ライフサイエンスコーパス: projectile

1 e 1 vary considerably with the nature of the projectile.

2 n innocent chest blow by a baseball or other projectile.

3 model representing the forearm and hand plus projectile.

4 rate comparable to the frequently used O2(+) projectiles.

5 , enabled foragers to hunt effectively using projectiles.

6 e projectiles is produced by the C20 and C60 projectiles.

7 ness) were tested for impact resistance to 5 projectiles (air gun pellets, golf balls, tennis balls,

8 For these projectiles, all of the incident energy is deposited in

9 0(4) K) reached on impact, which atomize the projectile and break all chemical bonds.

10 a function of number of atoms in the primary projectile and energy.

11 ccurring between molecular N2 (+) and O2 (+) projectiles and surface-adsorbed D atoms in two steps: f

12 Full simulations are performed for 5 keV projectiles, and the yields are calculated.

13 Molecular projectiles are generally less reactive, may dissociate

14 of the Late Eocene and Cretaceous/Paleogene projectiles are within 50% of independent estimates deri

15 impacts by combined, and poorly consolidated projectiles, as well as for the development of binary as

16 ify the nonredundant components required for projectile assembly.

17 istent with the impact of a large chondritic projectile at the Bolling-Allerod/Younger Dryas transiti

18 from ultrathin films by (CsI)nCs+ (n = 0-2) projectiles at the limit of single-ion impacts.

19 The increase in yield per projectile atom was linear for the emission of intact TD

20 ment of a novel nanomaterial with a suite of projectiles: Au1+, Au3+, Au9+, and Au400(4+).

21 The largest projectile, Au400(4+), has a diameter of approximately 2

22 ve been performed to model 5-keV C60 and Au3 projectile bombardment of an amorphous water substrate.

23 ossible to remove the damage induced by such projectiles by subsequent cluster bombardment.

24 lanetesimal populations dominated by massive projectiles can explain these additions, with our inferr

25 ations in order to investigate the effect of projectile cluster size and incident energy on the resul

26 halose yield and low damage depth of the C60 projectile combine to prevent damage accumulation.

27 the intact ion and the fragment ion with the projectile complexity and energy.

28 ring and secondary ion mass spectrometry use projectiles consisting of several hundreds of atoms, acc

29 he main assumptions required to estimate the projectile diameter.

30 ver, some instances exist where an energetic projectile directly reacts with an adsorbate in a single

31 ose expected to be encountered from the test projectiles during their routine use.

32 d crescentic and trapezoidal tools, probably projectile elements, made on cherts and obsidian, some b

33 ponse from sample volumes too small for full projectile energy deposition.

34 the damage accumulation are when most of the projectile energy is deposited in the near-surface regio

35 olecules, we are able to investigate how the projectile energy is partitioned into changes in potenti

36 ear-surface region, which is optimal for the projectile energy to contribute to the ejection yield.

37 reversal produced a longer throw and greater projectile energy, and deactivation of the muscles resul

38 ivation of the muscles resulted in increased projectile energy.

39 Of the projectiles examined in this study, the 20 keV (CsI)Cs+

40 nstrated resistance to impact for all tested projectiles exceeding the impact potential expected duri

41 rmophila, the resulting crystals function as projectiles, expanding upon exocytosis.

42 Experiments conclusively show that the projectile F atom ends up in the fast molecular product

43 act a copper isotope from a large mixture of projectile fragmentation products in an aqueous medium.

44 keV cluster bombardment of a range of carbon projectiles from C6H6 to C180 is studied by a coarse-gra

45 ) can be targeted with DNA-coated gold micro-projectiles ("Gene Gun") to induce potent cellular and h

46 examined in this study, the 20 keV (CsI)Cs+ projectile generated negative-ion mass spectra that best

47 The projectile hypothesis also explains the fragmentation of

48 th process and use an advanced laser-induced projectile impact testing apparatus to selectively launc

49 Here, by using a laser-induced projectile impact testing technique, we discover a defor

50 e counting allowed the atomic and polyatomic projectile impacts on a particular sample surface to be

51 ed by the kiloelectronvolt energy polyatomic projectile impacts on NaNO2 were NO2- and Na(NO2)2-.

52 gaelectronvolt energy 252Cf fission fragment projectile impacts on NaNO3 and NaNO2 were collected and

53 sion from the nanovolume perturbed by single projectile impacts.

54 ain information from SIs emitted from single-projectile impacts.

55 protect property by absorbing the energy of projectiles, impacts, and crashes.

56 a first-time gunshot injury with a retained projectile in 2000-2002.

57 Surviving fragments of projectiles in the lunar regolith provide a direct measu

58 by electronic excitations in a model of a Ni projectile interacting with a Ni target, a metallic syst

59 The highest yield for the projectiles is produced by the C20 and C60 projectiles.

60 formation could not be achieved using atomic projectiles, it is possible to remove the damage induced

61 to achieve maximum range, as well as maximum projectile kinetic energy for a variety of projectile ma

62 een subjected to impact from a high-velocity projectile launched from a powder gun.

63 able chest barriers, including 7 in whom the projectile made direct contact with protective padding (

64 rved Hungaria asteroids, we find that E-belt projectiles made about ten lunar basins between 3.7 and

65 m projectile kinetic energy for a variety of projectile masses.

66 unsteady penetration response: an impacting projectile may erode on the surface of a ceramic target

67 heir assumptions on the fate of an impacting projectile may need to be reassessed, however, because o

68 solid on the rear surface; that most of the projectile melted; and that little, if any, vaporized.

69 e bond between reactive SAM surfaces and the projectile molecule.

70 Here we show (using simulations of projectile motions resulting from human throwing) that 8

71 objects were bombarded with kiloelectronvolt projectiles of atomic to nanoparticle size (Au400(4+)).

72 Using 18 keV Ga+ as a projectile, oligomer abundances are low relative to the

73 ide variety of tools and the possible use of projectile or thrusting spears.

74 attachment, whereby the particles behave as projectiles penetrating the oil droplets to depths varyi

75 The tip of a projectile point made of mastodon bone is embedded in a

76 d 11,200 years ago, contain numerous stemmed projectile points and crescents associated with a variet

77 Western Stemmed projectile points were recovered in deposits dated to 11

78 chert cobbles, worked them into bifaces and projectile points, and discarded thousands of marine she

79 Thus, osseous projectile points, common to the Beringian Upper Paleoli

80 bove sea level (masl)] includes two fishtail projectile points, which date to about 12.8 to 11.5 thou

81 Activities involving projectiles pose the greatest risk for visual impairment

82 In addition, the fission fragment projectile produced relative negative SI intensity distr

83 The fission fragment projectiles produced SI spectra from NaNO3 that were dom

84 nce can be increased by using the polyatomic projectile ReO4- (approximately 5 keV).

85 We find that the fraction of a projectile's angular momentum that is retained by a targ

86 rize a mass of target rock comparable to the projectile's mass.

87 of a chondritic meteorite are indicative of projectile size, if the soluble fraction of osmium carri

88 Massive Au projectiles, specifically 136 keV Au(400)(4+), were util

89 dest, nonpenetrating chest blows produced by projectiles (such as baseballs) or bodily contact in the

90 om ice films using a variety of energies and projectiles suggests this approach may greatly aid in th

91 ntry calculations show that centimeter-sized projectiles survive passage through the martian atmosphe

92 aspects associated with utilizing the C(60) projectile that show how this technology can be taken to

93 gies were found to vary with the mass of the projectile, the anthropometry and the muscle characteris

94 uscular coordination strategies for throwing projectiles to achieve maximum range, as well as maximum

95 use experimental studies of humans throwing projectiles to show that our throwing capabilities large

96 Using a variety of molecular ion projectiles to stimulate desorption, 3-dimensional imagi

97 econstructed for the convergent evolution of projectile tongues, reduction in toe number, and special

98 Issues include the chemical nature of the projectile, topography formation, differential erosion r

99 The projectile used, Au400(4+), with impact energy of 136 ke

100 The projectiles used were Au(3)(+), C(60)(+), and Au(400)(4+

101 Here, we report experimental data at low projectile velocities near the Bragg peak, where the sto

102 Projectile velocity was measured and standardized.

103 rs thick, corresponding to 16 percent of the projectile volume, remained solid on the rear surface; t

104 lacrosse/hockey goalies), and 2 in whom the projectile was a baseball specifically designed to reduc

105 This projectile was thrust at a velocity of 30 miles per hour

106 erical shape make them potentially useful as projectile weapons, a property that, uniquely, humans ha

107 The possibility exists that some late projectiles were differentiated and left an incomplete H

108 ed from NaNO3 by the kiloelectronvolt energy projectiles were NO3- and Na(NO3)2-, both of which relat

109 ccasionally, but only humans regularly throw projectiles with high speed and accuracy.

110 int (MEDF) model, we are able to model large projectiles with incident energies from 5 to 140 keV and