ライフサイエンスコーパス: proficiency test

1 l spiked with nine quinolones as sample in a proficiency test.

2 terials within the participation in European proficiency tests.

3 Evaluation Program for General Bacteriology proficiency testing.

4 comparison study was also conducted using a proficiency test and retrospective neonatal DBS that dem

5 fields is weakened by evidence of errors in proficiency testing and in actual cases.

6 These reference reagents will facilitate proficiency testing and other validation efforts aimed a

7 he method was applied in real samples and in proficiency tests and proved to be adequate for routine

8 tringent laboratory accreditation standards, proficiency testing, and competency assessment.

9 al Laboratory Improvement Amendments, office proficiency testing, and office testing for streptococca

10 test validation, quality control procedures, proficiency testing, and reference materials.

11 studies be conducted to validate laboratory proficiency testing as an important step in the preventi

12 A proficiency test by dental professionals using a standar

13 The proficiency testing challenge also included a request fo

14 Panels for proficiency testing consisted of coded replicate samples

15 ates to those obtained in a covert (blinded) proficiency testing (CPT) program.

16 The laboratory proficiency test (FAPAS, 2014) shows satisfactory (|z|<2

17 pplicability was tested by analyses of three proficiency tests for systematic toxicological analysis

18 of DBSs for genotyping assay validation and proficiency testing in selected laboratories in the Worl

19 of samples in the second and third official proficiency tests (International Round-Robins) for the P

20 s established by blind analysis of certified proficiency testing materials prepared in synthetic urin

21 In addition, proficiency testing monitors the performance of the meth

22 Standardization and proficiency testing of diagnostic laboratories performin

23 e test results suggests a positive impact of proficiency testing on the testing performance of the pa

24 Changes over the last decade in overt proficiency testing (OPT) regulations have been ostensib

25 ies vs research laboratory, participation in proficiency testing (P<.001), and Clinical Laboratory Im

26 ories, and a continuous training program and proficiency testing participation may translate into lab

27 Proficiency testing performance of Turkish accredited la

28 present study was to develop and evaluate a proficiency testing program (PTP) for the antifungal sus

29 laboratories participating in the Wisconsin Proficiency Testing Program could not accurately identif

30 tories were recruited by the Wisconsin State Proficiency Testing program through the Association of P

31 y was performed using data from the ASHI-CAP proficiency testing program.

32 Ten blind DBS proficiency test (PT) specimens and 100 known HIV-positi

33 Between 2010 and 2012, DTS proficiency testing (PT) panels consisting of 5 specimen

34 indicators specified in the legislation are proficiency testing (PT) performance and periodic inspec

35 A BED-specific proficiency testing (PT) program was initiated in 2006 t

36 American Pathologists (CAP) 2009 viral load proficiency testing (PT) survey (VLS) were examined.

37 us surrogate for specific assay training and proficiency test purposes.

38 laboratory that meets the accreditation and proficiency testing requirements set out by this documen

39 Proficiency tests run by FAPAS for vitamin A analysis in

40 es of disease agents for use as training and proficiency test samples.

41 This study was a part of Proficiency Testing scheme conducted by National Metrolo

42 The aim of the proficiency testing scheme was to evaluate the performan

43 itical steps, available reference materials, proficiency testing schemes, other analytical methods an

44 alidation data or inter-laboratory data from Proficiency Testing schemes.

45 gents, and consumables; and participation in proficiency-testing schemes.

46 AATs in the marketplace, and based on recent proficiency test surveys, they have become the predomina

47 sults from 554 laboratories participating in proficiency testing surveys for quantitative PCR assays

48 The method was also submitted to proficiency testing; uncertainty was calculated; and the

49 oup had a 0% pass rate at the 30-day initial proficiency test, while students in the experimental gro

50 The results of a proficiency test with 42 blinded samples are presented d

51 Inter-laboratory precision was performed by proficiency testing, |z| 2 was considered satisfactory.