ライフサイエンスコーパス: preventive care

1 antation; and improvements in supportive and preventive care.

2 may potentially improve risk assessment and preventive care.

3 provide critical knowledge for treatment and preventive care.

4 ors) and 4.3 +/- 1.8 deficits in recommended preventive care.

5 ons have historically been a part of regular preventive care.

6 c guideline-based recommendations to enhance preventive care.

7 children have asthma and receive suboptimal preventive care.

8 rage for young adults and improved access to preventive care.

9 care, adhere to medical regimens, and access preventive care.

10 tment was more likely to meet standards than preventive care.

11 ng the need for early diagnosis and diligent preventive care.

12 f pediatric care (P=0.001), but not of adult preventive care.

13 ntially leading to fragmented and inadequate preventive care.

14 linics on the cost, quality, and delivery of preventive care.

15 rse effect on quality of care or delivery of preventive care.

16 es can be used to quantify risk and to guide preventive care.

17 0.7% (95% CI, 38.1 to 43.4) of the indicated preventive care.

18 abetes mandates comprehensive and aggressive preventive care.

19 r 30 acute and chronic conditions as well as preventive care.

20 ategies are the most effective for promoting preventive care?

21 , 61.0%, and 62.6%) and patient's receipt of preventive care (14.5%, 14.2%, and 13.7%) (P > 0.05 vs.

22 exiting than those that remained in terms of preventive care (57.5% vs 60.4%; difference, 2.9% [95% C

23 oints [CI, 10 to 17 percentage points]), and preventive care (64% vs. 44%; difference, 20 percentage

24 in the same county having higher quality for preventive care, 71.1% for chronic disease management, 6

25 men preferred that their PCPs handle general preventive care (79%) and comorbidity care (84%), but a

26 ss of the diverse approaches used to promote preventive care activities, such as cancer screening and

27 serial measurements permits the efficacy of preventive care aiming either to arrest or to reverse th

28 2009) and post-ACA (2011) rates of receiving preventive care and (2) determine if post-ACA increases

29 d in clinical trials achieved better routine preventive care and cancer screening than the general po

30 ect (NSABP) protocol LTS-01 examines routine preventive care and cancer surveillance in long-term col

31 compare cohorts and determine predictors of preventive care and cancer surveillance.

32 Studies suggest that the VHA provides better preventive care and care for some chronic illnesses than

33 ans are needed to improve the quality of CVD preventive care and lower morbidity and mortality from C

34 This clearly indicates that preventive care and regular medical examinations are imp

35 93% were for dental checkups, 80.5% received preventive care, and 28.8% received dental/periodontal t

36 upporting well-being and healthy lifestyles, preventive care, and cardiovascular risk reduction in th

37 Improvements in health infrastructure, preventive care, and clinical treatments have reduced th

38 ograms, screening for other cancers, general preventive care, and comorbidity management.

39 s is critical to direct clinical management, preventive care, and family screening.

40 in older individuals for health behaviours, preventive care, and long-term survival.

41 for physicians, identifying patients needing preventive care, and providing physicians feedback about

42 HPV infection, social influences, irregular preventive care, and vaccine cost were also identified a

43 , increased numbers of outpatient visits for preventive care are associated with improved provision o

44 Efforts to ensure appropriate preventive care are needed.

45 Except for serum creatinine testing, preventive care associated with lower ASHD rates in the

46 evelops evidence-based recommendations about preventive care based on comprehensive systematic review

47 e-versus PCP-directed care-for their general preventive care (black odds ratio [OR], 2.01; 95% CI, 1.

48 We defined preventive care by the receipt of laboratory measurement

49 discussion of the effects of capitation, how preventive care can be cost effective, and the future pr

50 provision of high-quality care, particularly preventive care, can result in improved patient outcomes

51 eness Data Information Set measure rates for preventive care, chronic care, and acute care primary ca

52 construct 3 composite indicators of quality (preventive care, chronic disease care management, and ma

53 ive to other groups and infrequently receive preventive care directed at the greatest threats to thei

54 ied CKD and diabetes during year 1, assessed preventive care during year 2, and evaluated ASHD outcom

55 We examined physician visits and preventive care each year for 5 years, starting 366 days

56 Preventive care, family education, and support are essen

57 ne defect is crucial for rational treatment, preventive care, family screening, and, in some cases, t

58 Preventive care for adults with diabetes has improved su

59 loss, but little evidence supports biannual preventive care for all adults.

60 not routinely access primary care, including preventive care for heart disease.

61 tices and policymakers attempting to improve preventive care have little definitive information on wh

62 Mid-range issues address providing preventive care, identifying geriatric syndromes, and he

63 ice interventions can improve cardiovascular preventive care in developed countries by addressing ris

64 d reminders have not been proved to increase preventive care in inpatient settings.

65 thod for cost-effective health promotion and preventive care in older individuals, but the long-term

66 diology programme could improve standards of preventive care in routine clinical practice.

67 the basic assumptions of ARDS prevention and preventive care in the intensive care unit.

68 with closely examining the effectiveness of preventive care in the promotion of adolescent health.

69 6 of 40 necessary care indicators (including preventive care indicators), beneficiaries received the

70 behaviours and increased use of recommended preventive care interventions, but also improves surviva

71 Adherence to ADA recommendations for preventive care leads to better oral health, and consist

72 ved outcomes were demonstrated in studies of preventive care, management of osteoarthritis, cardiac r

73 Models of personalized preventive care may illustrate how magnitude and rank or

74 r on most measures and was worse for several preventive care measures.

75 obtaining needed care from a specialist, no preventive care, no developmental screening at a prevent

76 k of mortality through mental well-being and preventive care practice mechanisms.

77 Poor preventive care practices were unrelated to VI and to mo

78 fference among the proportion of recommended preventive care provided (54.9 percent), the proportion

79 a plan: 0.7-percentage point improvement in preventive care quality (95% CI, -4.9 to 6.3); 0.2-perce

80 previous research documenting differences in preventive care quality between cancer survivors and non

81 bivariate model to determine differences in preventive care rates by year; model 2, a multivariable

82 insurance coverage accounted for changes in preventive care rates.

83 We found 102 specific preventive care recommendations that encompassed eight d

84 otal of 10,065 hospitalizations), generating preventive care reminders as appropriate.

85 kely to report uncertainty regarding general preventive care responsibility (often/always: OR, 1.97;

86 ining, malpractice-driven test ordering, and preventive-care responsibility concerns may require cont

87 a retail store that provide simple acute and preventive care services for a fixed price without an ap

88 Urban EDs serve patients with poor access to preventive care services who have a high prevalence of H

89 Law and strong, community-based primary and preventive care services, these values have resulted in

90 emergency department, or home settings; for preventive care services; for office procedures requirin

91 ckages of community and primary curative and preventive care should be adapted to country contexts, a

92 These results suggest that aggressive preventive care should be focused on those patients with

93 Well-child preventive care strongly predicted immunization status,

94 ces but also may reduce the use of important preventive care such as mammography.

95 igh deductibles could lead patients to avoid preventive care, such as cancer screening.

96 Survivors were less likely to receive preventive care than screening controls but were more li

97 iculty accessing physicians and receive less preventive care than their able-bodied counterparts.

98 bles representing mental well-being and poor preventive care to examine multiple effect pathways of s

99 lthcare payers to offer consistent pretravel preventive care to travelers.

100 Primary outcomes were health behaviours and preventive care use at 2 y and all-cause mortality at 8

101 1 quality measures for diabetes, asthma, and preventive care; utilization of hospital, emergency depa

102 Receipt of preventive care varied more by whether patients were mor

103 we found that the guidelines for adolescent preventive care vary considerably.

104 Young men had nearly one half the preventive care visits compared with male adolescents or

105 Children with early preventive care visits from dentists were more likely to

106 rs or had wait times longer than 4 weeks for preventive care visits.

107 assignment, the impact of patient gender on preventive care was not significant except for less aspi

108 2 y, favourable health behaviours and use of preventive care were more frequent in the intervention t

109 Profiles of cardiovascular health and preventive care will be developed at the health region l