ライフサイエンスコーパス: productivity

1 trustworthiness, professional competence, or productivity.

2 esert-steppes following a slight increase in productivity.

3 s and contribute approximately 20% to global productivity.

4 al warming-driven reductions in agricultural productivity.

5 mg/L of limonene, a 2.3-fold improvement in productivity.

6 ors for understanding variation in ecosystem productivity.

7 nd sink organs are main determinants of rice productivity.

8 wing elevation responses to changes in plant productivity.

9 by increasing both NIH funding and scholarly productivity.

10 ertilizer are applied to ensure maximum crop productivity.

11 requirements have negatively affected their productivity.

12 resulting in protein systems with increased productivity.

13 operiod requirements restricting its use and productivity.

14 lly sourced high-energy compounds to sustain productivity.

15 ven by the negative effects of asynchrony on productivity.

16 cibility of the materials and their methanol productivity.

17 w glandular trichomes achieve high metabolic productivity.

18 rongly influences biodiversity and ecosystem productivity.

19 t chloroplasts could increase photosynthetic productivity.

20 tress causing growth retardation and loss in productivity.

21 ed available soil nitrogen, resulting in low productivity.

22 s a major limitation to root growth and crop productivity.

23 anslated to crops for increased agricultural productivity.

24 he spiked and incurred residues with similar productivity.

25 as it helps to maintain high levels of water productivity.

26 ous effects on photosynthetic efficiency and productivity.

27 r factor limiting plant development and crop productivity.

28 ng that transcript levels influence specific productivity.

29 mporal variation in recruitment and breeding productivity.

30 with further implications for photosynthetic productivity.

31 nt negative growth regulation limiting plant productivity.

32 and hundreds of billions of dollars in lost productivity.

33 ays beyond its recognized effects on primary productivity.

34 on in surface ocean settings where it limits productivity.

35 ypass such negative effects and improve crop productivity.

36 hology is critical to improving agricultural productivity.

37 logy, and related asynchrony to annual avian productivity.

38 also influence climate change and agronomic productivity.

39 d be predicted based on Na, N or net primary productivity.

40 is sufficient to improve plant nutrition and productivity.

41 een the growing season length and vegetation productivity.

42 growth-enhanced channel catfish and increase productivity.

43 ding plant energy storage and improving crop productivity.

44 with negative effects on quality of life and productivity.

45 ther fire-driven nutrient losses limit plant productivity.

46 lectron transport processes to increase crop productivity.

47 ir populations are an indicator of microbial productivity [14].

48 lation and community biomass [2-6], reducing productivity [7-10] and life-history diversity in traits

49 s positively correlated with annual breeding productivity, a sensitivity analysis revealed that popul

50 Gross primary productivity, above-ground biomass and tree cover align

51 ry to optimize photosynthetic efficiency and productivity according to long-term changes in the light

52 ar increases in cataract surgical volume and productivity across diverse settings in three distinct g

53 ll contribute to maintaining a high level of productivity across many Central European mountain fores

54 residence time is the primary driver in the productivity-allocation-turnover chain for the observed

55 ble POS production with 22.0g/L/h volumetric productivity and 4.5g/g POS/monosaccharides was achieved

56 ared with EQ-5D (EuroQuol) and WPAI-AS (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in allergy) in 1288

57 ria and angioedema symptoms, HRQoL, and work productivity and activity impairment were collected from

58 Microbial interactions influence the productivity and biogeochemistry of the ocean, yet they

59 ecological droughts, which drive vegetation productivity and composition, remain poorly understood i

60 rs and material elemental composition on the productivity and Cu speciation during the key process st

61 ications are still sometimes hampered by low productivity and difficulties in scaling up.

62 ress below the water table; in between, high productivity and drought can send roots many meters down

63 Intraspecific richness increased plant root productivity and ECM root tips but decreased hyphal leng

64 Overall productivity and environmental efficacy depended on the

65 using a new index accounting for both their productivity and feasibility.

66 mensional process on hospital and individual productivity and financial sustainability after 4 years.

67 and nutrient condition, and can affect local productivity and food web composition.

68 are extensively used to predict agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions.

69 isturbance may help to account for the lower productivity and higher accumulation of biomass in nutri

70 ations for nutrient and carbon cycling, land productivity and in turn, worldwide socio-economic condi

71 hanges consistent with increased terrestrial productivity and intensified weathering by the first lan

72 t of liver fluke infection on UK beef cattle productivity and investigating the use of diagnostic tes

73 loss and mortality, likely due to the higher productivity and leaf area and reduced water-use efficie

74 ess-based model ensembles to predict jointly productivity and N2 O emissions at field scale is discus

75 orters are effective targets to improve crop productivity and nitrogen use efficiency.

76 but significant effects on plant and fungal productivity and nutrient retention, but no effect on CO

77 The goal of increasing crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency is being addres

78 t of diatom blooms, thus impacting ecosystem productivity and ocean-atmosphere climate dynamics.

79 cycle has consistently modulated biospheric productivity and ocean-atmosphere oxygen levels over tim

80 Pre-gelatinization may improve fish productivity and offer greater flexibility during aquafe

81 tion, warming, and elevated CO2 ] on primary productivity and on the biogeochemistry of carbon (C), N

82 hecked, algae can cause declines in seagrass productivity and persistence through shading and competi

83 The extent, productivity and preservation of mangroves are controlle

84 s on VIs used to monitor canopy dynamics and productivity and proposes a new approach to predicting a

85 d a novel strategy to simultaneously improve productivity and quality of oils from industrial microal

86 social care use, as well as the loss of both productivity and quality-adjusted life-years.

87 will enhance efforts to improve oilseed rape productivity and quality.

88 apparent contrast, other studies report high productivity and reproduction in some range edge populat

89 ought to mediate ecosystem functions such as productivity and robustness, but the mechanisms underlyi

90 conditions, being influenced by both oceanic productivity and sea surface temperature.

91 in leaves, and this is predicted to decrease productivity and seed yield 8% and 10%, respectively.

92 re are compensatory opportunities to enhance productivity and SOC storage in degraded lands through i

93 tional diversity from space can help predict productivity and stability of forest ecosystems at globa

94 ted that biodiversity loss reduces ecosystem productivity and stability.

95 se forests is a poor proxy for their overall productivity and that (v) residence time is the primary

96 tmental prestige predicts overall individual productivity and the timing of the transition from first

97 h in advancing extraction methods to enhance productivity and to meet the demands of the consumer was

98 ility and climatic stability hypotheses, but productivity and topographic complexity were rejected as

99 cost of epidemic years, and that account for productivity and tourism losses, are scarce.

100 substrate concentration) was investigated on productivity and yield.

101 (community cover and belowground net primary productivity) and soil microbial activities in the middl

102 s within the network also affect the growth, productivity, and abundances of those individuals that p

103 dark CO2 fixation, malate accumulation, CAM productivity, and core circadian clock robustness.

104 mperatures affect plant growth, development, productivity, and ecological distribution.

105 opment Goals, in terms of health, wellbeing, productivity, and equity in current and future generatio

106 lations between soil fertility, agricultural productivity, and human settlement patterns influence pe

107 endangers the survival of organisms and crop productivity, and increases environmental deterioration(

108 ch are well recognized to influence ungulate productivity, and provided a basis for comparing the rel

109 th profound effects on quality of life, work productivity, and school performance.

110 considerable waste of government investment, productivity, and scientific innovation.

111 of soil moisture, soil temperature, primary productivity, and soil carbon estimates with observation

112 sical health, academic achievement, lifetime productivity, and the probability of interfacing with th

113 n is observed with regard to blurred vision, productivity, and visits to eye care practitioners in mi

114 m processes, such as aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), are increasingly being modeled as a

115 Although centralization and productivity are inversely related, no clear relationshi

116 declining Arctic sea ice on local ecosystem productivity are not well understood but have been shown

117 hresholds and postdrought recovery of forest productivity are not yet predictable.

118 Soil biodiversity, fertility and plant productivity are strongly positively related in surface

119 However, associated impacts on fisheries productivity are unclear and could weaken the food secur

120 tween soil biodiversity, fertility and plant productivity are universal.

121 and harvest microalgae without affecting the productivity as compared to that in traditional culture

122 trategy to produce crop plants with improved productivity as well as N use efficiency in a range of N

123 ed to achieve accurate predictions of forest productivity, as trait variation driven by species turno

124 rted greater reductions in work and non-work productivity, as well as greater need for visits to opht

125 health for detailed, precise information on productivity, as well as physiology and well-being.

126 food webs, fertility and above-ground plant productivity at 289 sites and two soil depths, that is 0

127 estriction of N supply for increased primary productivity at higher latitudes.

128 very of nutrients with implications on ocean productivity at peak glacial conditions.

129 lly be used to estimate spatial variation in productivity at the landscape scale.

130 pact of heat stress and increase global food productivity, benefiting from [CO2] rich environments.

131 al pump when compared with the denser summer productivity blooms.

132 in proportion to increases in leaf area and productivity but precipitation was still adequate, based

133 In summer all four species presented higher productivity, but also higher sensitivity to lose coral

134 y associated with increases in socioeconomic productivity, but it also creates strong inequalities.

135 define the most extreme transition in ocean productivity, but little is known about nutrient limitat

136 are known to have powerful effects on plant productivity, but the consequences of these shifts for t

137 d with long-read DNA sequencing, we optimize productivity by 50-fold to produce bioactive yields that

138 species, it may also increase total fishery productivity by removing predatory fish.

139 Limitation of plant productivity by the low partial pressure of atmospheric

140 ased the reduction in ecosystem functioning (productivity) by atrazine for both traits.

141 We conclude that an increase in productivity can be expected for a large majority of the

142 In situ hydrothermal-based productivity combined with sinking photosynthetic organi

143 e range of mechanisms in sea ice/terrestrial productivity coupling, allowing the generation of testab

144 arge-scale components of sea ice/terrestrial productivity coupling.

145 Long-term population, but not productivity, declines were greatest among those species

146 ns after accounting for population dynamics (productivity, density dependence, and typical stochastic

147 reflect co-variability of sea ice and tundra productivity due to a common forcing, such as large-scal

148 ems, diffuse light can enhance plant primary productivity due to deeper penetration into and greater

149 tive to our ability to increase agricultural productivity (e.g., by enhancing the processing and turn

150 Under elevated productivity, ECM trees enhanced decomposition more than

151 uctivity is most important in large and high-productivity ecosystems (negative relationship).

152 e is the most important driver of FCL in low-productivity ecosystems (positive relationship) while pr

153 oncentration and high-resolution terrestrial productivity estimates (Normalised Difference Vegetation

154 ed life-years and US$3.5 billion of economic productivity every year, which is comparable to recent a

155 This glycosylation event enhanced viral productivity, exacerbated the host response, and thereby

156 coli is required to improve laboratory-scale productivity for further drug delivery applications.

157 Our bioconversion system suggests very high productivity for itaconate production.

158 ween central carbon metabolism and metabolic productivity for secondary metabolites in glandular tric

159 yme L, EMR provided a 3-5x higher volumetric productivity for the smallest POS.

160 stage 1 down to 4% on average) and grassland productivity (from 44% to 27%) and to a lesser and more

161 cross a dynamic redox boundary, with primary productivity fuelled by chemoautotrophic production and

162 Gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) in tropical forests varies both with

163 AND ), resulting from changing gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (ER), remai

164 ates of canopy conductance and gross primary productivity (GPP) derived from EC data to calculate a m

165 Annual gross primary productivity (GPP) varies considerably due to climate-in

166 ecosystem respiration (Reco ), gross primary productivity (GPP), and net summer CO2 storage (NEE).

167 (COS) is a potential tracer of gross primary productivity (GPP), assuming a unidirectional COS flux i

168 tal wetlands had higher annual gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (Re ), and net

169 epresented the annual cycle of gross primary productivity (GPP), of photosynthetic capacity (Pc), and

170 ture and water availability on gross primary productivity (GPP), terrestrial ecosystem respiration (T

171 Remarkable productivity has been achieved in crop species through a

172 Our results show that productivity has significant effects on population densi

173 le radiation (PAR), but the effects on ocean productivity have received little consideration aside fr

174 The nitrogen limitation and habitat productivity hypotheses use the same logic to predict mo

175 ontrast, the nitrogen limitation and habitat productivity hypotheses, which predict more animal consu

176 reported >/=1 hour per week of missed work; productivity impairment was 27%.

177 contribute approximately 15% of the primary productivity in coastal marine ecosystems, fix up to 27.

178 light conditions can reduce carbon gain and productivity in field crops because photosynthetic respo

179 Analyzing phenotypic patterns may increase productivity in genetic screens, and facilitate the stud

180 t this N-linked glycosylation enhanced viral productivity in infected mammalian cells and induced str

181 ar cases of negative epistasis could improve productivity in many agricultural organisms.

182 Efficiency and productivity in many of these applications depends on th

183 or monitoring and understanding agricultural productivity in many regions of the world.

184 water availability as a driver of ecosystem productivity in mesic temperate forests is not adequatel

185 via FveGA20ox4 provides a path for improving productivity in strawberry by controlling the trade-off

186 g demand for N, the element limiting primary productivity in temperate forests, which could be reduci

187 the agricultural industry to improve animal productivity in the future.

188 the 21st century, was favorable for fishery productivity in the HCS.

189 increased over the study due to higher plant productivity in the increasingly warm summers.

190 rient phosphorus is thought to limit primary productivity in the oceans on geological timescales.

191 Results indicate reduced productivity in the Subarctic Northwest Atlantic associa

192 in northern regions (e.g., a 21% increase in productivity in the US and Canada) and large declines in

193 s important in affecting upper trophic-level productivity in these marine ecosystems.

194 ient global predictions of picophytoplankton productivity including inhibition.

195 n the effects of other well-known drivers of productivity, including climate and nutrient availabilit

196 nd LFGTE fourth on all four soil-quality and productivity indicators.

197 oil models with consistent climate and plant productivity inputs.

198 Increasing phytoplankton productivity is expected to fundamentally alter marine e

199 The area-specific productivity is found to be 33362 liters per hectare per

200 rmining the degree to which population-level productivity is habitat limited rather than regulated by

201 land consolidation in improving agricultural productivity is low, which lies in contrast to optimisti

202 ity ecosystems (positive relationship) while productivity is most important in large and high-product

203 be linked with breeding performance: colony productivity is negatively associated with wintering lat

204 d, no clear relationship between density and productivity is observed.

205 Tropical forest productivity is sustained by the cycling of nutrients th

206 ology, adjusting for experience and research productivity, is lacking.

207 ling, leading to significant reliability and productivity issues such as low cell viability, product

208 -)NAO(-) phases as being critical for forest productivity, likely due to decreased winter water balan

209 Reduced productivity limited fresh plant resources supplied to m

210 an affect ecosystem functioning by enhancing productivity, litter decomposition and resistance to nat

211 Costs primarily focused on productivity loss, missed work, out-of-pocket treatment

212 diseases are a major cause of morbidity, and productivity losses in both human and animal populations

213 the magnitude and dynamics of ocean primary productivity, making it an integral component of the oce

214 This could alter productivity, marine food webs and carbon sequestration

215 s in the hopes that changes in abundance and productivity may be useful for adaptive management of ma

216 this study we develop the Agricultural Water Productivity Model for Shallow Groundwater (AWPM-SG) for

217 In contrast, most other productivity models either ignore inhibition or only inc

218 Thus, diversity increases productivity more than reported in previous studies that

219 ic transport model prescribed with net biome productivity (NBP) from an ensemble of nine terrestrial

220 a 27% coefficient of variation in net biome productivity (NBP).

221 osystem respiration (Re ), and net ecosystem productivity (NEP) than inland wetlands.

222 Net Primary Productivity (NPP) is one of the most important paramete

223 We compared the sensitivity of net primary productivity (NPP) to temperature, precipitation, and CO

224 nction of lake area, terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP), and precipitation (r(2) = .56), and

225 onomic analyses for predicting the potential productivities of large-scale commercial facilities.

226 ns was associated with increased annual lost productivity of $9,099 (95% CI, $7,224 to $10,973) per s

227 The best engineered strain achieved a productivity of 1.2 g/L/h and a process yield of 0.27 g-

228 o account yields a terrestrial gross primary productivity of 120 +/- 30 PgC year(-1) and soil invasio

229 factors, with 64.0% conversion in 19 h and a productivity of 2.19 g/L/h.

230 degrees C, 600 psig ethylene over 4 h with a productivity of 560 kg copolymer/g Ni.

231 ments should be chosen so as to maximize the productivity of a model metabolic pathway.

232 ttle to combine the yak's hardiness with the productivity of cattle.

233 distributions, as well as the diversity and productivity of communities.

234 duction continues, knock-on effects upon the productivity of fisheries are to be expected unless thes

235 adaptation within gradients, despite greater productivity of high-altitude than low-altitude populati

236 ion species known to influence diversity and productivity of intertidal habitats, over the past 40 ye

237 to the limitations associated with cost and productivity of mAbs, there has been a surge in the deve

238 se a nonlinear decrease in seagrass biomass, productivity of our model seagrass-the eelgrass (Zostera

239 ivalves, inorganic nitrogen cycling, primary productivity of sediment dwelling microphytobenthos, and

240 CO2 from the atmosphere while enhancing crop productivity of summer maize in the North China Plain.

241 but may also carry traits that increase the productivity of the plant.

242 estoration practitioners' assessments of the productivity of their collaborations to inform network t

243 cell phone data to assess the impact on work productivity of uncontrolled rhinitis assessed by visual

244 ynamics (growth, mortality, aboveground wood productivity) of nutrient-poor tropical forests.

245 e globe flux greater energy than net primary productivity on a per area basis.

246 potheses, which predict a positive effect of productivity on FCL, and may help reconcile the contradi

247 ay accounts for approximately 25% of primary productivity on the planet despite being used by only 3%

248 tions in the per capita growth rate affected productivity only shortly following changes in environme

249 ave reported both increases and decreases in productivity over the past few decades.

250 Sixty years of studies on career productivity patterns in a variety of fields suggest an

251 ged N rate, grain yield and N partial factor productivity (PFPN) of the farmers were 336.7 kg ha(-1),

252 ignificant influence upon soil fertility and productivity - processes largely controlled by microbial

253 ace-to-place, with large increases in annual productivity projected in northern regions (e.g., a 21%

254 duction throughout the Holocene using (paleo)productivity proxies in lacustrine sediments to reconstr

255 fects of variation in weather and climate on productivity, recruitment, and patterns of long-distance

256 an annually resolved record of Labrador Sea productivity related to sea-ice variability in Labrador,

257 Sensitivity (i.e., productivity response standardized by the amount of prec

258 erall relationships between the magnitude of productivity responses and the magnitude of precipitatio

259 functionality by regulating plant and fungal productivity, soil CO2 efflux and nutrient retention.

260 core the potential for a reduction in boreal productivity stemming from increases in midsummer evapor

261 e explained by satellite-derived net primary productivity, suggesting that widely available remote se

262 on in spring polar bear fasting and food web productivity suggests that polar bears may be a useful i

263 odeled accurately using just surface primary productivity, temperature, and wind stress.

264 suggest an intuitive and universal pattern: Productivity tends to rise rapidly to an early peak and

265 To achieve clinical productivity, the chemical architecture of the oligonucl

266 Rather than a gradual linear decline in productivity, there is some limited but nonconclusive ev

267 rrelations in the monoculture yield affected productivity throughout exposure.

268 ons of open marine water and active biologic productivity throughout one of the harshest glaciations

269 alyzing the structures of individual faculty productivity time series, constructed from over 200,000

270 was found to significantly increase biomass productivity to 10.7 +/- 0.2 g AFDW.m(-2).d(-1) (p < 0.0

271 er variants for genes regulating three major productivity traits in tomato: fruit size, inflorescence

272 is diversity, we introduce a simple model of productivity trajectories and explore correlations betwe

273 (6.2)) across ranges in DOC (40-500 muM) and productivities (ultraoligotrophic to hypereutrophic) typ

274 Although this crop displays high productivity under drought and poor soil conditions, it

275 has provided promise regarding its sustained productivity under future warming scenarios.

276 improve stress tolerance and enhance cereal productivity under suboptimal field conditions.

277 Furthermore, marine productivity was found to be an important but indirect f

278 re greatest among those species whose annual productivity was most greatly reduced by asynchrony.

279 t, the effect of diversity on measured plant productivity was much higher in the absence of fungi and

280 increased from 10 of 20 mL/min, the alcohol productivity was not improved and the labeling rate ( 0.

281 ar degree of negative soil feedback on plant productivity was observed in soil conditioned by sibling

282 r springs, birds were more asynchronous, but productivity was only marginally reduced; long-distance

283 The yield per unit water consumed (water productivity) was nearly constant for 2.3 kg/m(3).

284 ated design and management, increasing water productivity, wastewater-based epidemiology and on-site

285 Through a systematic assessment of forest productivity we demonstrate the importance of directly m

286 Effects of biodiversity indicators on productivity were comparable in size to effects of other

287 Incremental use, expenditures, and lost productivity were evaluated with multivariable regressio

288 justed differences in promotion and research productivity were present, which suggests that female ra

289 ntially resulting from increased net primary productivity, were seemingly driven by drier conditions

290 e global carbon cycle given their mean lower productivity when compared with other biomes (Ahlstrom e

291 instead linked to environments with variable productivity, where helpers at the nest can buffer repro

292 iodiversity-fertility and/or fertility-plant productivity, which can negatively impact nutrient cycli

293 olated organs: the greatest increase in crop productivity will be achieved if both source and sink me

294 Finally (iv) work productivity will be examined in adults.

295 One critical challenge is to understand how productivity will change within the next decades.

296 t aboveground biomass growth and net primary productivity will increase by 10%-40% in many parts of t

297 anic phosphorus (Po) largely drive ecosystem productivity with increasing development of natural soil

298 ing mental illness and a major cause of lost productivity worldwide.

299 Evidence is reviewed that productivity would have been uniformly lower and less CO

300 lots with remotely sensed indices of primary productivity (years 2000-2015).