ライフサイエンスコーパス: prosociality

1 re the prospects for nonparochial "religious prosociality"?

2 n social conditions may foster credulity and prosociality.

3 influences the development and expression of prosociality.

4 -making, and other behaviors associated with prosociality.

5 ctor of interspecific variation in proactive prosociality.

6 ls, values, and emotions (SAVE) framework of prosociality.

7 rk to understand the role of social class in prosociality.

8 cal decision-making processes that result in prosociality.

9 therefore can contribute to the expansion of prosociality.

10 lity, rather than a need to induce or assess prosociality.

11 ing to chart the biological underpinnings of prosociality and apply our framework to understand the r

12 successfully did so because they facilitated prosociality and cooperation in large-scale, anonymous g

13 ssary nor sufficient to account for in-group prosociality and discipline.

14 estigations of how cultural norms related to prosociality and relational striving may also covary wit

15 s' well-being, mental health, and individual prosociality and risk aversion.

16 ng condition increased the payoffs of mutual prosociality, and prosocial choice increased accordingly

17 ochialism, rather than extended or universal prosociality, and that the same general mechanisms under

18 al evolutionary theory; (4) clarify the term prosociality; and (4) discuss proximal mechanisms.

19 Early predispositions toward prosociality are thought to arise in concert with the so

20 Two further key aspects of prosociality as a sexual signal are explored here.

21 lenges standard evolutionary explanations of prosociality because well-studied mechanisms of cooperat

22 These include not only increased prosociality between interactants, but also unexpected e

23 ing can inform training programs to increase prosociality, considering their "fit" with different ind

24 pproached middle childhood and then rates of prosociality diverged as children tracked toward the beh

25 sed for its perceived emotional effects (eg, prosociality, empathy, psychotherapy), but surprisingly

26 s are correct, extravagant displays enhanced prosociality even among nonbelievers.

27 herefore present the results of standardized prosociality experiments in 24 groups of 15 primate spec

28 The debate about the origins of human prosociality has focused on the presence or absence of s

29 gh the psychological mechanisms behind human prosociality have extensively been studied, the specific

30 ees do not satisfy experimental criteria for prosociality in food delivery tasks, they help others co

31 mportant debate centres around the nature of prosociality in nonhuman primates.

32 Proactive, that is, unsolicited, prosociality is a key component of our hyper-cooperation

33 to produce general scholarly consensus that prosociality is widespread, intuitive, and rooted deeply

34 natural selection favored increased in-group prosociality over aggression in late human evolution.

35 for future experimental research on the awe-prosociality pathway.

36 however, more complex normative behaviours (prosociality, punishment) that require integration of so

37 combination with a relatively high level of prosociality, rather than a need to induce or assess pro

38 Prosociality refers to behaviours that are intended to b

39 Or is spontaneous prosociality reined in by calculating self-interest?

40 To explain this rapid expansion of prosociality, researchers have proposed several mechanis

41 rather suggested that joint action promotes prosociality, resulting in so-called attitudinal recipro

42 evidence suggests that it promoted proactive prosociality, social transmission, and communication in

43 g some authors to conclude that the forms of prosociality studied evolved in humans since our common

44 On this view, any acts of prosociality--such as cooperation, giving, and other for

45 get article develops an account of religious prosociality that is driven by increases in self-control

46 g through verbal instruction, imitation, and prosociality-that were observed only in the children and

47 xpanding on laboratory research on religious prosociality, this is the first study to tie religious b

48 Although religion might increase prosociality to the in-group, it decreases it to the muc

49 ally large circles of trust that form due to prosociality toward unfamiliar people (i.e. xenophilia).

50 Fundamental forms of prosociality were age-dependent in children, conditional

51 ies that have been proposed to explain human prosociality, with an emphasis on kinship, reciprocity,