ライフサイエンスコーパス: prenatal care

1 ects and common chromosomal anomalies during prenatal care.

2 nital tract colonization with E. coli during prenatal care.

3 hest, thereby changing family counseling and prenatal care.

4 ps in patients' satisfaction with quality of prenatal care.

5 , mother's age, race, education, parity, and prenatal care.

6 asure of antioxidant status, at the entry to prenatal care.

7 al age less than 32 weeks, and having had no prenatal care.

8 ers (23.5%) were known to have received some prenatal care.

9 3946) reported not being permitted to obtain prenatal care.

10 37 respondents, 519 (11%) reported receiving prenatal care.

11 omen who received only third-trimester or no prenatal care.

12 risk substance use among 186 women receiving prenatal care.

13 nd attended a public health clinic for their prenatal care.

14 e-gene conditions is the current standard of prenatal care.

15 pecially for women who may not have obtained prenatal care.

16 cs, that are not amenable to intervention by prenatal care.

17 perinatal deaths (n = 189) caused by lack of prenatal care.

18 periodic checkups (9%; 95% CI, 6%-12%), and prenatal care (11%; 95% CI, 7%-15%).

19 . 34.5 pounds (15.7 kg)), and to have had no prenatal care (12% vs. 2% ) than mothers of nonasthmatic

20 after TennCare in the proportions with late prenatal care (16.2% in 1993 vs 15.8% in 1995), inadequa

21 21.4% [95% CI, 19.4%-23.4%]; P < .001), and prenatal care (50.2% vs 9.9%; difference, 40.3 [95% CI,

22 tay, 10 days (6-17 d) versus 6 days (4-9 d); prenatal care, 75% versus 99.4%; fetal-neonatal losses,

23 he analysis to subjects with first-trimester prenatal care, a nonmissing date of the last menstrual p

24 The timing of HAART initiation and prenatal care, along with medication adherence during pr

25 irapine was demonstrated when women received prenatal care and antenatal ART, and elective cesarean s

26 The authors studied women seeking prenatal care and delivering singletons in uncomplicated

27 ay result in the seeming incongruity of more prenatal care and more preterm births; however, these da

28 This study suggests that prenatal care and nutritional counseling could reduce as

29 s evaluated the relation between adequacy of prenatal care and risk of delivery of full term small-fo

30 e relation between plasma leptin at entry to prenatal care and subsequent changes in weight from entr

31 (i.e., race/ethnicity, education, entry into prenatal care) and infant (i.e., birth weight, gestation

32 ronic Health Evaluation II, education level, prenatal care, and admission to tertiary hospitals.

33 istory, perinatal complications, adequacy of prenatal care, and infant gender.

34 is, previous pregnancy with HIV, adequacy of prenatal care, and postpartum HIV care engagement (>/= 1

35 ing in the first 3-6 months of life, optimum prenatal care, and timely immunisations against the comm

36 y homogenous population, virtually universal prenatal care, and uniform institutional conditions for

37 etrical and medical history, time of initial prenatal care, and year of pregnancy.

38 ortant to foetal growth and could be used in prenatal care as an additional strategy to screen women

39 f at least 25 years (relative risk, 6.8); no prenatal care as compared with early prenatal care (rela

40 20 African American adolescents who received prenatal care at an inner-city maternity clinic between

41 ohort study were obtained from women seeking prenatal care at any of the two tertiary, seven regional

42 ween October 1992 and February 1995, entered prenatal care at Magee-Womens Hospital in Pittsburgh, Pe

43 e data beginning with interviews of women in prenatal care at midpregnancy to predict alcohol use and

44 395 self-reported smokers who were receiving prenatal care at public clinics in three US states (Colo

45 e from Camden, NJ, was studied from entry to prenatal care (at 15.0 +/- 0.49 wk gestation).

46 d subsequent changes in weight from entry to prenatal care (at 17 wk gestation, baseline) until 6 mo

47 ntage of women who, if deterred from seeking prenatal care because of a mandatory HIV testing policy,

48 Complete agreement for month and trimester prenatal care began was 31.1% (n = 632) and 50.6% (n = 1

49 io (controlling for mother's age, education, prenatal care, cigarette smoking status, and residential

50 um among 1,006 women enrolled in Los Angeles prenatal care clinics between 1995 and 2001.

51 Women were enrolled at prenatal care clinics during their second trimester, at

52 ruited at 24-29 weeks of pregnancy from four prenatal care clinics in North Carolina from August 1995

53 pregnancy prevention programs, young adults, prenatal care clinics, and married women.

54 Although awareness was highest in private prenatal care clinics, compared with public outpatient c

55 per liter]) were randomly assigned to usual prenatal care (control group) or dietary intervention, s

56 with multiple births who received intensive prenatal care (defined as a high number of visits, excee

57 of outcome in the first pregnancy, adequate prenatal care did not reduce the risk of full term SGA b

58 de a growing trend towards medicalisation of prenatal care, ensuring staff are trained to treat devel

59 In 1989, the Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care established guidelines on the timing and c

60 traditional risk factors such as smoking and prenatal care fail to account for it.

61 body mass index, age, ethnicity, parity, and prenatal care, gestational diabetes was associated with

62 ears, this screening test has revolutionized prenatal care globally and opened up new prospects for p

63 tion for themselves and their spouses, early prenatal care, gravida 2 or 3, and no previous fetal los

64 Advances in fetal imaging and access to prenatal care have improved the ability to anticipate an

65 study adds to the evidence base for enhanced prenatal care home visiting programs and informs state a

66 shed guidelines on the timing and content of prenatal care, including a schedule consisting of fewer

67 lacebo, returning every 4 weeks for standard prenatal care, including malaria screening, prophylaxis

68 es traditionally used to examine adequacy of prenatal care indicate that prenatal care utilization re

69 is change was undetected by more traditional prenatal care indices.

70 The impact of maternal smoking and poor prenatal care is also reviewed in the form of a number o

71 Incorporating NBS education into prenatal care is broadly supported by lay and profession

72 pregnancy was unintended; and who initiated prenatal care late, responded late to the survey questio

73 Inequalities in access to adequate prenatal care may contribute to poor outcomes associated

74 that a high leptin concentration at entry to prenatal care may predict an increased risk of overweigh

75 ment groups: treatment 1 (transportation for prenatal care [n = 166]), treatment 2 (transportation pl

76 phaly among infants born to women with early prenatal care (odds ratio (OR) = 4.54, 95% confidence in

77 stratified analysis to assess the effect of prenatal care on the risk of having an SGA baby in the s

78 commended regimens did so because of limited prenatal care or by choice.

79 ma (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 9,7), lack of prenatal care (OR = 4.7), history of bronchiolitis (OR =

80 d hypertension among women who received less prenatal care (OR=4.2 for eclampsia and OR=3.1 for sever

81 they were less well educated, had inadequate prenatal care, or had longer hospital stays at delivery.

82 ernal age, maternal education, initiation of prenatal care, order of livebirth, and use of ultrasound

83 use, drug use, alcohol consumption, level of prenatal care, parity, genitourinary infections, and nut

84 a population-based cohort study of high-risk prenatal care patients in Jefferson County, Alabama.

85 Mellitus Study, a prospective cohort of 1231 prenatal care patients.

86 n important part of overall strengthening of prenatal-care programmes.

87 evaluations of state-based Medicaid enhanced prenatal care programs that provide home visiting to gui

88 To determine the receptivity of prenatal care providers and their patients to carrier te

89 ed by genetic counseling of carriers, to all prenatal care providers in Rochester, NY, for all their

90 Efforts should be made by prenatal care providers to provide Tdap vaccine to pregn

91 Of 124 prenatal care providers, only 37 elected to participate,

92 other prospective data were determined from prenatal care records and questionnaires for 10 314 wome

93 .8); no prenatal care as compared with early prenatal care (relative risk, 10.4); and less than 12 ye

94 by other factors (e.g., maternal birthplace, prenatal care, reproductive history, age, socioeconomic

95 Earlier prenatal care seemed "protective" for non-Hispanics (OR

96 to 31 290 pregnant women through government prenatal care services that were strengthened by trainin

97 s and infant death in the setting of routine prenatal care services.

98 intercept survey of 411 pregnant women in 4 prenatal care settings was conducted during 15-28 Februa

99 rnal age, education, parity, marital status, prenatal care, smoking, and previous preterm delivery.

100 Treatment is still prenatal care, timely diagnosis, proper management, and

101 d may create the potential harms of avoiding prenatal care to avoid mandatory testing.

102 fant mortality rate for women with intensive prenatal care use declined between 1983 and 1996 and rem

103 ion was used to assess the risk of intensive prenatal care use in 1981 and 1995.

104 owed a steadily increasing trend toward more prenatal care use throughout the study period (R-GINDEX,

105 After adjustment for maternal hypertension, prenatal care use, and sociodemographic factors, the dis

106 these data suggest that women with intensive prenatal care utilization also have a lower infant morta

107 % in 1981 to 47.1 % in 1995; the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index, intensive use, 18.4% in

108 mine adequacy of prenatal care indicate that prenatal care utilization remained unchanged through the

109 For women with intensive prenatal care utilization, the preterm birth rate increa

110 that included maternal sociodemographic and prenatal care variables, the adjusted odds ratio of pret

111 ratio, maternal smoking status at the first prenatal care visit and at 32 weeks' gestation, and othe

112 e whether stopping smoking between the first prenatal care visit and the 32nd week of pregnancy affec

113 is study, stopping smoking between the first prenatal care visit and week 32 of pregnancy prevented s

114 l outcomes when low-risk women are seen in a prenatal care visit schedule of fewer visits than routin

115 ine pregnant females were recruited at their prenatal care visits.

116 HIV-focused ambulatory care, or had adequate prenatal care visits.

117 Utilization of prenatal care was also associated with low birth weight.

118 In unadjusted analyses, inadequate prenatal care was associated with an increased risk of d

119 Inadequate prenatal care was not associated with the risk of SGA de

120 oposed by the Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care was observed.

121 ered infants at UMMS but who had received no prenatal care were also eligible.

122 Socioeconomic status and access to prenatal care were not associated with either disorder.

123 private hospitals: the former received less prenatal care, were less educated, were more frequently

124 at 30 weeks of gestation to a mother without prenatal care who had prolonged rupture of the membranes

125 data on the amount, timing, and adequacy of prenatal care with the same data abstracted from the pre