ライフサイエンスコーパス: proctocolectomy

1 with septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy.

2 with septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy.

3 nt of septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy.

4 flat mucosa are both strong indications for proctocolectomy.

5 D; 49% underwent LAR, 27% colectomy, and 14% proctocolectomy.

6 at this disease can develop many years after proctocolectomy.

7 long-term option in patients requiring total proctocolectomy.

8 ts with chronic ulcerative colitis requiring proctocolectomy.

9 isease (CD), and pouchitis after restorative proctocolectomy.

10 51 left-sided, 46 rectal resections, and 151 proctocolectomies.

11 Nine patients required proctocolectomy after liver transplantation; 5 because o

12 expectancy benefit (3.1 years compared with proctocolectomy and 0.3 years compared with subtotal col

13 ng patients who underwent colectomy or total proctocolectomy and experienced no significant increase

14 summary, the history and development of the proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has inv

15 tomy with end ileostomy, or a combined total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

16 complication of in patients with restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

17 Studies of patients after total proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch anastomosis suggest t

18 peration should be individualized, but total proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch should be strongly co

19 ow-up of 60 months (range, 5-170 months) had proctocolectomy and IPAA at Mayo Medical Center in Roche

20 surveillance to 15.6 years for prophylactic proctocolectomy at 25 years of age compared with no inte

21 Although prophylactic proctocolectomy can essentially eliminate the risk of ca

22 .02) but not among those in the colectomy or proctocolectomy cohorts.

23 rmine whether age at the time of restorative proctocolectomy correlates with physiologic changes.

24 Prophylactic proctocolectomy does not appear necessary, but annual su

25 s a durable operation for patients requiring proctocolectomy for CUC; functional and QoL outcomes are

26 indeterminate colitis patients who underwent proctocolectomy for dysplasia were retrospectively selec

27 98 females, 336 males) underwent restorative proctocolectomy for inflammatory bowel disease between 1

28 Restorative proctocolectomy for mucosal ulcerative colitis is well e

29 ts who had undergone a two-stage restorative proctocolectomy for mucosal ulcerative colitis were divi

30 Following APPEAR with restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, median Wexner co

31 Proctocolectomy had been performed before transplantatio

32 roximately 20 years during which restorative proctocolectomy has been performed for ulcerative coliti

33 s, undergoing minimally invasive restorative proctocolectomy in 1, 2, or 3 stages between January 201

34 d from 1,965 patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy in a single center between 1983 and 2001

35 Health-related quality of life (HRQL) after proctocolectomy is a critical parameter for management d

36 mosis is now the preferred option when total proctocolectomy is required for ulcerative colitis or fa

37 Restorative proctocolectomy is the elective surgical procedure of ch

38 complications within 3 months of restorative proctocolectomy or within 3 months of ileostomy closure.

39 Total proctocolectomy, or total colectomy and a 1-year interva

40 evere polyposis are frequently offered total proctocolectomy rather than colectomy and ileorectal ana

41 From 1984 to 2007, 348 proctocolectomy specimens with preoperative dysplasia sh

42 tients with a nondilated rectum, restorative proctocolectomy the most suitable in those with dilatati

43 nsiently somewhat impaired after restorative proctocolectomy, the impairment is not an age-related ph

44 Sixteen patients (44%) who underwent a total proctocolectomy (TPC) or subtotal colectomy (STC) had mu

45 elvic septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy were identified from a prospective datab

46 nt contrast medium-enhanced CT after a total proctocolectomy with an IPAA.

47 minal colectomy, 354 (14.3%) underwent total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, and 1172 (47.3%) rec

48 omy with ileal pouch/anal anastomosis, total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, and partial colectom

49 ectomy or total abdominal colectomy, a total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, or a combined total

50 Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA)

51 Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)

52 Although restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)

53 Over the past few years, restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has em

54 Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is con

55 Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is now

56 ents with ulcerative colitis (UC) undergoing proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

57 omy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA), total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch/anal anastomosis, total

58 Prophylactic surgical options were proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis and subtotal c

59 Proctocolectomy with ileostomy or ileal pouch-anal anast

60 ammatory bowel disease underwent restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA from 1984 to 2009 at the Cleve

61 The restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA has become the procedure of ch

62 Total proctocolectomy with IPAA is known to be associated with