ライフサイエンスコーパス: preoperative

1 Patients underwent preoperative 3-T magnetic resonance imaging with convent

2 Discordance between preoperative 4D-CTs and intraoperative findings in the n

3 strongly associated with discordance between preoperative 4D-CTs and intraoperative findings, followe

4 female), 123 (29.9%) had discordance between preoperative 4D-CTs and intraoperative findings.

5 with primary hyperparathyroidism undergoing preoperative 4D-CTs and subsequent parathyroidectomy wer

6 ssociated with missed parathyroid lesions on preoperative 4D-CTs and to investigate patterns of commo

7 ations and factors affecting the accuracy of preoperative 4D-CTs remain poorly defined.

8 Patients were assessed on 5 preoperative activities of daily living recommended by t

9 d risk of postoperative complications with a preoperative acute kidney injury risk index of class III

10 Modification of preoperative age-related ECD thresholds is indicated to

11 Preoperative and 1 year patient-reported outcomes were m

12 Difference between the median preoperative and final best-corrected visual acuity (BCV

13 d comparative research should consider these preoperative and intraoperative factors along with conve

14 Incidence, prevalence, preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for enhance

15 ed for the cataract surgery group, including preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acu

16 Although the difference between preoperative and postoperative BVCA was significantly di

17 heduled for surgery, we performed open-ended preoperative and postoperative interviews.

18 patient age at primary SMILE, gender, race, preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction spher

19 Patients received complete preoperative and postoperative ophthalmic examinations f

20 Preoperative and postoperative patient-centered outcomes

21 Elevated preoperative and postoperative plasma levels of C-reacti

22 can be stated that local control after both preoperative and postoperative RT is comparable, but tha

23 fest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), preoperative and postoperative uncorrected distance visu

24 Mean preoperative and postoperative visual acuities were simi

25 The mean preoperative and postoperative visual acuities were simi

26 S/mGPS which should form part of the routine preoperative and postoperative workup.

27 43 patients' conversations with surgeons, 34 preoperative, and 27 postoperative interviews.

28 , including axial length, corneal power (K), preoperative anterior chamber depth (corneal epithelium

29 rvival and a pathologic complete response to preoperative anthracycline therapy in 3 BC cohorts from

30 Unlike preoperative anti-TNF agent use among patients who under

31 To evaluate the effect of a single dose of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of

32 ie Generale (EVAN-G) score and the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information (APAIS) score, as m

33 The beneficial effects of preoperative arginine-enriched dietary supplements (AES)

34 Agreement between preoperative AS-OCT and intraoperative measurements.

35 ative to polar lines (RENAL) nephrometry and preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomic cl

36 cle (EOM) insertion to the limbus to improve preoperative assessment of adult patients undergoing str

37 Preoperative assessment of older geriatric patients is f

38 ion tomography (PET) is commonly utilized in preoperative assessment of patients with solid malignanc

39 Preoperative assessment of tissue anatomy and accurate s

40 Preoperative assessment showed preserved sagittal balanc

41 ectiveness of ITSS grading and rCBV ratio in preoperative assessment.

42 the presence of other ocular pathologies or preoperative astigmatism >1.5 diopters (D).

43 s (D), preoperative myopia more than 6.00 D, preoperative astigmatism more than 3.00 D, and intraoper

44 e MRSE, greater preoperative myopia, greater preoperative astigmatism, and the occurrence of intraope

45 Clinical Question: Should patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation who are undergoing card

46 Difference between measured preoperative axial length and age-matched mean axial len

47 We confirm that even without preoperative axillary imaging or routine use of nodal RT

48 r edema (ME) developed (>/=30% increase from preoperative baseline central subfield macular thickness

49 The mean preoperative baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of

50 with both leads activated, compared with the preoperative baseline mean TRS score.

51 ity (BCVA) improvement of >/=15 letters from preoperative baseline through day 14 maintained through

52 had a BCVA improvement of >/=15 letters from preoperative baseline through day 90 (77.2% vs. 67.7% [P

53 ng (difference, 4.6; P = .047) compared with preoperative baseline.

54 with second eyes, first eyes had worse mean preoperative BCVA (0.55 vs. 0.36 logarithm of the minimu

55 The mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.3

56 Preoperative biliary stenting was confirmed as an indepe

57 ndently validated, MSI or MMRD determined by preoperative biopsies could be used to select patients f

58 cant predictor for achieving this goal was a preoperative BMI of less than 40 (odds ratio [OR], 12.88

59 Patients with a preoperative BMI of less than 40 are more likely to achi

60 DSAEKs with preoperative BSCVA < 1.3 logMAR had significantly better

61 high NLR was strongly associated with stage, preoperative CA125 level and ascites at surgery.

62 The mean preoperative CAant (0.97 +/- 0.30 diopter [D]) was signi

63 ogical parameters, 5-year follow-up data and preoperative CBC parameters were obtained retrospectivel

64 cesarean delivery who received the standard preoperative cephalosporin prophylaxis, a postoperative

65 >/=30) who had received standard intravenous preoperative cephalosporin prophylaxis.

66 The patients' preoperative characteristics were similar in all groups.

67 Propensity score matching using 34 preoperative characteristics yielded 5813 matched sets.

68 eye, data were collected and analyzed on the preoperative characteristics, intraoperative procedures,

69 for patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation.

70 Purpose After preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorec

71 or cN+) rectal cancer who were treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorec

72 APC and PIK3CA predicts inferior response to preoperative chemotherapy and poor survival in patients

73 and PIK3CA mutations in patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy and resection for colorectal l

74 hile preserving renal tissue by intensifying preoperative chemotherapy, completing definitive surgery

75 tment approach including standardized 3-drug preoperative chemotherapy, surgical resection within 12

76 le attenuation and quantity as quantified on preoperative chest computed tomographic scans may be pre

77 tric assessment tool can be implemented in a preoperative clinic and can estimate risk of postoperati

78 eriatric patients is feasible in the general preoperative clinic and can help identify patients at hi

79 distinguish cancer from normal tissue in the preoperative clinic and throughout surgical resection.

80 70 years of age or older were assessed in a preoperative clinic for elective surgery from July 9, 20

81 In the preoperative clinic, the open-field device demonstrated

82 erative delirium (POD) never return to their preoperative cognitive baseline.

83 ngs suggest that older patients with reduced preoperative cognitive functions or who develop postoper

84 Closer preoperative collaboration between surgeons, geriatricia

85 While designing new preoperative combination regimens, responses should be c

86 ging with pathologic complete response after preoperative combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy

87 Several parameters of preoperative complete blood count (CBC) and inflammation

88 Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography images were a

89 ed by a multidisciplinary team involving the preoperative consultant, anesthesiologist, and surgeon.

90 ate of pathological complete response in the preoperative context and increases overall survival amon

91 etween April 2008 and September 2014 who had preoperative CT data and tumor tissue available was stud

92 An appropriate MPD diameter on preoperative CT or MRI to predict malignant disease was

93 Preoperative CT studies in all patients who underwent su

94 Patients in arm A received 4 preoperative cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxalipl

95 Patients with missing preoperative data, and patients in whom no lymphadenecto

96 Primary outcome was preoperative decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Sc

97 Preoperative decisional conflict did not differ between

98 lyse the frequency of remission and identify preoperative determinants of successful outcome.

99 Preoperative diagnosis can be challenging, particularly

100 romising minimally invasive biomarker in the preoperative diagnosis of ACC but needs further validati

101 There is no available blood marker for the preoperative diagnosis of adrenocortical malignancy.

102 ients who underwent surgical resection for a preoperative diagnosis of MD or mixed IPMN and in whom I

103 The only significant preoperative differences between groups were higher perc

104 atment of fractures below the knee, a single preoperative dose of intravenous cefazolin compared with

105 We have matched preoperative DTI with image-guided sampling of the brain

106 predictors of long-term remission including preoperative duration of T2DM (P < 0.0001), preoperative

107 and Methods Patients with DCIS who underwent preoperative dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MR

108 The mean preoperative ECD was 2761 +/- 285 cells/mm(2).

109 pic) randomized 1:1 to usual care (including preoperative education about early mobilization with pos

110 Among patients with preoperative eGFR>/=30 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), the inciden

111 MRI provides satisfactory accuracy for preoperative estimation of tumor thickness and predictin

112 th a difference of DS less than 1 D from the preoperative estimation.

113 These steps, which include preoperative evaluation, operative reconstruction, and p

114 tions is enhanced assessment of risks during preoperative evaluation.

115 queried from the home medication list of the preoperative evaluation.

116 No preoperative evidence for vitreous traction on the optic

117 ce showed that continuous passive motion and preoperative exercise had no pain improvement and reduct

118 ventions included continuous passive motion, preoperative exercise, cryotherapy, electrotherapy, and

119 t 1 and 2 weeks (P = .32, I2 = 87%), and for preoperative exercise, the mean difference was -0.14 (95

120 Preoperative exhaled carbon monoxide level was not assoc

121 Smoking status and preoperative exhaled carbon monoxide level, assessed by

122 he day of surgery and SSI was not related to preoperative exhaled carbon monoxide levels.

123 after VR, and 64.3 (SD, 11.7) after standard preoperative experience (difference, 20.0; 95% confidenc

124 rsive preoperative VR experience or standard preoperative experience stratified on type of operation.

125 pport patient profiles 1 and 2, the need for preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or rena

126 Preoperative factors of patients with and without malign

127 ls were used to determine the association of preoperative factors with the presence of MCN-associated

128 Although it considers 21 preoperative factors, it does not include procedure-spec

129 in ARF prediction improved performance over preoperative features (AUC = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.50-0.85), t

130 From 101 patient records, we extracted 15 preoperative features from clinical records and 41 featu

131 Using only preoperative features, mortality prediction achieved an

132 y of 98%; importantly, by co-registering the preoperative fibre maps to postoperative surgical lacuna

133 ted at determining the optimal components of preoperative frailty assessment.

134 Assessment of preoperative frailty in all patients scheduled for elect

135 was the proportion of patients returning to preoperative functional walking capacity (6-min walk tes

136 -enhanced US scans to corresponding coplanar preoperative gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR images i

137 d US is superimposable on that provided with preoperative gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging

138 head coil may provide useful information for preoperative glial tumor grading.

139 To examine the use of preoperative HbA1c and early postoperative glucose level

140 As preoperative HbA1c increased, the frequency of 48-hour p

141 cluded 23094 operations with measurements of preoperative HbA1c levels and postoperative glucose leve

142 Preoperative HbA1c levels were examined as a continuous

143 Patients with a preoperative HbA1c of more than 6.5% had lower threshold

144 By contrast, a preoperative HbA1c of more than 6.5% was associated with

145 A higher preoperative HbA1c was associated with increased postope

146 ted with increased readmission, but elevated preoperative HbA1c was not.

147 plications and readmissions with the closest preoperative HbA1c within 90 days and the highest postop

148 Although possibly a contributor to preoperative heart failure, pulmonary hypertension did n

149 Whether preoperative hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or postoperative glu

150 Preoperative hemoglobin A1c was not significantly associ

151 on monoxide level, assessed by nurses in the preoperative holding area.

152 Preoperative hyperglycemia is associated with adverse po

153 Two of 5 patients had preoperative hypertropia of the affected eye (1.4 +/- 2.

154 be a beneficial procedure for patients with preoperative hypertropia or intorsion requiring transpos

155 In patients with preoperative hypertropia, IRT resulted in a downward shi

156 Standard (18)F-FDG PET/CT is an effective preoperative imaging method for the prediction of LN sta

157 sing targeted dual-modality probes combining preoperative imaging with intraoperative guidance is of

158 Patients underwent preoperative imaging, amygdalohippocampectomy and postop

159 From preoperative imaging, the fimbria-fornix, parahippocampa

160 %) malignant pulmonary nodules identified by preoperative imaging.

161 RF), improving upon predictions that rely on preoperative information only.

162 to the Glaucoma Index (GI) that incorporated preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), number of medic

163 , 95% CI = 1.49-23.73, P = .012), while high preoperative intraocular pressure (OR = 4.54, 95% CI = 0

164 /=7 days) postoperative LOS, controlling for preoperative/intraoperative variables (eg, age, comorbid

165 A single preoperative intravenous dose of 1000 mg of cefazolin (c

166 To assess the optimal interval of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) administrati

167 Mean preoperative IOP of the study population was 31.5 +/- 11

168 The mean preoperative IOP was 24.70 +/- 3.90 mm Hg in the IMCT gr

169 Both groups were comparable with respect to preoperative IOP, corneal clarity, corneal diameter, ver

170 glaucoma (n = 23), of whom several required preoperative IOP-lowering treatment.

171 outcomes at 6 months when subjects received preoperative IVB 5-10 days before PPV compared to 1-3 da

172 lysis of patients with normal or near-normal preoperative kidney function (eGFR>/=60 ml/min per 1.73

173 We compared the impact of NFLG condition on preoperative left ventricular (LV) remodeling and myocar

174 fter AAV1/2-A53T-aSyn injection, compared to preoperative levels (-82%; p < 0.01).

175 rgery (1.48 +/- 0.08; P < .03) compared with preoperative levels (1.73 +/- 0.09), despite significant

176 -month follow-up, mean CDVA in comparison to preoperative levels improved significantly (P = .001) fr

177 In patients undergoing aortic surgery, preoperative levels of miR-542-3p/5p were positively cor

178 To assess the ability of preoperative levosimendan to prevent postoperative low c

179 vidence, although limited, suggests that the preoperative LMR may be prognostic in CRC.

180 New techniques for preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions

181 interest (ROIs) per patient in the NEPTR at preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with (166 r

182 Only 18% of patients with a normal preoperative manometric LES deteriorated to a lower cate

183 Preoperative mapping of language areas using fMRI greatl

184 field device demonstrated potential to guide preoperative mapping of tumor borders, optimize the day

185 Preoperative MDCT measurements differ substantially from

186 Preoperative MDCT measurements of the aortic annulus ser

187 The IOP was reduced from a preoperative mean of 30.4 (+/- 10.3) to 24.9 (+/- 10.6)

188 The preoperative mean visual acuity was 20/625 (range, hand

189 Compared with preoperative measurements, 1-year follow-up after AWR de

190 very, replication, and pooled cohorts at the preoperative (median paired difference [MPD] 1.97 mg/L [

191 Higher levels of preoperative medication were associated with lower level

192 American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

193 s) of women with breast cancer who underwent preoperative MR imaging combined with MR-guided needle b

194 ults Of 415 subjects with DCIS who underwent preoperative MR imaging, 14 experienced recurrence and 1

195 ging between real-time intraoperative US and preoperative MR imaging.

196 sted odds ratio [OR], 1.76; P = .04), better preoperative MRD (adjusted OR, 2.21; P < .001), and abse

197 25 patients had preoperative US, and 130 had preoperative MRI.

198 Age older than 35 years, preoperative MRSE more than -6.00 diopters (D), preopera

199 cluded older age at SMILE procedure, greater preoperative MRSE, greater preoperative myopia, greater

200 Each unit increase in preoperative MST score predicted longer LOSs of 2.5 d (9

201 ified, which enabled spatial mapping between preoperative multiparametric MR imaging and the gland.

202 operative MRSE more than -6.00 diopters (D), preoperative myopia more than 6.00 D, preoperative astig

203 rocedure, greater preoperative MRSE, greater preoperative myopia, greater preoperative astigmatism, a

204 ast and/or axillary surgery, or who received preoperative/neoadjuvant systemic therapy may be offered

205 preoperative duration of T2DM (P < 0.0001), preoperative number of diabetes medications (P < 0.0001)

206 They also underwent preoperative OCT and infrared imaging of the affected pu

207 pitals across the United States report their preoperative, operative, and 30-day outcome data.

208 Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were col

209 Preoperative opioid use (binary exposure variable) was r

210 mortality, it is critical to understand how preoperative opioid use impacts surgical outcomes.

211 e the clinical and financial implications of preoperative opioid use in major abdominal surgery.

212 To examine the extent to which preoperative opioid use is correlated with healthcare ut

213 gression was used to determine the effect of preoperative opioid use on postoperative healthcare util

214 Preoperative opioids represent a potentially modifiable

215 ren were prospectively enrolled during their preoperative outpatient appointment with the following c

216 on [yes vs no]: OR, 1.75, 95% CI, 1.03-2.97; preoperative oxygenation: OR, 0.86, 95% CI, 0.80-0.93; b

217 chymeter (Tomey, Nagoya, Japan) was used for preoperative pachymetry and flap thickness measurement.

218 anxiety (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.10-1.42), and preoperative pain disorders (back pain: aOR, 1.57; 95% C

219 Preoperative pain in the operative area ( P < .001), hig

220 lationship between postoperative outcome and preoperative pathology of white matter tracts, which con

221 RYGB and may serve as a diagnostic marker in preoperative patient assessment.

222 ficantly higher number of CTCs compared with preoperative Pe (P < 0.0001) and intraoperative Pe (P <

223 lance indicated that presence of clusters in preoperative Pe blood predicted a trend toward poor prog

224 iac transplantation, to assess the impact of preoperative pectoralis muscle index and pectoralis musc

225 t was measured by computed tomography in the preoperative period (T0) and 6 to 12 months after proced

226 Clopidogrel use in older adults through the preoperative period of GI surgery does not significantly

227 The most significant change, observed in the preoperative period, in the eyes that underwent surgery,

228 hesis that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in preoperative peripheral blood (PPB) and intraoperative p

229 features suspicious for malignancy underwent preoperative PET.

230 SC patients and 93% of LC patients received preoperative planned radiotherapy.

231 leverage this new localization technique in preoperative planning and intraoperative troubleshooting

232 Preoperative plasma extracellular vesicle samples of 6 a

233 Plasma was collected at four time points: preoperative, postanesthesia care unit, postoperative da

234 This study aimed to investigate if preoperative posturing affects the progression of RD.

235 Traditionally, preoperative posturing consisting of bed rest and positi

236 Preoperative posturing is effective in reducing progress

237 By making use of usual interruptions of preoperative posturing we were able to show, in a prospe

238 Frailty is a novel preoperative predictor of poor KT outcomes including del

239 vided into two groups based on whether their preoperative pulmonary vascular resistance indicated sev

240 ment in epiphora had a significantly smaller preoperative punctal diameter at 100 mum depth on OCT co

241 illustrates the critical role of a detailed preoperative radiological evaluation in complex spine su

242 In this study, we assessed the effect of preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) for locally advanced rec

243 Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) is a mainstay in the mana

244 Perineal wound healing after eAPR with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer was not impr

245 mplications frequently occur after eAPR with preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer.

246 of short-course (SC) versus long-course (LC) preoperative radiotherapy.

247 sing model optimization strategies) included preoperative recipient age, sex, race, employment status

248 ies performed via FLACS, in combination with preoperative refraction calculation, is minimal.

249 er predictors of response and more effective preoperative regimens should be aggressively sought.

250 large, matched cohort study, controlled for preoperative risk factors and most importantly for the s

251 approach, including correction of modifiable preoperative risk factors and prompt treatment of POD.

252 e logistic regression identified independent preoperative risk factors associated with RF, used to de

253 However, data are limited on preoperative risk factors for malignancy (adenocarcinoma

254 National Surgery Quality Improvement Program preoperative risk factors, with elective surgery as the

255 surgical procedures every year, the current preoperative risk scores and guidelines do not adequatel

256 To assess the effect of preoperative risk stratification for phacoemulsification

257 There is currently no preoperative risk-assessment tool that allows physicians

258 and postoperative RT is comparable, but that preoperative RT comes with a more favorable toxicity pro

259 On multivariable analysis, preoperative sarcopenia was associated with CCI (P = 0.0

260 oretical elastic modulus correlated with the preoperative SI index (rho = -0.387, P = .007).

261 The mean preoperative SI index in the asymmetrical group was 2.06

262 ction, a pelvic PET/CT scan was acquired for preoperative SLN mapping.

263 Additionally, preoperative SPECT/CT (12 h after injection) and (99m)Tc

264 Preoperative SPECT/CT showed a high (99m)Tc-PSMA-I&S upt

265 Both groups were matched for age, preoperative spherical equivalent (SE), mean keratometry

266 lly significant in all cases compared to the preoperative status, especially after binocular implanta

267 not clear how best to screen for frailty in preoperative surgical populations.

268 estigated regional tissue characteristics of preoperative temporal lobe white matter tracts known to

269 formation that was not available on standard preoperative testing.

270 in a large cohort of patients who underwent preoperative therapy and pancreatectomy for pancreatic d

271 logic response occurs infrequently following preoperative therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinom

272 ancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who received preoperative therapy prior to pancreatectomy between 199

273 sected pancreatic cancer who did not receive preoperative therapy should be offered 6 months of adjuv

274 nstrated that a major pathologic response to preoperative therapy, defined histopathologically by the

275 incomplete (<45.0 Gy) doses of radiation as preoperative therapy.

276 ish this, we studied 186 cases of NSCLC with preoperative thin-slice CT scans.

277 Preoperative TIAs were 49.5 +/- 8.7, 48.3 +/- 9.6, and 4

278 The AL growth from preoperative to age 5 years.

279 rdiac troponin T increase of >/=14 ng/L from preoperative to postoperative measurements.

280 ated with new persistent opioid use included preoperative tobacco use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.3

281 Preoperative torsion ranged from 7 to 30 degrees excyclo

282 as an accessory to perfusion MR technique in preoperative tumor grading.

283 Patients will undergo a preoperative ultrasound and randomization will be strati

284 Of them, 125 patients had preoperative US, and 130 had preoperative MRI.

285 To assess the association of preoperative use of anti-TNF agents with adverse postope

286 fraction less than 30%, type of surgery, and preoperative use of beta-blockers, intra-aortic balloon

287 for all follow-up time points compared with preoperative values (P < .001) and compared in between f

288 A total of 12 preoperative variables were used with additional procedu

289 ve factors along with conventional ACS-NSQIP preoperative variables.

290 ic regression analysis after controlling for preoperative variables.

291 , -41.7; 95% CI, -33.1 to -50.2), and higher preoperative VAS preparedness (difference, 32.4; 95% CI,

292 In addition, VR led to lower preoperative VAS stress score (difference, -41.7; 95% CI

293 er long-term BSCVA was independent of better preoperative vision in DSAEK eyes.

294 unger patients (average, by 3 years), better preoperative visual acuity (22% vs. 32% with 0.4 logarit

295 0.001), there was not a correlation between preoperative visual acuity as a predictor of final posto

296 st all patients (95.8%, 46 of 48 eyes) had a preoperative visual acuity of 20/200 or worse.

297 rimary outcome measure was the change in the preoperative visual acuity score at postoperative month

298 nderwent a 1:1 randomization to an immersive preoperative VR experience or standard preoperative expe

299 resonance cholangiopancreatography, enabling preoperative VR exploration, and intraoperative augmente

300 All patients underwent a preoperative whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan at 1 h (st