戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  under the control of an NF-kappaB-regulated promoter.
2 with lpiA/acvB expression coupled to an RpoN promoter.
3 ence-specific binding of rSaWRKY1 with MYB20 promoter.
4 d an FXR-responsive element on the Tgr5 gene promoter.
5 racts with TRF2 to recruit it to the RP gene promoter.
6 h a fluorophore is expressed under the TRPV1 promoter.
7 and promotes occupancy of BMI1 on the CDKN2A promoter.
8 criptional silencing at the transgenic RD29A promoter.
9 istone H4R3me2a methylation at the PPARgamma promoter.
10 ponding to its binding site in the IL-2 gene promoter.
11 ectly and does not catalyze 5hmC at the gene promoter.
12 volved in HIF-1alpha degradation at the ASS1 promoter.
13  element-binding (CREB) protein on the IL-10 promoter.
14 essed vieSAB transcription by binding to its promoter.
15 eatment activated the acetylation of the p21 promoter.
16 -like4) were identified as binding to OsNHX1 promoter.
17 changes of nucleosome composition at the frq promoter.
18 ne 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) over the Crhr1 promoter.
19 R2) gene under the control of a 1 kb L7/Pcp2 promoter.
20 unified conceptual understanding of the core promoter.
21 anscriptional interference at the downstream promoter.
22  expressed under the regulation of the Prox1 promoter.
23 rect interaction between DAF-3 and the lag-2 promoter.
24 latory-element binding protein-1c (Srebp-1c) promoter.
25 ncer and the CUPID1 and CUPID2 bidirectional promoter.
26 lls through epigenetic editing of the native promoter.
27 ues and single cells without tissue-specific promoters.
28 he organization of epigenetic states at gene promoters.
29 ) which binds specifically to RpoN consensus promoters.
30 nhanced divergent antisense transcription at promoters.
31 da cI TF against two synthetic bidirectional promoters.
32 mechanisms that interfere with GR binding at promoters.
33  ESR1 binding to Pck-1, G6Pase, Fas and Acc1 promoters.
34 i triggered immediate binding to target gene promoters.
35 tions between distal regulatory elements and promoters.
36 expressed from individual RNA polymerase III promoters.
37 anism that involves CRTC1 recruitment to CRE promoters.
38 cluding p130/p107, still bind to target gene promoters.
39 omatin accessibility at B cell enhancers and promoters.
40 distal CGIs, despite methylation at proximal promoters.
41 1) which cooperatively activate the two LMP1 promoters.
42 FIID alone binds poorly to native p53 target promoters.
43 , than the constitutive MoMuLV 5' LTR (MMLV) promoter (0/25).
44 ry cells when luciferase is driven by a Hes1 promoter (10/19), which has previously been reported to
45                         Further, we identify promoters able to drive strong expression in multiple ti
46 e EGR1- and AP-1-binding sites in the CD44v6 promoter account for its responsiveness to TGFbeta1 in l
47 s and measuring their expression to indicate promoter activities at single-mRNA level.
48 s been previously found to increase the IL1B promoter activity and is the most frequent haplotype in
49 nome coverage, allowing us to map autonomous promoter activity genome-wide in K562 cells.
50 ce confirmed increased Cldn14 expression and promoter activity in the TAL of Ksp-cre;Pth1r(fl/fl) mic
51 ecent experiments have shown a heterogeneous promoter activity of autoinducer synthase genes, suggest
52                                        ITPR2 promoter activity was measured in Huh7 and HepG2 cells.
53 h hydrogen peroxide directly inhibited mmp-3 promoter activity with concomitant nuclear translocation
54 region, the mutation of which increased ULK1 promoter activity, and rendered it unresponsive to mTOR
55            Consistent with their alternative promoter activity, CGI-initiated transcripts are associa
56 hat high miR-375 expression reduced vimentin promoter activity, suggesting that vimentin is an indire
57 cell downwardly tunes CRP-dependent Class II promoter activity, whilst elevating CRP steady state lev
58 e levels, thus indirectly increasing Class I promoter activity.
59 gion is important for the regulation of CAT2 promoter activity.
60 ndicate a functional non-coding SNP in EPHA2 promoter affects PAX2 binding and reduces EPHA2 expressi
61 ntivirus vectors carrying the same enhancers/promoters, an effect not explained solely by foamy virus
62                                              Promoter analysis revealed an increase in luciferase act
63                                              Promoter analysis revealed the presence of Zn-deficiency
64 somal rearrangements cause the fusion of the promoter and 5'-UTR of the androgen-regulated TMPRSS2 (t
65 actions indicate the physical proximity of a promoter and an enhancer, we constructed a three-dimensi
66 ell line demonstrated strong allele-specific promoter and enhancer activity and differential binding
67 t several putative Klf5 binding sites in the promoter and first intron of Dmp1 and Dspp genes that ar
68 ith the drug combination exhibited increased promoter and gene body H3K4me3 occupancy at DAC-responsi
69  DNA base OG to guide BER activity in a gene promoter and impact cellular phenotype ascribes an epige
70  manner, resulting in ERG enrichment at Dll4 promoter and multiple enhancers.
71 65, binds to the proximal region of the IL22 promoter and promotes transcriptional activity.
72 egulated by a melanoma-specific BRD2/4-bound promoter and super-enhancer configuration.
73 ion-D6Ertd527e-in which an MT LTR provided a promoter and the 5' exon with a functional start codon w
74 a cell type-specific loop formed between its promoter and the novel DRE.
75  reports showed that LEF1 binds to the MMP13 promoter and transactivates its expression, but we obser
76  rescued by transgenic expression of AtHEMN1 Promoter and transcript analyses indicated that AtHEMN1
77                       The use of alternative promoters and alternative splicing at the foraging locus
78 ng reporter genes constructed with inducible promoters and cognate-inducible short hairpin RNA (shRNA
79 n interactions in the nucleus involving gene promoters and distal regulatory elements are currently c
80       We investigated the evolution of liver promoters and enhancers in six primate species using ChI
81 F3 can displace KLF1 from key erythroid gene promoters and enhancers in vivo.
82                                              Promoters and enhancers share similar architectures and
83 s of Gene Expression (CAGE) demonstrate that promoters and enhancers, based on their expression profi
84 three-dimensional global connectivity map of promoters and enhancers, revealing transcription-activit
85 how enrichment with known cell type markers, promoters and enhancers.
86 mobile gene-remodeling platforms that supply promoters and first exons.
87 ted the interaction of PU.1 with target gene promoters and led to downregulation of canonical PU.1 tr
88  accessible (RAMA) elements were enriched at promoters and may act as gatekeepers of monoallelic mRNA
89 om latency, and they stimulate certain viral promoters and productive infection.
90 ized transcription factor that can bind gene promoters and regulate target gene transcription in resp
91 ark differences in methylation levels within promoters and regulatory regions of genes involved in TL
92         Interactions between transcriptional promoters and their distal regulatory elements play an i
93  comprised de novo synthetic cancer-specific promoters and, to enhance specificity, an RNA-based AND
94 AK4/PPARgamma complex co-recruitment to Nox1 promoter, and increased Nox1 expression and ROS levels a
95 vation of c-jun, which binds to the IFN-beta promoter, and second, p38-mediated inactivation of the m
96 as noncoding, with 24% in intergenic, 12% in promoters, and 28% in introns, with similar statistics o
97 enerated through the use of different genes, promoters, and alternative splicing, but the functional
98  hypermethylation of the PPARgamma2 proximal promoter; and elevated circulating adiponectin.
99 n start-site (TSS) selection and alternative promoter (AP) usage contribute to gene expression comple
100 anscription factors that bind to the insulin promoter are known, relatively little is known about the
101 rial immunomodulatory outputs only when both promoters are mutually active.
102         It has been proposed that many yeast promoters are not nucleosome-free but instead occupied b
103                       These newly identified promoters are shown to be transcriptionally active in 29
104                Misregulation of enhancer and promoter associated noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) could stabil
105 ent of the activity of thousands of designed promoters at six different levels of TF.
106                  In chimeric BACs, the mTert promoter became strongly repressed in the human genomic
107 al role of the transcription factor Xylanase promoter binding protein 1 (Xpp1) in the regulation of b
108 aled by studying the pre-initiation steps of promoter binding, bending and melting, and abortive RNA
109 d IRF3 binding and increased CTCF binding in promoter-binding assays, and risk allele carriage dimini
110 istic studies on a beta-globin enhancer- and promoter-binding factor, GATA-1, the founding member of
111 TERT regulation by chromatin environment and promoter-bound TFs during ESC differentiation.
112  cleavage-stage genes driven by conventional promoters but did not activate MERVL-promoted genes.
113 We propose that double locking of the vieSAB promoter by H-NS and HapR in the El Tor biotype prior to
114 -activator complex SAGA is recruited to gene promoters by sequence-specific transcriptional activator
115                               By integrating promoter capture Hi-C data with genetic associations for
116 atin per se can stimulate efficient enhancer-promoter communication (EPC); however, the role of chrom
117                   Moreover, by using mutated promoter constructs, we identified a NF-kappaB site as c
118 or or corepressor, depending on the cell and promoter contexts.
119 ion is under dopamine transporter gene (DAT) promoter control to ablate Cnr2 gene in midbrain DA neur
120 single cells was 20 864 (72.7%), with 12 961 promoters covered.
121 s are enriched in flanking regions of active promoters, CpG island shores, binding sites of the trans
122 ly, elevated expression of H19 lncRNA due to promoter demethylation was observed in cells isolated fr
123 s within the bidirectional histone3-histone4 promoter direct HLB formation in Drosophila In addition,
124 e levels, and IL-4, INF-gamma and Foxp3 gene promoter DNA methylation status, and their correlation w
125             To determine the mapping between promoter DNA sequence, TF concentration, and gene expres
126 igma(N) fragment in complex with its cognate promoter DNA, revealing the molecular details of promote
127 ymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme and competing with promoter DNA.
128 s catalytically active but unable to bind to promoter DNA.
129                          The state of the Re promoter does not change during the FT process.
130 ansgenic mouse model in which the keratin 14 promoter drives expression of the entire HPV8 early regi
131 Moreover, RUNX1 is sufficient for long-range promoter-Ebeta looping, nucleosome clearance, and robust
132 es spatial clustering of MIR335 enhancer and promoter elements along with overexpression of the MIR35
133 d factor (TAF) subunits recognize downstream promoter elements, act as coactivators, and interact wit
134 usters of co-regulated genes with shared cis promoter elements, whose expression can be controlled po
135                                              Promoters enhance the performance of catalytic active ph
136 not with MLV, suggesting MLV prefers smaller promoter-enhancer loops, whereas PB insertion encompasse
137 which were driven from a strong constitutive promoter ermEp*.
138 ns, and that initiation with them stimulates promoter escape.
139 such genomic regions to genomic annotations (promoters, exons, enhancers, etc.).
140 b) in plants, using a dual RNA polymerase II promoter expression system.
141 at auxin response maxima sites using the DR5 promoter fails to fully rescue lfs plants, suggesting th
142 ine 4 trimethylation (H3K4Me3) at the CDKN2A promoter following LPS-induced senescence.
143 the whole landscape of CRMs, to discriminate promoters from enhancers.
144 thelial growth factor (VEGF) regulates PRKCB promoter function in CLL cells, stimulating PKCbeta gene
145 under the control of the guard-cell-specific promoter, GC1.
146  viral-host co-evolution is imprinted within promoter gene sequences before transcript or protein int
147 monstrate that CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of promoters generates diverse cis-regulatory alleles that
148 d genetic variants with precise mutations in promoters, genes, and terminators, leading to altered ca
149  with a strain containing the wild-type ACT1 promoter.Genetic isolation of a genetically modified org
150  that 21-nt diRNAs were generated from a 35S promoter::GU-US reporter transgene targeted by CRISPR/Ca
151 cognitive enhancement and MEF2C occupancy at promoters harboring canonical and variant MEF2C motifs.
152     A detailed characterization of the phage promoter has provided a set of constitutive promoters th
153 Drosophila that interact with different core promoters: housekeeping enhancers (hkCP) and development
154 have recently reported that HPV E7-dependent promoter hypermethylation leads to downregulation of the
155 t ChIP-sequencing localized PDX1 to the Atf5 promoter, implicating Atf5 as a PDX1 target.
156            MRTF overexpression drove the TAZ promoter in a CC(A/T-rich)6GG (CArG) box-dependent manne
157                     Resequencing of the CHGA promoter in an Indian population (n = 769) yielded nine
158 , increased Nrf2 recruitment to the Srebp-1c promoter in livers of BPA-exposed mice was observed.
159 showed that HES1 and NR3C1 bind to the CLDN1 promoter in rat colon crypts.
160 the transcriptional activity from the NtPDR1 promoter in situ with a reporter gene and found that, al
161 recruited to the proximal region of the Ucp1 promoter in subcutaneous inguinal white adipose tissue.
162 e overproduced from the cold-inducible cspD2 promoter in the genetically tractable Haloarchaeon, Halo
163                      DNA methylation at gene promoters in a CG context is associated with transcripti
164 nscription of genes with methylated proximal promoters in a tissue-specific fashion.
165 synergistically activated smooth muscle gene promoters in an SRF-dependent manner.
166 the transcription from the Sema3a and Sema3d promoters in cotransfected cells.
167  4) bind the stress-response element in gene promoters in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae However,
168 ressed under control of a hemolymph-specific promoter increased fungal lethality to mosquitoes at spo
169 iation of LXRalpha with Lxralpha and Srebp1c promoters, increased LXRE-LXRalpha binding, and broadly
170 r method is effective in predicting enhancer-promoter interactions as compared to the state-of-the-ar
171  Deletion of CTCF sites compromises enhancer-promoter interactions.
172 ntrol of the cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter into the VC2 vector in place of the HSV-1 thymi
173 n the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) promoter is used to express cellular toxins that elimina
174 action of a promiscuous activator on cryptic promoters is a critical mechanism for specifying precise
175                           DNA methylation at promoters is an important determinant of gene expression
176 ng a transcription factor and the associated promoter it represses.
177 NACbs, and the proteins failed to regulate a promoter lacking a crucial NACbs.
178 antibody under the control of the major late promoter, leading to generation of ICOVIR-15K-cBiTE, whi
179   DNA repair protein counteracting oxidative promoter lesions may modulate gene expression.
180  using cell type-matched epigenomic data and promoter long-range interactions.
181 r depletion of YY1 protein disrupts enhancer-promoter looping and gene expression.
182 nced AP-2alpha expression and decreased TACE promoter luciferase activity in DCs.
183       Chromatin immunoprecipitation and NNMT promoter luciferase assays revealed that AURKA's effects
184 vivo lineage tracing revealed that the Krt15 promoter marks a long-lived basal cell population able t
185 s in the DNA methylation status of the PRTN3 promoter may predict the likelihood of stable remission
186                     Here we show that dbetah promoter-mediated expression of LMO1 in zebrafish synerg
187 ng that it is coupled to TFIIH's established promoter melting activity.
188 ow that TFAM has 'post-recruitment' roles in promoter melting and RNA synthesis, which were revealed
189 of ovalbumin-specific T cells in rat insulin promoter-membrane-bound ovalbumin transgenic mice after
190 wed significant negative correlation between promoter methylation and expression of an alternative tr
191 l transition, correlating with delayed Nanog promoter methylation and phenocopying loss of Eprn or Li
192      Biological validation showed that PCSK9 promoter methylation is conserved across tissues and pos
193  epigenetic silencing of RAD51C and BRCA1 by promoter methylation is strongly associated with signatu
194                     Next, we quantified CDH1 promoter methylation levels in CDH1 mutation-positive fa
195                                          DNA promoter methylation of cyclin D1 regulators were assess
196 Mechanistically, COX2/PGE2 signaling induced promoter methylation of let-7, resulting in its downregu
197                                 In addition, promoter methylation of two translationally relevant gen
198 utcomes (P = 0.50), but the presence of TERT promoter methylation, alone or concurrent with promoter
199 3b in liposarcoma cells was downregulated by promoter methylation, resulting at least in part from in
200 mary luminal differentiation marker FoxA1 by promoter-methylation, and that is regulated by the Plk1
201 sing Pd(OAc)2 as the catalyst and AgO as the promoter, mono- and diarylation of anilides were realize
202                                         TERT promoter mutations alone did not predict adverse outcome
203 Here, we describe the somatic acquisition of promoter mutations in telomerase reverse transcriptase (
204 omoter methylation, alone or concurrent with promoter mutations, correlated with reduced recurrence-f
205 ary atypical meningiomas do not harbour TERT promoter mutations, which have been reported in atypical
206 accessibility and deposition of STAT5 at the promoter of Id2 in response to interleukin (IL)-15.
207  PRC1-independent recruitment of OCT4 to the promoter of Kdm2b, a histone demethylase gene that promo
208 ease gene (BnCysP1) with anther-specific P12 promoter of rice for facilitating production of hybrid v
209                                 The putative promoter of Ss-riok-2 contains a number of conserved ele
210 hylation localized to a 600 bp region in the promoter of the Ifitm3 gene.
211 ichment of O-GlcNAc-modified proteins at the promoter of the transcription factor MYBL1, which was al
212 f RNAPII, but no changes in H3K27me3, at the promoters of affected endocrine genes.
213         The GACTTTT motif is enriched in the promoters of both these gene sets, and conserved in SARD
214 ion towards transcription start sites in the promoters of co-expressed genes.
215 ranscription factor DNA-binding sites in the promoters of differentially expressed genes was used to
216 TD) RNA polymerase (Pol) II formation on the promoters of IRF1, IRF7, and RIG-I, producing their enha
217  bind to and activate transcription from the promoters of its gluconeogenic targets, and the effects
218 at may act as cis-regulatory elements in the promoters of LEC1 target genes suggest that LEC1 may int
219 ecruitment to canonical binding-sites in the promoters of Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2.
220 ing motifs of TFAP2 (which was identified in promoters of T, NANOS3, and SOX17) and the RREB-1 cell a
221 trong evidence for positive selection within promoters of this species.
222  toolkit includes 23 Cas9-sgRNA plasmids, 37 promoters of various strengths and temporal expression p
223 cription initiation from host RNAP-dependent promoters on the phage genome via a mechanism that invol
224 duces structural changes in mtRNAP to enable promoter opening and trapping of the DNA non-template st
225 tisense transcripts originate either at gene promoters or within the gene body, and they show differe
226 better interpreted as a switching off of the promoter, or where an increase in bioluminescence would
227 ngation of RNA Polymerase II from a proximal promoter paused state is a rate-limiting event in human
228 AC-seq) data, we found that the latent HIV-1 promoter phenotypically resembles endogenous long termin
229         We found that strong viral enhancers/promoters placed in foamy viral vectors caused extremely
230 h cDNA sequencing, revealed four independent promoters, pr1-4, that produce 21 transcripts with nine
231 II in transcriptional elongation, leading to promoter-proximal accumulation of Pol II.
232 tion and restriction of gene activity to the promoter-proximal approximately 25 kb is observed.
233      Finally, we find a higher percentage of promoter-proximal GR binding for genes regulated by GR a
234 I) recruitment levels tend to display Pol II promoter-proximal pausing, while Pol II recruitment and
235                                              Promoter-proximal Ser2 phosphorylation is associated wit
236 oter DNA, revealing the molecular details of promoter recognition by sigma(N) The structure allowed u
237                  Thus, gp226 is required for promoter recognition by the AR9 nvRNAP and may represent
238                         We describe here the promoter reference technique (PRT), an assay for protein
239 s quantified at 7 CpG sites within the SFRP1 promoter region by pyrosequencing.
240  Additionally, the analysis of the HvPAPhy_a promoter region containing the GCN4/Skn1/RY motif highli
241 tro, leptospiral PerR could bind to the perR promoter region in a metal-dependent manner.
242 studied bind a conserved AT-rich site in the promoter region of the exoY gene from Mesorhizobium loti
243 h analysis of the functional consequences of promoter region variation within the classical HLA class
244 thylation at multiple CpG sites in the HOXA4 promoter region was associated with height in a cohort o
245 nding sites within the LIF (stemness factor) promoter region, and demonstrate LIF repression by ZEB1.
246                                        Thus, promoter regions are intrinsically bidirectional and are
247 ed acetylation of histones in the respective promoter regions but also re-expression of APM component
248                         Our study shows that promoter regions harbour recurrent mutations in cancer w
249  several mechanisms: chromatin remodeling in promoter regions of specific genes, blockade of NF-kappa
250 he methylation status of CpG loci within the promoter regions of Th1/2 lineage commitment genes (GATA
251 me capture, we included genome-wide proximal promoter regions that contain sequences that regulate ge
252 itative RT-PCR, and DNA methylation of their promoter regions was analyzed by PCR and pyrosequencing.
253 thylation in adipose tissue, particularly in promoter regions.
254 ut genomes, and are especially found in gene promoter regions.
255 ave a high enrichment of CTCF binding sites, promoter-related marks, and enhancer-related histone mod
256                                     However, promoter release was inhibited in the presence of dUTP o
257                                              Promoter reporter and gel shift assays determined that t
258 gulate alpha-SYN expression; while exogenous promoter-reporter assays failed to reproduce the similar
259 nce of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 at developmental promoters represents a poised transcriptional state.
260 ce expressing Cre from the Lyz2 or the BGLAP promoter, respectively.
261 blies, BAF and PBAF complexes, enhancers and promoters, respectively, suggesting that each complex ha
262                                     In vivo, promoter responses to TAF mutations correlate with the l
263 g to SBE DNA in TGF-beta-responsive SMC gene promoters, resulting in suppression of SMC marker gene t
264 iability in RNA and protein numbers are both promoter sequence-dependent and subject to regulation.
265              Here we compare viral and human promoter sequences and expression to test whether geneti
266  and microscopic tools to characterize plant promoter sequences and the discovery of two root hair re
267                         Our results identify promoter shape as a molecular trait that can evolve inde
268 e and negative regulatory influences at each promoter site are integrated to modify pqsR expression.
269        Moreover, we find that the lncRNA and promoter-spanning transcript interaction are based on a
270 RNAs interact first with a 5' UTR-containing promoter-spanning transcript, which is then followed by
271 cular trait that can evolve independently of promoter strength.
272 istone H3 Lys27 acetylation at enhancers and promoters, suggesting a cross-talk between these chromat
273 ally active histone modifications at M2 gene promoters than did macrophages from male mice.
274 silencer factor) to position 509 of the KCC2 promoter that leads to downregulation of KCC2 transcript
275  promoter has provided a set of constitutive promoters that span over four logs of strength without d
276 ancer cells increased ER binding to the NEMO promoter, thereby increasing NEMO expression, NFkappaB a
277 entation by enhancing H3K9me2/3 at the CIITA promoter, thereby repressing its expression through NO a
278  under the control of the endogenous fly tau promoter, thus avoiding potential toxicity due to geneti
279 at uses a mannose receptor, C type 1 (mrc1a) promoter to drive strong EGFP expression in lymphatic ve
280 se p300 is normally associated with the ASS1 promoter to maintain acetylated H3K14ac and H3K27ac for
281 to three E-boxes present in the human 4E-BP1 promoter to repress transcription of 4E-BP1.
282  phosphorylation mutants from a constitutive promoter to uncouple Atf1 activity from endogenous, stre
283 ing site-specifically integrated single-copy promoter transgenes and measuring their expression to in
284 uclear factor-kappaB to the PTPRZ1 and Wnt8a promoters, ultimately decreasing Wnt/beta-catenin signal
285         By applying this assay to over 1,500 promoter variants in yeast, we reveal pronounced differe
286 vation domain of FoxM1 to the cyclin B1 gene promoter via clustered regularly interspaced short palin
287 rdingly, the activity of the wild type RUNX2 promoter was decreased upon methylation treatment in vit
288 utative dioxin response elements in the EBF1 promoter was demonstrated by EMSAs and chromatin immunop
289                                     The EGR1 promoter was engineered to enhance trans-activation capa
290  in the human genomic context, but the hTERT promoter was highly active in the mouse genomic context.
291                 Hypermethylation of the ANO1 promoter was strongly correlated with but not sufficient
292                     No enhancers of the APIP promoter were found.
293 enriched for cell migration genes, and their promoters were enriched for the binding motifs of TFAP2
294 n of mtRNAP to recruit the polymerase to the promoter whereas TFB2M induces structural changes in mtR
295 neage-specific transcriptional enhancers and promoters, which is mediated by pioneer transcription fa
296 lent in the other tend to share demethylated promoters, while methylation differences between alpha-
297 , and that it is regulated by an alternative promoter whose activity is repressed by the liganded est
298  transcription factors, particularly in SDHD promoter wild-type samples.
299 veals predominant R-loop formation near gene promoters with strong G/C skew and propensity to form G-
300 cally activating the two EBV immediate early promoters (Zp and Rp).

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top