ライフサイエンスコーパス: premolar

1 ry gingiva between the left canine and first premolar.

2 ith acute pain on the maxillary right second premolar.

3 eduled to undergo extraction of a mandibular premolar.

4 lesion revealed root exposure of the second premolar.

5 information from the lower molars and distal premolars.

6 s found to be below the apices of mandibular premolars.

7 iolucent lesion between his mandibular right premolars.

8 36 maxillary and 35 mandibular single-rooted premolars.

9 nd left second, third, and fourth mandibular premolars.

10 nts, or having no sealant-eligible molars or premolars.

11 I, II, or III furcation defects in maxillary premolars.

12 anterior mandible or involving the maxillary premolars.

13 ower shrinkage was tested in extracted human premolars.

14 majority of abfractions and PCCR occurred in premolars.

15 by eruption of molars faster than permanent premolars.

16 he mandible between the roots of canines and premolars.

17 mandibular premolar or between apices of the premolars.

18 study was divided among 7 for the maxillary premolar-1st molar region, 6 for the mandibular premolar

19 molar-1st molar region, 6 for the mandibular premolar-1st molar region, and 6 for the incisor-canine

20 tionship of the 3 regions was for mandibular premolar-1st molar sites, r2 = 0.78.

21 Approximately 79-80%, 59-60%, and 35-36% premolars 2D BSH remained in comparison to 75%, 50%, and

22 om 41 CT scans, 65% of the mandibular second premolars, 53% of the mandibular first molars, and 73% o

23 mit available bone for IIP, 7% of the second premolars, 9% of the first molars, and 31% of the second

24 eth adopt a size and shape characteristic of premolars, a tooth type that was lost in mice around 50-

25 nd left second, third, and fourth mandibular premolars; a resorbable collagen membrane was secured ov

26 (rs1219648) presented higher risk for having premolar agenesis (p = 0.02; OR = 1.8; 95% C.I., 1.1-3.0

27 ere found in more common cases of incisor or premolar agenesis, indicating that these have a differen

28 vidence of replacement of the ultimate upper premolar and a unique paleopathological case in Mesozoic

29 lar second premolar and mesial of the fourth premolar and Class II furcation defects at the buccal fu

30 nation determined hypodontia of right second premolar and delayed eruption of left second premolar in

31 including a proximal femur, the fourth upper premolar and first and second upper molars, and a mandib

32 created on the mesial surface of the second premolar and first molar in all quadrants.

33 , and a mandible preserving the lower second premolar and lower canine and incisor alveoli, reveal a

34 bony defects distal of the mandibular second premolar and mesial of the fourth premolar and Class II

35 fferent loading scenarios (incisive, canine, premolar and molar bites) to test the hypothesis that th

36 location and angulation were compared among premolar and molar edentulous sites.

37 Premolar and molar MBLs were measured on panoramic radio

38 CF was collected from the mesial surfaces of premolar and molar teeth using filter paper strips.

39 h significant differences between the second premolar and second molar sites.

40 ch as the loss of the upper and lower second premolar and the development of a honing blade for the u

41 aterally on the distal surface of the second premolar and the mesial surface of the first molar in ni

42 Twelve canines had their mandibular four premolars and first molar teeth extracted bilaterally.

43 design included extraction of all mandibular premolars and first molars in five canines.

44 All mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted in five dogs.

45 frequently seen near mandibular canines and premolars and is routinely treated with excisional biops

46 d premolars- most commonly, maxillary second premolars and mandibular central incisors.

47 s were placed on buccal left and right upper premolars and molars (UL, UR), labial upper central inci

48 plaque samples from mesio-buccal aspects of premolars and molars exhibiting probing depths in the 4-

49 Incisors and canines responded better than premolars and molars.

50 al incisors, followed by maxillary posterior premolars and molars.

51 unt of AL in anterior teeth was less than in premolars and molars.

52 f pulp vitality of two maxillary left second premolars and one maxillary left first molar occurs afte

53 In addition, the deciduous fourth premolars and permanent first and second molars consiste

54 ll lower primary postcanine teeth (deciduous premolars and permanent molars) in hominins.

55 to-enamel junctions of mandibular molars and premolars and the position where the lingual nerve left

56 y with autosomal dominant agenesis of second premolars and third molars identified a locus on chromos

57 h agenesis in a single family lacking second premolars and third molars, we performed a mutational an

58 entition by a loss of the permanent canines, premolars and to some extent incisors.

59 ficantly more interproximal plaque in molar, premolar, and anterior teeth compared to manual floss at

60 omated flosser to manual floss for anterior, premolar, and molar teeth using the plaque index (PI) an

61 uid (GCF) samples were taken at one incisor, premolar, and molar tooth and stored with serum samples

62 ncisors and cuspids; between 84% and 92% for premolars; and between 59% and 96% for molars.

63 Upper and lower distal premolars are strongly molariform and are captured under

64 sion in the gingiva of the mandibular canine-premolar area.

65 y vestibular gingiva extending to the second premolar areas, without any associated radiographic abno

66 patients, each requiring extraction of four premolars before orthodontic treatment, were enrolled in

67 lk sutures tied around the mandibular second premolars bilaterally, followed by the topical applicati

68 ne the clinical SOG dimensions around molar, premolar, canine, and incisor teeth in upper and lower j

69 Each subject required maxillary premolar, canine, or central incisor tooth extraction.

70 ysts located predominantly in the mandibular premolar-canine region.

71 ngle-rooted molars preceded by double-rooted premolars, combined with a very long muzzle, exceedingly

72 Ar. ramidus had a reduced canine/premolar complex and a little-derived cranial morphology

73 umans had a functionally honing canine-third premolar complex.

74 the first and second lower molar crowns, and premolar crown and radicular anatomy) indicates attribut

75 Both maxillary and mandibular premolars demonstrated a nonsignificant RSA percentage a

76 ology hypothesizes that loads applied to the premolars during feeding had a profound influence on the

77 Forty-five (45) premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were randoml

78 178 human permanent mandibular first premolars extracted from a native Chinese population wer

79 females; mean age, 14.1 y) undergoing first premolar extraction-based fixed appliance treatment were

80 rwent atraumatic bilateral second and fourth premolar extractions from both arches.

81 ntrol study for sample size, sex, mandibular premolar extractions, pretreatment age, post-treatment o

82 - 2.2 mm, and 12.5 +/- 2.5 mm for the second premolar, first molar, and second molar sites, respectiv

83 sites were 15%, 8.2%, and 2.4% in the second premolar, first molar, and second molar sites.

84 eived silk ligatures around their mandibular premolars followed by an application of a periodontal pa

85 its using ligatures around mandibular second premolars, followed by topical Porphyromonas gingivalis

86 Nine months after root coverage, all four premolars from each of the three patients were surgicall

87 in a 49-year-old male whose right maxillary premolar furcation had a bony defect with poor biologic

88 premolar and delayed eruption of left second premolar in maxilla, as well as persistent deciduous tee

89 est evidence of reduction of the first upper premolar in rhinocerotoids, and resembles paraceratherii

90 Tooth chipping was found on molars and premolars in 47% of subjects with a tongue piercing for

91 nd root canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in a Chinese population.

92 omy and canal morphology of mandibular first premolars in southwestern Chinese population, which need

93 ller Class I recessions affecting canines or premolars in the maxillary arch.

94 tiodactyls, in the structure of its ears and premolars, in the density of its limb bones and in the s

95 ht sites on each molar and six sites on each premolar included plaque, bleeding on probing, probing d

96 uble heterozygous mice present with an extra premolar-like tooth revealing a genetic interaction betw

97 s, A. africanus, is well suited to withstand premolar loads.

98 sites associated with the mandibular second premolar, mandibular first molar, and mandibular second

99 the following tooth types: mandibular second premolars, mandibular first molars, and mandibular secon

100 GCF was collected from 16 molar and premolar mesiobuccal sites and then clinical attachment

101 Defined regions (anterior, cuspid, premolar, molar) on two preserved human mandibles were i

102 roximal bone height (BH), were analyzed in 2 premolar/molar interproximal > or = 5 mm pockets at base

103 gatures at the gingival margins of maxillary premolar/molar teeth.

104 duals with missing molars also lacked second premolars- most commonly, maxillary second premolars and

105 MSCs were obtained from PDL and P tissue of premolars (n = 3) extracted for orthodontic reasons.

106 Cs) from PDL tissue were isolated from human premolars (n = 3).

107 The third premolars of both quadrants served as negative controls.

108 ally located apical to the second mandibular premolar or between apices of the premolars.

109 All implants replaced mandibular premolars or molars.

110 he mesio-buccal root of the maxillary fourth premolar (P4) was performed bilaterally in 8 dogs.

111 various locations correlating to molar (M), premolar (PM), and anterior (A) regions.

112 the lateral aspect of the mandibular second premolar (PM2) mesial roots including removal of root ce

113 namel junction (CEJ) of the maxillary fourth premolar (PM4; thin bone over root); 2) 6 mm apical to t

114 Twenty patients with incisors or premolars presenting with a facial recession of > or = 4

115 he formation of the germ of the second lower premolar (r=0.67; p<0.001).

116 cted, in one quadrant, the second and fourth premolars received nonresorbable expanded polytetrafluor

117 The other quadrant, second and fourth premolars, received the bioabsorbable membranes, made of

118 platform and 13 mm in length) placed in the premolar region of the mandible.

119 nts, each with a hopeless tooth (anterior or premolar region), were recruited to receive dental impla

120 lant areas in the upper incisor, canine, and premolar regions of 18 patients.

121 at the second molar, first molar, and second premolar, respectively.

122 nding to a 75%, 50%, and 25% 2D BSH reserve, premolars retained 67-68%, 39-41%, and 15-17% 3D BA-RSA,

123 s that a thick facial plate, small gaps, and premolar sites were more favorable for successful implan

124 lants at the right and left maxillary second premolar sites.

125 parisons were made with 15 untreated control premolar teeth from the same subjects.

126 ontal defects were created at the mandibular premolar teeth in 9 beagle dogs.

127 defects were surgically created in maxillary premolar teeth in adult, female, mini-pigs and filled wi

128 mesial roots of freshly extracted mandibular premolar teeth in three minipigs.

129 ferential defects were created in mandibular premolar teeth of 6 beagle dogs, followed by placement o

130 Four mandibular premolar teeth per quadrant were extracted; a total of 4

131 nd left second, third, and fourth mandibular premolar teeth were extracted; the implant osteotomies w

132 Fifteen premolar teeth were treated with straight-wire fixed ort

133 , oral sites other than maxillary canine and premolar teeth, and Miller Class III and IV defects; 2)

134 icle) gels, topically applied twice daily to premolar teeth.

135 tal root for the third and fourth mandibular premolar teeth.

136 atures around the mandibular first molar and premolar teeth.

137 es were prepared from the roots of extracted premolar teeth.

138 served in the P-MSCs compared to PDL-MSCs of premolar teeth.

139 crown height More bone removal was noted at premolar than at molar sites; however, this was not stat

140 nds to increase in thickness from the second premolar to the second molar and from 5 mm up to 15 mm.

141 We present five cases in which a maxillary premolar was extracted and an implant placed into the ex

142 Cementum-covered roots of 20 extracted human premolars were coated with resin caps, leaving four area

143 illary and 35 mandibular single-rooted human premolars were examined.

144 Second, third, and fourth mandibular premolars were involved; experimental periods covered fr

145 subjects in need of extraction of maxillary premolars were recruited.

146 gingival recessions >/=2.0 mm in canines or premolars were selected.

147 Twenty-five GRs in maxillary canines and premolars were treated with coronally positioned flap pl

148 lade for the upper canine on the lower third premolar-which suggest that oligopithecines constitute t

149 extraction site of a molar or a first upper premolar with a flapless approach.

150 etermining the severity of periodontitis for premolars with alveolar bone loss based on 3D's or 2D's

151 This is particularly true for maxillary premolars with multiple roots.

152 combining enlarged, elongate, and molariform premolars with simple upper molars that lack hypocones.

153 dontal disease, incisor and canine (zone 1), premolar (zone 2), and molar (zone 3) SOG dimensions wer