ライフサイエンスコーパス: proportional hazard model

1 f overall discontinuation (multivariable Cox proportional hazard model).

2 ) breast cancer (using the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model).

3 the PRO-ACT ALS dataset in comparison to Cox proportional hazard model.

4 Hazard ratios were calculated with the Cox proportional hazard model.

5 those without were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model.

6 alibration plots for each cause-specific Cox proportional hazard model.

7 re made with the log-hazard ratio of the Cox proportional hazard model.

8 V status using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models.

9 self-harm and suicide were estimated by Cox proportional hazard models.

10 annual variation in tree mortality using Cox proportional hazard models.

11 Risks were estimated with Cox proportional hazard models.

12 rction (MI) were analyzed using adjusted Cox proportional hazard models.

13 t modality and all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazard models.

14 act of adjusting for surveillance within Cox proportional hazard models.

15 ere analyzed using linear, logistic, and Cox proportional hazard models.

16 ssociations with 12-week mortality using Cox proportional hazard models.

17 nd SE of 0.02 for a previously published Cox proportional hazards model.

18 odel and transplant-free survival with a Cox proportional hazards model.

19 ence were estimated with a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

20 , and survival were examined using the Cox's proportional hazards model.

21 who did not; we further adjusted using a Cox proportional hazards model.

22 with 95% CIs were estimated by using the Cox proportional hazards model.

23 for clinically relevant covariates in a Cox proportional hazards model.

24 ard ratios (HRs) were estimated with the Cox proportional hazards model.

25 dex and mortality was investigated using Cox proportional hazards models.

26 of HIV-1 infection among vaccinees using Cox proportional hazards models.

27 e with incident AF was examined by using Cox proportional hazards models.

28 and survival curves were measured using Cox-proportional hazards models.

29 ate cancer, using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

30 en treated and untreated groups by using Cox proportional hazards models.

31 e survival analyses were performed using Cox-proportional hazards models.

32 rude incidence rates (IRs) and developed Cox proportional hazards models.

33 of dementia, separately, using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

34 mployed Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

35 n or receipt of a KT were examined using Cox proportional hazards models.

36 associated with mortality using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

37 y follow-up were defined in time-updated Cox proportional hazards models.

38 determined using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

39 timated from a sequence of multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

40 confidence intervals were obtained using Cox proportional hazards models.

41 90 days was examined with time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models.

42 Associations were tested using Cox proportional hazards models.

43 636 incident cases) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.

44 iovascular mortality were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.

45 and overall survival was performed with Cox proportional hazards models.

46 sing logistic and linear regression, and Cox proportional hazards models.

47 overall survival (OS) were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards models.

48 ption using multivariate regression with Cox proportional hazards models.

49 factors for epilepsy were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models.

50 lation were evaluated using log-rank and Cox proportional hazards models.

51 d and traditional multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

52 s of death was estimated with the use of Cox proportional hazards models.

53 ncome, and area-based deprivation) using Cox proportional hazards models.

54 e risk of developing breast cancer using Cox proportional hazards models.

55 nce intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.

56 nd 95% CIs estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

57 lyzed using life tables and time-varying Cox proportional hazards models.

58 with survival after ALS diagnosis using Cox proportional hazards models.

59 n R/S and incident all-cause mortality using proportional hazards models.

60 roups using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

61 ty were assessed using Andersen-Gill and Cox proportional hazards models.

62 emorrhagic), using survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models.

63 alifornia State Inpatient Database using Cox proportional hazards models.

64 stimated cumulative hazards with conditional proportional hazards models.

65 WU completion or KT were examined using Cox proportional hazards models.

66 tests, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox proportional-hazards models.

67 was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard modeling.

68 luated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

69 as performed using step-up and step-down Cox proportional hazards modeling.

70 d using Kaplan-Meyer curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling.

71 al prognostic factors were identified by Cox proportional hazards modeling.

72 n-Meier event rate curves and univariate Cox proportional hazards modeling.

73 thout RVAD using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

74 ted using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and proportional hazards modeling.

75 ssed using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling.

76 assessed covariables as predictors with Cox proportional hazards modelling.

77 Cox proportional hazards models, accounting for time under o

78 e most significant predictor of CKD in a Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for age, diabetes, se

79 use-specific mortality was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, AMD s

80 In Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, race,

81 Calculations were based on proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, race,

82 biomarkers with SAR were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for clinicopatholog

83 Time to death was studied with Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic and

84 h overall and CRC-related survival using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic, tu

85 y Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazard modeling, adjusted for treatment, pa

86 assessed through logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for potential confo

87 However, a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for age, sex, and g

88 We fitted Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for known confound

89 or lithium exposure were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for potential conf

90 n between genotype and OS is assessed by Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, sex, Inter

91 of 30-day readmission, we constructed a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, sex, race,

92 and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for baseline progn

93 umption were obtained from multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for lifestyle and

94 's disease, and multiple sclerosis using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for individual an

95 In Cox proportional hazards models, ADT was associated with a d

96 Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated by Cox proportional hazard model and compared subjects with 3 t

97 was determined by multivariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models and propensity score analysis

98 Cox proportional hazard models and Recursive Partitioning an

99 thin the LGE+ group was determined using Cox proportional hazard models and time-dependent receiver-o

100 the likelihood to receive an OLT using a Cox proportional hazards model and a generalized additive mo

101 Cox proportional hazards model and logistic regression were

102 ecific survival (DSS) were assessed with Cox proportional hazards modeling and a competing risk analy

103 We used Cox proportional hazards models and inverse probability-weig

104 e free survival (RFS) were determined by Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier method.

105 isk score was derived using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and standard clinical predic

106 Cox proportional-hazard modeling and Kaplan-Meier analyses w

107 the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score-matche

108 c regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards models, as well, were developed to

109 Cox proportional hazards modeling assessed the association b

110 We used Cox proportional hazard models at the person-quarter level t

111 The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model based on significant prognost

112 dated postdiagnostic diet using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models based on follow-up until 201

113 ng sex-stratified multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, black women and men were mo

114 After adjusting for 34 covariates in a Cox proportional hazards model, borderline PH was associated

115 We propose new Bayesian hierarchical Cox proportional hazards models, called the spike-and-slab l

116 Using Cox proportional hazards modeling, class 2 GEP was the progn

117 Using competing risk and Cox proportional hazards models, clinical factors at baselin

118 s) of breast cancer were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models, considering exposure as a t

119 In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model controlling for sociodemograp

120 A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that multifocali

121 Cox proportional-hazard modeling demonstrated a lower death

122 Cox proportional hazards models estimated the risk of mortal

123 For accepted offers, Cox proportional hazards models estimated these probabilitie

124 Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models fit to individual patient da

125 differences in rehospitalization using a Cox proportional hazards model, following sequential adjustm

126 ier curves and constructed multivariable Cox proportional hazard models for mortality and hospitaliza

127 For each outcome, we first ran a Cox proportional hazards model for each city, adjusting for

128 to relapse; the hazard ratio, based on a Cox proportional hazards model for lisdexamfetamine vs place

129 sess the usefulness of extensions of the Cox proportional hazards model for repeated events in this c

130 By using the Cox proportional hazards model for univariate and multivaria

131 We fit multivariable proportional hazards models for baseline, time-updated a

132 dities, medications, and biomarkers into Cox proportional hazards models for each outcome.

133 d Kaplan-Meier probability estimates and Cox proportional hazards models for post-HCT outcomes based

134 Cox proportional hazards models for recurrent gap-time data

135 (CVD) and mortality were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models (from 12 weeks postpartum to

136 We estimated all-cause mortality using Cox proportional hazards models; hazard ratios with 95% conf

137 In Cox proportional hazards models, higher levels of miR-124-3p

138 el of P < .10 constructed a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model in which the impact of each c

139 of SCD by using an age- and sex-adjusted Cox proportional-hazards model, in all participants and also

140 adjustments for covariates, results from Cox proportional hazards models, including SBP and DBP, join

141 In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, increasing years of baselin

142 In proportional hazards model, insurance and tumor characte

143 Marginal structural Cox proportional hazards modeling investigated the relations

144 In time-varying Cox proportional hazards models, liver transplantation (haza

145 We used Cox proportional hazard models, logistic regression models,

146 A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model of Cohort #2, incorporating ge

147 A Cox proportional hazards model of survival outcome indicated

148 The software enables analyses under a Cox proportional hazards model or Weibull regression model,

149 In a time-dependent Cox proportional-hazards model, picobirnaviruses were predic

150 In the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, reinfection with a heterolog

151 using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards modeling, respectively.

152 The multivariate Cox proportional hazard model showed that PRT was an indepen

153 The multivariate Cox proportional hazard models showed that glucocorticoid si

154 For the 0.10-mg/m3 exposure level, Cox proportional hazards models showed significantly increas

155 nocarcinoma only through a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model stratified by trial.

156 ssociations were evaluated with weighted Cox proportional hazards models stratified by race/ethnicity

157 Cox proportional hazards models, stratified according to bir

158 Cox proportional hazards models, stratified by age, were use

159 , and butter were tested with the use of Cox proportional hazards models that were adjusted for age,

160 on (ppb) for ozone using a two-pollutant Cox proportional-hazards model that controlled for demograph

161 In the Cox-proportional hazards model, the use of induction of was

162 We used Cox proportional hazard models to analyze the association be

163 survival analysis with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models to assess independent prognos

164 We used Cox proportional hazard models to assess risk of exacerbatio

165 We also used Andersen-Gill proportional hazard models to assess the influence of am

166 We used Cox proportional hazard models to calculate hazard ratios (H

167 We used Cox proportional hazard models to calculate multivariate-adj

168 We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate HRs and 95% CIs f

169 We first fitted a Cox proportional hazards model to examine the relation of kn

170 took a multifactorial analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model to identify factors affecting

171 We used a Cox proportional hazards model to identify index case, conta

172 We used Cox proportional hazards modeling to assess sequentially add

173 in the general adult population and used Cox proportional hazards modeling to estimate determinants o

174 We used Cox proportional hazards modeling to estimate hazard ratios

175 We used Cox proportional hazards modeling to examine the association

176 We used Cox proportional hazards models to assess associations of th

177 We fit Cox proportional hazards models to assess the association of

178 CRIC) and Hispanic-CRIC Studies, we used Cox proportional hazards models to determine the association

179 We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate age- and multiva

180 We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate associations bet

181 We used proportional hazards models to estimate associations.

182 The authors used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios of

183 We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate HRs and 95% CIs.

184 We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate HRs and their 95

185 We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association b

186 in the Cardiovascular Health Study using Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association b

187 We fitted Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association o

188 We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to examine the associations

189 ing Kaplan-Meier survival and univariate Cox proportional hazards models to examine the effect of LSF

190 did not file for bankruptcy, we then fit Cox proportional hazards models to examine the relationship

191 r method to estimate 5-year survival and Cox proportional hazards models to generate hazard ratios.

192 We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to independently estimate th

193 We used Cox proportional hazards models to investigate whether assoc

194 We used Cox proportional hazards models to obtain adjusted hazard ra

195 ine at the individual patient level with Cox proportional hazards models to quantify associations of

196 We used proportional hazards models to test the association betw

197 We applied Cox proportional hazards models to test the potential HTEs o

198 In a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model, transmissions with 80% to 98

199 tegrated these AD-associated SNPs into a Cox proportional hazard model using genotype data from a sub

200 therapies in a propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards model using data from the British A

201 Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models using time-dependent endocri

202 Cox proportional hazards models using time-updated covariate

203 isk factors for disengagement based on a Cox proportional hazards model, using multiple imputation fo

204 re estimated with multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, using the 120-129 mm Hg sys

205 e analysis using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard model was performed to identify inde

206 A stratified Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the cause

207 The Cox proportional hazard model was used to test univariate an

208 with mid-term all-cause mortality, and a Cox proportional hazards model was developed.

209 The marginal Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the factor

210 Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard

211 A univariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to correlate disease

212 A multivariate proportional hazards model was used to determine the ass

213 Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to generate the nomo

214 A Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate first

215 to determine treatment failure rates and Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to identify risk

216 eight clinical variables and a penalised Cox proportional-hazards model, was used to compare method p

217 Using Cox proportional hazard models, we compared neighborhood mor

218 Using Cox proportional hazard models, we estimated IHD mortality h

219 Using Cox proportional hazard models, we found that a higher degre

220 Using a Cox proportional hazards model, we identified predictors of

221 Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, we compared cumulative inci

222 Using covariate-adjustment Cox proportional hazards models, we estimated associations o

223 Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, we estimated hazard ratios

224 Using Cox proportional hazards models, we estimated hazard ratios

225 Cox proportional hazard models were applied to determine the

226 d to identify potential confounders, and Cox proportional hazard models were applied.

227 ted as events per 1000 patient-days, and Cox proportional hazard models were used for time-to-event a

228 Cox proportional hazard models were used for time-to-event a

229 Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess variables

230 Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine mortal

231 curves and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the as

232 Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard

233 Time-varying Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate HRs and

234 Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the ass

235 Piecewise Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the ass

236 Competing risks regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate whether

237 Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify risk fa

238 Logistic regression or Cox proportional hazard models were used to test association

239 Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for demographi

240 Cox proportional hazards models were applied to determine th

241 Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox proportional hazards models were conducted to identify r

242 Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to assess associ

243 Unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were performed to compare ou

244 Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were performed to evaluate s

245 d were enrolled at 130 SELECT sites, and Cox proportional hazards models were used in a modified inte

246 Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for rele

247 Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the ass

248 d quantitated 204 serum metabolites, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the lon

249 Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the out

250 Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze variabl

251 Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess effects

252 Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the asso

253 Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazar

254 Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the h

255 Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare surviva

256 Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the ris

257 Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute hazard

258 Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute HRs for

259 Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute the ass

260 Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine wheth

261 Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjust

262 Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjust

263 Proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjust

264 Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjust

265 Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associ

266 Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard

267 Proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard

268 Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard

269 Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard

270 Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard

271 Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate T2D HR

272 Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the re

273 Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate body s

274 Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate factor

275 Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the as

276 ier method was used to estimate DSS, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the as

277 andmark analyses and marginal structural Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the re

278 Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify indepe

279 Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate rep

280 Cox proportional hazards models were used to model time to f

281 Cox proportional hazards models were used to test predictors

282 Cosinor analysis and Cox proportional-hazards models were employed to analyze sea

283 Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate hazard

284 using the Andersen-Gill extension to the Cox proportional hazards model while accounting for the comp

285 ns (time-varying) was determined using a Cox proportional hazard model, while correcting for the use

286 Cox proportional hazard model with restricted cubic spline w

287 ated condition to those without and used Cox proportional hazard models with frailties to examine ass

288 h the outcomes were determined using the Cox proportional hazards model with a significance level set

289 We performed a Cox proportional hazards model with propensity score weighti

290 The performance of a Cox proportional hazards model with the SPC analysis predict

291 P = .0050, P = .0075, respectively) and in a proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariate

292 We applied extended Cox proportional hazards modeling with time-dependent covari

293 In multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with follow-up through 2012,

294 Using hierarchical multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with occurrence of depressio

295 l 2002 and November 2013, analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates

296 We used Cox proportional-hazards models with incident coronary heart

297 We estimated the associations with Cox proportional hazard models, with adjustment for potentia

298 Cox proportional hazard models, with robust sandwich varianc

299 Sex-stratified multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling, with adjustment for time-

300 d hazard ratios (HRs) for death by using Cox proportional hazards models, with adjustment for age, se