ライフサイエンスコーパス: prosocial

1 ous processes are as likely to be selfish as prosocial.

2 amic networks only promote cooperation among prosocials.

3 social deficits were seen in the emission of prosocial 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USV) parallel

4 asticity and cognition, but led to increased prosocial 50-kHz USV emission rates and enhanced social

5 onduct problems, peer conflicts, and reduced prosocial abilities.

6 The prosocial account argues that oxytocin mainly enhances a

7 ncies; and (c) the macro level--the study of prosocial actions that occur within the context of group

8 Prosocial actions were manifested in all three species f

9 ild on this study by introducing intentional prosocial activities into classrooms and recommending th

10 Prosocial acts benefitting others are widespread amongst

11 When prosocial acts did not require personal sacrifice, proso

12 atic memories within the context of positive/prosocial affects can facilitate diverse psychotherapies

13 es children's sleep, school performance, and prosocial and aggressive behaviors and that these effect

14 hile children watched characters engaging in prosocial and antisocial actions in two different tasks.

15 manization, emphasizing its implications for prosocial and antisocial behavior and for moral judgment

16 sponses as sympathy and personal distress to prosocial and antisocial behavior are discussed, as is t

17 A new study shows that prosocial and antisocial behaviors arise from individual

18 gods are mentioned, and I discuss the words prosocial and antisocial.

19 cial to mental health due to its anxiolytic, prosocial and antistress effects, but evidence for anxio

20 Oxytocin has received much attention as a prosocial and anxiolytic neuropeptide.

21 relationships comprised of a balance of both prosocial and conflicted interactions create experiences

22 merging biases might help explain the robust prosocial and financial biases men exhibit toward attrac

23 and maternal-perinatal association, modulate prosocial and inbreeding-avoidance behaviors toward spec

24 che also coincides with the emergence of the prosocial and neurobehavioral skills of middle childhood

25 in the neuroeconomics literature: fairness, prosocial and punishing behaviours.

26 stress factor of the brain, besides its many prosocial and reproductive effects.

27 is no difference in reports of anger between prosocial and selfish individuals after finding out that

28 lassify participants a priori as egoistic or prosocial and then embedded them in homogeneous networks

29 use more energy from the communal resource, prosocials are less likely to act on their anger and ret

30 ess-reducing internal norms are likely to be prosocial as opposed to socially harmful.

31 umbens) also appears important for promoting prosocial attitudes/behaviors.

32 ortex is implicated in emotional valence and prosocial attitudes/behaviors.

33 ggression (P=.03) and an increase in neutral/prosocial behavior (P=.04) in the intervention group com

34 volution of cooperation that is relevant for prosocial behavior among humans.

35 its capacity for widespread cooperation and prosocial behavior among large and genetically heterogen

36 uromodulatory hormone oxytocin (OT) promotes prosocial behavior and can improve social function.

37 e.g., common group identity) can account for prosocial behavior and cooperative norms without the nee

38 n motives form a powerful force in promoting prosocial behavior and enabling large-scale cooperation

39 ship between neurochemical systems and human prosocial behavior and have potential implications for o

40 The examples of prosocial behavior and information exchange in decision-

41 s ochrogaster), which display high levels of prosocial behavior and low levels of MeA ERalpha.

42 ognitive perspective taking as precursors of prosocial behavior and suggest that these discrete route

43 h specific interventions designed to promote prosocial behavior and well-being.

44 olution to cooperation problems and promotes prosocial behavior between group members.

45 dgments encourages cooperation in groups and prosocial behavior between group members.

46 unique evidence that serotonin could promote prosocial behavior by enhancing harm aversion, a prosoci

47 rative breeding facilitates the emergence of prosocial behavior by presenting cottontop tamarins (Sag

48 We examined the ontogeny of prosocial behavior by studying 326 children 3-14 y of ag

49 Aggressive and prosocial behavior changes were measured 2 weeks and 6 m

50 ncreased attentiveness to others and greater prosocial behavior compared to individuals of higher SES

51 Current research on prosocial behavior covers a broad and diverse range of p

52 ts to others was personally costly, rates of prosocial behavior dropped across all six societies as c

53 a proximate neurobiological mechanism where prosocial behavior extends to unrelated strangers.

54 e that experience of conspecific companions' prosocial behavior facilitates prosocial behavior in chi

55 Although chimpanzee prosocial behavior has been reported both in observation

56 While a substantial body of scholarship on prosocial behavior has provided evidence of such norms,

57 However, similar prosocial behavior has since been documented in other pr

58 Recent studies of ERalpha and male prosocial behavior have shown an inverse relationship be

59 ted whether direct reciprocity could promote prosocial behavior in brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apel

60 c companions' prosocial behavior facilitates prosocial behavior in children and chimpanzees.

61 d directly link these neural computations to prosocial behavior in children.

62 ence for an empirically identifiable form of prosocial behavior in humans, which we call "strong reci

63 that reduced sensitivity to E may facilitate prosocial behavior in males.

64 sive behavior and an increase in neutral and prosocial behavior in school.

65 nary explanations also account for increased prosocial behavior in situations in which attractive ind

66 amework could provide insights into atypical prosocial behavior in those with disorders of social cog

67 ocial males in brain regions associated with prosocial behavior including the bed nucleus of the stri

68 We argue that increased prosocial behavior is a contextually adaptive response f

69 frameworks model the conditions under which prosocial behavior is evolutionarily viable, yet no unif

70 Taken together, our findings show that prosocial behavior is not an invariant social trait; rat

71 Together, these data suggest that prosocial behavior is not simply a response to external

72 behaviors, but the link between empathy and prosocial behavior is still unclear.

73 t observations have suggested that, instead, prosocial behavior may reflect an intrinsic value placed

74 It is unclear, however, whether OT promotes prosocial behavior per se, or whether it facilitates soc

75 source of human altruism by suggesting that prosocial behavior results, in part, from our broader te

76 large inter- and intra-personal variation in prosocial behavior still needs to be explained.

77 These results demonstrate that OXT promotes prosocial behavior through direct effects on VTA DA neur

78 inbreeding and the mechanisms that regulate prosocial behavior toward kin.

79 ce the effects of xenophobia by facilitating prosocial behavior toward refugees.

80 wing breaches of trust, oxytocin facilitates prosocial behavior while modulating neural signals in th

81 , population density) with psychology (e.g., prosocial behavior), (b) process studies that clarify wh

82 ndling kin-motivated responses (for example, prosocial behavior).

83 x, average weekly sleep, school performance, prosocial behavior, and aggressive behavior.

84 erienced low status showed more communal and prosocial behavior, and endorsed more egalitarian life g

85 review work exploring responses to inequity, prosocial behavior, and other relevant behaviors in nonh

86 Ralpha are necessary for high levels of male prosocial behavior, and provide the first direct evidenc

87 ate that group attachment positively affects prosocial behavior, and that this effect is not simply t

88 sion of public goods, collective action, and prosocial behavior, and we give special attention to fie

89 evidence that all three species will display prosocial behavior, but only in certain conditions.

90 ligion contours people's moral judgments and prosocial behavior, the relation between religiosity and

91 rewards for the donor for a stricter test of prosocial behavior, while reducing separation distress a

92 The study of prosocial behavior--altruism, cooperation, trust, and th

93 mote protective affiliative interactions and prosocial behavior.

94 enging the view that religiosity facilitates prosocial behavior.

95 similarity, and numerous others give rise to prosocial behavior.

96 ed on understanding the role of signaling in prosocial behavior.

97 r hand, may actually be associated with less prosocial behavior.

98 atives, empathy may be the main motivator of prosocial behavior.

99 ial harms infuse moral judgment and motivate prosocial behavior.

100 ermit" the expression of high levels of male prosocial behavior.

101 cing ERalpha in the MeA altered/reduced male prosocial behavior.

102 l amygdala (MeA), and the expression of male prosocial behavior.

103 ys a critical role in the expression of male prosocial behavior.

104 ure intra- and interdisciplinary research on prosocial behavior.

105 y counteract this tendency and thus increase prosocial behavior.

106 We identify three levels of analysis of prosocial behavior: (a) the "meso" level--the study of h

107 ave generally positive effects on normative 'prosocial' behavior, recent laboratory research suggests

108 Therefore, this commentary can show why prosocial behaviors are biased toward physically attract

109 Prosocial behaviors are ubiquitous across societies.

110 d co-opt midbrain reward circuits to promote prosocial behaviors critical for species survival.

111 ilance may have facilitated the evolution of prosocial behaviors in humans.

112 es live in highly social environments, where prosocial behaviors promote social bonds and cohesion an

113 n indicates that testosterone can also cause prosocial behaviors that are appropriate for increasing

114 length) and, second, the different types of prosocial behaviors that exist in social interactions.

115 Behavior matching that leads to prosocial behaviors toward others may have been one of t

116 hypothesized to be a critical facilitator of prosocial behaviors, but the link between empathy and pr

117 triatal reward system in moral judgments and prosocial behaviors.

118 the unique phenotype reflects dimensions of prosocial behaviors.

119 nks between exposure to science and moral or prosocial behaviors.

120 ocial interactions is critical for promoting prosocial behaviors.

121 uding impulse control), decision making, and prosocial behaviors.

122 a) is associated with the expression of male prosocial behaviors.

123 e PVN or their terminals in the VTA enhanced prosocial behaviors.

124 es that oxytocin mainly enhances affiliative prosocial behaviors; the fear/stress theory suggests tha

125 Illusory prosocial behaviour could arise as a by-product of task

126 erformance suggested a reduced expression of prosocial behaviour, associated with decreased grey matt

127 th increased risk of suboptimum outcomes for prosocial behaviour, fine motor, communication, and soci

128 the awe elicited by extravagant displays and prosocial behaviour.

129 mong the primates most likely to demonstrate prosocial behaviours.

130 omists, attractiveness-related financial and prosocial biases are the result of preferences or prejud

131 rrent perspectives on attractiveness-related prosocial biases emphasize the contribution of evolution

132 Financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive adults have been

133 more important role in driving financial and prosocial biases toward attractive adults than previousl

134 provide an important service in highlighting prosocial biases toward attractive people from a cross-d

135 people are causally related to financial or prosocial biases toward them is weak or nonexistent.

136 There are numerous behaviours that appear prosocial but, on scrutiny, may not have been intended a

137 to the suggestion that well-being and other prosocial characteristics might be enhanced through trai

138 ferences predicted children's preference for prosocial characters and were influenced by parental val

139 ased the payoffs of mutual prosociality, and prosocial choice increased accordingly.

140 hs) would engage in direct reciprocity in a 'prosocial choice test' where a donor could select either

141 al captive studies and in the wild, thus far Prosocial Choice Tests have failed to produce evidence.

142 However, methodologies of previous Prosocial Choice Tests may have handicapped the apes uni

143 between selfish and generous motives during prosocial choice, consistent with ideas that the TPJ pro

144 Chimpanzees made significantly more prosocial choices after receiving their partner's assist

145 aling OT, monkeys increased the frequency of prosocial choices associated with reward to another monk

146 Prosocial choices occurred both in response to solicitat

147 ative care behaviors are thought to scaffold prosocial cognitive processes.

148 ship between dopaminergic mechanisms and two prosocial concerns at the core of a number of widely use

149 ting or modulating behavioral sensitivity to prosocial concerns.

150 be motivated by social, but not necessarily prosocial, concerns.

151 In the prosocial condition, patients' performance suggested a r

152 te the discriminant validity between similar prosocial constructs and highlight the different prosoci

153 how phenomena such as altruistic punishment, prosocial contagion, self-other similarity, and numerous

154 drives learning only when we are acting in a prosocial context and signals a prosocial prediction err

155 ole of cognitive tendencies and selection of prosocial cultural variants.

156 Together our results suggest that prosocial decision-making is sustained by an intrinsic m

157 mes reduced when incentives meant to promote prosocial decisions are added to the environment.

158 ther neural sensitivity to eudaimonic (e.g., prosocial decisions) and hedonic (e.g., selfish rewards

159 l overlooks the contribution of a relational/prosocial dimension to the enjoyment of negative emotion

160 the precise boundaries of this surprisingly prosocial disposition has implications for understanding

161 ether young children increase their level of prosocial donating in response to an upwards shift in ge

162 A prosocial effect of d-cycloserine was observed at a dose

163 derscoring a fear-reducing and strategically prosocial effect of testosterone on human social behavio

164 Big Gods are described as having a "prosocial" effect.

165 ltural variants were then selected for their prosocial effects in a long-term, cultural evolutionary

166 molecules of the decade due to its profound prosocial effects in nonvertebrate and vertebrate specie

167 peptide oxytocin (OXT) exerts anxiolytic and prosocial effects in the central nervous system of roden

168 ear processing per se cannot account for the prosocial effects of amygdala inhibition.

169 (4) Can the prosocial effects of amygdala manipulations be explained

170 hat suppression of "fear" could underlie the prosocial effects of amygdala manipulations, our data st

171 e welcome Norenzayan et al.'s claim that the prosocial effects of beliefs in supernatural agents exte

172 Furthermore, the prosocial effects of citalopram varied as a function of

173 The prosocial effects of MCR agonists may be mediated, in pa

174 g the neurochemical mechanisms mediating the prosocial effects of MDMA could help in the development

175 port for the idea that oxytocin produces the prosocial effects of MDMA.

176 opose that religious beliefs with incidental prosocial effects propagated via a long-term process of

177 ocessing, moral reasoning, and processing of prosocial emotions such as guilt and embarrassment may c

178 ng-Embracing model to the use of stories for prosocial ends.

179 While both appear to serve a prosocial function, they may represent separate mechanis

180 , once cooperation is prevalent, we show how prosocial genes favoring cooperation and punishment may

181 The term prosocial has often been taken to mean nice or neighbour

182 ealed that intranasal administration of the "prosocial" hormone oxytocin (OT) activates the frontal c

183 d choose between two tokens, with one being "prosocial" in that it rewarded both individuals (i.e., 1

184 useful to quantify individual differences in prosocial inclination that are not influenced by concern

185 ing interpersonal violations (Studies 1, 2), prosocial intentions (Study 3), and economic exploitatio

186 lated past event of helping others increased prosocial intentions to help the present person in need,

187 isodic simulation and memory to facilitating prosocial intentions.

188 ns oppose long-term aims or when selfish and prosocial interests collide.

189 Yet, determining what counts as prosocial is not as simple as it first appears.

190 cy of a standard ISG (S-ISG) and an enhanced prosocial ISG (P-ISG).

191 y, in part, be a product of declining use of prosocial language during Congressional debates.

192 icacy (e.g., passing bills), suggesting that prosocial language has an independent, direct effect on

193 Warm, prosocial language still predicted public approval when

194 1996 and 2014 found that declining levels of prosocial language strongly predicted public disapproval

195 hus reveal a computational mechanism driving prosocial learning in humans.

196 y in the neural and behavioral efficiency of prosocial learning, which is predicted by trait empathy.

197 eir sgACC response is the most selective for prosocial learning.

198 The prosocial manipulation may have inadvertently constraine

199 the past oxytocin was conceived merely as a prosocial molecule that nonselectively facilitated affil

200 Prosocial morality appeared in wealthier post-Axial envi

201 orical cultures that were not concerned with prosocial morality or with public statement of belief.

202 A multifaceted construct, empathy includes a prosocial motivation or intention to help others in need

203 irming previous findings suggesting a common prosocial motivation underlying altruism and cooperation

204 Proactive prosocial motivations therefore systematically arise whe

205 ocial constructs and highlight the different prosocial motivations underlying economic game behaviour

206 The prosocial neuropeptide oxytocin (OXT) has been identifie

207 s in the WS region with the dysregulation of prosocial neuropeptides.

208 reasingly cooperative, altruistic, and other prosocial norms of interaction from exploitation, especi

209 were spontaneously prosocial, selecting the prosocial option at the same rate regardless of whether

210 Subjects systematically favored the prosocial option provided their partner was a) familiar,

211 ly, this was the case even when choosing the prosocial option was materially costly for the subject (

212 partners, showed a significant bias for the prosocial option.

213 option that rewarded only themselves, or a "prosocial" option that rewarded both of them.

214 echanisms that support heightened or extreme prosocial or altruistic tendencies.

215 lations and time-locked ERPs when perceiving prosocial or antisocial agents.

216 f monetary offers designed to produce either prosocial or punishing behaviours.

217 ulatory roles of anger and guilt, as well as prosocial or selfish social preferences in a repeated so

218 embedded them in homogeneous networks of all prosocials or all egoists, or in heterogeneous networks

219 wards for themselves (self), another person (prosocial), or no one (control).

220 tra-technical proficiency constructs such as prosocial organizational behavior, and overall job perfo

221 d reputation in the eyes of others) modulate prosocial orientation.

222 warmer temperatures are associated with more prosocial outcomes.

223 c achievement and engagement, antisocial and prosocial peer affiliations, mother-child and father-chi

224 le a predictive division between proself and prosocial people and proves that people have attitude to

225 nt perceptions of facial resemblance but not prosocial perceptions.

226 acting in a prosocial context and signals a prosocial prediction error conforming to classical princ

227 hat both partners alternated making choices, prosocial preference significantly increased, leading to

228 However, the existence of prosocial preferences has been inferred post hoc from th

229 results contradict the suggested role of the prosocial preferences hypothesis and show how the comple

230 breeding common marmosets, and indicate that prosocial preferences in a food donation task do not eme

231 of cooperation is the ability of those with prosocial preferences to alter their networks.

232 Prosocial preferences were reduced by inequity, when the

233 ecome an accepted paradigm that humans have "prosocial preferences" that lead to higher levels of coo

234 when nodes are occupied by persons with more prosocial preferences, who tend to attract and keep more

235 rely different sub-populations is confirmed: prosocial punishers on the one hand, who behave fairly a

236 Resulting from their greater cooperation, prosocials' relations are more stable, yielding substant

237 Norenzayan et al. argue that prosocial religion develops through cultural evolution.

238 ltural evolutionary theory of the origins of prosocial religions and apply it to resolve two puzzles

239 Hence, we doubt whether Big Gods and prosocial religions are more effective than alternative

240 ngers and, simultaneously, (2) the spread of prosocial religions in the last 10-12 millennia.

241 Moreover, prosocial religions often do not prevent conflict within

242 iscuss Abrahamic religions as the best-known prosocial religions, but the evidence shows that the cas

243 questions concerning the evolution of karmic prosocial religions.

244 ion have facilitated the rise of large-scale prosocial religions.

245 ultural group selection as an explanation of prosocial religiosity, we propose an alternative that vi

246 In turn, prosocial religious beliefs and practices spread and agg

247 ittle attention to developmental accounts of prosocial religious beliefs.

248 ial acts did not require personal sacrifice, prosocial responses increased steadily as children matur

249 nts that view maternal behaviour as tuned to prosocial responsiveness, by showing that vital elements

250 reward funds facilitates the maintenance of prosocial rewarding but prevents its invasion, and that

251 at are shared exclusively among cooperators (prosocial rewarding).

252 an sometimes select against the evolution of prosocial rewarding.

253 Capuchins were spontaneously prosocial, selecting the prosocial option at the same ra

254 er, the evolutionary foundation of the human prosocial sentiment remains poorly understood, largely b

255 ocial behavior by enhancing harm aversion, a prosocial sentiment that directly affects both moral jud

256 esigned to examine the phylogenetic range of prosocial sentiments and behavior is beginning to shed s

257 Humans are an unusually prosocial species-we vote, give blood, recycle, give tit

258 the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire prosocial subscale (AMD, 0.5; 95% CI, >0.0-0.9).

259 the micro level--the study of the origins of prosocial tendencies and the sources of variation in the

260 ecent commentators have suggested that these prosocial tendencies arise from our unique capacity to u

261 xamining the cognitive mechanisms underlying prosocial tendencies has focused on the facilitating rol

262 Prosocial tendencies increased with social closeness, be

263 dence shows reductions in fairness and other prosocial tendencies when self-regulation fails.

264 Humans appear to have an inherent prosocial tendency toward one another in that we often t

265 pressure by the partner reduced the actor's prosocial tendency.

266 by greater orientation to the partner during prosocial than selfish choices.

267 tanding, and trust), which lead generally to prosocial thoughts and behaviors, or attempts to fortify

268 ard for the actor only (1/0), and the other "prosocial" token rewarding both the actor and a partner

269 e associated with lower reward dependence, a prosocial trait.

270 a pattern of differential relations between prosocial traits and game behaviours.

271 ent and recompensation games with respect to prosocial traits from the Big Five and HEXACO models of

272 te strong and possibly runaway selection for prosocial traits, without requiring group selection, kin

273 ooperation by dividing people in proself and prosocial types, or appealing to forms of external contr