ライフサイエンスコーパス: prone position

1 y distress syndrome is often improved in the prone position.

2 7 infants (40%) were placed for sleep in the prone position.

3 ompressed with two fenestrated plates in the prone position.

4 significant changes in Crs were seen in the prone position.

5 ge, 53 years; age range, 18-84 years) in the prone position.

6 (6 ml/kg; PEEP 3 cm H(2)O; 3 h) in supine or prone position.

7 ng the patient in the 6) Trendelenberg or 7) prone position.

8 eolar ventilation became more uniform in the prone position.

9 p algorithm and acquired with the patient in prone position.

10 s obtained with the patient in the supine or prone position.

11 ing sleep hours and the person is found in a prone position.

12 were attributable to sleeping in the side or prone position.

13 quisition with the patient in the supine and prone positions.

14 lateral position compared with the supine or prone positions.

15 n; age range, 47-72 years) in the supine and prone positions.

16 even surfactant-depleted sheep in supine and prone positions.

17 fflation, and helical scanning in supine and prone positions.

18 underwent CT colonography in both supine and prone positions.

19 /inverse-ratio ventilation, and intermittent prone positioning.

20 ole of preload in the hemodynamic effects of prone positioning.

21 CT images were repeated in supine and prone positioning.

22 iratory pressure, recruitment maneuvers, and prone positioning.

23 re-controlled inverse ratio ventilation, and prone positioning.

24 , greater use of neuromuscular blockade, and prone positioning.

25 distribution of injury might be altered with prone positioning.

26 ained with the patient in the supine and the prone position, 11 moved from a dorsal to a ventral loca

27 20.2]) and with turning from the side to the prone position (45.4 [23.4-87.9]).

28 The residual molecules assumed prone positions along the pores, with the tailgroup bein

29 The prone position alters the distribution of histologic abn

30 She is placed in the prone position and a neuromuscular blocking agent is adm

31 of 10 L/min (treatment); 3) in Trendelenburg/prone position and ventilated as in the control group (T

32 Use of prone positioning and neuromuscular blockade was signifi

33 ided greater skepticism over the efficacy of prone positioning and the currently available surfactant

34 stention with the patient in both supine and prone positions and interpretation of both transverse an

35 dying a wide range of PBF values, supine and prone positions and various positive end-expiratory pres

36 ion, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, prone positioning, and extracorporeal life support.

37 Recruitment maneuvers, prone positioning, and kinetic therapy are all reported

38 ng regional injury and protective effects of prone positioning are unclear.

39 mb and hindlimb during head-up tilt from the prone position before and after the removal of vestibula

40 Prone positioning, bronchodilators, inhaled nitric oxide

41 chniques and other treatments (eg, steroids, prone positioning, bronchoscopy, and inhaled nitric oxid

42 Infants were placed in the prone position by 70% of caregivers in 1992, prior to th

43 CT scans were obtained with patients in the prone position by using 5-mm-thick sections, 140 kVp, 13

44 es +/- 4.3 (62%) to each reading (supine and prone positions combined); average total reading time, 8

45 gnificant improvement in Rrs occurred in the prone position compared to supine in patients with obstr

46 In the prone position, computed tomography scan densities redis

47 nhaled vasodilators increased whereas use of prone position decreased over time (p for trend = 0.04 a

48 Animal experiments clearly show that prone positioning delays or prevents ventilation-induced

49 fashion with alternation between supine and prone position during incremental dosing.

50 ) have failed to show a beneficial effect of prone positioning during mechanical ventilatory support

51 Prone positioning enhances lung recruitment and decrease

52 y square-wave, knee-extensor exercise in the prone position for 6 min with a 6 min rest interval.

53 evere ARDS, the recommendation is strong for prone positioning for more than 12 h/d (moderate confide

54 Prone positioning further decreased nonaerated tissue (3

55 No woman, regardless of supine or prone position, had all breast tissue within the reduced

56 Acquisition in the prone position has been demonstrated to improve the spec

57 (POVL) as related to spinal surgery and the prone position has garnered increasing attention in the

58 We conclude that prone positioning has no effect on FRC and in this serie

59 tients with ARDS, neuromuscular blockade and prone positioning have further reduced mortality, probab

60 Before and within 20 minutes of starting prone positioning, hemodynamic, respiratory, intraabdomi

61 rfactant-deficient model of lung injury, the prone position improved gas exchange by restoring aerati

62 However, the regional mechanism by which the prone position improves gas exchange in acutely injured

63 The prone position improves gas exchange in many patients wi

64 sthetized, mechanically ventilated pigs, the prone position improves pulmonary gas exchange to a grea

65 evere refractory hypoxemia due to ARDS (2C); prone positioning in sepsis-induced ARDS patients with a

66 blood gases, FRC, Rrs, and Crs in supine and prone positions in 30 patients under neuromuscular block

67 der the heart was measured in the supine and prone positions in seven patients.

68 In the prone position, in which the rat's head was in the most

69 In the presence of abdominal distension, the prone position increased Pa O2 by 26 +/- 18 mm Hg (p < 0

70 When the abdomen was normal, the prone position increased PaO2 by 16 +/- 21 mm Hg (p < 0.

71 entilation and maximal alveolar recruitment, prone positioning increased the cardiac index only in pa

72 In all patients, prone positioning increased the ratio of arterial oxygen

73 ber of therapies (eg, recruitment maneuvers, prone positioning, inhaled nitric oxide, high-frequency

74 vered include conservative fluid management, prone positioning, inhaled nitric oxide, inhaled vasodil

75 a single-detector CT scanner with supine and prone positioning, insufflation of the colon with air or

76 erfusion SPECT (MPS) with the patient in the prone position is commonly used to minimize attenuation

77 east intensity modulated radiotherapy in the prone position is feasible and it permits a drastic redu

78 improvements in gas exchange occur with the prone position is not known.

79 The prone position is used to improve gas exchange in patien

80 Prone positioning is protective and induces MKP-1.

81 sminogen activator and gas followed by brief prone positioning, is effective in displacing thick subm

82 atory distress syndrome, carefully performed prone positioning offers an absolute survival advantage

83 as imaged at computed tomography (CT) in the prone position on a dedicated table.

84 With subjects in the prone position on their hands and knees, ultrasonographi

85 evaluated the effect of early application of prone positioning on outcomes in patients with severe AR

86 erdependence between the effects of PEEP and prone positioning on these variables is unknown.

87 modulated radiotherapy, with the patient in prone position, optimally to spare the heart and lung.

88 y after delivery, to place the infant in the prone position (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.44-3.60).

89 tion, intragastric pressure was lower in the prone position (p < 0.01).

90 Before prone positioning, preload reserve was assessed by a pas

91 itioning with alternation between supine and prone position (R) during incremental dosing of three 5-

92 ury induced solely by mechanical forces, the prone position resulted in a less severe and more homoge

93 Prone positioning resulted in increased sensitivity for

94 Prone positioning returns as a desirable therapeutic opt

95 ned 466 patients with severe ARDS to undergo prone-positioning sessions of at least 16 hours or to be

96 severe ARDS, early application of prolonged prone-positioning sessions significantly decreased 28-da

97 Prone positioning should be considered in the severest o

98 In the nine patients with preload reserve, prone positioning significantly increased cardiac index

99 ergo less extensive histologic change in the prone position than in the supine position.

100 With the patient in the prone position, the breast was compressed with two fenes

101 d the improvement in PAO2 in patients in the prone position, the underlying mechanism has yet to be d

102 he patient was turned from the supine to the prone position; thus, polyps appeared to be mobile.

103 hese modalities: high frequency ventilation, prone positioning, tracheal gas insufflation, and partia

104 omized to be positioned: 1) in semirecumbent/prone position, ventilated with a duty cycle (TITTOT) of

105 ly short-term use of neuromuscular blockade, prone position ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane o

106 very infrequent cause of dysphagia following prone-position ventilation.

107 To communicate a complication of prone-position ventilation.

108 rvival were found between those who received prone positioning vs. inhaled vasodilators (propensity s

109 The prone position was associated with an increase in lung g

110 At 3 months, switching from nonprone to prone position was associated with mother's race/ethnici

111 rogressively more hypoxemic; exposure to the prone position was extended from 8 to 17 hours/day, and

112 The hazard ratio for death with prone positioning was 0.39 (95% confidence interval [CI]

113 Prone positioning was not associated with a significant

114 Prone positioning was protective against injurious venti

115 Prone positioning was used in 16.3% (95% CI, 13.7%-19.2%

116 CT with patients in both supine and prone positions was necessary, since seven (19%) and fiv

117 lonography (with patients in both supine and prone positions) was performed with a multisection helic

118 l pressure distributes more uniformly in the prone position, we hypothesized that the extent of injur

119 ecruitment only decreased when high PEEP and prone positioning were applied together (4.1 +/- 1.9 to

120 t in the lateral position (compared with the prone position), which mimics the natural resting/sleepi

121 1 cm of H2O; n = 8) and pigs studied in the prone position with a low PEEP (6 +/- 3 cm of H2O; n = 9

122 s were described, including molecules in the prone position with the perfluorinated aromatic rings lo

123 atients underwent scanning in the supine and prone positions with 3-mm collimation during a single br

124 Gas exchange was measured in the supine and prone positions, with and without abdominal distension,

125 fraction decreased in dorsal regions in the prone position without a concomitant impairment of gas e