ライフサイエンスコーパス: pressure difference

1 n porosity levels with the increase in argon pressure difference.

2 filtration than the plasma-to-lymph oncotic pressure difference.

3 an electrochemical potential and an osmotic pressure difference.

4 e driving force for water flux is an osmotic pressure difference.

5 nosis was defined as > or =15 mm Hg interarm pressure difference.

6 e pipette, was linearly proportional to this pressure difference.

7 mined by the ratio of the water flux and the pressure difference.

8 e and inertial components of the transmitral pressure difference.

9 han whites to have adequate control of blood pressure (difference, 4.4 percentage points; P<0.001) an

10 iliter [0.2 mmol per liter]), systolic blood pressure (difference, 5.1 mm Hg), and SCL-20 depression

11 sures before diabetes onset (diastolic blood pressure difference=5.6 mm Hg in women and 8.4 mm Hg in

12 free space, thereby maintaining the osmotic pressure difference across the cell membrane.

13 ion glaucoma (NTG) is caused by an increased pressure difference across the lamina cribrosa (LC) rela

14 e on the complementary system, a hydrostatic pressure difference across the membrane can be establish

15 on; 2), the enclosed volume or the effective pressure difference across the membrane thickness; and 3

16 molecular dynamics simulations a hydrostatic pressure difference across the membrane, from which pf c

17 that displaces the middle ear and induces a pressure difference across the membrane.

18 ults support our hypothesis that the oncotic pressure difference across the tumor microvascular wall

19 The pressure differences altering leading edge protrusion ra

20 sure equal to approximately half the osmotic pressure difference and an initial feed flow rate fracti

21 omponents that measure the driving capillary pressure difference and the relevant geometrical paramet

22 ater flux as a function of applied hydraulic pressure difference and the resulting power density in P

23 nt outcrops can be sustained in a setting of pressure differences and crustal properties as reported

24 nown to experience large forces from osmotic pressure differences and their local microenvironment, q

25 timates of arterial-to-end tidal CO2 partial pressure differences are reliable indicators of alveolar

26 By choosing an argon pressure difference (around 150 torr) suitable for this

27 2) s(-1) at 40 degrees C were measured using pressure difference as a driving force, while water flux

28 be inferred from calculations of the osmotic pressure differences associated with measured values of

29 nuation of water permeation when the osmotic pressure difference becomes equal to the applied hydraul

30 pre-capillary component" on the basis of the pressure difference between diastolic pulmonary artery p

31 reath and tidal stress as the transpulmonary pressure difference between end-inspiratory and end-expi

32 Though the concept of utilizing osmotic pressure difference between high and low salinity stream

33 In addition, a shell can support a pressure difference between its interior and its exterio

34 ssure across only the lung tissue (i.e., the pressure difference between the alveolar space and the p

35 ling bacterial cells to establish an osmotic pressure difference between the biofilm and the external

36 sseus junctions, presumably resulting from a pressure difference between the bone vasculature and the

37 in pressure, and hence the largest possible pressure difference between the H2 and D2 phases, which

38 sting machine, Hero et al. reported that the pressure difference between the melting chamber and the

39 The osmotic pressure difference between the mitochondrial intermembr

40 uding the intrapulmonary airways, (i.e., the pressure difference between the opening to the pulmonary

41 te, the phloem functioned with a high turgor pressure difference between the sugar sources and sinks

42 s thought to result in a maximization of the pressure difference between the SV and ST for BC stimuli

43 controlled trials was confounded by a blood pressure difference between treatments.

44 The maximum pressure difference between water in the lumen and gas i

45 erally in a surface layer, due to the strong pressure difference between zones illuminated by sunligh

46 product, uniform fluid properties, and zero pressure differences between inlets and outlets.

47 noporous alumina membrane, which can support pressure differences between the flow channels of over 6

48 Based upon blood pressure differences between the leg and arm during upri

49 Pooled blood pressure differences between treated and control groups

50 n stenosis, diagnosed by a brachial systolic pressure difference (BSPD) > or =15 mm Hg, is associated

51 ]max = 1.78+/-1.30 mm Hg) in the noninvasive pressure difference calculation significantly increased

52 Oncotic and hydrostatic pressure differences control the movement of fluid and l

53 to an abnormally high trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference, could result in barotraumatically i

54 an C(4) grasses were more sensitive to vapor pressure difference (D) at night and soil water potentia

55 Plots of the pressure difference (DeltaP) applied to plant roots vs.

56 llowed an accurate approximation of the peak pressure difference ([deltapc+I]max = 0.95 [delta(p)cath

57 subgroups according to whether the diastolic pressure difference (diastolic pulmonary artery pressure

58 e plateau pressure - positive end-expiratory pressure difference did not change (15 mm Hg [14-17] vs

59 We calculated LV tau, LA relaxation (a-x pressure difference divided by time, normalized by a pre

60 alculated LV tau, LA relaxation (a through x pressure difference divided by time, normalized by a pre

61 The diastolic pressure difference (DPD) is recommended to differentiat

62 nction such as the ejection intraventricular pressure difference (EIVPD) and the systolic strain rate

63 e this further, Lp and the effective oncotic pressure difference (f3DeltaPi) acting across the vessel

64 +/-11% to 1+/-5% and mean arm systolic blood pressure difference from 44+/-16 mm Hg to 3+/-3 mm Hg.

65 s analyzer without a barrier for maintaining pressure differences, high sensitivity in chemical analy

66 extent as did adjustments for systolic blood-pressure differences in Cox-regression analyses.

67 tial importance of regional intraparenchymal pressure differences in the clinical settings may be und

68 trimester body mass index and mean arterial pressure, differences in intima thickness and I/M remain

69 The translaminar pressure difference is projected to be higher during the

70 nder low pH conditions and low transmembrane pressure differences (<3 bar).

71 x and RV systolic through LA peak v (RVSP-v) pressure differences, LV ejection fraction, long-axis sh

72 timates of arterial-to-end tidal CO2 partial pressure differences may be used to predict alveolar dea

73 ssure alone, not the plasma-to-lymph oncotic pressure difference, modulates pulmonary transvascular f

74 The model also predicts a pressure difference of -0.036 +/- 0.004 atm (pressure hi

75 at in the posterior chamber, compared with a pressure difference of less than 0.1 mm Hg for accommoda

76 s the viral DNA into the procapsid against a pressure difference of up to 40 +/- 20 atm.

77 ary sodium intake, are associated with blood pressure differences of clinical and public health relev

78 s the viral DNA inside the procapsid against pressure differences of up to approximately 60 atm durin

79 side the tumor as well as diminished osmotic pressure differences, on the fluid flow across the tumor

80 ergetic terms for bending, surface area, and pressure difference, our free energy includes terms for

81 <.01), and arterial-to-end tidal CO2 partial pressure differences (p <.01).

82 ressure were associated with childhood pulse pressure (difference per additional average risk allele

83 Small hydrostatic pressure differences produced by removal of bathing flui

84 This pressure difference promotes biofilm expansion on nutrit

85 scL or the G22C mutant was opened by osmotic pressure difference; rates of release of calcein were ve

86 engineered salinity gradients), PRO osmotic pressure difference rises proportionally but not so for

87 ppler-derived peak ejection intraventricular pressure difference should be preferred for this purpose

88 s tested, the peak ejection intraventricular pressure difference showed the best correlation with Ema

89 Thus, the effective oncotic pressure difference (sigma black triangle down pi) oppos

90 This results in an osmotic pressure difference that dehydrates the bilayer aggregat

91 The movement of water by osmosis causes pressure differences that drive the transport of sugars

92 from each other by using a small hydrostatic pressure difference; this feature can be used to localiz

93 The trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD) was calculated as the differ

94 Trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD) was calculated using ICP and

95 Raising the argon pressure difference to 300 and 450 torr caused a signifi

96 ired for the diastolic left atrioventricular pressure difference to fall to half its initial value (h

97 In this paper the potential for global pressure differences to achieve such transport are consi

98 idopsis thaliana and its dependence on vapor pressure difference (VPD) and on water feed to the leaf.

99 ospheric vapor demand: the leaf-to-air vapor pressure difference (VPD).

100 Although no external pressure difference was applied, our experiments and mod

101 The instantaneous diastolic transmitral pressure difference was computed from the M-mode spatiot

102 nstrated that peak ejection intraventricular pressure difference was less sensitive to load, whereas

103 The circadian translaminar pressure difference was projected based on the ICP data

104 The translaminar pressure difference was projected to be 5.26 mm Hg highe

105 n the sugar sources and sinks but the turgor pressure difference was reduced if additional parallel c

106 were evacuated to 6 x 10(-2) torr; the argon pressure difference was then adjusted to either 50, 150,

107 5 variables plus proline, systolic/diastolic pressure differences were -2.7/-2.0 mm Hg (z scores -2.5

108 Blood pressure differences were attenuated but remained statis

109 festyle factors, black-white diastolic blood pressure differences were reduced substantially: 21% to

110 Blood pressure differences were similar whether breast-feeding

111 For these five buildings, the induced pressure differences were sufficient to control the flow

112 olumes and arterial-to-end tidal CO2 partial pressure differences were used as indicators of CO2 elim

113 reduction in upper- to lower-extremity blood pressure difference with sustained improvement to 2 year