177                                 To eliminate potential differences in sorting due to the extracellula
178                                 In addition, potential differences in SSD parameters (mean and standa
179 nal extension not found in Cdc42, suggesting potential differences in subcellular location and functi
180           More research is needed to clarify potential differences in susceptibility between women an
181  varied by race/ethnicity, which may reflect potential differences in susceptibility.
182                Overall these findings reveal potential differences in the active sites of these two P
183                                     However, potential differences in the amplification performance o
184    The goal of this study was to investigate potential differences in the biophysical properties of s
185 mic areas of the United States to search for potential differences in the clinical presentation.
186 ore rapidly than wild-type virions, implying potential differences in the composition of the two viri
187                 These findings highlight the potential differences in the effects of nutritional immu
188 contact with psychosocial services highlight potential differences in the extent to which services ar
189 tation of motion-related information implies potential differences in the functional roles of these a
190 tion and those never vaccinated to allow for potential differences in the health seeking behaviour of
191 ootprints that are rare in maize, suggesting potential differences in the host proteins involved in e
192 published data were shown to demonstrate the potential differences in the identification of outliers.
193 atment modalities appears to be similar, but potential differences in the immunological mechanisms in
194 ncreased in asthma but not in AR, suggesting potential differences in the immunopathogenesis of these
195                        Results also indicate potential differences in the mechanisms leading to parti
196  under-enriched in localized proteins and of potential differences in the mechanisms that target prot
197 d) are compared, in order to investigate the potential differences in the metabolic profiles.
198 ed in the microbial tree of life, leading to potential differences in the minerals produced by differ
199 , which reflect both demographic factors and potential differences in the natural history of TB.
200                                          The potential differences in the nature of the data derived
201 or immunotherapy of prostate cancer, despite potential differences in the pattern of expression betwe
202 ll lines and provides the first evidence for potential differences in the penetrance of mutations in
203 eadily elicited against the D1 arm; however, potential differences in the presentation of Man(4) on n
204 on of viral load in the infected population; potential differences in the prevalence of Incurable STD
205                                 To highlight potential differences in the processing of endogenous ve
206 1 and S6K2 by PDK1 were observed, suggesting potential differences in the regulation of these homolog
207 onatal rat cardiac myocyte assay to evaluate potential differences in the response of TNF-alpha-expos
208   The impact on measurement comparability of potential differences in the tertiary and quaternary str
209 s, no neuroimaging studies have investigated potential differences in the underlying deliberative pro
210  The objective of this study was to identify potential differences in the upper airways inflammatory
211 gative transfer machinery, identification of potential differences in their adhesion mechanisms, and
212 d 15-deoxy-Delta12, 14-prostaglandin J2, and potential differences in their function have yet to be d
213 tween the VZV and CMV proteases also suggest potential differences in their oligomerization states.
214 ze or sensorimotor function, indicating that potential differences in these measures did not contribu
215   The Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate potential differences in these US parameters between tre
216 nducted from 1978 to 2002 were evaluated for potential differences in time to recurrence (TTR), time
217 the delivery of cardiac care have focused on potential differences in treatment by individual physici
218                                              Potential differences in treatment failure, left ventric
219 pecies abundance distributions and points to potential differences in vertical structure among Centra
220 mg of VX-770, the median change in the nasal potential difference (in response to the administration
221               Results show that the measured potential difference increases as the internal probe tra
222         We derive an analytical model of the potential differences induced across plasma and internal
223 is study is to distinguish the supramembrane potential difference-induced electroconformational chang
224                    The physical basis of the potential difference is a mixed interfacial potential wi
225 al to 9.4 x 10(4) s(-1) M(-1) when the redox potential difference is large.
226                Although the etiology of such potential differences is currently not clear, age-depend
227 F diagnosis by sweat chloride testing, nasal potential difference measurement, and DNA analysis for a
228                      We have made transnasal potential difference measurements (effective in detectio
229                                        Nasal potential difference measurements are valuable endpoint
230                                              Potential difference measurements could form a useful fu
231 her kindreds with this condition, then nasal potential difference measurements could provide a simple
232                                In vivo nasal potential difference measurements were performed in non-
233           Using EcFM, we demonstrate contact potential difference measurements, consistent with the p
234 weat testing, spirometry, or base-line nasal potential-difference measurements.
235 osed a planar nano-gap structure for surface-potential difference monitoring.
236  two different families with large oxidation potential differences, namely, dopamine (DA) and adenosi
237                                        Nasal potential difference (NPD) response patterns and sweat c
238                                        Nasal potential difference (NPD), a well-established in vivo c
239 ither the inhibitor resistance nor the redox potential differences observed between the bacterial (or
240 tween 2H and 1T' MoTe2 domains, possessing a potential difference of about 100 mV.
241 ermined from simulations in which a chemical potential difference of water has been established on th
242 ring power characteristics that include peak potential differences of 600 volts and currents of 1 amp
243 Further analysis suggests that the reduction potential differences of type-1 copper sites are caused
244 uid movement, as well as the transepithelial potential difference (PD) across the in vitro ciliary ep
245 tassium-replete animals, the transepithelial potential difference (PD) at the late proximal convolute
246 y fluorescein fluorescence and transmembrane potential difference (PD) by fluorescent quenching of 3,
247 Previous measurements of the transepithelial potential difference (PD) of the proximal tubule have yi
248                                  Using nasal potential difference (PD) protocols in 8 subjects with C
249 t study demonstrated with a new open-circuit potential difference (PD) technique that Cl- moves acros
250 ted in vivo measures of CFTR function (nasal potential difference [PD] measurements and sweat chlorid
251 nificantly higher amiloride-sensitive rectal potential difference (PDamil) than control mice fed a hi
252                                 Open-circuit potential differences (PDs) across the fluid-bathed ocul
253 l membranes, the field-induced supramembrane potential difference plays a dominant role in damaging t
254 unlight into a transmembrane electrochemical potential difference, providing chemical energy to almos
255 merous abnormalities such as reduced mucosal potential differences, reduced surface oxygenation, and
256                              Transepithelial potential difference, short-circuit current (Isc), and r
257 biomarkers, such as sweat chloride and nasal potential difference, suggests that they may reset the c
258 c fibrosis (aged >/= 6 years; abnormal nasal potential difference; sweat chloride >40 mmol/L; forced
259 he epithelial sheet because the transcorneal potential difference (TCPD; +40 mV internally positive)
260                  These studies highlight the potential differences that exist between divergent Mga p
261                                  To identify potential differences, the effects of GFs and radiation
262 pecies from the solution causes the measured potential difference to have nonzero values at distances
263 ials, rely heavily on improvements in airway potential difference to identify promising interventions
264 ntrol individuals (n = 32) were screened for potential differences using surface-enhanced laser desor
265 rder membrane, we have measured the membrane potential difference (Vm) of villus-attached enterocytes
266                             Trans-epithelial potential difference (Vt) measurements are routinely car
267                          Tracheal epithelial potential difference was measured bronchoscopically by s
268                                 Rectosigmoid potential difference was measured.
269 significantly lower (p < .05) and epithelial potential difference was significantly higher (p = .03)
270 ld not be demonstrated, and (c) transtubular potential difference was zero.
271 ction of o-dopaquinone, which requires a low potential difference, was detected electrochemically.
272                    Short-circuit current and potential difference were similar during Pre-Crystal and
273                      Dipole potential is the potential difference within the membrane bilayer, which
274 omology modeling of RacE1 and RacE2 revealed potential differences within the active site pocket that

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top