1 Inhibition of
prepotent action is an important aspect of self-control,
2 specific effects in the ability to cancel a
prepotent action.
3 ial, so on these trials a "yes" response was
prepotent and had to be inhibited, by hypothesis.
4 ates, filtering distractors, and suppressing
prepotent,
and competitive responses.
5 ask in which successful performance required
prepotent behaviors to be inhibited.
6 ion may also enable some animals to overcome
prepotent biases, by allowing them to treat prepotent st
7 that this contributes to deficits inhibiting
prepotent but contextually inappropriate responses and t
8 spinobulbospinal mechanisms that may be the
prepotent contributors to central sensitization and deve
9 ts more vigorously approach their particular
prepotent CS and to energetically sniff and nibble it in
10 pressed approach, nibbles, and sniffs of the
prepotent CS.
11 The individually
prepotent cue is either a predictive CS+ that signals re
12 Only the
prepotent cue was enhanced as an incentive target, and a
13 veness of whichever reward CS was that rat's
prepotent cue.
14 s-induced activity which in turn disinhibits
prepotent motivated behaviors.
15 oms show greater susceptibility to acting on
prepotent motor impulses compared to TD patients.
16 mpulsivity and the proficiency of inhibiting
prepotent motor impulses.
17 Impaired inhibition of
prepotent motor response may represent an important risk
18 ge in fMRI signal after the withholding of a
prepotent motor response.
19 strongly biased toward stimuli that inhibit
prepotent or automatic responses.
20 orcement learning model that characterizes a
prepotent (
pavlovian) bias to withhold responding in the
21 Because behavioral inhibition is a
prepotent reaction to aversive outcomes, it has been a c
22 leading to diminished abilities to suppress
prepotent responding.
23 ognitive control task involving overcoming a
prepotent response tendency to examine the development o
24 The building up of a
prepotent response tendency was tested by manipulating t
25 Compared with a condition in which no
prepotent response was created, this condition yielded b
26 h the participant was unable to withhold the
prepotent response, this resynchronization occurred afte
27 stimuli which activate few or only a single '
prepotent'
response.
28 ween appropriate selection and inhibition of
prepotent responses in cognitive paradigms, but that a w
29 with deficits in using context to establish
prepotent responses in complex paradigms and failures to
30 The ability to inhibit
prepotent responses is critical for successful goal-dire
31 in complex paradigms and failures to inhibit
prepotent responses once established.
32 the rabbits learned primarily to omit their
prepotent responses to the spout on CS- trials.
33 rontal gyrus, often implicated in inhibiting
prepotent responses, connected more strongly with the st
34 and use this ability to control lower-level,
prepotent responses.
35 ation and the ability to control and inhibit
prepotent responses.
36 ve the larger one, and so had to inhibit the
prepotent selection of the larger quantity.
37 prepotent biases, by allowing them to treat
prepotent stimuli and responses more flexibly.
38 ff one of two reward-associated stimuli (its
prepotent stimulus).
39 sponse may reflect deficient modification of
prepotent stimulus-response mappings in response to erro
40 an with suppressing the neural impact of the
prepotent stimulus.
41 The inhibition of a
prepotent tendency to respond produced markedly greater
42 ter maze with procedures that deterred their
prepotent thigmotaxic response.
43 e retrieval of substitutes in the context of
prepotent,
unwanted memories.